A recent danish study seemed to give the all clear to cell phones, but it merely ignored the mountain of clear contrary evidence. The website:

http://www.mast-victims.org shows the extent of victims

Here is a report of this study:

'WASHINGTON - A huge study from Denmark offers the latest reassurance that cell phones don’t trigger cancer.

Scientists tracked 420,000 Danish cell phone users, including 52,000 who had gabbed on the gadgets for 10 years or more, and some who started using them 21 years ago.

etc

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16059841/

Whats the matter with this first paragraph? The word: 'reassurance'. They are saying the study was set up with a certain outcome in mind: to reassure the public/consumers that microwave technology has no hazards.

Modern scientists are often paid by the very industries they are investigating, the studies of cell phone radiation, and the one above were paid for by that very industry. Just ask DR George Carlos:

http://www.mast-victims.org/index.php?content=news&page=2&pages=118

His analysis of the danish study:

http://www.mast-victims.org/index.php?content=news&action=view&type=newsitem&id=1273

That site: Mast-victims, also shows the extent of microwave injury, and gives the lie to the Danish study!

Mercola on his site has the following extensive review of the documentary Public Exposure, with its reams of evidence from independent scientists like George carlo and Neal Cherry:

http://www.mercola.com/forms/public_exposure.htm