I contend that the Iraq is the biggest threat for U.S. I contend that the Iraq is the biggest threat for the world. I contend that the Iraq is the centre of terrorists. I contend there is a coherence between Iraq and 9/11. I argue the converse of CIA conclusions. Allegations must not be proven. People pray for me and I pray for them. I pray for peace and freedom. To avert a war is beyond my power. I contend that UN is nonrelevant. We have enough vassals for a raid. I contend that millions of people are nonrelevant. I contend that other states are asolutely nonrelevant and I contend yet that the Blix report will be false, corrupt and a dangerous distortion of my consolidated findings. My only intention is to protect my citizens. The war will be expensive, impossible to specify, have no idea. Bin Ladin is located in Pakistan. Pakistan was involved in three wars and is testing now an new nuke-missile with range over 500 miles, damn about. I decide which dictatorship needs a democracy-bombing. I pray for my troops making a great war and I pray for the Iraqi people, I will erase now. Massacre on Iraqi civilians by American troops can never be happen because ugly iraqi troops will dress up like our soldiers to befoul us. Good gimmick, isn't it? We only wage clean wars.

Pray for me!

Your blessed president!

It still scares me to know that there are so many misinformed idiots running through the streets of America, not knowing what it is they are protesting. I understand that you liberal losers would rather give our country back to the Mexicans (so they can turn it into a toilet like their own country), Asians (the ones who come over on "scholarships", then leave to their own countries without repaying their debts, or the brown-trash that comes from the Middle East.

Let me ask you a question: While you are hugging your trees and smoking your dope, waving your anti-war flags, who in the fuck do you think is protecting your right to act ilke fools? Yep, you guessed right: honorable young men (such as myself) and women in the armed forces. What if your house, or your por-plants were taken over by terrrorists? Then you would realize that your head has been lodged in your ass for way too long. By then it will have been too late. TERRORISTS DO NOT WANT PEACE. I challenge you to preach your mission of love and peace to the families and survivors of the WTC. As the great president said: "It is us against them. You are either with us or against us." While you pacifists go to college, work in the movie industry, make your money, who do you think is defending your country? Do you think freedom is free? What have you done for your country? Maybe you pay your taxes; good job. Like Jack Nicholson said: "You sleep under the blanket of security I provide, and then you question the means of which I provide it?" Until you blow-hard, liberal, give-our-country-away-to terrorists idiots realize that you look like a bunch of fools, my words are moot and won't get through to you with your heads buried in the sand.

Wow

I sense

hostility

wow

Thanks for the constructive criticism...

To All the misguided souls,

I don't think you understand how dangerous Iraq is. Do you receive the intelligence reports that President Bush receives everyday about what Saddam's is up to. You say a war with Iraq will strengthen Al Qaeda but as I write this email they have arrested and are interrogating Bin Laden's most senior guy, Khalid Shaikh Mohammed . It is only a matter a time before they get the information they need, busting cells worldwide and maybe even capturing Bin Laden. That would most likely result in the demise of Al Qaeda. I find it hypocritical that with Iraq you protest America's motive for going to war, but you don't protest the innocent people in Iraq who are being killed by a ruthless dictator, a dictator who if given the opportunity will most certainly give his weapons of mass destruction to a terrorist to hurt Americans including all of you who are marching against the war, Yeah I know its hard to believe. You say over a hundred thousand will be killed if we go to war, did that same number result in the Afgani war to drive out the Taliban? Look I am not saying you can't have an opinion, but atleast back it up with facts, something you obviously didn't. I hope you will atleast support our troops and our President once the war begins or else you could consider me a former fan. Remember, the terrorists don't care whether we go to war or not, they will attack us! One final comment, I support the President and our troops 100%!! Thanks to their sacrifice, they are making this country safer! God Bless America!!!

John New York City

"Do you receive the intelligence reports that President Bush receives everyday about what Saddam's is up to. "

Do you, Einstein? Maybe you could fill us in. Or, you could get informed as to how US foreign policy works, the corruption of chickenhawk Enron Bush and his cronies, and other things. Shut off Limbaugh and get informed!

You just don't get it. The President's number one job above anything else is to protect Americans. At the time that photo was taken, Saddam wasn't perceived as a threat to America. We are not looking at the past, but the present day foreign policy, and since September 11, we have to deal with threats before they could manifest into mass murder like what happened on 9/11. If you could prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that Saddam is no threat, than you have a case. But I doubt you can. And speaking of the Regan adminstration, if Communist Russia wasn't stifled, I don't think you and I would be talking as freely as we are now. President Regan had the guts to stand up to that threat.

You just don't get it. The President's number one job above anything else is to protect Americans. At the time that photo was taken, Saddam wasn't perceived as a threat to America. We are not looking at the past, but the present day foreign policy, and since September 11, we have to deal with threats before they could manifest into mass murder like what happened on 9/11. If you could prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that Saddam is no threat, than you have a case. But I doubt you can. And speaking of the Regan adminstration, if Communist Russia wasn't stifled, I don't think you and I would be talking as freely as we are now. President Regan had the guts to stand up to that threat.

Indeed.

Impeach Bush for treason and murder.

9-11

What REALLY Happened

?

I won't even dignify that comment. You people rely on emotional tactics that aren't based on any fact whatsoever. There is no basis for that, its just a clever way of trying to demonize Bush. Let me ask you this, would you be saying the same thing if this was Al Gore in the White House, going to Iraq, probably not!!! And would you make the same connection between 9/11 and Al Gore if he was in the White House. Probably not since this all motivated by politics not by what is best for this country. You should leave this country if you hate it so much. Live in Iraq if you think you are so smart. And by the way, its funny that a few of your supporters who went to Iraq as human shields wimped out and left the country because they said it was too dangerous, Looks like your people don't stand behind what they say they will do.

There is a fifth dimension beyond that which is known to man. It is a dimension as

vast as space and timeless as infinity. It is the middle ground between light and

shadow, between science and superstition, and it lies between the pit of man's

fears and the summit of his knowledge. This is the dimension ofimagination. It is

an area which we call the Twilight Zone.

Has nothing to do with this discussion.

Nice try, lots of vergage. And garbage.

9-11

What Really Happened

?

who dont get it, jms? may i ask if it is 100% ok to kill to keep america "safe"?

sorry, this peace of mind is long gone with the twin tower.. the more u hate, and the more u kill.. will keep u guys awake through the night..

god bless the rest of the world.. :-)

I thought I told you to shut off the Limbaugh. Pay attention! Here's another example of what your buddies are all about:

Swing Blades

Rumsfeld Filled His Pockets with Pyongyang's Nuclear Loot

By CHRIS FLOYD

It's a well-known fact--oft detailed in this column--that the boys in the Bush Regime swing both ways. We speak, of course, of their proclivity--their apparently uncontrollable craving--for stuffing their trousers with loot from both sides of whatever war or military crisis is going at the moment.

That's why it came as no surprise to read last week that just before he joined the Regime's crusade against evildoers everywhere (especially rogue states that pursue the development of terrorist-ready weapons of mass destruction), Pentagon warlord Donald Rumsfeld was trousering the proceeds from a $200 million deal to send the latest nuclear technology--including plenty of terrorist-ready "dirty bomb" material--to the rogue state of North Korea, Neue Zurcher Zeitung reports.

In 1998, Rumsfeld was citizen chairman of the Congressional Ballistic Missile Threat Commission, charged with reducing nuclear proliferation. Rumsfeld and the Republican-heavy commission came down hard on the deal Bill Clinton had brokered with North Korea to avert a war in 1994: Pyongyang would give up its nuclear weapons program in exchange for normalized relations with the United States, plus the construction of two non-weaponized nuclear plants to generate electricity. The plants were to be built by an international consortium of government-backed business interests called KEDO.

Rum deal, said Rummy: those nasty Northies would surely turn the peaceful nukes to nefarious ends. What's more, even the most innocuous nuclear plant generates mounds of radioactive waste that could be made into "dirty bombs"--hand-carried weapons capable of killing thousands of people. The agreement was big bad juju that threatened the whole world, Rumsfeld declared.

Of course, that didn't prevent him from trying to profit from it. Even while he chairing commission meetings on the "dire threat" posed by the Korean program, Rumsfeld was junketing to Zurich for board meetings of the Swiss-based energy technology giant, ABB, where he was a top director. And what was ABB doing at the time? Why, negotiating that $200 million deal with North Korea to provide equipment and services for the KEDO nuclear reactors, of course!

Yes, nuclear proliferation is ugly stuff--but you might as well squeeze a few dollars from it, right? A smart guy always plays the angles--and, as the hero-worshiping American media never stop telling us, Rumsfeld is one smart guy.

In fact, he's so smart that he's now playing dumb. A Pentagon spokesman says Rumsfeld "can't recall" discussing the Korean deal at ABB board meetings. And his erstwhile ABB corporate colleagues say that it's possible the subject never came up. Of course it didn't; going into the nuclear business with a Communist tyranny that very nearly launched a nuclear war against the West just four years before, in a deal that involved high-level negotiations with the governments of the United States, South Korea, Japan and the European Union--that's certainly the kind of thing that would be handled by a couple of junior executives in a branch office somewhere. Nothing for the bigwigs--especially hard-wired government players like Rumsfeld--to trouble their pretty heads about. A perfectly reasonable explanation.

And so Rumsfeld joins the roster of Bush Regime multimillionaires who once trumpeted their "business savvy" as selling points for their right to national leadership but now claim to have been "hands-off" figureheads who had no idea what their companies were up to. Bush, in his sinkhole of insider trading and stockholder scamming at Harken; Cheney, making fat deals with Saddam Hussein (yes, after the Gulf War) and muddying up the corporate books at Halliburton; Army Secretary Thomas White, gaming the power grid and stealing millions for Enron in the manufactured California "energy crisis"--all of them went from mighty moguls to mere "front men" the instant their corruption was brought to light. None of it was their fault; nothing ever is.

Whatever happened to Bush's much-trumpeted "era of responsibility?" These guys are not only chiselers, hustlers, hypocrites and war profiteers--they're a bunch of gutless wonders as well. So you'll pardon us if we are just the tiniest bit cynical about the "moral arguments for war" and other such buckets of warm spit this gang is now forcing down the world's throat.

Postscript 1: Losing the Plot And what became of that 1994 pact with North Korea? UN inspectors entered the country to make sure the weapons program was put on ice. Pyongyang signed a number of lucrative deals with various politically-connected Western firms, like ABB, to build the promised energy plants, while waiting for the normalization of relations with the United States to begin--a move which most observers thought would set North Korea on a course toward China-style "moderation" of its monolithic regime.

But normalization never came. Clinton, pressured by rightwing forces (such as Rumsfeld's commission) who opposed any truck whatsoever with godless commies, did his usual folding number, with much windy suspiration of forced breath--and no action. The KEDO companies pocketed Pyongyang's cash but dithered about the actual construction. Pyongyang--while not exactly a font of smiling cooperation itself--concluded that the pact was being deep-sixed. This suspicion was confirmed when Bush took office, calling Korean leader Kim Jong Il a "pygmy" and declaring the county part of the "Axis of Evil."

Pyongyang then accelerated its weapons program, kicked out the UN inspectors, and is now threatening to unleash a nuclear war if Bush, a la Iraq, makes a "pre-emptive strike."

A dicey situation, sure--but at least Don Rumsfeld made some money out of it.

Postscript 2: Red Don Rising The Korean caper was not the first time Rummy signed up for both teams, of course. There is the little matter of his former financial tryst with the leaders of Communist China -a most Bushian affair, featuring ruling family members profiting from Daddy's government power.

It happened on this wise. A few months after Rumsfeld joined the Bush Regime stable, the American master of war bagged an estimated $500,000 by cashing in his joint investment with Jiang Mianheng, son of former Chinese president Jiang Zemin. The pair had been partnered in Shanghai's Red Flag Software, which is used by the godless Chinese commies to, er, block attempts by American spies to penetrate Beijing's computer networks. Naturally, Red Rum was not bothered by these national security considerations--not when there was easy money to be had.

Politically-Connected Insiders of the World, Unite!

The presidents job, as outlined by the PNAC, is to destroy alliances and dominate the region for oil so that the Euro doesn't destroy the dollar despite the fact that Bush is plunging us into a depression. I haven't heard many PHD's or scientists urging Bush for war. I understand your anger at Sadam, but you must understand the worlds anger at America comes from the fact that he was originally our guy. We are not buying in anymore to Capitalist money mongers who reap huge profits from misery. They have destroyed the beauty that was the American dream with greedy deregulation. Many of our founding fathers said to beware of war profiteers. We love our boys, the president just wants to use them. We want our boys back here in an emergency effort to rebuild our infrastructure and redesign our energy system to be sustainanble. This would keep our money here, and our interests here as well. You do not realize the ramifications of having greedy men at the helm. If you can go through their history (the current cabinet) and find me one decision that really helped the people of the untied staes more than it hurt them, I would give you a shot. But the fact is they are killing democracy, and capitalism, with unfair nepotism, and greed, faster than the commies ever could. America is beautiful, but not when our own version of the Taliban (Christian Fundamentalists) are at the helm. We cannot, for the sake of god, and most religious leaders agree, commit genocide because we fear the ideas of a people. We must strive to do our very best to give them a chance and vice versa, a chance at understanding, a chance at everlasting peace. It is simply a change of consciousness that we seek. And I might ask, while Bush sends all our boys overseas, who is here to protect their families? Who is here to protect America from pollution?

Who is here to give our kids guidance, we all know what happens to fatherless children, let us not raise a nation of idiots, animals who use anger and violence as the only mean, but a nation of the best, who are smarter than war, who can outthink Sadam and beat him without one shot.

Better explain what PNAC is to JMS. I doubt Michael Savage or Limbaugh talk about it.

I actually listen to Bill O'Reilly whose show 'The No Spin Zone' present only facts and nothing like what your saying is every presented. And by the Bill O'Reilly is just as critical of republicans as democrats, he is a independent thinker. If you feel so strongly about your convictions regarding the President, why don't you go on the 'No Spin Zone' Speaking of Oil, did you know that France refuses to support the disarming of Iraq only because it is afraid of its 'greedy oil' deals with Saddam being undermined severly. So it isn't American that is fighting over oil. Of that were the case why didn't we just take possession of those oil fields from the last gulf war?

mymicz, I have to comment on you statement about President Bush getting a chance to understand Iraq? What is there to understand about a ruler who kills millions of his own people. Also kills children and babies. Anyone who disagrees with him has to watch their loved one raped in front of them. This is what a lady who fortunately excaped Iraq had to say. You are so naive, we are not going there to commit genocide, we are going to liberate the poor people of Iraq who have had to endure the brutal conditions that Saddam has been responsible for. I cannot believe what you are saying, you just wait, once we free Iraq and see the celebrations of the Iraqi people. It will be the same celebration as in World War Two when we liberated France. All I can say is thank god we don't have people like you running this country otherwise there would be No America, there would have been a Nazi occupied America, Hitler's regime would continue to rule even here.

wow

Hitler=Saddam=Idiot

wow

In a prime-time press conference last night, President Bush declared that the U.S. will seek a vote on an 18th U.N. resolution on Iraq:

We want to see people stand up and say what their opinion is about Saddam Hussein and the utility of the United Nations Security Council. And so, you bet. It's time for people to show their cards, to let the world know where they stand when it comes to Saddam.

I've argued for this approach. There's no indication that the Security Council will save itself from irrelevance; the Associated Press reports that France's Foreign Minister Dominique de Villepin, speaking at the council after Hans Blix's latest temporizing, "rejected a compliance deadline," saying it "would be 'a pre-text for war.' " He added: "France will not allow a resolution to pass that authorizes the automatic use of force."

Fine, let's get this over with and consign the U.N. Security Council to history's ash heap.

JMS:"I actually listen to Bill O'Reilly whose show 'The No Spin Zone' present only facts"

Yes, and you sound like just the person for a bridge in Brooklyn I just happen to have for sale...

yes, you are only relevant if you do what we tell you...

...boy, this flamming defeat must really stick in your craw....

MM: "It still scares me to know that there are so many misinformed idiots running through the streets of America,"

Fuck runnin in the streets, it's the ones runnin the White House that you gotta worry about...

JMS: "Do you receive the intelligence reports that President Bush receives everyday about what Saddam's is up to. "

...No, but I read fairy tales to my kids everynight before they go to bed..

...I'll bet they are very similar...

30 years of US' un vetoes... by rp

http://la.indymedia.org/news/2003/03/34171.php

Let's See:

Patriot One: Warrantless Searches

Monitoring and recording of Internet Activity.

Violation of 1st, 4th, 5th, 9th and 10th Amendments (Bill of Rights if you're not familiar with it. Which would appear to be the case.)

Homeland Sekurity Act: Establishes a Gestapo Like Organization.

Patriot II (Thank God not yet passed):

Warrantless Arrest

Secret Arrest

Secret Trial

Secret Execution

Trial-less summary Execution at Der Fuhrer's whim.

Please tell me which activities listed are not identical to what occurred in the Third Reich?

Oh - and after I read them fairy tales, I remind them that very Jew should be killed.

It looks like a smelly Ring Baloney. The Perverted Pimple rides again.

Pastrami is a faggot!

Yep, we played both sides of the Iraq/Iran conflict so that it would end in stalemate. Pretty smart - given the alternative.

If we had not supported Iraq, the Iranian fundamentalists would have overrun the Saudi peninsula - and we'd have found our selves in the same position we are in now 20 years earlier.

Would you rather have Trillions of petro-dollars under the control of a western democracy - or under the control of Wahabist fundamentalists who murder women for wearing squeaky shoes?

See you after the Apokeelybse

-Max

My taste in men is for the swarthy middle Eastern types. I like to rim their musky bungs. Oh joy!

but the war is not about oil...

...it's not...

...really....

...nope...

..uh-uh...

...oh, except for France and Germany....

See!?!?! I'm learnin'!

Did I mention I am upper middle class? I am.

We busted you, you fucking faggot. Now be gone.

...pathetic...

Yup,real lame. But persistant, though.

Typical kike bullshit...

I agree. Fuck the jews. It's all a conspiracy, man.