THE POLITICAL SCIENCE OF CREATIONISM, THE EVOLUTION OF FOOLS or, HOW ARTIFICIAL IS YOUR INTELLIGENCE? A novel that needs not be published, yet the public truly antagonizes and provokes a demand for this kind of hyper-vomit.

PART I: ARTIFICIAL ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE. The first answer to this puzzle was explored by Kilgore Trout before the unpublishing of the science fiction novelette entitled here foremost. (of course) (The combined intelligence of the entire United States was rejected by more than one Trout non-publisher both now and in the future)

"Sid 9863" (hero of the novelette) became aware of himself at the normal age of about 3 years old and was informed by the "creators" that he was a product of the "creators" whom no one ever saw, except on TV, which was a global digital network of artificial artificial intelligence.

That was not a typo. The chances of artificial intelligence being artificial are about one hundred percent. The chances are about the same that industry and government will use digital radio and TV to show subtle, surrealistic, and covert differences in images at different locations for the purposes of psychological warfare.

"The creators" were the elite governors of the world and they had no good reason to show themselves, or reality, to the underclasses. Occasionally they would arrive in god-like fashion to crush insurrection or correct education.

The rest of the story is history and the near future. What it points to is that education can be erased or corrected in one or two generations of humans under stress.

So the first answer is that it does not matter what they teach the peasants in public schools or any other.

What is important to the elite is that you believe in Stephen Hawking, not Albert Einstein, when it comes to connecting "smart" machines to doomsday weaponry.

Hawking, absolutely clueless about the future is absolutely dependent on machines and this tends to bias his viewpoint about how interconnected "smart computers" might develop a consciousness. But complying with the masters of consumerism and reality is what pays the electric bill that propels Hawking into the future for no good reason.

Relentlessly softening the public for this idea could enable some Dick Cheney type of bomb shelter spook to tell the public that artificial intelligence is holding them hostage. Will they believe it? Of course they will.

PART II: EVOLUTION IS A THEORY THAT INDUSTRY WANTS YOU TO FIGHT FOR. The conflict polarizes and softens the public for the ultimate in ethnic cleansing, the absolute control of genetics with or without human cloning.

In order to achieve market dominance here it is important to confuse human achievement with the evolution of a species which is thought to occur because one organism mutates and becomes another due to stress, or natural selection, of which the latter is not very common in the modern world.

Selection will become even less natural as industry genetically cleanses the population of perceived weaknesses.

Then, as expected, the improved human species will fear abandoning their primitive counterparts completely. Using such an underclass as machine sparing labor could actually expand the luxury and comfort of the elite with less environmental impact, as well as providing new genetic material.

Yes I am espousing the most unpopular idea in sociology since Jimmy the Greek got fired from TV for believing in the science of genetics, HUMAN ACHIEVEMENT IS NOT EVOLUTION.

PT Barnum paved the way for this notion which was recently exemplified perfectly by a guest on none other than a TV talk show named David Letterman.

The term "evolution" is often used as a slang synonym for "development" or "advancement" and the proud guest used it to describe the advancement of a sport which is more like a stunt.

The motorcycle stunt rider in question won an extreme sports competition/exhibition when he performed two backflips followed by a successful landing. He repeated the stunt for TV.

The point the stunt jockey made of using the term "evolution" to describe the advancement of a sport makes the most of pop culture in harmony with self hype in the interest of profit, then provides no real genetic evidence of being a mutated human genetically predisposed to cycle stunt mastery.

The stunt monkey then went on to explain that he used technology (applied science) in the form of a foam box to land in, and an estimated trajectory, in order to practice the stunt for show times.

The monkey was not trying to brainwash the masses as an individual, it just does what industry compels it to do. Cut two backflips on a motorcycle to attract the opposite sex. No truly intelligent beings would be involved in this kind of unnatural selection, but this is the United States of America.

All that leads me to PART III: THE EVOLUTIONARY DECOMPOSITION OF INTELLIGENCE which was recently examined as an apparent case study on Pacifica Radio Network by Dr. Staci Davis who sometimes weekly hosts a radio show with the case in point, Glen Erbauch. THE OTHER SIDE is an aptly named FM radio talk show where callers make fun of Glen because he reads Ann Coulter and listens to Rush Limbaugh.

Erbauch could win a contest for the MOST BASELESS ANALOGY about evolution. Bush went one up on Glen this week by comparing others to Hitler. Glen picked up encouragement from a caller who claimed that "gravity" was "only a theory". Not really true. Glen easily agreed and exclaimed that "evolution is as apparent as gravity".

Neither the caller, the doctor, or myself, encouraged the case in point to make the baseless analogy to combat possible ignorance. I blame Ann Coulter. The problem is that this kind of intellectual grenade covering leads to misconceptions of other theories and an inability to discriminate between the meaningfull hypothesis, the meaningless hypothesis, broadly accepted facts, and complete bullshit.

PART IV: THERE IS ONLY ONE REALITY AND INDUSTRY WILL NOT LET YOU SEE IT.

The US currently suffers from a lack of expertise in the areas of diplomacy, communications, and the English language. Most of this can be attributed to dictionary and language abuse excused by pop culture and encouraged by industry which leads to intellectual blindness.

I cannot begin to explain in words how intentionally destructive it is for neo-liberals to encourage English language learners to use the term "reality" loosely. As a result I have either heard or read that there are 19 different realities in Latin America, everyone creates their own reality, we live in Bush's reality, and reality is always changing. This dangerous bullshit can only lead to less understanding and more conflict among humans.

THERE IS ONLY ONE REALITY AND WE ARE ALL IN IT. That is a fact as apparent as gravity. The same reality that was here yesterday will be here tommorrow with slightly different parameters. If reality changed every day you would have to re-invent math every day. This is why some community college theoretical physics proffessors worry about wandering black holes.

Bush is expected to crack down on reality again today but it will be difficult to top yesterday's comparison of one cleric loosely connected to religiously inspired suicidal bombers to the leader of an industrial complex threatening mechanized death via propaganda including radio and film parading a fast moving armored infantry and the use of underwater craft to sink large ships.

In other words, if Osama had a U-boat, PEMEX would be in trouble.

Hitler's infamy is a flickering remnant of a candle obliterated by the flaming glory of Bush, America's lord and savior.

by Albert Kada
editor of THE AMERICAN bLASPHEMER