|
|
json version - view hidden posts
View article without comments
by U'wa Defense Working Group
Tuesday, May. 07, 2002 at 4:23 PM
kevin@amazonwatch.org
Los Angeles-At its annual shareholder meeting Friday, Occidental Petroleum (NYSE:OXY) announced its plans to return to the Colombian government its controversial Siriri oil block (formally Samore), located on the traditional
territory of the U'wa people. This follows a nearly decade-long peaceful campaign by the U'wa to halt the oil project.
U'WA DEFENSE WORKING GROUP: AMAZON WATCH . ACTION RESOURCE CENTER PROJECT UNDERGROUND . RAINFOREST ACTION NETWORK
For Immediate Release Contacts: Kevin Koenig-310.420.8245 May 3, 2002 7:30pm EDT Patrick Reinsborough-415.722-1846
Occidental Petroleum to Leave U'wa Land! Company Announces Plans to Leave Controversial Colombia Oil Project
Los Angeles-At its annual shareholder meeting today, Occidental Petroleum (NYSE:OXY) announced its plans to return to the Colombian government its controversial Siriri oil block (formally Samore), located on the traditional territory of the U'wa people. This follows a nearly decade-long peaceful campaign by the U'wa to halt the oil project.
"This is the news we have been waiting for. Sira, the God of the U'wa has accompanied the U'wa here in Colombia and our friends around the world who have supported us in this struggle. Now Sira is responding to us. This is the result of the work of the U'wa and our friends around the world," said an U'wa spokesperson.
The U'wa's campaign to protect their people and land from the violence and environmental destruction that comes with oil projects in Colombia has garnered international attention and created an ongoing public relations liability for Oxy. Peaceful U'wa resistance to the Oxy project has been met with several episodes of violent repression over the years, in one case resulting in the death of three indigenous children during a military break up of peaceful U'wa blockades.
The U'wa have repeatedly denounced Occidental's oil operation, saying it threatens their tribe and will raise the death toll of innocent civilians caught in the crossfire of Colombia's civil war. Activists noted that while Oxy's departure from the oil block is a welcomed development, the threat remains that another company could take over the area. In addition, Repsol-YPF is currently looking to develop the Capachos oil block, also located on traditional U'wa land. "Oxy's departure from the oil block will be a great victory for the U'wa," said Atossa Soltani, Director of Amazon Watch. "Oxy now needs to commit to staying out of all U'wa ancestral lands permanently."
Last July, Oxy announced that its first exploratory well on U'wa land turned up dry. Today the company cited economic reasons for relinquishing the block, while observers noted that the company's continuing public relations conflicts around U'wa issue weighed heavily on the decision. Meanwhile, Occidental also finds itself center stage in the growing controversy around the Bush Administration's military aid proposal to hand over $98 million of U.S. taxpayers' money to defend Occidental's Caño Limon oil pipeline in Colombia, which runs through traditional U'wa land.
If Congress passes the proposal, this targeted military assistance for the pipeline will set a dangerous precedent of taxpayers covering private corporations' security expenses overseas. Critics say this is a clear case of corporate welfare. Based on last year's level of U.S. oil imports from Caño Limon, taxpayers will be covering Occidental's security expenses at the cost of $24 per barrel of oil. Occidental also finds itself in the spotlight this week with Attorney General Ashcroft's indictment of six FARC guerrillas for the 1999 murders of three Americans working in Colombia with the U'wa people. Among the activists murdered was Terence Freitas who founded the U'wa Defense Project. Freitas' family issued a statement in opposition to more military aid to Colombia (available upon request).
The U'wa are expected to release a full statement next week. -END-
www.amazonwatch.org
by Duff
Wednesday, May. 08, 2002 at 11:02 PM
duff@ecomail.org
Subject: Statement by family of FARC victim on day of US grand jury indictment
For Immediate Release: 5:40 pm EST April 30, 2002 Following Grand Jury Indictment of Colombia's FARC Leadership for 1999 Murders, Statement by Family and Friends of Terence Freitas, One of the Three US Citizens Killed by FARC
Contact: Abby Reyes, girlfriend of Terence Freitas, Julie Freitas, mother of Terence Freitas, Pete Freitas, father of Terence Freitas,
FARC guerillas kidnapped and murdered our son, brother, and friend, TerenceUnity Freitas, in early 1999. Terence was one of three US citizens taken by FARC after visiting the Colombian indigenous U'wa community on land coveted by US-based Occidental Petroleum. In Washington today, a grand jury announced the indictment of FARC leadership for authorizing the murders, findings that parallel a separate grand jury investigation taking place within the Colombian justice system. Today's announcement fuels the fire for President Bush's proposed expansion of the war on terrorism in Colombia.
We are dismayed to see the Administration's cynical and exploitative use of Terence's murder to justify further US military aid to the Colombian armed forces, aid the President has slated for training the Colombian troops to defend a beleaguered Occidental oil pipeline. Terence went to Colombia to work with local communities grappling with the escalation of legal and extralegal armed violence that Occidental's presence in the region has wreaked over the last 15 years. To the 2 dozen social organizations in the Arauca region protesting US military intervention on behalf of Occidental, oil equals violence. Employing Terence's death as a means to continue perpetuating violence in Colombia grossly contradicts everything Terence believed in.
We deplore the use of kidnapping and executions as political, economic, and military tools. We demand that those responsible in this case be arrested, given a fair trial, and, if proven guilty, sentenced severely, with full respect for due process of law in Colombia. However, we object to twinning the pursuit of justice for Terence's murder with the pursuit of the war on terrorism. As we have said from the beginning, we do not believe that meeting violence with violence is a legitimate means to obtain justice and peace. It has never worked in Colombia before, and it is certainly not working now. We are distressed to see the Bush Administration championing Terence's murder as a rallying cry for war. If it is to be held up as anything, we implore that it be held up as a mirror reflecting back to our own country the fractured complexity of Colombia's civil war and our own stark complicity in it: as long as we maintain our addiction to oil, Colombia will not see peace.
by Duff
Wednesday, May. 08, 2002 at 11:02 PM
duff@ecomail.org
Subject: Statement by family of FARC victim on day of US grand jury indictment
For Immediate Release: 5:40 pm EST April 30, 2002 Following Grand Jury Indictment of Colombia's FARC Leadership for 1999 Murders, Statement by Family and Friends of Terence Freitas, One of the Three US Citizens Killed by FARC
Contact: Abby Reyes, girlfriend of Terence Freitas, Julie Freitas, mother of Terence Freitas, Pete Freitas, father of Terence Freitas,
FARC guerillas kidnapped and murdered our son, brother, and friend, TerenceUnity Freitas, in early 1999. Terence was one of three US citizens taken by FARC after visiting the Colombian indigenous U'wa community on land coveted by US-based Occidental Petroleum. In Washington today, a grand jury announced the indictment of FARC leadership for authorizing the murders, findings that parallel a separate grand jury investigation taking place within the Colombian justice system. Today's announcement fuels the fire for President Bush's proposed expansion of the war on terrorism in Colombia.
We are dismayed to see the Administration's cynical and exploitative use of Terence's murder to justify further US military aid to the Colombian armed forces, aid the President has slated for training the Colombian troops to defend a beleaguered Occidental oil pipeline. Terence went to Colombia to work with local communities grappling with the escalation of legal and extralegal armed violence that Occidental's presence in the region has wreaked over the last 15 years. To the 2 dozen social organizations in the Arauca region protesting US military intervention on behalf of Occidental, oil equals violence. Employing Terence's death as a means to continue perpetuating violence in Colombia grossly contradicts everything Terence believed in.
We deplore the use of kidnapping and executions as political, economic, and military tools. We demand that those responsible in this case be arrested, given a fair trial, and, if proven guilty, sentenced severely, with full respect for due process of law in Colombia. However, we object to twinning the pursuit of justice for Terence's murder with the pursuit of the war on terrorism. As we have said from the beginning, we do not believe that meeting violence with violence is a legitimate means to obtain justice and peace. It has never worked in Colombia before, and it is certainly not working now. We are distressed to see the Bush Administration championing Terence's murder as a rallying cry for war. If it is to be held up as anything, we implore that it be held up as a mirror reflecting back to our own country the fractured complexity of Colombia's civil war and our own stark complicity in it: as long as we maintain our addiction to oil, Colombia will not see peace.
|