imc indymedia

Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News

About Us Contact Us Calendar Publish RSS
Features
• latest news
• best of news
• syndication
• commentary


KILLRADIO

VozMob

ABCF LA

A-Infos Radio

Indymedia On Air

Dope-X-Resistance-LA List

LAAMN List




IMC Network:

Original Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq kenya nigeria south africa canada: hamilton london, ontario maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan korea manila qc europe: abruzzo alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol brussels bulgaria calabria croatia cyprus emilia-romagna estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege liguria lille linksunten lombardia london madrid malta marseille nantes napoli netherlands nice northern england norway oost-vlaanderen paris/Île-de-france patras piemonte poland portugal roma romania russia saint-petersburg scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki torun toscana toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia latin america: argentina bolivia chiapas chile chile sur cmi brasil colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso venezuela venezuela oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine process: fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

Surviving Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: canada: quebec east asia: japan europe: athens barcelona belgium bristol brussels cyprus germany grenoble ireland istanbul lille linksunten nantes netherlands norway portugal united kingdom latin america: argentina cmi brasil rosario oceania: aotearoa united states: austin big muddy binghamton boston chicago columbus la michigan nyc portland rochester saint louis san diego san francisco bay area santa cruz, ca tennessee urbana-champaign worcester west asia: palestine process: fbi/legal updates process & imc docs projects: radio satellite tv
json version - view hidden posts

Wide Right

by Paul Heller Sunday, Sep. 07, 2003 at 5:30 PM

George W. Bush is doing for his Party what the Kremlin did for theirs...

The math is simple, the equation flawless. Roots are taking hold across the soil of America. The Republican Party, while its loudest chortlers will never admit anything but the contrary, is on the way down. The latest example of the GOP shaking itself to pieces under George W. Bush's warped leadership shows up right on the front pages of the papers last week. The U.S., it says, is actively seeking more U.N. involvement in Iraq. They have little choice; otherwise, Congress estimates we'll be calling up more Reserve and National Guard units by spring, just to keep enough troops in place in our addle-headed occupation. That's no more likely to corral votes for the top cowboy than is the growing number of wounded soldiers, whose families now get to change their dressings, and are still wondering why.

After capitulating to the world community's demands for power and control, which will be seen by most in the administration as nothing less than a colossal loss of face, the American public can expect such failure to be spun into gossamer success by the loudmouth Bushies. See, they'll say, we dragged the U.N. in there, kicking and screaming, did their jobs for them, and turned it over to their care. Why, that was our plan all along... and they'll tug on their collars and pray that we really are as stupid as they have believed us to be all this time.

This is part of a pattern that has long been identified by aficionados of politics. Bush tends to over-reach in the first place and then reel it back to a defensible position when the consequences, which are usually predictable if not always obvious, become the results of his actions. My old political science instructor called this practice "yo-yo politics", but back then, he was talking about the tactics of the Soviets.

Bush does for his party what the Kremlin did for theirs. They wearied their populations with this dance, and their military contingents as well, and when the time came for the stone-throwing crowds to drag out the politicians and burn their filing cabinets, they were able to do so without a shot being fired. Ronald Reagan's vision of an Evil Empire became a tin-cup cripple over a period of months, due to the very sort of political errors we see being committed by Bush today.

It is not so much that he is an uninspiring figure to potential Republican voters (although an awful lot of moderates are horrified by the caricature that the president has become); it's that the opposition has been galvanized by his partisanship, sprayed with fuel and set ablaze by the incendiary tone of his most ardent supporters.

This, too, is a yo-yo scenario. Look at the last few elections and you'll see what I mean. In 1992, the right wing was a bit tepid about Papa Bush; he'd won a popular war, no question, but the economy wasn't doing so well, the jobless rate was peaking, and the deficit was running at a whopping rate of $30 billion a year (as opposed to $400 billion this year). Those disaffected "threw their votes away" in the direction of H. Ross Perot, and the Democrats, once they got the wheat sorted from the chaff in the primaries, backed Bill Clinton just enough to get him comfortably over the top.

In 1996, the Democrats and most all Americans weren't about to replace a sitting chief executive, who had done a good job in the face of mulish opposition from a Republican House of Representatives (led by the world's biggest irrelevancy, Newt Gingrich). Again, the voters on the right had a hard time getting it up for Bob Dole, and Clinton won in an embarrassing landslide.

In 2000, a lot of Democrats had seen their political pride wane with the overblown Lewinsky scandal, and nobody was all that excited about the prospects of a Gore/Lieberman ticket. The Republicans, on the other hand, were breathing fire out of their nostrils to get "their" America out from under the yoke of Democratic prosperity, and they campaigned and voted like the world was about to end. By anyone's count, Bush lost the popular vote by half a million ballots, and still managed to win on a technicality and some unwarranted manipulation of the electoral process by five members of the Supreme Court, whom history will treat accordingly.

See where this is going? Full-blown backing of Republicans versus mild support for Democrats equals, essentially, a tie. But when the Elephants are less than enthusiastic in the face of a Donkey stampede, they get mown down. In 2004, both parties will be out en masse. The GOP has their champion, and it won't matter who comes out of the pack for the opposition (it's going to be Dean). The Republican voters are in a panic to keep their illegitimate little president in office, and the Democrats are very serious about their politics after what happened last time. With both parties stomping on the pedal, this race isn't even going to be close.

Franklin Delano Roosevelt used to have a saying whenever the press or the Congress would crawl up his back about something: "I guess everyone's agin' me," he'd chuckle, " except for the electorate." George W. Bush is about to find his political livelihood impaled on the other end of a truly great leader's pointy axiom.


© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy