Lilly in lawyers' cross hairs again. Lawsuits suggest vaccine may be linked to autism By Jeff Swiatek July 14, 2002 Indianapolis Star



The Evidence Against Thimerosal Safety from the Manufacturer, Eli Lilly Internal studies at Lilly show thimerosal toxic Released by Waters and Kraus, LLP



Lilly wins shield from autism suits By Maureen Groppe Indianapolis Star November 20, 2002

Finding The Answer To Washington's Hottest Whodunit Filed December 4, 2002

Arianna Huffington



US Senate Votes to Keep Vaccine Language in Homeland Security Bill By Julie Rovner

Reuters Medical News



A Capitol Hill Mystery: Who Aided Drug Maker?

By SHERYL GAY STOLBERG

New York Times November 29, 2002

The Man Behind The Vaccine Mystery WASHINGTON, Dec. 12, 2002

CBS Evening News

Lilly's Pipeline of Plenty By Herman Saftlas

DECEMBER 9, 2002 Business Week Online

Can a Company that Potentially Contributed to the Rise in Autism, Make Money Treating the Kids They Harmed? Autism Treatment, What Medications are

Does this mean that researchers have found that genetics is the "cause" of Autism? No, it does not, but it does mean that it may well be a contributing factor, along with many others.

The only contributing factor I want to hear you admit to is:

Eli Lilly &Company were the major contributing factor to the cause of Autism in Children!

It is for this reason that no area of research that implied and accused Eli Lilly can or will be ignored. "

I can be wrong, that's OK. This is not about me. This is about LLY.

You have used every distraction and excuse in the book but admission of LLY guilt in harming these children and their families. There are no research Rabbits or studies you can pull out of the hat to eliminate their hand in Autistic Children!

Please spare us all the excuses and blaming everything and everyone else in the world.

Just admit it! This is the fault of Eli Lilly & Company. There is no research you can post that will change that fact.

You're the one who is making a positive claim here. The BOP is on you; kindly produce evidence in support of your claim.

Otherwise, the OP can be regarded as nothing but word salad.