'We could lose this situation'

· CIA says insurgents now 50,000 strong

· Crisis talks over transfer of power

Julian Borger in Washington and Rory McCarthy in Baghdad

Thursday November 13, 2003

The Guardian

The White House yesterday drew up emergency plans to accelerate the transfer of power in Iraq after being shown a devastating CIA report warning that the guerrilla war was in danger of escalating out of US control.

The report, an "appraisal of situation" commissioned by the CIA director, George Tenet, and written by the CIA station chief in Baghdad, said that the insurgency was gaining ground among the population, and already numbers in the tens of thousands.

One military intelligence assessment now estimates the insurgents' strength at 50,000. Analysts cautioned that such a figure was speculative, but it does indicate a deep-rooted revolt on a far greater scale than the Pentagon had led the administration to believe.

An intelligence source in Washington familiar with the CIA report described it as a "bleak assessment that the resistance is broad, strong and getting stronger".

"It says we are going to lose the situation unless there is a rapid and dramatic change of course," the source said.

"There are thousands in the resistance - not just a core of Ba'athists. They are in the thousands, and growing every day. Not all those people are actually firing, but providing support, shelter and all that."

Although, the report was an internal CIA document it was widely circulated within the administration. Even more unusually, it carried an endorsement by Paul Bremer, the civilian head of the US-run occupation of Iraq - a possible sign that he was seeking to bypass his superiors in the Pentagon and send a message directly to President George Bush on how bad the situation has become.

Proof of the strength of the insurgents and their ability to strike anywhere in Iraq was provided in another devastating suicide bombing yesterday.

This time the target was the Italian military police barracks in the south-eastern city of Nasariya.

At least 17 Italians and eight Iraqis were killed, striking a blow at one of the few nations prepared to send troops to help the US and Britain contain the rising violence.

Following crisis talks in Washington yesterday, Mr Bremer flew back to Baghdad armed with proposals to bolster the US-backed Iraqi governing council with more powers and more resources in an attempt to speed up elections.

Under one of the proposals, the council could be expanded or transformed into a full provisional government backed by an interim constitution.

That would represent a radical reversal of earlier US policy which was to put off the transfer of real power to an Iraqi government until after elections, which in turn would have to await a comprehensive new constitution.

The new blueprint, which reverses that methodological progression and which is closer to what was done in post-war Afghanistan, emerged from an urgently arranged series of meetings between the president, his top national security advisers, and Mr Bremer, as the security situation in Iraq continued to deteriorate rapidly.

In scenes last night reminiscent of the height of the war, US forces went back on the offensive with air strikes and armoured assaults on a suspected guerrilla stronghold near Baghdad. Guerrilla attacks, meanwhile, have become more frequent, bolder and bloodier.

In public at least, the defence secretary, Donald Rumsfeld, has insisted that the attacks are the work of a few remnants of Saddam Hussein's Ba'athist party and a handful of Islamic jihadists from other Arab countries.

It is understood that Mr Bremer's administration is concerned about the impact of the decision by US forces to escalate their offensive against the insurgents, anxious that bombing and heavy-handed raids will increase popular support for the insurgency.

Mr Bremer refused to provide details of the new US plan, but US and British officials said he was carrying proposals from Mr Bush aimed at bolstering the interim Iraqi leadership in the hope of winning the confidence of Iraqis and paving the way for elections pencilled in for the end of next year. But, according to some US officials, elections could be held in four to six months.

The UN security council has given the Iraqi governing council until December 15 to come up with a constitutional blueprint and organising elections.

The council, deeply divided by internal disputes, has shown little sign of meeting that deadline, but the new US proposals would put it under pressure to accelerate its work and the transfer of power.

One of the options discussed in the White House yesterday was replacing the governing council with a new body.

The council was hand-picked by Washington after the war, largely from returning exiles, but it has since disappointed US officials by its slow progress. Many of its 24 members fail to turn up to its meetings, and the CIA report said the council had little support among the Iraqi population.

However, the secretary of state, Colin Powell insisted: "We are committed to the governing council and are prepared to help them in any way we can."

"We're looking at all sorts of ideas, and we do want to accelerate the work of reform," Mr Powell said.

"We want to accelerate the work of putting a legal basis under the new Iraqi government and we are doing everything we can to get the governing council equipped with everything they need."

Guardian Unlimited © Guardian Newspapers Limited 2003

I read this article yesterday, but that's only because the National Enquirer was sold out. The NE is more reliable than the Guardian. But, so is reading tea leaves.

So, are you saying the article are inaccurate, or that you rather just stick your head up your...err...I mean...in the sand?

Forget it...you are Republican...and if Republican is anything...it is PREDICTABLE. If you can't refute...discredit...and this is one flaccid example of it...

Of course, who am I to say. If it says something bad about Bush, I'll believe it regardless if it's written on the back side of a sanitary napkin.

Bush said he was sending L. Paul Bremer, the top U.S. administrator in Baghdad, back to the country to work with Iraqis on developing a plan to speed up establishment of an Iraqi government.

I am flattered that you envy me so much that you use my handle...if I were you I would want to be somebody else too....

...now, did you READ the article? CAN you read the article? Where does it say anything bad about da shrub? Are you saying the CIA sent no such report? Are you saying these are all lies?

What the fuck are you saying anyway? Try to make a little sense worth paying attention to. That should keep you busy for a while....

More accurate? They are of a completely different scope, and neither contradict each other.

Maybe more comfortable to read for you...but no more accurate.

Of course, who am I to say anything like that to anyone. I apologize for being so stupid as to print the above two statements. When my buddy was butt-fucking me last night, he shot his wad before he could cum in my mouth. And I'm having a bad hair day. Sorry.

Thank you sir, may I have another?

Son, when you start saying what liberal asswipes like you actually believe rather than the front you put on, I'll not use your handle. Until then, I'm going to express what you really mean if you had the balls to say it. Now, get it together, or I will for you. It's really up to you.

Oh...another dickless KOBE...

...shoulda known...no wonder you want to be somebody else....

Tell me, is EVERYONE with KOBE so insecure and self-loathing? Not that I wouldn't understand if they were....

National Enquiring minds wanna know...

Maybe the KOBE crowd are too mentally challenged to think of their own handles, or maby they don't want to use the obvious ones that apply to them - Brain-damaged Victim of the Alcohol Industry, for example. Or Product of Aurhoritarian Upbringing. Or Still Wishing I Was On the High School Football Team. Or I Wish It Was 1955. Or I Don't Have Many Accomplishments In Life But I Can Feel Superior By Ponting Out That I Am A Straight White Male.

Not a kobe.

Strike # 999 qualdrillion.

Strike # 999 Quadrillion.................................

and counting

Wrong about KOBE...

...but right about dickless...

...battin' .500...I can live with that!