Opponents Prepare to Challenge Bush Budget Cuts and Drive to Privatize Social Security

Interview with Roger Hickey, co-director of the Campaign for America's Future, conducted by Scott Harris

After winning a narrow victory in the November 2004 election, President Bush set out an audacious set of foreign and domestic policy goals in his State of the Union address and his administration's budget proposal. In his State of the Union speech, Mr. Bush gloated about the higher than expected turnout in the Iraqi election and threatened the nations of Iran and Syria, demanding they comply with Washington's blueprint for a democratic transformation of the Middle East.

On the domestic front, the president made many questionable declarations about the imminent demise of the Social Security system while proposing that the nation follow his prescription of moving toward costly partial privatization of the popular New Deal era program. In his administration's 2006 budget proposal, Bush put forth a plan that would eliminate or deeply cut programs benefiting veterans, food stamp recipients, students and farmers, while increasing funding for the Pentagon. The dramatic cuts were said to be part of a plan to reduce record deficits amassed during the president's 1st term in office.

But much of the country greeted Bush's audacious agenda with skepticism, noting that with the U.S. tied down in a bloody guerrilla war in Iraq, threats made against Iran and Syria were mere empty gestures. And although solutions to long-range shortfalls in Social Security and current budget deficits could easily be addressed with a rollback of the president's tax cuts primarily benefiting the rich, these obvious resolutions were willfully ignored. Between The Lines' Scott Harris spoke with Roger Hickey, co-director of the Campaign for America's Future, who takes a critical look at the president's agenda and the strategies being discussed to oppose his policies.

Contact Campaign for America's Future by calling (202) 955-5665 or visit their website at www.ourfuture.org

LISTEN to this week's half-hour program of Between The Lines by clicking on one of the links below:

http://www.btlonline.org

*

"Between The Lines" is a half-hour syndicated radio news magazine that each week features a summary of under-reported news stories and interviews with activists and journalists who offer progressive perspectives on international, national and regional political, economic and social issues. Because "Between The Lines" is independent of all publications, media networks or political parties, we are able to bring a diversity of voices to the airwaves generally ignored or marginalized by the major media. For more information on this week's topics and to check out our text archive listing topics and guests presented in previous programs visit: http://www.btlonline.org

*

"Between the Lines," WPKN 89.5 FM's weekly radio news magazine can be heard Tuesdays at 5:30 p.m. ET; Wednesdays at 8 a.m. ET and Saturdays at 2 p.m. ET (Wednesday's show airs at 7:30 a.m. ET during fundraising months of April and October).

*

For an email subscription of "Between The Lines Weekly Summary" which features a RealAudio link to the week's program for Between The Lines, send an email to btlsummary-subscribe@lists.riseup.net

*

For an email subscription of "Between The Lines Q&A" which features a RealAudio link and weekly transcript to one of the interviews featured on Between The Lines, send an email to btlqa-subscribe@lists.riseup.net

*

betweenthelines@snet.net

*

http://www.squeakywheel.net/

*

Distributed by Squeaky Wheel Productions

©2005 Between The Lines. All Rights Reserved.

Just testing out my new anti-censorship plans.

George W. Bush is a great president.

And Firefox has excellent website cookie rejection capabilities.

I wonder how to set it up for proxy use, though.

Let's find out.............

It's a free service that let's you surf the internet anonymously. You can post on LA Indymedia and the losers that censor this forum will never know its you.

The fact that all you liberal-haters have no goals in life except to hate the IMC. At least us IMC types have set our goals higher: to attack Fox News!

One time, back in the "Fresca" days, I noticed that he'd been online almost every day for something like two years. Even I could not manage that. I'm an angry guy, but not *that* angry, and all the time too.

Another thing that's funny is that the less intelligent ones, like Bush Admirer, have discouraged the smarter ones from posting so much. I can totally relate to that, having been on one too many blogs where the talk degenerated to "oh my god, these bumpkins are so stupid."

Fresca does not seem angry to me. Fresca probably just has an IT job where s/he sits in front of the computer all day. Those sorts of jobs get boring and intellectual entertainment is hard to come by. So why not bash leftist?