Hundreds of people marched against a possible war against Iraq Saturday, Oct. 26, 2002 in Tokyo, Japan.
Canada Is Free. Check it out.
Yeah - it's becoming quite a dictatorship. That's because it is influenced by the USA.
Sorry to diverge from the main point, but does anyone know if there is an Indymedia in Japan or if one is being setup?
I heard a few months back that one was being set up in Tokyo, but that was all. there's got to be someone here who's tapped in to the process info who can let us know, I'm curious too.
doesn't seem to be much indymedia in asia at all, actually.
This is G o o g l e's cache of http://calgary.indymedia.org/news/2003/03/6145_comment.php?theme=default.
G o o g l e's cache is the snapshot that we took of the page as we crawled the web.
The page may have changed since that time. Click here for the current page without highlighting.
To link to or bookmark this page, use the following url: http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:NIFUaIXpgDoJ:calgary.indymedia.org/news/2003/03/6145_comment.php%3Ftheme%3Ddefault+trevor+jukes+thunder+bay&hl=en
Google is not affiliated with the authors of this page nor responsible for its content.
These search terms have been highlighted: trevor jukes thunder bay
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
about us contact subscribe calendar publish
features
• newswire
• g8
• media watch
• police/law
• politics
• ecology
• arts/culture
• commentary
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
G8 Registration
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
donate
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
participate
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
resources
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
links
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
search
medium text image audio video other
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
translate
deutschde » enespañoles » enfrançaisfr » enitalianoit » ennorskportugpt » en
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
archives
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
chat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
sf-active
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IMC Network:
www.indymedia.org
Projects
climate
print
radio
satellite tv
video
Pacific
adelaide
aotearoa
brisbane
hawaii
jakarta
japan
la
melbourne
portland
san francisco
santa cruz
seattle
sydney
vancouver
victoria
Africa
ambazonia
nigeria
south africa
Europe
athens
austria
barcelona
belgium
bristol
cyprus
euskal herria
finland
germany
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
lille
madrid
netherlands
nice
norway
paris
poland
portugal
prague
russia
sweden
switzerland
thessaloniki
united kingdom
west vlaanderen
Canada
alberta
hamilton
maritimes
montreal
ontario
ottawa
quebec
thunder bay
vancouver
victoria
windsor
Latin America
argentina
bolivia
brasil
chiapas
chile
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
qollasuyu
rosario
sonora
tijuana
uruguay
Asia
india
israel
japan
mumbai
palestine
United States
arizona
arkansas
atlanta
austin
baltimore
boston
buffalo
central florida
chicago
cleveland
danbury, ct
dc
eugene
hawaii
houston
idaho
ithaca
la
madison
maine
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new jersey
new mexico
north carolina
north texas
ny capital
nyc
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rocky mountain
san diego
san francisco bay area
santa cruz, ca
seattle
st louis
tallahassee-red hills
urbana-champaign
utah
vermont
western mass
Process
discussion
fbi/legal updates
indymedia faq
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech
volunteer
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
printable version police_law
Rod Peltonen
by Bob • Tuesday March 11, 2003 at 09:37 PM
Revenue Canada agent in Thunder Bay..
He Work's to have people convicted wihtout evidence.
I hear he is into something else!!!!
Time will tell........CHECK THE SITE I FOUND!!
bob10010.tripod.com/bobspersonalsite/id2.html
add your comments
Criminal LIbel 300
by Calvin Cumberland • Monday April 14, 2003 at 08:43 PM
Click on the link!!!!
Check the letter from the Justice Minister:::on the letters page...... Does he know his job???
cumber-1.tripod.com
add your comments
Criminal LIbel 300
by Calvin Cumberland • Monday April 14, 2003 at 08:44 PM
Click on the link!!!!
Check the letter from the Justice Minister:::on the letters page...... Does he know his job???
cumber-1.tripod.com
add your comments
Is he an a asshole????
by Yes • Monday May 26, 2003 at 10:46 PM
Good crap;;;; right t????????? That 's what I here!!! You jurk............... Sorry Ass
add your comments
Convicted
by Your Friend • Wednesday May 28, 2003 at 09:45 PM
Don't talk Jurk, You will see this!!!!! Ha Ha!!!! Crap.........
Have a nice day crap............
add your comments
Convicetd Crap
by I guess that is me calvin • Monday August 18, 2003 at 08:41 PM
Putting people in jail with out evidence is a criminal act!!!! So tell me my friend, who is a jerk?????
Love you,,,, Your friend Cal
add your comments
Truth
by Cal • Monday August 18, 2003 at 08:57 PM
Isn't it great that you can type in all the major players and it comes up with something on everyone. I don't mind the truth; Should anyone????????
I tell the truth!!!!!!! Like it or not.....
cumber-1.tripod.com
add your comments
Nail them
by CAl • Wednesday October 01, 2003 at 09:39 PM
My lawyer friends are now going to sew for big $$$$.
I cannot reveal the details, all that I can say some people are now going to sweat!!!
add your comments
Criminal libel Canada
by Cal • Tuesday October 07, 2003 at 09:52 PM
I don't know why they don't attack me again????????? Although I know that it is coming..... Rignr????
Dork's !!!!!!!!!!!
cumber-1.tripod.com
add your comments
house of Commons OF CANADA (defamatory libel)
by F George • Sunday May 09, 2004 at 07:57 PM
House of Commons of Canada
Bill C-372
An Act to amend the Criminal Code (defamatory libel)
Before they amend the Criminal code they should look at things like this.
Check the link..
bob10010.tripod.com/bobspersonalsite/id2.html
add your comments
house of Commons OF CANADA (defamatory libel)
by F George • Sunday May 09, 2004 at 07:59 PM
House of Commons of Canada
Bill C-372
An Act to amend the Criminal Code (defamatory libel)
{{{{Before they amend the Criminal code they should look at things like this.}}}}
Check the link..
Court File No. - 00-000133
SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
B E T W E E N:
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
-AND-
CALVIN CUMBERLAND
CHARGE TO JURY
OF THE HONOUPABLE MR. JUSTICE T. A. PLATANA
the 17th day of January, 2001,
at the City of Thunder Bay, and Province of Ontario
APPEARANCES:
Assistant Crown Attorney
Counsel for the Accused
Court Reporter
Trevor Jukes Representing Hirnself
Lenore McKevitt
Charge to the Jury Platana, S.C.J.
Those are some general comments. Let me turn now more specifically to the law that applies in this particular case.
Let me remind you, that Mr. Cumberland is charged on an indictment that says he did on or about the 23rd day of May 2000, and the 24th day of May 2000, at the City 'of Thunder Bay in the Northwest region in the Province of Ontario, publish a defamatory libel, knowing that it was false, by posting posters defaming xxx xxxxxxxx contrary to Section 300 of the Criininal Code of Canada.
That is the charge which the accused is facing.
Let me read you the exact section of the Crinilnal
Code. That section, which is 300, says:
"Everyone who publishes a defamatory libel, that he knows is false, is guilty of an indictable
offence.
In order for you to understand and come to a conclusion on that section, it's necessary that I
LATER...
Charge to the Jury
Platana, s.c.j.
"Caution Attention." There's a picture of an individual on it, and the name xxx xxxxxxxx appears. The writing on the document says, "This man is known to be working for an insidious organization accused of causing peoples deaths. Protect yourself from organized crime. If you approached by this man be prepared to defend yourself." That is the wording on one of the documents which the Crown relies upon.
The second document which the Crown relies upon, and again filed as an exhibit, is one which says, "Tax trouble, screw Revenue Canada. See http://www.tbaytel net/acumberland."
Let me indicate to you directly at this point in time, that for purposes of your deliberations I would instruct you that this particular exhibit in and of itself does not appear to bear any relation to xx.xxxxxxxx. I'll have more to say of that aspect afterwards. I would also indicate to you that from my recollection of the evidence there is no witness who suggested in any way that they saw
Mr. Cumberland placing this particular document anywhere. Now again, let me remind you, if my recollection of the evidence on that regard differs from yours, you must accept your view of the evidence.
Let me specify for you now, a charge of defamatory libel therefore, requires as an element of the offence physical publication of the alleged defamatory material in one of the three specific manners outlined in the Code. Furthermore, the Crown must prove that the matter in question was objectively defamatory. That it was likely to injure the reputation of the person by exposing him to hatred, contempt or ridicule or that it was designed to insult the person of or concerning whom it was published.
The Crown must also prove that the accused knew that the defamatory libel was false and that there was intent to defame.
Let me review with you now some of the evidence which I believe you may find of some assistance in your assessment of whether each of these elements
LATER...
found in public parks, on downtown streets, and outside public buildings.
In considering the issue of whether the poster was likely to injure the reputation or designed to insult the person of whom it was published, you also have the evidence of Mr. xxxxxxxx himself as to his own reaction when he saw the poster and the consequences immediately there afterwards. You will recall that he left work that day. It was indicated to him, I believe, by his superiors that he appeared to be upset enough that he should go home.
Finally now as an essential element, in order to sustain a conviction for this charge, the Crown must prove that the accused published the defamation that he knows is false.
The knowledge required by that phrase is subjective. You must therefore determine whether the accused knew that the published statements were false. The question is whether he knew that the message as it would be
understood by a reasonably prudent person was false.
Now there is certainly no direct evidence that Mr. Cumberland had any subjective knowledge that the message on the posters was false, and you have no direct evidence that he intended to defame Mr. xxxxxxxx. He did not testify on his own behalf, nor did he call any witnesses in his defence, and let me remind you that is the right of an accused person. No one has to prove their own innocence.
The Crown called no evidence specifically as to his knowledge.
You may, however, draw inferences, as long as those inferences are based on facts, which you find from the evidence. Therefore the question is, is there any evidence which you may wish to consider to determine whether you can find that Mr. Cumberland subjectively knew that the information was false and that it was intended to defame.
I would suggest to you that you might need to look at the evidence as to Mr. Cumberland's knowledge of....
------------------------------------------------------------
This is not the transcript and may contain errors.
If you want exact transcript cantact Calvin Cumberland
1807 344-1101
bob10010.tripod.com/bobspersonalsite/id2.html
add your comments
© 2000-2002 Alberta Independent Media Centre. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Alberta IMC. Disclaimer | Privacy
