It’s not a coincidence when governments choose and pick certain men as icons, name buildings and streets after

them, or elevate them to holiday status. These people, in some cases, are seen as prime examples of what the

rulers want us to emulate; the kind of behavior they hope the masses will follow blindly and accept as heroes of

change. But, in fact, these figures are most likely helping to promote and maintain the status quo. In the case of

Cesar Chavez, it included activities such as assisting the government in keeping “wetbacks” out of America’s

work force and the exclusion of immigrants in the struggle to participate in becoming unionized.

For those of us that walked the picket lines with Cesar Chavez and UFW members in the 1970’s, particularly the

Safeway markets in East Los Angeles, the following facts will tend to dampen the nostalgia of our youth. But as

adults, we must now decipher the past and create wisdom for new generations to learn from Cesar Chavez’

shortcomings and the errors about the mistreatment of vulnerable immigrant workers. Chavez, like many before

him, is not a symbol of drastic change as much as he is a protector of keeping the system the same.

Today we see the Minutemen on the US/Mexico border in the states of Arizona and California. Their purpose is to

keep out illegal aliens, not spacemen but immigrant workers, from crossing the border. We can not overlook the

new hysteria of racism, nor can we accept that which discriminates against immigrant workers based on

ethnicity and poverty. Can you imagine Cesar Chavez helping them? You should, because that is what was going

on in 1979 when Chavez and the United Farm Workers launched a campaign on the Arizona border to keep

Mexican workers from entering America. There was a 100-mile long stretch of land called the “wet line” that

turned into a dangerous place for undocumented immigrant workers. They only searched for something

humankind has been looking for since the beginning of time – a warm place to sleep, a meal, a job, a place to raise

a family, a place that welcomes them with compassion, and not the gun-toting Minutemen of today or like the UFW

in 1979 who beat them as they attempted to cross. (New York Times, February 7, 1979)

The acceptance of the illegal status of some immigrant workers plays into the hands of those who wish to keep

workers divided and perpetuate the scapegoat theories that persist in newspapers across the country. The

working class remains divided on the issue, placing greater tensions among Mexicans and other Latinos against

native-born Chicanos and African-Americans in the workplace. It is unfortunate that Chavez pursued and

contributed to that line of thinking and his legacy haunted him then, as it does us today.

“Most all California farm workers have people in their families who have trouble with their legal status, so any

union trying to organize them cannot risk taking the side of the I.N.S., the hated migra. Yet the UFW sometimes

supported the use of the migra against scabs, sacrificing long-term respect for a possible short-term gain.” (The

Nation, Cesar Chavez Ghost: The Decline and Fall of the UFW, Frank Bardacke)

Even the greatest labor activist of our time, Bert Corona, spoke out against the anti-immigrant tactics of Cesar

Chavez and the UFW.

“Later in the 1960’s, when I began to organize undocumented immigrants full-time in the Hermandad Mexicana

Nacional, I did have an important difference with Cesar. This involved his, and the union’s, position on the need to

apprehend and deport undocumented Mexican immigrants who were being used as scabs by the growers…We

supported an open immigration policy, as far as Mexico was concerned, that did not victimize Mexicanos because

they did not have documents. We did not support deportation of people.” (Mario T. Garcia, Memories of Chicano

History, The life and narrative of Bert Corona, UC press, 1994)

What Cesar Chavez and those in the Minutemen Project failed to see is that immigration is the foundation of our

society. Franklin D. Roosevelt expressed it this way, “Remember, remember always that all of us…are descended

from immigrants and revolutionists.”

Harvard economist George J. Borjas explains, “We should keep in mind that someone who decides to leave their

country in search of better opportunities will be especially ready to make an effort and utilize all of their resources

and talents to move ahead.” (Migration, a Positive Balance) Borjas’ question of the day: “Why does the host

country benefit? Because the market wage equals the productivity of the last immigrant hired. As a result,

immigrants increase national income by more than what it costs to employ them. Put differently, all the

immigrants hired except for the last one contribute more to the economy than they get paid.” (Economics of

Migration) This gives good capitalists a reason to allow the flow of immigrants from Mexico. So it is easy to see

why even President Gorge Bush said of the Minutemen, “I’m against vigilantes in the United States of America.”

Bush wants immigrants so corporations can exploit them for cheap labor. Chavez wanted them out to protect the

UFW, instead of including them and making them part of the labor struggle. And the Minutemen do not want

Spanish-speaking immigrant workers doing work nobody else wants, in schools sitting next to their children or

see them at the local doctor’s office when they are sick.

Cesar Chavez, like the Minutemen, needed to see the human value and advantage of helping immigrant workers

become part of the fabric of society, rather than excluding them for their plight.

The frame work for keeping immigrants out of America is against the natural historical tendencies to seek out a

better life. We must reject accepting the randomness of being born anywhere on Earth as our only home, as an

absolute determinate for defining legitimacy or legality. The mosaic of civilization lies in the great migrations of

people. Human movements and their cultures cannot be dictated by governments, as much as they would like us

to believe it. The Berlin Wall could not separate us; The Great Wall of China was not long enough; Palestinians and

Israelis continue fighting to end this separation, because history is about where we have been, where we are

going and what happens when we arrive.

As long as our children are taught in school that the heroes of governments, whose names are on buildings and

streets, are examples they should follow, the longer it will take to make revolutionary change. The changes must

come by breaking down how the state apparatus promotes these international antagonisms through nationalistic

fervor, which leads to each state believing that they are more superior, leading to arrogant and false images over

immigrant workers.

We need change that welcomes all immigrants to a new land. What Chavez missed was that a revolution fights for

all people’s rights, regardless of how a government or union chooses to label them, and that all workers are

entitled to justice.

Thank you to Chuck O'Connell for pointing out a few of the conflicting positions that Chavez embraced.

-Robert Bracamontes