U.S. can't keep "hands off" policy in Iraq anymore?

by DLi Wednesday, Apr. 27, 2005 at 6:49 AM

The most amazing spin from the White House today states that, frustrated by the impasse of its own quislings in Baghdad, the U.S. may not be able to keep its "hands off" policy much longer. Well, what about all that brow-beating on the 'sovereign' Iraqi government by Warlord Don 2 weeks ago? Or the barely-concealed threats issued by Ms. 'Chevron' Rice & Halliburton Dick that the Iraqi government better get going, or else?

If spending 0 Billion on a fraudulent War of Naked Aggression(based on a mountain of WMD Lies), and killing over 100,000 innocent civilians is considered a "hands off" policy on the part of the Bush regime, then the Evil Empire has indeed mastered the art of Orwellian Newspeak(and the corporate bin-Laden media a more than willing accomplice).

Perhaps that's why the faith-based(rather than evidence-supported basis that most rational people rely on)NeoCons would speak with honest conviction that they are spreading freedom & democracy all across the Globe--even if it means that the USA Empire will do so from the bomb bays of B-52s, & with the help of Depleted Uranium munitions against resistance fighters & innocent civilians alike.

Original: U.S. can't keep "hands off" policy in Iraq anymore?