...a thousand words.

Please go home - France awaits you.

Did you use Adobe Photoshop to put the words, "Human Shields," in the sign these two men are carrying?

Its clear to me this is a doctored photograph.

Right Jack about 50 milliion people in the free world saw this on TV broadcast by every ststion in Iraq and you think it's a doctored photo. The only doctoring needed is one for your ass where your brain can be checked.

Dumkofts.

Look at it.

50,000,000 ha ha ha.

You make me laugh.

Wow....I didn't know that PhotoShop worked over the air waves!!!!!

Given that Fox News is owned by Rupert Murdoch, it wouldn't surprise me they paid these people to hold up the sign.

And Rupert Murdoch owns the Weekly Standard, which is linked to friends of the Bush administration who support this war in Iraq.

If it isn't doctored, its cheap propaganda.

notice the false edge on the left side where 'one'

edge of a 'different' layer exhibits a stationary

time trail where as the background cloth is moving

in a breeze. Other anomalies. Look @ it.

This piece of pig flop is the crudest forgery I've

ever seen. On national TV, you say?

Dear me. This could be embarrassing.

You guys sound just like Baghdad Bob, the Iraqi Disinformation Minister...



LOL!

.Notice the space between the first two letters off the word

H umanshields That shows th sign is indeed handlettered probably by stick on lettering. Computer enhancement would not cause this anomly.

Gee I know FOX News paid these men to hold the sign. Grab another straw loosers.

Notice the clumsy false shadow on the 'top'

layer. Notice the indeterminate boundary of the

'top' layer. The 'spray on' lettering inside a

'different' frame.

Damn fine gig.

Blew us away.

Yes, it looks like a sign that was made and then modified. The different lettering, and the guy on the left if you look there is the continuation of a letter. Its not surprising, cheap propaganda is easy. Im sure some people feel that way in Iraq, or at least could be easily influenced to hold a sign like that. Many possibilities

...possibility the Iraqis REALLY thought the human shields are wankers?

After all, that was MY first impression.

....everyone knows that all the wankers are on IMC yapping their fat clueless mouths. Sheesh, Bush-Propagana-Machine, give it a break until you have a clue....and some fact would be fucking nice.

But you have to admit, there are possibilities

"...it looks like a sign that was made and then modified."

"...Notice the clumsy false shadow on the 'top'

layer. Notice the indeterminate boundary of the

'top' layer. The 'spray on' lettering inside a

'different' frame."

"...the crudest forgery I've ever seen. "

"...it wouldn't surprise me they paid these people to hold up the sign."

"...Its clear to me this is a doctored photograph. "

You mean facts like those? Ahhh. I understand completely. The made-up kind of facts. The opinions masquerading as facts. The pulled-out-of-your-butt facts.

But the obvious facts? The ones witnessed worldwide? Must be "propaganda".

May be if you nit wits turned on your TV to any news source you chose, you will see the REAL images just as it is dhown above. I have been using Photoshop for three years and do a lot better if I was going to docter the picture. The experts trying to pick out doctoring to the image, don't "Know Jack Shit about Photoshop!"

>May be if you nit wits turned on your TV to any news source you chose, you will see the REAL images

That would mean we would have to open our eyes. No, thank you.

The ability of the left to weave and bob is amazing.

These Iraqis walked right through the public square in Bagdad carrying that sign. There is zero doubt that it expresses their true feelings. Why wouldn't they feel that way? After all, the Human Shield dorks were trying to keep Saddam's regime in power. That's what the anti-war movement is all about -- keeping Saddam in power.