SAY, HAS ANYONE asked Dick Gephardt if this falls under "miserable failure"?

Obviously we'll have to wait for all the politics to play out, but at this stage it's hard to say which was worse for Howard Dean: the capture of Saddam Hussein or Al Gore's endorsement. Until Sunday, Gov. Mean's big applause line in speeches has been to sneer about the Bush administration's failure to catch Saddam Hussein. It seems the governor is better at prescribing bitter pills than at swallowing them.

In a speech to the Pacific Council the day after Saddam was captured, Dean nearly choked on the words, "The capture of Saddam is a good thing," and then quickly added, "but the capture of Saddam has not made America safer." (Possible headline: "Dean Says Saddam's Capture Good Thing, Just Not Really Good Thing.") If George W. Bush announced that a cure for cancer had been discovered, Democrats would complain about unemployed laboratory rats.

On Fox News Sunday, Sen. John F. Kerry, D-Mass., said of Saddam's capture: "This is a great opportunity for this president to get it right for the long term. And I hope he will be magnanimous, reach out to the U.N., to allies who've stood away from us."

It's as if he were reading my mind! After listening to all the bellyaching from European leftists for the past eight months, I think I speak for all Americans when I say I've been on tenterhooks waiting for the right opportunity to grovel to the French. And now we have it – a major win is the perfect opportunity! That Kerry has an uncanny sense for what the average American is thinking.

Actually, he lost me with that one. Maybe it's a good opportunity for the French and the United Nations to reach out to us, but by what logic is this an opportunity for us to reach out to them? As I understand it, the situation is: We caught Saddam. So the obvious next move is ...

(a) Put him on trial.

(b) Get information from him.

(c) Torture him.

(d) Turn him over to the Iraqis.

(e) Appeal to the French.

What was interesting about Kerry's suggestion was that it was the exact same suggestion liberals were making when they claimed the war was going badly. The day before Saddam's capture, the New York Times editorialized: "The way to deal with all that is going wrong in Iraq remains as clear as it was on the day that Mr. Bush declared an end to major combat operations. ... Instead of driving away France, Germany, Russia and Canada with financial sanctions, the president should be creating the room for compromise ..." Damn that Bush. He squandered the good will of a bunch of people who hate our guts.

Apparently, this is what liberals mean by "a plan":

Military setback: Appeal to the French.

Military victory: Appeal to the French.

Saddam captured: Appeal to the French.

Osama captured: Appeal to the French.

Osama catches Saddam: Appeal to the French.

In 24 months, Bush has perceptibly degraded terrorist operations throughout the world. The rebuilding in Iraq is going better than could possibly be expected. Liberals don't care. They just want to turn everything over to the French. (And, apparently, the recent capture of Saddam presents us with a golden opportunity to do so!) The Birchers were right about these people. They believe in world government more than they believe in the United States.

One strongly suspects that the White House sat on the story of Saddam's arrest for a day so the Times could put out its regular Sunday bad news: "A Baghdad Neighborhood, Once Hopeful, Now Reels As Iraq's Turmoil Persists," "Saboteurs, Looters and Old Equipment Work Against Efforts to Restart Iraqi Oil Fields," "It's Going to Be a Bloody Christmas," "Dean Strives for a Nuanced Approach to Foreign Policy." The New York Times hasn't looked this foolish ... well, I guess since the day before.

Liberals should perk up. It's not all bad news. True, Saddam Hussein has been captured. But Norman Mineta is still at large.

...more than they believe in the United States."

Man, she's good.

Nailed 'em again!

nonanarchist

jhgcdz used up his last crayon scribbling:

"Man, she's good. Nailed 'em again!"

No, jhgcdz, she just told more lies. That's all she does. It's her job, ya know.

"In 24 months, Bush has perceptibly degraded terrorist operations throughout the world."

How so?

"The rebuilding in Iraq is going better than could possibly be expected."

Riiight. Coulter missed her true calling - standup comedy.

I'm just another vapid pissant leftist with its head up its ass. I know squat.

I'm hearing voices again-help me. I can't remember who I am.

Al Franken reports that even Republican office holders invariably respond (in private) when he asks them about Ann Coulter by saying "there's something wrong with her."

Much the same as me.................

There is something wrong with Al Franken and it's not just his buck teeth.

He writes a book about political liars and forgets to mention his buddy Bill Clinton, the biggest liar of them all (along with his paid staff of professional liars: James Carville, Lanny Davis, etc.).

Ann Coulter writes compelling and accurate politcal essays. She does exagerate at times to make a point but it's always done tongue in cheek with a wink.

Al Franken would make a better yard man than journalist.

Personally, I would let Al Franken furtilize my petunia patch, let alone read any of his horse shit ...

Al Franken must be doing something right; he's got the bigfoot/neanderthal set all in a dither.

Meyer -

When the Nazi Army was rolling through Europe one of their greatest Generals made the following observations regarding personnel.

"There are four kinds of people we get into the Army.

First there are those who are dumb and lazy. They make perfect infantrymen.

Next there are those who are smart and industrious. They make excellent line officers.

Also we get those who are smart but lazy. They're perfect for staff jobs in planning, logistics, etc. back at headquarters.

Lastly we get those who are dumb but industrious. We shoot them right away. They're dangerous.

So you see Meyer, if you were in the Nazi army, you'd be shot right off.

Thank you for your memories of serving in the German army; I didn't know you went back that far. Were you one of the dumb infrantrymen? I wonder if the infrantrymen, mostly draftees who took the brunt of the casualties in Hitler's murderous and ultimately suicidal wars of naked aggression, knew how the officers regarded them.

I wish there were more people like you in the German Army - the war would have been over a lot sooner or, more likely, Hitler would never have dared to start it in the first place.

He was the one who advised Hitler to invade Russia and then declare war and America.

Sheer genius.

declare war and America.

Sheer genius.

I'd really like to blow you, Meyer. I charge Barney, but I'd do you for free. Whaddya say?