By increasing materialism, expressing in the isolation associated with greed and a precarious self-defence system to protect unregulated individualism, one of the remnants of tolerant Holland, the University of Amsterdam, was seen to have complied with a ratrace of numbers, quite symbolically.

An analogy has been given between this phenomenon and the Treaty of Amsterdam, the latter having made possible the European Monetary Union and its Euro Currency.

One day somebody was expulsed from the University (Mensa) of Amsterdam.

This was justified by tolerance.

Various people had confided him they frequented a prostitute in the University district, internationally known as the Red Light District of Amsterdam, but being tolerant, he still had to admit he wouldn't and was found placing himself above the others, and this again was taken as a form of discrimination.

This shows the nature of tolerance and democracy, being rationalized. The same procedure can often be seen in politics and society at large. We don't need to derive a moralistic position from this; we can simply observe the pattern of manipulation and the so-called emanicipation of a majority of people.

Many wasted lives are the results of alienation. Our world is seen by measures of official education and ongoing time, divided by examinations that, once succesfully concluded, compulsively carry on in every day life in many variations on a theme and increasingly complex compartments, to the fulfillment of an Apartheid system, not consisting of two or three groups, but as many as there are single individuals or members of a nation.

This Apartheid is enforced by placing people in sections of society on the basis of greed and graduation.

One has sought to escape suffocation in ever larger structures, which are however still conditioned by the same marks.

This is more or less how Apartheid became Globalization.

Why do I have this suspicion that even if the above post was translated into perfect English it still wouldn't make any sense?

That is because you have been placed in the right (wing) section of society, and so you feel personally offended.

You defend prostitutes, for on their behalf - it seems- you took offence. Yet, the only prostitute mentioned above, could well be taken as a metaphor, something which students in perfect English have never been trained to comprehend.

Whom the cap fits, let him wear it.

Now take your medication or the doctor is going to get really upset and not let you play with the internet anymore.

Again.

The suspicion of Meyer London stems from his having been placed in the right (wing) section of society, unfortunately.

Mister Meyer does not get the point about Apartheid, defending prostitution, out of context.

Students, taught perfect English, usually are not very well trained in interpretation. That is why they can not distinguish subjective from objective, or recognize the clue of any story, and there is so much confusion in the world.

The incapacity to recognize the point is characteristic to all rationalization.

Doctor, I feel so true today ! Could I please get euthanasia?

They always dismiss our posts on this board, just because we are sending them from a group home.

As Woody Allen once pointed out, just because we are paranoid down here at the group home, that doesn't mean the world isn't really out to get us. That Amsterdam incident proves that the Illuminati are using prostitution to cover up their real aim of globalization and domination of the world by Jews. Anyone who doesn't believe this is a rightwinger and a racist.

Our multicultural society is a great success.