To vote or not to vote ?
Vote Bush ? or Vote Kerry ?


Call for CHOICE in election

In a sane democracy, you wouldn't have to vote AGAINST a candidate,
but FOR the one you think will best represent people (We, the people...).

In a healthy democracy, there could be more than two candidate, and each one
would have equal chances to expose their programme.

In a ethical democracy, money invested in campaigns would be less determinant
than the real political engagement of a candidate toward his public.

If democracy was taken more seriously, presidential elections wouldn't be run
like a 'Mister Universe' competition where the candidates have to PLAY good on TV shows.


Bet for a real CHANGE, vote for PEOPLE


Vote Ralph NADER !


link: Election 2004: Vote Bush ? Vote Kerry ?

...and the incredible ruination he and his handlers have wrought in the few short years could have frightened the people enough to even consider to vote for Kerry. Every thing as planned. *No matter who wins, we're promised terror terror terror. What we'll get is deeper and deeper into the darkness of a totalitarian

rule from secret places of power who in fact create the terror used to lash the herd.