My usual IP address has been blocked by our young Nazi IMC editor this evening. Therefore I must use this anonymous proxy service to post or visit here.

My regular IP gets this message (shades of Nessie and SF. Indymedia):

__

Forbidden

You don't have permission to access /comment_latest.php on this server.

Red Hat Secure/3.0 Server at la.indymedia.org Port 80

__

It's a shame to see this sort of censorship on a site that claims to support Open Publishing.



It seems that there is a strong motivation to suppress the truth and those who would speak the truth here.

Nazi -

If you're going to delete my posts, and block me from visiting LA IMC, please have the courtesy to post your handle and your reasoning. I'd like the opportunity to reply. As it stands, I'm simply deleted (Nessie style).

Are you that unwilling to debate the issues? Must you run and hide?

This Nazi has hidden an excellent article along with some very good responses, Diogenes included.

Here is the hidden article.

http://la.indymedia.org/news/2003/03/37288.php

Censorship reigns at LA IMC!

The Collective knows best.

But wait – Isn’t Anarchy "Without Government"?

Seems to me the Collective is playing the role of Government already - here in this little cyber-nation.

And what happens when the proletariat decides it wants to speak out and questions the Collective?

How many millions die this time?

...out. While I frequently find the both of you over the top as long as you don't spread overt hatred or pornography I would just as soon have you around to beat up on.

It's nice to have you around to beat up on too.



Poke! Nyuck Nyuck Nyuck, Whoop Whoop Whoop.

...B.A. needs a new prescription. It's about half way down the page. For some reason it did not bump back up when I entered my comment. A quirk of the system I have seen it happen before.

"Wink, wink; nudge, nudge. You know what I mean?"

http://sf.indymedia.org/uploads/the_road_to_tyranny__34kbps_.ram

Hi, this is Diogenes, from Al-Jazeera News, reporting straight from the sex slave chamber of my MASTA, Hussein.

As I report, I would like to say, Hussein's cock is really yummy.

No really!

You think I'm lying but I'm not.

Here is a song for my master and it goes a little something like this:

Yummy yummy yummy, I got cock in my tumMMMYYYY!!!

Husseins cock that is!

This has been a report by Diogenes, gay heritage! Hitler, back to you at the newsroom!

Fairly well done. Powerful presentation.

If there is an adult supervisor at IMC LA, I'd appreciate having my IP address unblocked.

It's a bit silly that I'm unable to use my normal IP and must resort to anonymous proxy servers like this one.

Incredible!

Some of the very best stuff can be found here:

http://la.indymedia.org/news/?hidden=hidden

The scissors are out and the censors are active. Be careful with the truth. It's liable to be snipped.

Add a new article? I've been attempting to add via the "Publish" button in the upper right hand of the screen... and get all the way to the "your article has been added" screen.

And then, my article goes off into bit heaven.

The Publish button is the correct method?

Thanks,

MadMaxim

...it wanders

to and fro

only God

and statcom know...

Hey Bush Admirer,

that was a nice piece. I disagree with it but yeah.

And to whoever banned this guy at least respond as to why, I'm a leftist pinko bastard and I seriously am sickened that people are getting banned from here for honestly expressing alternate points of view other than from the left or from an anarchist perspective. That's not an open forum and that's not of the people when you're censoring folks.

Lets stop this war go here to find all the latest news and actions of our anti-war troops

The New X

by The New X • Thursday March 20, 2003 Thut 04:33 PM



the fear that Saddam will attack the US with WMD shows how PARANOID americans are.

they don't really know why he will attack

they just know he will

"we don't know what a nigger is, but we're just gonna hate 'em anyway"

AMERICAN HYPOCRISY

TO ANY PRO-WAR ADVOCATE

I DARE YOU TO REPLY TO THIS:

The US government supported Saddam during his most murderous years. They supplied him with WMD and the technology to make his own WMD. EVEN THOUGH HE WAS A KNOWN TYRANT. Why? So that he would use them on the Iranians. Even after Halabja in 1988, the US government CONTINUED to support him.

Now in the year 2003 (whether it is morally just or not), Saddam no longer wishes to play into US global strategy. So he is ALL OF A SUDDEN branded a TYRANT ------ EVEN THOUGH HE WAS A MURDEROUS TYRANT ALL THE YEARS THE US SUPPORTED HIM!

Isn't it hypocritical that although he was even more murderous back then, he was considered an ALLY and FRIEND OF AMERICA simply because he was killing Iranians (if 5,000 kurds happened to be gassed in a single attack thats no big deal). Now he's still murderous but now the US actually acknowledges that he is a tyrant. Imagine if he was still following US wishes by fighting with Iraq, would the US be calling him a TYRANT? I DON'T THINK SO.

HYPOCRISY HYPOCRISY HYPOCRISY.

Until the US apologizes to the victims of Saddam terror DURING THE YEARS THAT THEY SUPPORTED HIM, this war will only be about US PARANOIA and its attempts at gaining a FALSE sense of security.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

war advocates only want to see sand nigger blood being spilled. they try to improve the body count

2,500 Americans (WTC) < 100,000 Sand Niggers.

So they can feel better about themselves and feel as if they "won" the overall battle. Their oh so precious American pride was hurt on 9/11 and now they seek to get it back by killing sand niggers left rite and center

(basically this is the whole starship troopers scenario)