Mr. Assange is a defender of human rights; an innovative journalist and creative publisher; he is one of us. He should not be locked up but standing with us in our office. Is he not persecuted for doing what every serious human rights investigator should be doing every day: investigating allegations and promoting truth, accountability and justice?
Dear Mr High Commissioner: Help Free Assange 
  
 February 9, 2024 
  
 In an open letter, Christophe Peschoux, recently retired from the U.N. Human Rights Office, calls on his former boss to help the WikiLeaks publisher, whose legal appeal will be heard in London later this month.     
 Open Letter to the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights — Rule of law and raison d’etat :  Julian Assange must be released 
 By Christophe Peschoux 
  
 [This letter posted on 2/9/2024 is available on the Internet, https://consortiumnews.com/2024/02/09/dear-mr-high-commissioner-help-free-assange/.] 
 Mr. High Commissioner, 
 On 20-21 February, a High Court in London will decide Julian Assange’s fate: freedom or death. Two judges will decide whether the WikiLeaks founder will still be able to lodge an ultimate appeal, or will end his days in an American jail. 
 Mr. Assange has committed no crime. His only fault is to have revealed some of the crimes of the powerful of our time. Lèse majesté crime! 
 American wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere have destroyed millions of lives and ruined these countries for generations to come. No one has been prosecuted. On the contrary, these crimes have been covered up with impunity in the United States. And yet Mr. Assange is being punished for having published evidence of some of them. Political justice. 
 He is charged under a treason law dating from the first world war in 1917. Can one betray the laws of a country that is not our own? Is American law universal?  To accept it would be to dangerously open the door to the arbitrariness that comes with unchecked power: tomorrow, another powerful state could arrogate to itself the right, under the law of the strongest, to prosecute a foreign journalist, researcher or rights activist accused of breaking its law.  
 Under international law, depriving someone of their liberty is an exceptional decision, which must be duly justified to ensure fair proceedings. Yet, presumed innocent like any accused, Mr. Assange has been imprisoned without trial for almost five years as a dangerous criminal in a high-security prison near London. No release on bail for him, under judicial supervision, pending the outcome of proceedings that are clearly dragging their feet and taking their ease with time — the short time of a man’s life.  
 Why? To prevent him from the risk of escaping from a justice, which in his case, is set to fail him. Do the British judges who lent their names to this parody and threw him in jail, like a public enemy, wonder why their decisions are held in suspicion?  Presumption of innocence? Yes, but he must be punished first.  
 “No release on bail for him, under judicial supervision, pending the outcome of proceedings that are clearly dragging their feet and taking their ease with time — the short time of a man’s life.”  
 In the United States, he is charged with 18 counts  that carry a total of 175 years in prison. If extradited, he will have little chance of a fair trial. The court that will try him is located a stone’s throw from the C.I.A. headquarters, in a community of former or actual employees of its services, some of whose criminal practices WikiLeaks has revealed. During the special proceeding that will be imposed on him, his right to a defence will be compromised.  
 The villains who have been dragging him through the mud and hounding him for 14 years, thanks to the powerful relays of servile media, have no interest in a prolonged public trial that would open the Pandora’s box of America’s countless crimes. They accused him of rape and of endangering American lives. Neither allegation stood up to the test of evidence. 
 Others before him who became embarrassing, such as Jeffrey Epstein or his accomplice in France, were found “suicided” in their cells in dubious circumstances. It would be easy to put his death down to exhaustion and the despair of a life deprived of hope, meaning and freedom.  
 Julian Assange at the Stop the War Coalition rally at Trafalgar Square, London, Oct. 8, 2011. (Haydn, Flickr, CC BY-NC-SA 2.0) 
 None of the European states that preach the rule of law, democracy and human rights, yet trample them underfoot every day, has offered Mr. Assange political asylum. To allow the U.K. to extradite this man without a word to stop it, in the name of a justice that is not our own, but the black robe of the powers that be, is to consent to be an accomplice of his deportation. 
 Why are all Western states so determined to violate, left and right in his case, national and international human rights standards ? Is it to ensure that his torment is made a visible deterrent to dissuade others to expose certain of “our” crimes? 
 Mr. High Commissioner, 
 Mr. Assange is a defender of human rights; an innovative journalist and creative publisher; he is one of us. He should not be locked up but standing with us in our office. Is he not persecuted for doing what every serious investigative journalist, every serious human rights investigator, every one of us in this office should be doing every day: investigating allegations, documenting states and other crimes and promoting truth, accountability and justice?  
 “He is one of us. He should not be locked up but standing with us in our office.” 
 The fight for his freedom is not just a battle to free a man unduly pilloried by our modern inquisitions. It is one of the emblematic battles of our time: the battle of right against reason of State; of truth against lies. Free and verified information is indispensable to the exercise of citizenship and the duty of transparency incumbent upon every democratic government.  
 This battle is also emblematic of the gaping divide at the heart of our societies that is dangerously paving the way for future tyrannies and rumbling revolts: the recurrent confrontation between “we, the peoples” (as the preamble of the U.N. Charter begins) and the arrogant and uninhibited violence of the world’s “elites,” who are increasingly dissociated from society and for whom the human rights of others — which they enjoy— have become a “has-been” embarrassment. Were not human rights born of this struggle ? History continues. 
 Outside Belmarsh Prison in London, where Julian Assange is imprisoned, Sept. 16, 2023. (Alisdaire Hickson, Flickr, CC BY-SA 2.0) 
 All human-rights and press-freedom groups consider Mr. Assange’s indictment to be the most serious threat worldwide to press freedom in the United States and elsewhere. Our office, however, has remained conspicuously silent. How is it that successive high commissioners have carefully ignored him and have not dared to say a word in his defence? 
 I did not wait, Mr. High Commissioner, until I retired last October, to inform the office of the threats to our rights and freedoms posed by his persecution. I kept the management team informed on the basis of verified information. I worked in my spare time, and with several special rapporteurs, to ensure that the U.N. spoke out and said the law. As my successive memos went unanswered, hoping to reach their heart, I composed and sent Mrs. Bachelet, [who served as U.N high commissioner of human rights from 2018 to 2022] and then you, the poem appended to this letter: “A quarter to midnight.” Your silence was matched by that of most of my colleagues. Fear to speak and cowardice, Mr. High Commissioner, reign in the United Nations Human Rights Office.  
 I am well aware that your job is one of the most difficult among these disunited nations, each of them pulling the human rights fig leaf to hide its shame.   
 I also know that the funding of this office is political, and that it is the richest states that hold the strings of our purses. But if this office lacks resources commensurate with the challenges it faces — the rule of a just law is everywhere on the defensive — compromising its independence and impartiality for a few million dollars is a dubious calculation.  
 Isn’t it better to have a small ship sailing valiantly on the crests of international standards to show the way ahead, than a heavy liner emptied of its soul?  
 More than money, the world today needs the height and moral authority of someone who speaks out, above the fray of history and its battlefields, to remind us of the perils of unchained hubris, to get things back on track and avoid the worst. But moral authority is not a question of position and can only be acquired through integrity, courage and example.  
 You only have four years, Mr. High Commissioner, to “make a difference” in the real world. Whatever you do, to balance wolf and lamb, at the end of your term, the powers that chose you will spit you out like a cherry stone. Don’t exchange what’s left of the soul of this office, which the world badly needs, for the mirages of an OHCHR 2.0.  
 Exposing the truth must not become a crime. 
 Isn’t it high time for this office to make its voice heard above the compromises and short-term interests that stifle life? A freed voice that demands, without modesty, Julian Assange’s freedom for the sake of our own.  
 It’s already late, Mr. High Commissioner, a quarter to midnight past… 
 Quarter to midnight… 
 It’s high time my friends 
 That we realize 
 That the persecution 
 Of Julian Assange 
 Is also our own…  
 That he is one of us 
 And a pathfinder 
 Of some of the crimes 
 Of these dreadful times 
 Made in our name… 
 Hostage of conscience 
 Detained in the heart  
 Of democracies  
 Which show by his plight 
 What they‘re underneath… 
 * 
 His persecution 
 Is a frontal blow 
 At the foundation 
 Of our polities 
 To challenge our rights 
 Repress our freedoms: 
 Our right to think free 
 And to be informed 
 To speak and to act 
 To exchange and share 
 And build together 
 With our hands, our minds 
 The warmth of our hearts 
 And our eyes opened 
 The world, which we want 
 To live and love in… 
 — I say the world, which  
 We want to live in 
 And not just the show 
 Where we pass and dream… 
 * 
 What did he defend? 
 Oh, very little! 
 The freedom of speech 
 Of information 
 And of a free press 
 Still independent… 
 Our right to the truth 
 And our need to know 
 What those we elect 
 Do in our name 
 Especially when 
 They use the shadows 
 To commit their forfeits… 
 The right of any 
 Investigator  
 To freely inquire 
 In any matter 
 Of public concern 
 And protect their sources 
 Without reprisal… 
 The courage and right 
 Of whistle-blowers 
 To disclose the facts 
 That hurt their conscience 
 And to be protected 
 By law and justice 
 If they are attacked… 
 The duty to protect 
 Our own privacy 
 Which is essential 
 To the blossoming 
 Of our true being… 
 The right to fair trial 
 Not to be deprived 
 Of one’s liberty 
 Arbitrarily… 
 The right not to be 
 Subject to torment 
 For having acted in 
 Soul and conscience… 
 The right to respect 
 And to protection 
 For daring to speak 
 And stand by the truth… 
 * 
 Isn’t it what we  
 Do stand for and we 
 Do every day 
 In this high office: 
 Undressing states’ crimes 
 Exposing their lies 
 Promoting justice 
 And hold them to book? 
 Isn’t it our mission 
 And the raison d’être 
 Of our commitment 
 To keep the light on 
 Against the dark side? 
 * 
 Through Julian’s ordeal 
 It is our freedoms 
 That are undermined 
 The very spirit 
 Of democracy 
 Which remains the least 
 Of the worst regimes 
 To live and work in 
 Despite all its faults 
 Betrayals and filth 
 Its caricatures 
 And its perversions… 
 Its myriad of crimes 
 Made in our name 
 With impunity 
 Without us knowing… 
 How many countries 
 Have been torn to pieces 
 How many people 
 Were decimated 
 By this world of ours 
 That calls itself free? 
 * 
 It’s our liberties 
 That are under siege 
 Now on borrowed time 
 For how much longer? 
 Its is already 
 A quarter to midnight… 
 * 
 He has been paying 
 Ten years of his life 
 Deprived of the sun 
 For exposing the truth 
 And ignominy 
 Of brutal powers 
 And laid bare their words… 
 * 
 Rather than silence 
 Should not our office 
 Bestow him the price 
 Of our true spirit? 
 Let’s not add to his  
 Torment, the weight of 
 Our indifference 
 And add our disgrace 
 To his pillory… 
 * 
 We have the duty 
 To firmly oppose 
 His extradition 
 Which for sure will sign 
 His sentence of death 
 By a law that is 
 That of the strongest… 
 * 
 From a procedure 
 To a procedure 
 Those who want his life 
 In the name of justice 
 That is not our own 
 Will keep him confined 
 The rest of his life 
 In a cell of shame… 
 If he does not die 
 Before, of despair 
 For having too much 
 Believed in freedom 
 In the power of truth 
 These precious values 
 That institutions 
 Are meant to defend… 
 If he does not put 
 In act of despair 
 An end to himself 
 And to the non-life 
 That has become his… 
 * 
 There are reasons to fear 
 That he may be found 
 Lifeless one morning 
 “Suicided” in his cell 
 Like those before him 
 Who have become 
 Too embarrassing 
 To the powers that be… 
 Those who want him 
 For having unmasked 
 Some of their secrets 
 And their many lies 
 And shaken up their thrones 
 Have no interest 
 In a long trial 
 That would open up  
 The Pandora’s box 
 Of some of their crimes 
 And make them public… 
 * 
 It will be futile 
 When he will be gone 
 Across the ocean 
 Or the river Styx 
 To cry on his heels 
 Praise his memory 
 And beg his pardon 
 For not having reached 
 Our hand out in time… 
 Julian has no need 
 For crocodile tears… 
 * 
 In the lone descent 
 Of his dark exile 
 He expects the smile 
 Of our amity 
 To lighten his heart 
 And of our support 
 Conscious and active 
 Which only can put 
 An end to his plight… 
 Every minute counts 
 It is already  
 A quarter to midnight… 
 * 
 This poem my friends 
 Invites you to join 
 This plea to demand 
 To the powerful 
 Who hold in their claws 
 Julian’s fragile life  
 To release this man 
 And through his freedom 
 To defend our own… 
 This we do not owe   
 Solely to him 
 But also to these 
 Too precious values 
 Which we believe in 
 And which give meaning 
 And beauty to our lives… 
 It is now well past 
 A quarter to midnight… 
 (April 2022) 
 Christophe Peschoux is a senior human rights officer and one of the most experienced investigators in the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR). He devoted 42 years, half in the field, to the protection of refugees and people against the violence of states. He is the author of two books and several articles on the history of the Khmer Rouge. He retired from that office last October but not to causes close to his heart.