Nafeez Mossaddeq Ahmed of the Global Research Institute (a non-profit think tank) provides what is probably the best article and research on the U.S. government's pre-knowledge of the 9/11 attack, and how establishment journalists on both the right and left have made it their duty to disprove these facts.
Please go to:
http://www.globalresearch.org/view_article.php?aid=342536303
or if the link doesn't work, go to the globalresearch.org website and enter Ahmed in
the search engine.
In "911 'Conspiracies" and the Defactualization of Analysis: How Ideologues on the Left
and Right Theorise Vacuously to Support Baseless Supposition," Ahmed provides a
sharp and incisive argument on how the U.S. government's pre-knowledge of the 911
attacks is being disproves by establishment journalists on the left and right (including
the superfluous arguments of David Corn.) Ahmed's adept analysis also makes all
of the right connections, including the historical link to the U.S. governments pre-knowledge
of the attack on Pearl Harbor.
This document is extremely useful in light of the impending anniversary of 911 and the
forethcoming jingoism and govt./media propaganda that will accompany it (i.e. the anniversary
as a pretext for justifying war with Iraq). The truth is slowly starting to seep out....
Original: 9/11 "Conspriacies" and How The Right and Left Try to Disprove Them