{"article":{"id":299393,"heading":"America Boils Over","author":"Ian Buruma","created":"2020-06-06 13:50:31","modified":"2020-06-13 17:03:44","last_modified":"Sun, 14 Jun 2020 00:03:44","article":"

America Boils Over

George Floyd’s death at the hands of a white police officer has triggered protests across the United States and laid bare the country’s racial, economic, and political divisions. How, if at all, might America heal – and does history offer any guide?

In this Big Picture, Harvard’s Khalil Gibran Muhammad traces today’s crisis to the United States’ founding and argues that overcoming it will require fundamental political and economic reforms. Above all, elected US officials should put racial justice at the center of their vision for a new America.

Focusing on America’s long-standing problem of racist law enforcement, Jeffrey Sommers of the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee says that a multi-pronged strategy is needed to reduce the pressures on both urban communities and the police. New York University’s Jorge G. Castañeda, meanwhile, believes that today’s multiple crises point – more than at any time since 1932 – to America’s need for sound leadership and a full-fledged welfare state.

Hospital physician and human-rights advocate Akash Goel finds an example of the vision America needs in a 1968 US presidential campaign speech by Senator Robert F. Kennedy, and explains why Kennedy’s diagnosis of America’s cultural ills remains accurate today. But Ian Buruma draws a different lesson from that tumultuous year, and asks whether a Republican presidential candidate could again win in November by pledging to restore law and order. America Boils Over - Project Syndicate




America Boils Over - Project Syndicate

Mass protests over racial injustice, the COVID-19 pandemic, and a sharp economic downturn have plunged the Unite...

A long hot summer for America

Many Americans are appalled by the crass and inflammatory words of Donald Trump. But will their disapproval outweigh their fear of violent social unrest? Will age-old racial prejudices lead them to vote again for the deceptive security of an uncouth white tyrant? Some would suggest it's far from certain.

By Ian Buruma

The White House in Washington is in the dark.[Iam Buruma is a Dutch writer and essayist. Up to 2014, he was director of the renowned New York Review of Books.]

[This article published on 6\/4\/2020 is translated from the German on the Internet, https:\/\/gegenblende.dgb.de\/artikel\/<\/a>++co++0d3da178-a631-11ea-af2e-52540088cada.]

The lights are out in the White House, while outside there are protests against racism and police violence. Donald Trump has retreated to the basement. Maybe to avoid seeing the protesters, maybe because he's a coward.

Could the United States be facing a repeat of the summer of 1968? Even then, the world saw the wrath of angry Americans boiling over as predominantly African-American inner-city neighborhoods went up in flames and young people were shot at with tear gas, attacked and often brutally beaten by riot police and National Guard.

Despite two Obama terms in office, racism is virulent

The result of the civil unrest was what some liberals in America feared over the course of this year. Republican presidential candidate Richard Nixon promised the \"silent majority\", the \"non-clamourers\" and the \"non-demonstrators\" that he would restore law and order by force. Devastated, mostly African-American neighborhoods were stripped of federal funds and further isolated, white suburbanites bought more weapons, and police forces were armed as if they were a branch of the military.

Even the riots of 1968, like the protests today, began with anger at the oppression of the black population in America. The day after Martin Luther King Jr. declared that \"the nation is sick,\" he was shot dead by a white racist criminal. The protests that followed were not only an expression of rage over King's assassination but also over the lack of economic and educational opportunities that were the result of a long and often violent racist history.

Despite the two terms of an African-American in the White House, conditions today are hardly any better - and in some respects worse. This year it is the death of George Floyd, the defenseless 46-year-old black man in Minneapolis, who was killed by a policeman kneeling on his neck for almost nine minutes, that recalls the murder of Martin Luther King.

On top of that, Covid-19 has hit African Americans particularly hard because many of them do not have financial savings and are forced to work in risky areas, as nurses and other \"systemically important workers,\" often without proper medical care. Once the global recession has really hit, many will have nothing to cushion the impact.

Donald Trump is crossing a street, with armed police officers shielding him left and right.

The last appearance of the US president was particularly bizarre. He had demonstrators outside the White House driven away with tear gas to go to the nearby St. John's Church to hold up a Bible. It was all about a photograph.

And yet there are important differences between today and the summer of 1968, apart from the fact that the music was more interesting back then and there were more opportunities to have sex. The last point is quite serious. It may have increased the discontent of many young people to be locked up in relative isolation for several months, and they are only too willing to vent this displeasure in the streets.

In bad times the challenger has an advantage, as Joe Biden

The 1968 protests were not only about racial discrimination, but also about the Vietnam War. The two issues were related. President Lyndon B. Johnson, who was responsible for the escalation of this ruthless and cruel war, was a Democrat - the same man who passed civil rights laws. They did indeed improve the lives of African Americans, and therefore provoked the hatred of many voters in the southern United States who switched to the Republican Party and helped push it further to the right.

The \"screamers\" and \"demonstrators\" Nixon railed against were not only blacks, but also young whites who resisted having to fight in a war they considered immoral. Robert F. Kennedy, the candidate who promised to end the war and who visited the burning ghettos to appease the fears of African Americans, was murdered two months after King.

Nixon won the election in that November not only because he appeased the panicked \"silent majority\" with the promise of law and order, but also because Hubert Humphrey, a respectable mainstream Democrat, refused to condemn the Vietnam War. Joe Biden, the Democrats' likely candidate for this year's presidency, has shown, despite all his weaknesses, that he will not be another Hubert Humphrey. His sympathies are clearly with the protesters. Biden has publicly recalled many cases of police violence against unarmed blacks and promised to reform police work.

In bad times, the challenger has a certain advantage. Just as Johnson was blamed for the escalation of an increasingly unpopular war, the current incumbent in the White House will have to shoulder the sickness of today's America. Donald Trump cannot be blamed for the Covid 19 pandemic, but he can be held accountable for the bumbling response to the crisis.

Joe Biden sits next to Barack Obama and listens to him.

Joe Biden and Barack Obama - here both in a session during their term in office at the White House - have responded sympathetically to the demonstrations against police violence in speeches and have called for reforms to prevent incidents like the murder of George Floyd in the future.

Nor did the institutional racism that is once again setting America's streets ablaze begin with Trump. But he has deliberately poured oil on the fire by insulting dark-skinned immigrants as criminals and calling armed white racists decent, by disqualifying angry black demonstrators as \"thugs\" and by encouraging militias, guardsmen and police to use more violence with a growling, \"Please don't be too nice\".

Trump quotes racist police chiefs from the sixties to provoke a \"race war

While some extreme right groups in the US are hopefully talking about a coming \"race war\", Trump is doing nothing to dampen their violent enthusiasm. On the contrary, he seems to revel in it. Trump's recent tweet \"when the looting begins, the shooting begins\" is a quote from the Miami police chief who in 1967 ordered his police officers to point their guns at demonstrators from his city's \"black neighborhoods.

In the USA, this is called \"stirring up the base\". And much of Trump's base will certainly be stirring up. The big question in November will be what will the voters do who voted for him in 2016 but are not so fanatical in their support. How do white women in American suburbs, Midwest workers and older Southerners (who are among those most at risk of Covid 19 infection) think today?

Many Americans are obviously appalled by the crass and inflammatory words of their president. But will their disapproval outweigh their fear of violent social unrest? Will age-old racial prejudices, often unspoken or even openly admitted, lead them to vote again for the deceptive security of an uncouth white tyrant?

A lot will depend on how hot this summer gets. If people think sensibly in November, it is hard to imagine that they will cast enough votes to keep this hair-raising government in power for another four years. But fear is the worst enemy of reason.<\/p>\n","contact":"marc1seed@yahoo.com","link":"www.freembtranslations.net","address":"","phone":"","parent_id":0,"mime_type":"text\/plain","summary":"A lot will depend on how hot this summer gets. If people think sensibly in November, it is hard to imagine that they will cast enough votes to keep this hair-raising government in power for another four years. But fear is the worst enemy of reason.","numcomment":2,"fileurl":"\/uploads\/","filesize":null,"article_url":"\/news\/2020\/06\/299393.php"},"attachments":[],"comments":[{"id":299696,"heading":"Social Security Works","article":"Donald Trump put Social Security and Medicare cuts in every single one of his budget proposals. Now he\u2019s holding giant rallies in the middle of a pandemic that\u2019s killing tens of thousands of seniors.\r\n\r\nNew polls show that he\u2019s down 10 points with voters 65+ and 22 points with women over 65.1 Older voters are taking notice of Trump\u2019s contempt for them\u2015and it\u2019s because of the work we\u2019ve done together!\r\n\r\nSocial Security Works and our members have been holding Trump accountable for his attacks on seniors since he was elected. Together, we\u2019re going to stop his attacks once and for all, and EXPAND, never cut, our Social Security system! Become a member of Social Security Works with a donation of $5 or more today!\r\nJOIN NOW\r\n\r\nTrump\u2019s latest obsession is defunding Social Security by attacking its dedicated funding. He calls it a \u201cpayroll tax cut\u201d but this is just his latest in a long line of attacks on seniors, and the programs they rely on.\r\n\r\nTrump spent his first year in office trying to destroy Medicare and Medicaid and replace them with Trumpcare, which would have devastated seniors in long-term care.\r\n\r\nTrump put a Big Pharma executive in charge of the Department of Health and Human Services\u2015the Cabinet position with the most control over lowering drug prices (or in this case, protecting drug company monopolies and bankrupting U.S. families).\r\n\r\nTrump\u2019s idea of fighting the pandemic, that\u2019s killing seniors by the tens-of-thousands, is to pretend it\u2019s over, even as cases are on the rise in 23 states!\r\n\r\nBecause of Trump\u2019s inaction on the pandemic, the war on seniors has a body count. It\u2019s up to us to hold him accountable! Become a member of Social Security Works today!\r\n\r\nThanks,\r\n\r\nAlex Lawson\r\nSocial Security Works \r\n_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________\r\n\r\nTrump insider says that the military will haul Trump out of the White House.\r\nhttps:\/\/youtu.be\/ySt7pkqCQBw","author":"marc","parent_id":299393,"mime_type":"text\/plain","created":"2020-06-13 16:39:56","modified":"2020-06-13 16:39:56","fileurl":""},{"id":299698,"heading":"BS","article":"FARCE-COV-2 :\r\n\r\nTHE CON-VID COUP\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nBY ALETH\r\n\r\nMarch 7 - June 13, 2020\r\n\r\n\r\nNO DEATH SPIKES IN ITALY !\r\n\r\nMSM state that there have been death spikes in Italy. There have not. It\u00b4s a huge lie spread by the national statistics center, directed by a fascist idiot with no mathematical competence whatsoever.\r\nhttps:\/\/www.corriere.it\/cronache\/20_maggio_04\/rapporto-istat-8fd5bbb4-8e05-11ea-b08e-d2743999949b.shtml?refresh_ce-cp\r\nhttps:\/\/www.epicentro.iss.it\/coronavirus\/pdf\/Rapporto_Istat_ISS.pdf\r\nRead please, the Nota metodologica towards the end :\r\n1. normally it takes ISTAT 10 months after the end of any given year to come up with definive statistical death data : this year for the first time in history, they have been allowed to spread death data in near-real time - a physical and mathematical impossibility.\r\n2. Allowing for this miracle for a moment, which makes no sense because local county offices are extremely slow here in reporting definitive data, as families take ages to communicate a death to them, and they themselves take ages to process the data and send it to Rome ; but anyway : out of 7904 counties in total in Italy, ISTAT has arbitrarily chosen only 6866 for their extrapolations, ELIMINATING FROM THE COUNT AS MANY AS 1038 COUNTIES WHERE THERE HAD BEEN A DECREMENT IN DEATHS !!! THAT is how they came up with the OVERALL spikes - by way of fraud !!! And also the local spikes at this point are extremely dubiously arrived at.\r\n3. They state clearly that their provisory data HAS NO STATISTICAL VALUE WHATSOEVER, pending further future elaboration and checks !\r\nSo do not fall into the trap of believing in data accuracy when in fact those alleged spikes are the same type of lie as with PCR tests etc., that we shall demonstrate below.\r\n\r\nhttps:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=xFwqArvB1IM\r\n\r\n\r\nA CRIMINAL MASTERPLAN\r\nhttp:\/\/www.centerforhealthsecurity.org\/event201\/recommendations.html\r\nhttps:\/\/futurism.com\/neoscope\/recent-simulation-coronavirus-killed-65-million-people\r\nNOVEMBER 2019 : GATES GIVES A GOOD INVESTMENT TIP TO HIS COHORT RAY DALIO OF BRIDGEWATER FUND, WHO PROCEEDS TO MAKE A HUGE SHORT-TERM SPECULATIVE INVESTMENT BASED ON PREDICTING A STOCK EXCHANGE CRASH FOR MARCH 2020 - JUST WHAT WOULD REALLY HAPPEN THEN DUE TO THE FAKE "COVID" PANDEMIA :\r\nhttp:\/\/www.lavocedellevoci.it\/2020\/03\/16\/pandemia-a-novembre-la-scommessa-da-1-miliardo-di-dollari-del-fondo-bridgewater\/\r\nhttps:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Bridgewater_Associates\r\nRemember how larry silverstein bought an insurance with lloyds covering terrorist attacks on his twin towers just before 911 ? Insider info it would appear.\r\nCapitalfascism can only function through the spreading of fear and terror : until roughly 2001, they massmurdered their own, like 911 or the Bologna station massacre in 1980 ; starting with the Sandy Hook school shooting hoax back in 2012, they changed of tack and have started using their total control of the massmedia, to make Humanity believe in false shooters, nonexistent islamist kamikazes, virtual neonazi attackers and the like - until now : the new fake enemy is a fake disease called "covid 19" (dress rehearsals for this new form of psyop had been sars end mers starting in 2003 - caused by viruses whose very existence is every bit as questionable as that of "sars-cov-2").\r\n\r\n\r\nGLOBAL POLICE STATE\r\n\r\n" Police and public health officials to have powers to detain people who may be infected\r\nKate Proctor\r\nPolice, public health and immigration officers will be able to detain people suspected of having coronavirus under new emergency powers rolled out by the government. \r\nThe new guidance would allow the officials to return people to where they have been asked to stay during the virus outbreak, believed to be in a bid to curb people leaving hospital early. They will also have the power to take people to screening and testing facilities. \r\nThe bill says: \u201cThese measures look to fill existing gaps in powers to ensure the screening and isolation of people who may be infected or contaminated with the virus and to ensure that constables can enforce health protection measures where necessary.\u201d \r\nThe bill says: \u201cThese measures look to fill existing gaps in powers to ensure the screening and isolation of people who may be infected or contaminated with the virus and to ensure that constables can enforce health protection measures where necessary.\u201d " :\r\n\r\nTHIS AMOUNTS TO FULL GESTAPOIZATION OF SOCIETY - NOT EVEN HITLER WENT THIS FAR WITH HIS OWN CITIZENS !!!!!!:\r\n\r\nhttps:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/politics\/live\/2020\/mar\/19\/uk-coronavirus-live-boris-johnson-london-lockdown-williamson-refuses-to-rule-out-government-putting-london-in-lockdown-by-weekend?page=with:block-5e735fb18f088d757559658f#block-5e735fb18f088d757559658f\r\n\r\n\r\nVAXIS OF EVIL\r\n\r\nHow could u.s. pharma gangsters announce as early as of March 2020, they already had both drug and vaccine against "covid 19" at the ready ? It normally takes years to develop new drugs and vaccines against a new disease - no guaranteed achievement to boot.\r\nTherefore it is mathematically certain that these same firms who are now claiming to have made drug and vaccine in 2 months, are those responsible for masterminding the "covid" hoax in the first place. They are going to sell governments snake oil bound to rot in state warehouses just like billions of anti-flu vaccines before - or worse, mandatory vax for all humanity. Some fear that, under the pretext of "covid", they are going to push a mandatory bar-code tattoo for all humanity.\r\nWhat are these firms so apparently able to develop drugs and vaccines at the speed of light ? \r\nThe first one is Moderna :\r\n\r\nhttps:\/\/www.corriere.it\/economia\/finanza\/20_febbraio_25\/coronavirus-vaccino-arrivo-usa-pronti-test-sull-uomo-f76b58b8-579d-11ea-a2d7-f1bec9902bd3.shtml?refresh_ce-cp\r\n\r\nNow who are the owners of Moderna ? The usual suspects - the financial usurers who control the world : first up is fund vanguard, founded by the late christonazi usurer john bogle, but these days controlled by judeonazis fink laurence and kapito robert of blackrock:\r\n\r\nhttps:\/\/money.cnn.com\/quote\/shareholders\/shareholders.html?symb=AVD&subView=institutional\r\nNext up is fidelity management, owned by the christonazi puritan dynasty of the johnsons, currently represented by johnson abigail ; third in line is blackrock itself, of judeonazis fink & kapito :\r\nneed I continue ? These criminals are the real spreaders !!! Of an utter hoax, that is - more proof will follow shortly.\r\n\r\nThe second lightning-speed drug maker is Gilead Sciences :\r\n\r\nhttps:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/world\/2020\/mar\/10\/hopes-rise-over-experimental-drugs-effectiveness-against-coronavirus\r\n\r\n" Gilead stressed that it was boosting production [of anticovid drug remdesivir] \u201cin anticipation of potential future needs\u201d before knowing whether the trial would show the drug to be safe and effective at treating patients with the virus " :\r\n\r\nNOW YOU TELL ME WHAT CAPITALIST CORPORATION WOULD BOOST PRODUCTION BEFORE RECEIVING SCIENTIFIC AND GOVERNMENTAL APPROVAL - RISKING TO LOSE BILLIONS ! THE ANSWER IS, GILEAD KNEW IN ADVANCE THAT REMDESIVIR WOULD BE TRUMPETED AS A SOLUTION TO THE FAKE PANDEMIC (AND THE OWNERS OF GILEAD SCIENCES ARE THE EXACT SAME AS THOSE FOR MODERNA : FINK & KAPITO OF BLACKROCK, THE JOHN BOGLE HEIRS, CAPITAL RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT OF CAPITALFASCIST LOVELACE DYNASTY CURRENTLY HEADED BY ROB LOVELACE, ETC. - BILDERBERG GALORE); "COVID" DOESN\u00b4T EVEN EXIST, AND THESE NEW DRUGS AND VACCINES ARE SNAKE OIL TO BE SOLD TO VASSAL GOVERNMENTS FOR A PROFIT, ONLY TO BE LEFT TO ROT IN SOME HEALTH MINISTRY BASEMENT AS IT HAPPENED ALREADY IN THE PAST - OR WORSE, TO BE MADE MANDATORY AND INOCULATED INTO ALL HUMANS WITH DEVASTATING HEALTH AND IMMUNITY DAMAGE.\r\n\r\nhttps:\/\/www.thewealthadvisor.com\/article\/19t-fund-giant-crazy-idea-about-investing\r\n\r\nhttps:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Jonathan_Bell_Lovelace\r\n\r\nTHESE DRUGS ARE EXTREMELY HEAVY IN SIDE EFFECTS, TO THE POINT OF LETHALITY FOR THE OLD WEAK AND IMMUNODEFICIENT : IT IS A CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY TO GIVE THEM TO PATIENTS IN THE NAME OF A FAKE VIRUS !!!!\r\n\r\nAs for Europe, the dominant vax player apperas to be astrazeneca, owned by the usual global fund usurers :\r\n\r\nhttps:\/\/www.corriere.it\/salute\/malattie_infettive\/cards\/guerra-vaccini-chi-vincera\/sfida-senza-precedenti_principale.shtml\r\nhttps:\/\/money.cnn.com\/quote\/shareholders\/shareholders.html?symb=AZN&subView=institutional\r\n\r\nREFUSE VACCINATION AGAINST A NONEXISTENT DISEASE !!!\r\n\r\n\r\nHUNTED DOWN SPIED ON TRANSHUMANIZED\r\n\r\nhttps:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/world\/2020\/mar\/17\/israel-to-track-mobile-phones-of-suspected-coronavirus-cases\r\n\r\nOne of the real main purposes of this giant global hoax it is, to force us all to accept individual tracking via smartphone\/apps of everybody\u00b4s every single movement and communication, under pretext of emergency legislation (unapproved by Parliaments that have been shut down) \r\nto fight the non-existent pandemic. Plus mandatory facial recognition and sanitary treatments for all but those in power, and the rest of the orwellian panoplia - a capitalfascist\u00b4s wet dream of total control come true.\r\n\r\n\r\nNO VIRUS NO DISEASE NO PANDEMIC\r\n\r\n\r\nhttps:\/\/www.nejm.org\/doi\/full\/10.1056\/NEJMoa2001017\r\nHere\u00b4s what biochemist David Rasnik has to say about the alleged "sars-cov-2" virus :\r\n" The electron microscopy images of the new coronavirus I was talking about were published in the New England Journal of Medicine 2019 (attached). I accept that coronaviruses that cause the common cold exist. I am not convinced that a new coronavirus causing Covid-19 has been purified or even really exists. Given the importance of this you\u2019d think the proof of existence would be easy to come by and be confirmed by independent labs around the world. \r\n\r\nZhu (2019) did TEM on cell culture supernatant (Fig. 3A), which looks very much like a coronavirus (see 100 nm reference bar, ideal for identification of the viral family, see attached file)\r\nFig. 3B shows particles inside a cell. This is the correct thing to do on primary lung tissue. (It\u2019s not clear this was the case, however. See below.) They should have used the same magnification as in 3A in order to identify the particles as virus, in particular, coronavirus. Instead, they used 1\u00b5m (1000nm) reference bar.\r\n\r\nThere are some things not quite clear in the paper. After close re-reading, It looks like the TEM photos, especially Fig. 3B, may not be of primary lung tissue from a patient. \r\nOn page 4 the authors say, "Virus isolation from clinical specimens was performed with airway epithelial cells and Vero E6 and Huh-7 cell lines.\u201d This raises the question of a possible artifact, along the lines of Robert Gallo\u00b4s viral isolation of HIV. They should have first done TEM directly on primary lung tissue to establish the presence of virus. Culturing virus is fine but its presence must be confirmed by TEM of primary lung tissue.\r\n\r\nIt is essential to take great pains to accurately identify and characterize any presumed infectious agent present in people with new symptoms. That's where TEM on primary tissue samples from the person with symptoms is essential. This can be followed by culturing the suspect agent in order to purify it and performing TEM again, this time on the cultured virus. As a control, you must also perform TEM on the cultured cells that you have not treated with the suspect virus to make sure a virus had not contaminated the cells. I do not trust experiments using cancer cell lines to culture \r\nvirus. Usually, animals that are susceptible are treated with the pure virus to study and confirm its pathology. \r\n\r\nOnce all the preliminary work is done, which could take up to a year or more, simpler detection methods can be employed so long has their accuracy has been confirmed using gold standards such as TEM. \r\n\r\nLook up Koch\u2019s postulates. "\r\n\r\n\r\nThe chinese stated in their report that they had isolated the new virus now called sars-cov-2, termed by them 2019-nCoV, by combining (how?) 2 sequencing methods called Illumina and Nanopore, both of which are highly biased and error-prone :\r\nhttps:\/\/www.nejm.org\/doi\/full\/10.1056\/NEJMoa2001017\r\nhttps:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Illumina_dye_sequencing\r\n" This piecemeal process allows scientists to see the complete sequence even though an unfragmented sequence was never run; however, because Illumina read lengths are not very long[11] (HiSeq sequencing can produce read lengths around 90 bp long[7]), it can be a struggle to resolve short tandem repeat areas.[7][10] Also, if the sequence is de novo and so a reference doesn't exist, repeated areas can cause a lot of difficulty in sequence assembly.[10] Additional difficulties include base substitutions (especially at the 3' end of reads[11]) by inaccurate polymerases, chimeric sequences, and PCR-bias, all of which can contribute to generating an incorrect sequence.[11] "\r\nhttps:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Nanopore_sequencing\r\n" Notably, theorists have shown that sequencing via exonuclease enzymes as described here is not feasible.[14] This is mainly due to diffusion related effects imposing a limit on the capture probability of each nucleotide as it is cleaved. This results in a significant probability that a nucleotide is either not captured before it diffuses into the bulk or captured out of order, and therefore is not properly sequenced by the nanopore, leading to insertion and deletion errors. Therefore, major changes are needed to this method before it can be considered a viable strategy.\r\nThe use of proteins in biological nanopore sequencing systems, despite the various benefits, also brings with it some negative characteristics. The sensitivity of the proteins in these systems to local environmental stress has a large impact on the longevity of the units, overall. One example is that a motor protein may only unzip samples with sufficient speed at a certain pH range while not operating fast enough outside of the range- this constraint impacts the functionality of the whole sequencing unit. Another example is that a transmembrane porin may only operate reliably for a certain number of runs before it breaks down. Both of these examples would have to be controlled for in the design of any viable biological nanopore system- something that may be difficult to achieve while keeping the costs of such a technology as low and as competitive, to other systems, as possible.[9]\r\nOne challenge for the 'exonuclease approach',[32] where a processive enzyme feeds individual bases, in the correct order, into the nanopore, is to integrate the exonuclease and the nanopore detection systems. In particular,[33] the problem is that when an exonuclease hydrolyzes the phosphodiester bonds between nucleotides in DNA, the subsequently released nucleotide is not necessarily guaranteed to directly move into, say, a nearby alpha-hemolysin nanopore. One idea is to attach the exonuclease to the nanopore, perhaps through biotinylation to the beta barrel hemolysin.[33] The central pore of the protein may be lined with charged residues arranged so that the positive and negative charges appear on opposite sides of the pore. However, this mechanism is primarily discriminatory and does not constitute a mechanism to guide nucleotides down some particular path. "\r\nhttps:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/De_novo_sequence_assemblers\r\n" Reads from second generation technologies (called short read technologies) like Illumina are typically short (with lengths of the order of 50-200 base pairs) and have error rates of around 0.5-2%, with the errors chiefly being substitution errors. However, reads from third generation technologies like PacBio and fourth generation technologies like Oxford Nanopore (called long read technologies) are longer with read lengths typically in the thousands or tens of thousands and have much higher error rates of around 10-20% with errors being chiefly insertions and deletions."\r\n\r\n https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-020-2012-7\r\n"The association between 2019-nCoV and the disease has not been verified by animal experiments to fulfil the Koch\u2019s postulates to establish a causative relationship between a microorganism and a disease."\r\n"No statistical methods were used to predetermine sample size. The experiments were not randomized and the investigators were not blinded to allocation during experiments and outcome assessment."\r\n\r\nThe german counterparts of these chinese swindlers are no less subservient to bill gates and big pharma, substituting swindle for real science :\r\n\r\nhttps:\/\/www.corriere.it\/esteri\/20_giugno_01\/coronavirus-germania-virologo-star-bufera-l-accusa-stampa-asservito-politica-5e3bb63a-a403-11ea-b19d-c124828d4b5b.shtml\r\nhttps:\/\/www.bild.de\/politik\/inland\/politik-inland\/fragwuerdige-methoden-drosten-studie-ueber-ansteckende-kinder-grob-falsch-70862170.bild.html\r\n\r\n\r\nTHERE IS NO SARS-COV-2 VIRUS THERE IS NO COVID 19 DISEASE THERE IS NO EPIDEMIC THERE IS NO PANDEMIC IT\u00b4S ALL ONE PHARMANAZI HOAX FOR PROFIT MASTERMINDED BY CRIMINALS AGAINST HUMANITY BILL GATES LAURENCE FINK RAY DALIO AND THE REST OF THEM BILDERBERG THUGS DO NOT GET TESTED FOR COVID DO NOT WEAR MASKS DO NOT DOWNLOAD TRACING APPS SPREAD TRUE SCIENCE AND FIGHT BACK !!!!!!!!!!!!\r\n\r\nhttps:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=xFwqArvB1IM\r\nhttps:\/\/la.indymedia.org\/news\/2020\/05\/299352.php\r\nhttp:\/\/theinfectiousmyth.com\/coronavirus\/AntibodyTestingForCOVID.pdf https:\/\/twitter.com\/DavidRCrowe \r\nhttps:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=NYr2jJf-zZ0&t=187s https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=oWBRNwoUqFY&t=8s https:\/\/blog.nomorefakenews.com\/2018\/04\/04\/the-gold-standard-of-medical-tests-is-fake\/ \r\nhttps:\/\/theinfectiousmyth.com\/book\/CoronavirusPanic.pdf \r\nhttps:\/\/twitter.com\/DavidRCrowe https:\/\/theinfectiousmyth.com\/coronavirus\/EvidenceExistenceCOVID19Corbett.pdf \r\nhttps:\/\/theinfectiousmyth.com\/coronavirus\/RT-PCR_Test_Issues.php \r\nhttps:\/\/lockdownsceptics.org\/the-incredible-and-scary-truth-about-covid-19-tests-2\/\r\nhttps:\/\/twitter.com\/InfectiousMyth\/status\/1250138967799779328 \r\nhttps:\/\/www.projectveritas.com\/ \r\nhttps:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=o7A_cMpKm6w&t=5s https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=yaOvva72b7o \r\nhttps:\/\/uncoverdc.com\/2020\/04\/07\/was-the-covid-19-test-meant-to-detect-a-virus\/ https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=xFwqArvB1IM\r\nhttps:\/\/www.corriere.it\/esteri\/20_giugno_01\/coronavirus-germania-virologo-star-bufera-l-accusa-stampa-asservito-politica-5e3bb63a-a403-11ea-b19d-c124828d4b5b.shtml\r\n\r\n\r\nTESTING THE TESTS\r\n\r\n\r\nPCR TESTING IS NOT INTENDED FOR DIAGNOSTIC USE, AS BIG PHARMA ROCHE MANUFACTURER ITSELF STATES :\r\n" The LightCycler\u00ae 480 Instrument is\r\nnot intended for use in diagnostic procedures. " :\r\nhttp:\/\/icob.sinica.edu.tw\/pubweb\/bio-chem\/Core%20Facilities\/Data\/R401-core\/LightCycler480%20II_Manual_V1.5.pdf\r\np.11.\r\nAND YET ON SUCH NONDIAGNOSING TESTING, THE WHOLE DIAGNOSIS CIRCUS AND INFECTED-COUNT IS BEING BASED !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!\r\nIT\u00b4S A TOTAL FRAUD !!!!!!!!!!!!!!\r\nSee for instance this ludicrous pseudoscientific report claiming to have detected sars-cov-2 in tears, by using lightcycler 480 :\r\nhttps:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full\/10.1002\/jmv.25725\r\n"ran the PCR reaction using the Roche LightCycler\u00ae 480 (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). After instantaneous centrifugation for 40 cycles, the PCR was completed in about 85 minutes; thereafter, we checked the amplification curves to judge whether the results were negative or positive." !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!\r\nThe pseudoscientists in this pseudostudy admitted to not having isolated the virus in tears, so WTF are they ranting about ??? :\r\n" However, the virus was not successfully isolated and cultured in the conjunctival secretion of the patient." !!!!!!!!!!!!!\r\nAn italian team after this, claimed to have isolated the virus and cultured it, but without performing electron microscopy on it, so how did they know what TYPE of virus it was in those tears ?\r\nhttps:\/\/www.acpjournals.org\/doi\/10.7326\/M20-1176\r\nAgain they relied on PCR - unsuited for diagnostic purposes as roche manufacturer itself clearly states. Furthermore, the italians cultured the alleged virus using vero cells and not primary lung tissue from patien biopsy, so let us remind them what it is to do science in David Rasnick\u00b4s wording again :\r\n"Virus isolation from clinical specimens was performed with airway epithelial cells and Vero E6 and Huh-7 cell lines.\u201d This raises the question of a possible artifact, along the lines of Robert Gallo\u00b4s viral isolation of HIV. They should have first done TEM directly on primary lung tissue to establish the presence of virus. Culturing virus is fine but its presence must be confirmed by TEM of primary lung tissue.\r\nIt is essential to take great pains to accurately identify and characterize any presumed infectious agent present in people with new symptoms. That's where TEM on primary tissue samples from the person with symptoms is essential. This can be followed by culturing the suspect agent in order to purify it and performing TEM again, this time on the cultured virus. As a control, you must also perform TEM on the cultured cells that you have not treated with the suspect virus to make sure a virus had not contaminated the cells. I do not trust experiments using cancer cell lines to culture \r\nvirus. Usually, animals that are susceptible are treated with the pure virus to study and confirm its pathology. \r\nOnce all the preliminary work is done, which could take up to a year or more, simpler detection methods can be employed so long has their accuracy has been confirmed using gold standards such as TEM. \r\nLook up Koch\u2019s postulates. "\r\n\r\nNext we examine a southkorean report claiming to have isolated sars cov 2 and performed TEM on cells inoculated with it : \r\nhttps:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pmc\/articles\/PMC7045880\/\r\nThey show TEM pics purported to detect coronavirus-like morphology : but how do they know the pics are of this alleged new virus and not of another X corona ? How can we be sure what those black dots are ? And then again, the southkoreans based their diagnosis on PCR - a test unsuited for diagnostic purposes ! And they sequenced the alleged full genome of this alleged new coronavirus, by using the miseq illumina system which states in its package insert :\r\n"Solo a uso di ricerca. Non usare in procedimenti diagnostici."\r\n" For research purposes alone. Do not use in diagnostic procedures." !!!\r\nhttps:\/\/www.illumina.com\/content\/dam\/illumina-marketing\/documents\/products\/datasheets\/miseq-data-sheet-770-2011-001-translations\/miseq-specification-sheet-770-2011-001-ita.pdf\r\n\r\nhttps:\/\/uncoverdc.com\/2020\/04\/07\/was-the-covid-19-test-meant-to-detect-a-virus\/\r\n" Dr. Mullis wrote, on May 7, 2013:\u201cPCR detects a very small segment of the nucleic acid which is part of a virus itself. The specific fragment detected is determined by the somewhat arbitrary choice of DNA primers used which become the ends of the amplified fragment. \u201c\r\n\r\nNo, there is no such thing as a special test for the alleged "covid 19". Covid 19 is the official name they gave this alleged disease. The name for the virus is sars-cov-2. Now, if a virus is inside your body, it does NOT necessarily imply that you are sick. Just that you are "positive" to that particular virus. So : you might be sars-cov-2- positive, but still not have the disease covid 19 : not be sick. \r\nOk ? This is a very important difference, never forget it . Now : nobody has given us any solid evidence that this alleged new type of coronavirus, sars-cov-2, really exists. And there is no evidence that, IF it exists, it is the cause of the alleged disease called covid 19. What you hear from the massmedia is only lies : in the world of true science, it takes over a year to confirm the existence of a new virus, and its pathogenicity, that is to say, the fact that it does cause a new disease. Now : there are 2 main types of tests that are believed (falsely) to detect a virus in your body : the first test is called RT-PCR, or just simply PCR ; the second test is called serological, as it analyzes the serum (a part of your blood) in search of antibodies revealing that you are being or have been exposed to a virus. Neither of these 2 tests is specific to any particular virus, though they might claim otherwise. Let me give you 2 examples from commercially available PCR tests being used these days , I shall quote from the labels, the company labels that come with these tests : - Abbott : "Positive results do not rule out bacterial infection or co-infection with other viruses...Due to the high sensitivity of the assays run on the instrument, contamination of the work area with previous positive samples may cause false positive results" ; - Accula : " Cross-reactivity with respiratory tract organisms other than those listed in the Analytical Specificity Study may lead to erroneous results\u2026" : what they are saying is : we cannot guarantee through our test that you are positive to sars-cov-2 because our test may confuse sars-cov-2 with everything else, any other kind of RNA in your cells or other things !!! It\u00b4s a hoax, it\u00b4s a swindle, it is global pharma nazism to terrorize us all into buying their useless and harmful vaccines and drugs and face masks and disinfectants that will only cause one allergies and poisonings, and accept total control of our lives, contact tracing etc., under the false pretext of a pandemic that does NOT exist. \r\n\r\nhttps:\/\/uncoverdc.com\/2020\/04\/07\/was-the-covid-19-test-meant-to-detect-a-virus\/\r\n" Dr. Mullis wrote, on May 7, 2013:\u201cPCR detects a very small segment of the nucleic acid which is part of a virus itself. The specific fragment detected is determined by the somewhat arbitrary choice of DNA primers used which become the ends of the amplified fragment. \u201c\r\n\r\nPCR testing for the alleged sars-cov-2 virus is fraudulent : here is evidence taken directly from genesig company\u00b4s RT-PCR package insert :\r\n" Interpretation of results must account for the possibility of false negative and false positive results.\r\n\u2022 False negative results may be caused by:\r\no Unsuitable collection, handling and\/or storage of samples.\r\no Sample outside of viraemic phase.\r\no Failure to follow procedures in this handbook.\r\no Use of unauthorised extraction kit or PCR platform.\r\n\u2022 False positive results may be caused by:\r\no Unsuitable handling of samples containing high concentration of SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA or positive control template.\r\no Unsuitable handling of amplified product.\r\n\u2022 All results should be interpreted by a health care professional in the context of patient medical history and clinical symptoms.\r\n\u2022 This test cannot rule out diseases caused by other pathogens.\r\n\u2022 A negative result for any PCR test does not conclusively rule out the possibility of infection. " :\r\nhttps:\/\/www.genesig.com\/assets\/files\/Path_COVID_19_CE_IVD_IFU_Issue_3.pdf?timestamp=1589212981\r\np.8\r\n\r\nKiss my ass ! DO NOT TAKE THIS TEST, PCR IS NOT A DIAGNOSTIC TOOL !!!\r\n\r\n\r\nhttps:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Hybridization_probe\r\n"Detection of sequences with moderate or high similarity depends on how stringent the hybridization conditions were applied\u2014high stringency, such as high hybridization temperature and low salt in hybridization buffers, permits only hybridization between nucleic acid sequences that are highly similar, whereas low stringency, such as lower temperature and high salt, allows hybridization when the sequences are less similar."\r\nhttps:\/\/www.future-science.com\/doi\/abs\/10.2144\/01315dd03\r\nhttps:\/\/www.gene-quantification.de\/SIAL-qPCR-Technical-Guide.pdf\r\nNow highly similar is NOT identical : and since the genome of other known coronaviruses such as especially NL63 causing some 10% of the common cold is highly similar to the alleged, artificially made up genome of this purported "sars-cov-2", a PCR test at best risks branding you positive to covid when in fact all you have is a cold or some other respiratory infection caused by other known coronas. DO NOT SUBMIT TO COVID TESTING !!!!!!!!!!!\r\nPCR is unreliable when it comes to covid testing : from the package inserts of some PCR test kits in use :\r\nAbbott RealTime SARS-CoV-2 : The impacts of vaccines, antiviral therapeutics, antibiotics, chemotherapeutic or immunosuppressant drugs [on the performance of this test] have not been evaluated\u2026 Due to the high sensitivity of the assays run on the instrument, contamination of the work area with previous positive samples may cause false positive results.\r\nAccula Test for SARS-CoV-2 : Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA may be affected by sample collection methods, patient factors (e.g., presence of symptoms), and\/or stage of infection\u2026 Cross-reactivity with respiratory tract organisms other than those listed in the Analytical Specificity Study may lead to erroneous results\u2026 Analyte targets (viral nucleic acid) may persist in vivo, independent of virus viability\u2026 contamination of the work area with previous samples may cause false positive results.\r\nForget about PCR for covid diagnostics : it is fraud. \r\nAsk yourselves whether or not this alleged disease exists at all to begin with.\r\nhttps:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Hybridization_probe\r\nhttps:\/\/www.future-science.com\/doi\/abs\/10.2144\/01315dd03\r\nhttps:\/\/www.gene-quantification.de\/SIAL-qPCR-Technical-Guide.pdf\r\nSimply put : if they perform qPCR testing by the probe method, they can easily skew it to make you test positive to any corona other than the alleged sars-cov-2.\r\nIf they perform qPCR on you by the dye method - the most commonly used as it\u00b4s way cheaper - then they won\u00b4t be able to tell a virus from another or from any type of nonviral RNA, because dye-based qPCR is NONspecific. qPCR = quantitative PCR :\r\n" Two common methods for the detection of PCR products in real-time PCR are (1) non-specific fluorescent dyes that intercalate with any double-stranded DNA and (2) sequence-specific DNA probes consisting of oligonucleotides that are labelled with a fluorescent reporter, which permits detection only after hybridization of the probe with its complementary sequence. " :\r\nhttps:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Real-time_polymerase_chain_reaction\r\nBriefly : PCR testing for covid is a fraud - DO NOT DO IT !!!\r\n\r\n\r\nANTIBODY TESTING AND THERAPY\r\n\r\nAntibody tests for the alleged virus sars-cov-2 and the relative alleged disease covid 19 are a fraud : what they do is, they produce a synthetic protein in their labs, called S protein because it is allegedly present in the spike of the sars-cov-2 coronavirus : this artificial protein is produced in the lab, according to formulas from genebanks which have never been independently and scientifically verified. So they then proceed to coat their test grid with this S protein, and expose it to serum or plasma : if there are antibodies, for whatever reason, in your serum or plasma, they will attack this S-protein, because the S-protein enters our cells by attaching itself to a substance called ACE2 receptor. So if we develop antibodies that attack these infected cells where the S protein has entered thru this door called ACE2, they\u00b4ll say that we are positive to covid 19 - to the alleged disease covid 19. Bu that\u00b4a a lie : because there are other types of known coronaviruses causing for instance some 15% or so of the common cold : and these common coronas, such as NL63, that have been around forever, also feature the S-protein in their spikes, and also use the ACE2 receptor in our cells to enter them.\r\nTherefore if you turn out to be positive to these fraudulent tests, it does NOT imply that you have or have had the alleged disease called covid 19 : you might have responded with antibodies that targeted S-1 because when you have had a cold, that\u00b4s what you do. In other words : antibody testing is a fraud, it\u00b4s totally artificial, it\u00b4s meant to stigmatize as many humans as possible and force them into treatment that is more harmful than what they might really have - often, a common cold. DO NOT GO FOR THESE TESTS, REFUSE TO BE SUBMITTED TO THESE FRAUDULENT, CRIMINAL ANTIBODY TESTING FOR AN ALLEGED VIRUS\/DISEASE THAT HAS NOT EVEN BEEN PROVEN TO EXIST IN THE FIRST PLACE.\r\nEven big pharma fraudsters such as the hoffman-family\u00b4s roche company, warn us that their sars-cov-2-antibody test is totally unreliable :\r\n" False positive results for the Elecsys Anti\u2011SARS\u2011CoV\u20112 assay may occur\r\ndue to cross reactivity from pre-existing antibodies or other possible\r\ncauses " :\r\nhttps:\/\/www.fda.gov\/media\/137605\/download\r\nhttps:\/\/fr.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Coronavirus\r\nhttp:\/\/theinfectiousmyth.com\/coronavirus\/AntibodyTestingForCOVID.pdf\r\nhttps:\/\/www.corriere.it\/salute\/malattie_infettive\/cards\/guerra-vaccini-chi-vincera\/sfida-senza-precedenti_principale.shtml?refresh_ce-cp\r\nhttps:\/\/www.corriere.it\/salute\/20_maggio_06\/plasma-curare-coronavirus-entusiasmi-polemiche-ma-non-abbiamo-ancora-evidenze-35c35864-8fdd-11ea-bb7f-d3d655d2211a.shtml\r\n\r\n\r\nhttps:\/\/www.foxnews.com\/science\/covid-cure-california-biopharmaceutical-coronavirus-antibody-breakthrough\r\nhttps:\/\/www.google.it\/search?ei=lmjCXsXgFICj1fAPgoGBuAo&q=adverse+side+effects+of+antibody+therapy&oq=adverse+side+effects+of+antibody+therapy&gs_lcp=CgZwc3ktYWIQAzoOCAAQ6gIQtAIQmgEQ5QI6BAgAEEM6BQgAEIMBOgIIADoECAAQCjoGCAAQFhAeOgQIABATOggIABAWEB4QEzoFCCEQoAE6BAghEBU6BwghEAoQoAE6CAghEBYQHRAeULLnAlilxwNgjdMDaAFwAHgAgAHCAYgB4B6SAQUyOS4xMZgBAKABAaoBB2d3cy13aXqwAQY&sclient=psy-ab&ved=0ahUKEwjFg4CDn73pAhWAURUIHYJAAKcQ4dUDCAs&uact=5#spf=1589799121932\r\n"In general, the more common side effects caused by monoclonal antibody drugs include:\r\nAllergic reactions, such as hives or itching.\r\nFlu-like signs and symptoms, including chills, fatigue, fever, and muscle aches and pains.\r\nNausea, vomiting.\r\nDiarrhea.\r\nSkin rashes.\r\nLow blood pressure."\r\n\r\nPlus worse, potentially lethal ones such as anaphylactic shock :\r\nhttps:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Monoclonal_antibody_therapy\r\n"However, the immune response to certain antigens may be inadequate, especially in the elderly. Additionally, adverse reactions from these antibodies may occur because of long-lasting response to antigens.[6] Passive monoclonal antibody therapy can ensure consistent antibody concentration, and can control for adverse reactions by stopping administration. However, the repeated administration and consequent higher cost for this therapy are major disadvantages.[6]"\r\n" Major problems associated with murine antibodies included reduced stimulation of cytotoxicity and the formation complexes after repeated administration, which resulted in mild allergic reactions and sometimes anaphylactic shock.[12]\r\nThese antibodies suggested as therapy are not natural, they are synthesized in the lab, by mixing human, animal and synthetic sections ; and bear in mind that the spike protein of the new alleged coronavirus sars-cov-2 that these pharma usurers are experimenting with, is also lab-made and not extracted from infected samples ! Lab-made according to a formula registered by the chinese into genebank, a global genomic database, that nobody has verified conclusively so far in the real world.\r\n\r\n\r\nANTIBODY TESTING\r\nHere\u00b4s what doctor David Rasnick said about these proliferating antiboy tests :\r\nmainstream media are making a big deal about new tests targeting specific antibodies, that is sars-cov-2-antigen-specific antibodies : aside from the danger of cross-reactivity, generally speaking, is each antibody specific and unique for each antigen ? Does each virus type produce specific and unique antigens ?\r\n\r\n" Each virus produces antigens common to the family of viruses, and antigens common to the strain of virus. Viruses (especially RNA viruses) produce different antigens every time they replicate.\r\n\r\nYour body produces about one trillion B-cells producing a trillion different antibodies. The trillion different antibodies attach to a protein antigen (most antigens are proteins) strongly (highly specific), moderately or slightly (non-specifically), and the overwhelming majority not at all. The range of these antibodies are called polyclonal antibodies. \r\nTruly specific antigen-antibody reactions exist only in the laboratory\u2014the so-called mono-clonal antibodies. "\r\n\r\nIs there a danger there, that these serological tests would detect antibodies to antigens from common coronaviruses, and this might be sold for sars-cov-2 positivity ?\r\n\r\n"The antibody tests always show a range of binding between viral test antigens and a person\u2019s polyclonal antibodies. As with the HIV antibody tests, there is an arbitrary cut-off point of antibody-antigen reaction intensity, above the point is positive and below is negative. \r\nThere are over 80 documented ways a person who has never been exposed to HIV can have a positive result on the HIV antibody tests. This is true for any virus."\r\n\r\nhttps:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Monoclonal_antibody\r\nhttps:\/\/www.creative-diagnostics.com\/news-sars-cov-2-antigens-and-antibodies-79.htm\r\nhttps:\/\/www.thelancet.com\/journals\/lancet\/article\/PIIS0140-6736(20)30788-1\/fulltext\r\nhttps:\/\/www.medrxiv.org\/content\/10.1101\/2020.03.18.20038059v1.full.pdf\r\n\r\nAntibody testing is fraud : from the package insert of one of these bogus test kits : https:\/\/www.assaygenie.com\/covid-19-rapid-poc-test\/ " Results from antibody testing should not be used as the sole basis to diagnose or exclude SARS-CoV-2 infection or to inform infection status. Positive results may be due to past or present infection with non-SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus strains, such as coronavirus HKU1, NL63, OC43, or 229E." : you\u00b4ll test positive even if you have a common cold ! and they will kill you with heavy treatment, quarantine etc. \r\nDO NOT GO FOR IT !!!!!!!!!!!!!\r\n\r\nAntibody testing is unreliable, total fraud - this according to the WHO itself :\r\n" Antibody detection tests targeting COVID-19 may also cross-react with other pathogens, including other human coronaviruses.\r\nBased on current data, WHO does not recommend the use of antibody-detecting rapid diagnostic tests for patient care " :\r\nhttps:\/\/www.who.int\/news-room\/commentaries\/detail\/advice-on-the-use-of-point-of-care-immunodiagnostic-tests-for-covid-19\r\n\r\nAntibody tests for this alleged sars-cov-2 virus whose very existence and pathogenicity nobody has proven so far, are a fraud : the alleged spike protein that is supposed to detect antibody response\r\nand thus confirm covid diagnoses is NOT a real protein extracted from live samples of patients : it is a synthetic lab product, made according to a genome formula that was completely made up arbitrarily. So assuming that antibody response to this synthetic lab spike protein, is elicited in the serum or plasma sample, it does NOT mean a patient was infected with any real virus at all - just that his finger prick or serum etc., reacted to an artificial protein thrown into the sample by the tester, not to an alleged virus that does NOT repeat NOT even provably exist :\r\n" Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)\r\nWe used a novel ELISA. Recombinant SARS-CoV-2 trimeric spike protein was constructed,\r\ntagged and purified. Immunoplates coated with StrepMAB-Classic were used to capture\r\ntagged soluble trimeric SARS-CoV-2 trimeric S protein and then incubated with test plasma.\r\nAntibody binding to the S protein was detected with ALP-conjugated anti-human IgG or antihuman\r\nIgM." :\r\nhttps:\/\/www.medrxiv.org\/content\/10.1101\/2020.04.15.20066407v1.full.pdf\r\nnotice how none of this crap has been peer-reviewed - and it never will, for it is absurd and a mockery of science.\r\n\r\nhttps:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pubmed\/32075877\r\nhttps:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pmc\/articles\/PMC7164637\/\r\n(artificial construction of S-protein from databank genome)\r\n\r\nhttps:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pmc\/articles\/PMC7094943\/\r\n(fan wu march 2020)\r\nhttps:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/nuccore\/MN908947\r\n(alleged genomic structure of sars-cov-2 on genebank)\r\nhttps:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Human_coronavirus_NL63\r\n(NL63 uses S-protein and ACE2 receptor to enter cells. just like the sars cov corona and the alleged sars cov 2, and is associated with kawasaki as they are now saying of sars cov 2...)\r\n\r\nTHERE IS NO SARS-COV-2 virus no covid disease no pandemic it\u00b4s all a pharmanazi hoax for profit :\r\n\r\nhttps:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=xFwqArvB1IM\r\nhttps:\/\/la.indymedia.org\/news\/2020\/05\/299370.php\r\nhttp:\/\/theinfectiousmyth.com\/coronavirus\/AntibodyTestingForCOVID.pdf https:\/\/twitter.com\/DavidRCrowe \r\nhttps:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=NYr2jJf-zZ0&t=187s https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=oWBRNwoUqFY&t=8s https:\/\/blog.nomorefakenews.com\/2018\/04\/04\/the-gold-standard-of-medical-tests-is-fake\/ \r\nhttps:\/\/theinfectiousmyth.com\/book\/CoronavirusPanic.pdf \r\nhttps:\/\/theinfectiousmyth.com\/coronavirus\/EvidenceExistenceCOVID19Corbett.pdf \r\nhttps:\/\/theinfectiousmyth.com\/coronavirus\/RT-PCR_Test_Issues.php \r\nhttps:\/\/lockdownsceptics.org\/the-incredible-and-scary-truth-about-covid-19-tests-2\/\r\n https:\/\/twitter.com\/InfectiousMyth\/status\/1250138967799779328 \r\nhttps:\/\/www.projectveritas.com\/ \r\nhttps:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=o7A_cMpKm6w&t=5s https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=yaOvva72b7o \r\nhttps:\/\/uncoverdc.com\/2020\/04\/07\/was-the-covid-19-test-meant-to-detect-a-virus\/ https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=Ygms5aBiQQ8\r\nhttps:\/\/www.regenbogenkreis.de\/blog\/gesundheit-und-ernaehrung\/coronavirus-inszenierte-panikmache\r\nhttps:\/\/www.nogeoingegneria.com\/uncategorized\/tempo-di-coronavirus-essere-critici-e-permesso\/\r\nhttps:\/\/www.wodarg.com\/\r\nhttps:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/32133832\/\r\nhttps:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=92pPKqGnt8k\r\n(google function on everybody\u00b4s smartphones : " notice of exposure to covid" : so if you don\u00b4t download their fucking tracing apps, they\u00b4ll trace you and control you and blackmail you anyway, under permanent threat of quarantine, isolation, lockdown, forced sanitary treatment, psychiatric ward if you resist etc. : THROW AWAY YOUR SMARTPHONE NOW !!! )\r\nhttps:\/\/www.ospfe.it\/area-comunicazione\/news\/dal-27-maggio-tampone-a-tutti-i-pazienti-in-attesa-di-ricovero\r\n(compulsory "covid"-test swab for all patients awaiting surgery : forced sanitary treatment : auschwitz : all of which, over an alleged disease that DOES NOTEXIST !!\r\nhttps:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=_v2XWuPY09M\r\nhttps:\/\/drive.google.com\/file\/d\/1S7xW72ahs7Guqo7JzzPFuI0P6wjg_j5r\/view\r\n\r\nBill gates and his lackeys the world over are trying to use this false pretext to turn us all into their transhumanistic robotic slaves : \r\nSAY NO TO THIS VAXIS OF EVIL !!!!\r\n\r\nhttp:\/\/www.lavocedellevoci.it\/2020\/05\/17\/microchip-per-tutti-la-nuova-democrazia-di-bill-gates-c\/\r\nhttps:\/\/oresundstartups.com\/biohax-international-teams-up-with-london-based-icon-capital-reverse\/\r\nhttps:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/technology\/2019\/nov\/08\/the-rise-of-microchipping-are-we-ready-for-technology-to-get-under-the-skin\r\nhttp:\/\/www.iskrae.eu\/piano-usa-controllo-militarizzato-della-popolazione\/\r\nhttps:\/\/www.sourcewatch.org\/index.php\/American_Medical_Association\r\nhttps:\/\/www.bibliotecapleyades.net\/sociopolitica\/esp_sociopol_brotherhood05.htm\r\nJune 13, 2020\r\n\r\nALETH\r\n","author":"there is NO pandemic !","parent_id":299393,"mime_type":"text\/plain","created":"2020-06-13 17:03:44","modified":"2020-06-13 17:03:44","fileurl":""}]}