Looks like la-imc is in direct violation of its own privacy policy.
http://la.indymedia.org/process/privacy.php
"The LA-IMC web server does not track the domains or IP addresses from which people visit and/or post to the sf.indymedia.org web site. Usage of other services, however, may be logged."
[...]
"At no time, unless a user specifically authorizes such disclosure, will the LA-IMC disclose individual user personal information that is not publicly available to unrelated third parties."
"In the event that the LA IMC becomes aware that site security is compromised or nonpublic user information has been disclosed to unrelated third parties as a result of external activity, including but not limited to law enforcement activities or external security attacks, the LA IMC shall take reasonable measures which it deems appropriate, including internal investigation and, if required, cooperation with our web host, Transbay.Net.
If the LA IMC becomes aware that a user's personal information provided to the LA IMC has been disclosed in a manner not permitted by this Privacy Policy, the LA IMC shall make reasonable efforts to notify the affected user, as soon as reasonably possible, of what information has been disclosed, to the extent that the LA IMC knows this information."
I consider my IP address to be personal information.
Now, la-imc, you need to either remove your little "yellow star" feature, or change your privacy policy to reflect the feature.
But I'm guessing you'll do neither.
Man, you people are so afraid of differing viewpoints, aren't you?
Cowards.
LATEST COMMENTS ABOUT THIS ARTICLE
Listed below are the 10 latest comments of 25 posted about this article.
These comments are anonymously submitted by the website visitors.
| TITLE |
AUTHOR |
DATE |
| Oh, just so's you know... |
nonanarchist |
Friday, Jan. 09, 2004 at 12:27 AM |
| To short |
Espadrilles |
Friday, Jan. 09, 2004 at 1:37 AM |
| sorry bout that, my bad |
johnk |
Friday, Jan. 09, 2004 at 1:39 AM |
| that policy needs to be rewritten |
johnk |
Friday, Jan. 09, 2004 at 1:52 AM |
| Violation of policy ? |
Alan |
Friday, Jan. 09, 2004 at 1:59 AM |
| Embarrass me? |
;lkjlhh |
Friday, Jan. 09, 2004 at 2:07 AM |
| Allow me to paint my door for you: |
;lkjjkgkjg |
Friday, Jan. 09, 2004 at 2:11 AM |
| a few differences between the IMC and Nazis |
johnk |
Friday, Jan. 09, 2004 at 2:31 AM |
| It's better than TV |
Barney |
Friday, Jan. 09, 2004 at 2:32 AM |
| Hold on a second |
Barney |
Friday, Jan. 09, 2004 at 2:36 AM |
| oh another thing |
johnk |
Friday, Jan. 09, 2004 at 2:40 AM |
| to barney |
johnk |
Friday, Jan. 09, 2004 at 3:16 AM |
| Sounds like NA is a coward. |
Anarchist |
Friday, Jan. 09, 2004 at 5:13 AM |
| fresca |
fresca |
Friday, Jan. 09, 2004 at 6:32 AM |
| Oh my word! |
El Kabong |
Friday, Jan. 09, 2004 at 8:25 AM |
| long overdue |
johnk |
Friday, Jan. 09, 2004 at 11:37 AM |
| Interesting. |
;ljlihouih |
Friday, Jan. 09, 2004 at 12:58 PM |
| Yes nonanarchist. You need some behavioural modifications. |
tweak |
Friday, Jan. 09, 2004 at 1:14 PM |
| I formally resign from my position. |
Max |
Friday, Jan. 09, 2004 at 2:22 PM |
| tweak minded |
oihkiug |
Friday, Jan. 09, 2004 at 5:39 PM |
| this is a test |
Sheepdog |
Friday, Jan. 09, 2004 at 7:10 PM |
| fresca |
fresca |
Friday, Jan. 09, 2004 at 8:40 PM |
| yup |
more rational |
Sunday, Jan. 11, 2004 at 2:34 PM |
|
|