Where's the Fire: http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/wtc_fire.htm



So, what about that fire? What about the survivor looking out of the hole in the building?

Can you say "Cognitive Dissonance"? See, I knew you could.

...what does the evidence show? Not what the Shills spin it as but what does it show.

Look, don't listen.

Think for yourself.

The bombing of the towers was America's "Reichstag Fire". It has allowed the Cabal in Washington to pass draconian legislation which is a threat to all people not a part of the Cabal.

The evidence that the fire was not hot enough or extensive enough to do the damage claimed is pretty damning.

...what does the evidence show? Not what the Shills spin it as but what does it show.

Look, don't listen.

Think for yourself."

"And if you come up with an answer that disagrees with me, you're a shill and a Brown Shirt and a psyoperator, because I cannot conceive that you may look at the same evidence as me and come to a different conclusion."

Dio, you're full of crap. You don't want independent thought, you want a bunch of fawning sycophants.

Count me out. I'd rather believe the Tooth Fairy knocked over the WTC with the Plaque-Encrusted Bicuspid of Death than agree with you. Luckily, I have an actual, rational explanation. Perhaps you've heard of it...Muslim terrorists and hijacked airpalnes? Ring a bell? I know the signal-to-noise ratio is pretty high in your head, but maybe this bit of data got through.

...if someone disagrees with me. Just be prepared to have me disagree back. Forcibly.

...bother you.

That explains why you belittle and insult everyone who does. Forcibly.

...stay out of the Kitchen.

You are right though (please have the decency to not tell anyone I agreed with you on something) I have gotten into some bad habits.

Noted.

Your insults don't bother me.

Your hypocrisy does.

And I will point it out whenever I see it.

Forcibly.

"A slavish regard for consistency is a bugaboo for small minds."

I can't remember the correct attribution. Might have been G. B. Shaw but I'm not sure.

an argument is an argument/post by diogenes, and pretty well done, btw__daveman? lissenin?

i think the "official theory" (19hijackers) is correct, but i always stand to correction, unlike you there davey