RUDY THE ZERO
written august 2002, revised until june 2005
revised/updated september 2019
How does it feel to be a massmurdering regime terrorist, rudy ?
I am asking you because it´s much more likely than not that you are. Here´s why.
Louie Cacchioli, reportedly a firefighter with Engine 47 in Harlem on 911, witnessed this :
" We were the first ones in the second tower after the plane struck. I was taking firefighters up in the elevator to the 24th floor to get in position to evacuate workers. On the last trip up A BOMB WENT OFF. WE THINK THERE WAS BOMBS SET IN THE BUILDING " [my caps].
Interesting. An eye- and ear-witness account , published on September 12, 2001, therefore presumably collected early on the 12th or even possibly on the 11th. A fresh, expert, first-hand account.
" A BOMB WENT OFF. WE THINK THERE WAS BOMBS SET IN THE BUILDING. "
people.com, Sept.12, 2001 : " United in courage/New York City "
[this link went dead long ago - some time after I had published this essay...guess why...]
I´ll tell you why the original link to Cacchioli´s witness account went dead : because he himself retracted his bomb comment - whether spontaneously or not, is anyone´s guess...
So these days [september 2019] all you find on the web is his recantation :
(section "about me")
On September 12, 2001, Louie was heading to the WTC site to dig for survivors after only three hours of sleep when he was approached by a reporter from People magazine. The reporter was interested in what Louie had experienced the day before.
In an effort to describe what he saw and heard, Louie mentioned that there were loud noises inside the North Tower that “sounded like bombs going off.” There was some confusion over what Louie had tried to explain and he was misquoted as having said: “We were the first ones in the second tower after the plane struck. I was taking firefighters up in the elevator to the twenty-fourth-floor to get in position to evacuate civilians. On the last trip up a bomb went off. We think there was bombs set in the building.”
Conspiracy theorists then used that quote as proof that 9/11 was an “inside job.” Since then, Louie has repeatedly tried to set the record straight that he was misquoted. Louie even went so far as to cooperate with the editors of Popular Mechanics magazine and was interviewed for the book Debunking 9/11 Myths: Why Conspiracy Theories Can't Stand Up to the Facts (Hearst, 2006) " :
so, louie cacchioli has decided to become a liar and the umpteenth regime propaganda parrot.
But I read the original People mag quote and it said just what I quoted above : BOMBS SET IN THE BUILDING, BOMBS WENT OFF.
Was it you rudy by any chance, in your capacity as New York mayor, who supervised the planting of bombs in the WTC on behalf of your fellow terrorists bush & co. ?
Here´s a second bomb witness :
" Teresa Veliz, the facilities manager for a software development company, was on the 47th floor of the North Tower when Flight 11 [alleged Flight 11, my note] hit. [...] Veliz went down a staircase with a coworker [...] to the concourse level. [...] As the South Tower collapsed [...] in the pitch black, Veliz and her coworker followed someone carrying a flashlight. "
" The flashlight led us [...] out to Church Street. THERE WERE EXPLOSIONS GOING OFF EVERYWHERE. I WAS CONVINCED THAT THERE WERE BOMBS PLANTED ALL OVER THE PLACE AND SOMEONE WAS SITTING AT A CONTROL PANEL PUSHING DETONATOR BUTTONS. [...] I ENDED UP ON VESEY STREET. THERE WAS ANOTHER EXPLOSION. AND ANOTHER " [my caps].
Another ear-witness account. Another first-hand account.
" THERE WERE EXPLOSIONS GOING OFF EVERYWHERE. "
[This link has long since gone blank too, just like the cacchioli one above...guess why, guess who´s censoring and sabotaging critical thinking on the internet and everywhere else...].
The story is also to be found in the following book :
September 11 : an Oral History by Dean E. Murphy (Doubleday 2002), pp. 9-15: Tereza Veliz : A Prayer to Die Quickly and Painlessly ".
Both cacchioli´s (before his suspicious converting to the official story) and veliz´s original statements, and several other witnesses´ to bomb explosions, here :
According to author Chrisopher Bollyn, " in the basement of the collapsed towers, where the 47 central support columns connected with the bedrock, hot spots of ' literally molten steel ' were discovered more than a month after the collapse. Such persistent and intense residual heat, 70 feet below the surface, in an oxygen-starved environment, could explain how these crucial structural supports failed. "
' New seismic data refutes official explanation ', by Christopher Bollyn, here :
[Of course again, this link went dead long ago, killed by regime-terrorist censorship & sabotage, but the original article can be found here :
and here :
and elsewhere on the internet, it is widely available still as of september 2019.
" Peter Tully, president of Tully Construction of Flushing, N.Y., told AFP that he saw pools of
' literally molten steel ' at the WTC ". Tully consulted with another expert, Loizeaux, who said that the hot areas with the molten steel were found " at the bottom of the elevator shafts of the main towers, down seven [basement] levels ". [Loizeaux] said molten steel was also found at 7WTC, which collapsed mysteriously in the late afternoon ".
" Construction steel has an extremely high melting point of about 2800 degrees F. " It is disputed whether " kerosene-based jet fuel [...], paper, or the other combustibles normally found in the towers [...] generate the heat required to melt steel, especially in an oxygen-poor environment like a deep basement. " " [Experts say] that the maximum temperature that can be reached by hydrocarbons like jet fuel burning in air is 1,520 F. " That is, well below the 2,800 F necessary to melt steel.
Loizeaux, who´s an expert in controlled demolition, said : " If I were to bring the towers down, I would PUT EXPLOSIVES IN THE BASEMENT TO GET THE WEIGHT OF THE BUILDING TO HELP COLLAPSE THE STRUCTURES [my caps] " .
" While steel is often tested for evidence of explosions, despite numerous eyewitness reports of explosions in the towers, the engineers in the FEMA-sponsored building assessment did no steel tests ".
John Flaherty and Jared Israel at Emperors´ Clothes re-posted an article from the Albuquerque Journal where Van Romero, vice president for research at the New Mexico Institute for Mining and Technology, had spoken of explosives planted in the towers. Now Van Romero, just like louie cacchioli above, later recanted in a very unconvincing way. But in the original article, this expert on the effects of explosions on buildings had said :
" My opinion is, based on the videotapes, that [...] there were some explosive devices inside the buildings that caused the towers to collapse ". " Romero said the collapse of the structures resembled those of controlled implosions used to demolish old structures. " " It would be difficult for something from the plane to trigger an event like that ". " ' It could have been a relatively small amount of explosives placed in strategic points ', Romero said. The explosives likely would have been put in more than two points in each of the towers, he said. "
' In Curious Battle : An expert Recants on Why WTC Collapsed ', by John Flaherty and Jared Israel, Dec. 26, 2001.
[Miraculously, this particular link is still active as of 9.17.2019 - be quick and back it up on your desktop though !!!]
Original article from the ' Albuquerque Journal ' :
[This link has gone blank instead, as usual - this is the rule, not the exception with all serious free-thinking links on the web - talk about internet freedom !!!]
Summing it up so far :
the official story that the WTC steel beams gave way because of the intense jet fuel fire is based on absolutely NOTHING - especially since you, rudy, hurried and sold most of the evidence for scrap.
You destroyed the evidence - only reason for doing that can be, THAT YOU SUPERVISED THE PLANTING OF BOMBS INSIDE THE TWIN TOWERS AND WTC7 FOR THEIR CONTROLLED DEMOLITION.
YOU OUGHT TO BE ARRESTED ON CRIMINAL OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, DESTRUCTION OF EVIDENCE AND CO-CONSPIRING IN THE 911 ATTACKS.
Because, in the aftermath of 911, while you were mayor until January 2002, you systematically ordered all evidence such as steel beams, sold for scrap that might have yielded clues to the bombs.
By June 14, 2002, your successor & fellow terrorist bloomberg had almost finished "disappearing" all the twisted WTC steel stacked at the Fresh Kills landfill on Staten Island.
Congratulations. But - there is no such thing as the perfect crime.
Reportedly, quite a bit of the WTC structural steel survived your anxious, frantic trace-wiping policy, rudy. Over 100 beams and other samples were sent to a lab at Gathersburg, Md, to be studied by engineers. Unfortunately, only govt-appointed engineers so far. So, although you scrapped 100,000 tons of WTC steel and shipped it " to steel mills, mostly overseas, to be
recycled " ; and although most of that WTC steel has now been turned into refrigerators & cars, you didn´t manage to sell the whole truth for scrap rudy.
The Gathersburg bits & pieces didn´t save you from the outrage of " many victims´families who believe the steel should have been examined more thoroughly [before shipping it] ".
No AA77, no planes, nothing at all struck the pentagon on 911. It was controlled demolition.
Ditto for twin towers and wtc7. The video purporting to show ua175 smashing into the second tower is a gross and ludicrous fake, as Scott Loughrey found out first in early 2004. Nothing hit nothing on 911. It was all about controlled demolition.
At Fresh Kills, the us department of agriculture used "fireworks to keep thousands of seagulls and about 50 turkey vultures from scavenging the site. "
They ought to have used fireworks to keep you too, rudy, & your regime-terrorist vultures from scavenging the site to remove evidence for the explosions that brought down twin towers and wtc7.
Just have one more cancer & die.
september 20, 2019 revised/updated edition
I argue that the U.S. establishment has been inflating the 9-11 death toll wildly for warmongering purposes.
Oct.19, 2002 version, revised september 25, 2019.
First version written september 24, 2001.
Charles v. campisi, chief of the New York police department´s internal affairs bureau:
you've raised more dead in 1 year than Jesus ever did in 3.
On Oct.7, 2002 you reported an ever-so-slowly-slimming-down total of 2,797 WTC victims, deep down from your September 24, 2001 high of nearly 7,000.
- 1,411 death certificates have been issued, reportedly, by the medical examiner's office: that is, 1,411 victims have been reportedly identified, having been found whole or fragmented; are any of the alleged AA11 + UA175 victims among the 1411 allegedly identified? It's high time you let humanity know, so we could better assess the plausibility of the official story that AA11 + UA175 with 92+65=157 people on board crashed into the WTC;
- 1,327 death certificates have reportedly been issued without a body, reportedly at the request of victims' families;
- 59 people are reportedly missing.
(See the Associated Press web site for figure updates. They make it harder and harder to find data, as their special contribution to the general obfuscation/falsification, but if one seeks hard enough one will find.)
Summing up: according to you, campisi, as reported by the associated press on Oct.7, 2002, 17:38 ET ("Official Count of Sept.11 Victims"):
1,411 + 1,327 + 59 = 2,797 people died at the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001.
Adding the 184 alleged Pentagon victims + the 40 alleged Pennsylvania victims, the Sept.11 victims total would be 3,021.
As of Oct.7, 2002. The official figures exclude the alleged "19 hijackers".
Readers will soon realize from this essay why a critical thinker may only speak of ALLEGED WTC dead, ALLEGED Pentagon dead, ALLEGED UA93 dead.
The vast majority of the 911 dead has, to date (Oct.19, 2002), NOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLY CONFIRMED.
The official 3,021 total for the victims of 911 is by no means the final death toll. Here's some additional evidence.
First, how come the AP database of 911 victims has a total of 2,999 (Oct.7, 2002, 8:37:47 EDT), not your 3,021, campisi.
How come this difference of 22 victims?
If official Bush spokesparrots like you, campisi, and the AP can't even agree with each other, what is one to think of the reliability of your figures?
Second: according to the AP, Feb.8, 2002, 18:12 ET, "The toll is likely to drop slightly as investigators make changes." That's because your cops, campisi, are hypermeticulous. Or maybe because they're under orders to go as slow as it gets? Why haven't you brought the matter to closure yet after OVER 1 ENTIRE YEAR?
Third, "seven foreign countries still need to confirm their missing-persons lists, which could cause the death toll to drop." Who are those seven "snails"? You're in no hurry to push them, right campisi? AFTER OVER 1 ENTIRE YEAR!
According to your own data, campisi:
1,411 alleged identified dead + 1,327 alleged declared dead by a death certificate = 2,738 "confirmed" alleged WTC dead.
It is NOT correct/logical to add the alleged "59 missing" to the WTC victims total, as campisi does (that´s how he gets his total of "2,797": 2,738 confirmed dead + 59 missing = 2,797).
It is not correct because you yourself, campisi, have said, as reported by the associated press, March 7, 20:33 ET, that:
- of the "158" (then) allegedly still missing, only "SOME …[ARE] ALMOST CERTAINLY DEAD [my caps]";
but: "SOME [ARE] PERHAPS MISTAKENLY ON THE LIST [ my caps]";
and: "SOME [ARE] POSSIBLY TRYING TO FAKE THEIR DEATHS [my caps]".
"The police department ESTIMATES AT LEAST 60 PERCENT OF THE 158 STILL CLASSIFIED AS MISSING DID DIE… WHILE THE REST REQUIRE FURTHER INVESTIGATION [caps mine]."
That's to say, you campisi have no proof yet (after over 1 year!) allowing you to classify those "59" missing as victims.
So why did you add them to the Sept.11 "official count" of WTC victims - if not to artificially inflate that count?
Putting it simply: your "official count" is (at least in part) a lie, campisi. Because it includes "59 missing" of whom you yourself said that a big chunk may be mistakes or fakers, and you only "estimate" that the rest did die but you can't prove it.
That you, campisi, and your former slavemaster giuliani have been lying for 13 months about the difficulties of culling the WTC victims list is further attested to by an Oct.8, 2002, 04:25 ET Associated Press report (‘WTC Death Toll Drops Below 2,800', by Sara Klugler):
just one little example among many: Nickola Lampley, who "was removed [from the WTC missing list] after a reporter for The Associated Press tracked her down by phone in Brooklyn" on Sept.11, 2002. But you, campisi, had not managed to accomplish this extraordinary feat of picking up the phone book & dialing Nickola Lampley's number FOR AN ENTIRE YEAR!! "POLICE COULD NOT LOCATE HER"!!!
WHO DO YOU THINK YOU ARE FOOLING CAMPISI – YOU STUPID FUCKIN' FEET-DRAGGIN' BUSHIITE MOTHERFUCKER!!!
Another telltale indicator that your alleged WTC victims total of "2,797" is inflated, has recently surfaced in the associated press, Aug.23, 2002, 07:44 ET (" Few Sept.11 Families Apply for Aid "):
ONLY 662 SEPT.11 VICTIMS FAMILIES HAD APPLIED TO THE FEDERAL VICTIMS COMPENSATION FUND BY AUG. 23, 2002 (CLOSE TO 1 YEAR AFTER)!
AND SINCE WE'RE TALKING A MILLION BUCKS PER FAMILY, IT'S HIGHLY DOUBTFUL THAT THE OTHER ALLEGED 2,359 (3,021 - 662) SEPT.11 VICTIMS FAMILIES (THAT IS THE VAST MAJORITY) WOULDN'T HAVE APPLIED!
Don't you think, campisi?
Again: the alleged (provisory) confirmed WTC total is 2,738. 2,738, NOT "2,797"!
Plus Pentagon + Pennsylvania: 2,738 + 184 + 40 = 2,962 alleged Sept.11 dead.
2,962 "confirmed" alleged Sept.11 victims - NOT 3,021 (the AP-reported "official count" as of Oct.7, 2002, 17:38 ET).
And if and when you'll come up with proof that the "59 missing" are really dead, I'll add them to the alleged total. NOT NOW!
Furthermore, even that other official spokesparrot, medical examiner spokeswoman Ellen Borakove, cautioned (AP, Aug.20, 2002 7:35 ET: " WTC Victim Toll Lowered by Four ", by Sara Kugler) that the list of 2,819 WTC victims she gave to City Hall to be read aloud by a bunch of liars at the Sept.11 memorial "WASN'T BEING CALLED THE FINAL NUMBER" [my caps].
As a matter of fact, from Aug. 20 to Sept.11 (3 weeks) the WTC total slimmed down by 18, to 2,801. And as of Oct.7, 2002 it stood at 2,797.
And there is no end in sight.
And there is no way to independently verify if all of the 3,021 official 911 victims are really dead or not.
Lists for the Pentagon are only partial. No complete list of the 184 alleged Pentagon victims has been published so far to my knowledge. Why?
The 40 alleged UA93 (Pennsylvania) victims become 33 in the CNN list (http://www.CNN.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/ua93.victims.html ): why? Where's the other 7?
Where are the 4 original flight manifests for the 4 planes? Why haven't they been published integrally, AFTER OVER 1 YEAR?
HOW IS HUMANITY TO VERIFY IF THE 184 ALLEGED PENTAGON VICTIMS, THE 40 ALLEGED UA93 VICTIMS AND THE 2,797 ALLEGED WTC VICTIMS ARE REALLY DEAD?
ESPECIALLY SINCE NO SERIOUS, INDEPENDENT INQUIRY HAS BEEN SET UP YET?
Eric Lipton on The New York Times (http://www.nytimes.com/2002/09/11/nationchallenged/11EXAM.html ) confirmed on Sept.11, 2002 that "in New York, a year after the attack, the culling of the list is still not complete."
And Lipton reports that "THERE ARE STILL 35 TO 40 PEOPLE ON THE LIST OF THE MISSING WHOSE NAMES MIGHT BE REMOVED FROM THE FINAL COUNT ALTOGETHER".
Wonder how much longer it´ll take you, campisi, to remove those 35/40 from your list.
You said you could not prove that they were not killed. But the official count must include only those you CAN prove to have been killed.
The others about whom you're uncertain should be given as a separate category, otherwise your "2,797" official WTC count is a lie, because it gives the false impression that you´re certain each and every one of those 2,797 really died. Which you are not.
Ongoing fabrication of inflated numbers to keep the hatred high for warmongering purposes - that's what you are all about, campisi.
So the PROVISORY confirmed official total is 2,962 as of Oct.7, 2002. THAT IS, UNLESS EVEN THE IDENTIFIED-VICTIMS AND CERTIFIED-DEAD-WITHOUT-A-BODY TOTALS HAVE BEEN TAMPERED WITH/FALSIFIED/INFLATED. AIN´T NOTHING ONE SHOULD NOT BE SKEPTICAL ABOUT WITH PROFESSIONAL LIARS THE LIKES OF YOU.
As early as late October 2001, everyone else who conducted an independent count of WTC victims, from USA Today to the New York Times to the Red Cross and the associated press, had come up with victims totals under 3,000 (International Herald Tribune, October 26,2001, p.3), while you were still touting close to 4,800 dead.
Your WTC totals, campisi, which are the only ones most people have been fed by the mass media, have as-slowly-as-possible slimmed down from a sensational ´nearly 7,000´ in late September (full-blown headlines) to the much less than 3,000 of today (no headlines).
Sloppy work at best. Yet most effective in brainwashing worldwide TV-fed public opinion into believing the lie of 5 or 6 thousand Sept.11 dead.
WHY ON EARTH DID IT TAKE THE PRESS AND THE RED CROSS ONLY 6 WEEKS TO GET DOWN TO THE SAME WTC TOTAL YOU CAMPISI & YOUR THUGS EMPLOYED MONTHS TO GET AT - AND YOU AREN´T EVEN FINISHED YET?
Once more: according to you, campisi, the total confirmed death toll of September 11 at all three sites (New York, Pentagon, Pennsylvania) would be 2,962 by now.
WHY HAVEN'T YOU RELEASED A VERIFIABLE LIST OF NAMES FOR ALL VICTIMS? BY THAT I DO NOT MEAN PLAQUES ON A WALL - I MEAN A WRITTEN LIST CONTAINING ALL IDENTIFICATION DATA/RECORDS: SOMETHING A FUTURE SERIOUS INQUIRY COULD CROSSCHECK!
AND WHY HAVEN'T YOU GIVEN NEWS ORGANIZATIONS ACCESS TO YOUR FULL, VERIFIABLE LIST OF VICTIMS?
JUST HOW RELIABLE IS YOUR LIST?
JUST HOW RELIABLE ARE YOU?
LET NOONE BE FOOLED BY THE RECENTLY (AUGUST 2002) RELEASED (AND DECLAREDLY PROVISORY) "MEDICAL EXAMINER'S" LIST OF 2,819 WTC VICTIMS!
NOT EVEN THE NEW YORK TIMES COULD VERIFY IT: "THE NAMES RELEASED […] COULD NOT BE VERIFIED INDEPENDENTLY AFTER THEY WERE PROVIDED TO NEWS ORGANIZATIONS" (The New York Times, Aug.20, 2002: ‘City Compiles List of Dead and Missing From Sept.11', by Thomas J. Lueck,
At least you and your former slavemaster and co-liar giuliani have been faintly whispering (though not always, not nearly enough) from the beginning that your figures were in a state of flux due to "duplications"/"errors" and were/are likely to drop further.
But the following liars are more than a match for you, as shown by a Nov.21, 2001 New York Times report:
Colin powell had the straightface to repeat the 5,000-dead lie in a Nov.19, 2001 Louisville speech, although you, campisi, had made officially known WEEKS earlier that the Sept.11 toll had dropped well below 5,000. Actually, by Nov.19, 2001 it stood at little over 4,000. You're busted colin, you spouter of lies.
The 2nd certified liar is general richard b. myers , chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, who during November 2001 briefings repeatedly bleated the "5,000" myth.
The 3rd certified liar is don imus, the radio talk show host, who topped everyone else by inventing "6,000" WTC dead on larry king live, saturday Nov.17, 2001.
The list is long. Too long. Longer than anyone can bear. Overblown casualty lists printed by massmedia whores will always "create a helpful wave of national indignation" - a time-honored dirty trick.
See, campisi, these are not trivialities, or morbid curiosity. How can bush possibly be waging a "proportionate" war (as he and blair driveled all over the media after Sept.11: see for example International Herald Tribune, Oct.6, 2001, p.1: "Blair…Calls for ´Proportionate´ Strikes"), if the death toll is still uncertain? How many people does bush have the right to murder back? 2,962 (your PROVISORY confirmed total)?
This "proportionate" war has long since become savagely disproportionate: in only 10 days in November 2001, 6,000 alleged Talibans and Qaidas were killed, according to U.S. and French experts (International Herald Tribune, November 19, 2001, p.8). If this is true, then the total death toll of over 11 months of war since Oct.7, 2001 is much higher than 6,000, considering:
- the fighters killed outside those 10 days;
- the refugees who starved and froze to death;
- the ever-increasing "unintended victims" (who amount to "certainly hundreds and perhaps thousands of innocent Afghans", according to the International Herald Tribune, Feb.11, 2002,p.1, continued on p.8; who amount to "at least 3,767 civilian casualties from Oct.7 to Dec.6", according to Marc Herold of New Hampshire University, as reported ibid.; who amount to "1,000 to 1,300 deaths" according to Carl Conetta of the Project on Defense Alternatives, as reported ibid.: that is, only until before Feb.11).
Maybe it's time to declassify your victims list, campisi - lest more and more unpatriots should start thinking you are a liar who's been fabricating inflated figures all along to whip Americans up into a war frenzy.
War ought to be the first casualty of the Truth.
September 25, 2019 revision of the october 19, 2002 version. I wrote the first version on September 24, 2001.
DEAD OR A LIE
AUGUST 15, 2007 VERSION
FIRST VERSION JULY 2005
REVISED SEPTEMBER 2019
Most of the official 2,996 September 11 victims never died in the 911 terror attacks - IF that is, they ever existed at all to begin with. Some of them were govterrorist agents who faked their own deaths.
Most of those 2,996 (roughly 2,300 of them) were fabricated by bush & his thugs in order to generate a bigger-than-Pearl-Harbor warmongering spin.
1. ALLEGED PLANES
So I picked up the phonebook.
With the purpose of verifying alleged-AA11 alleged victim " David Seima Aoyama ".
The alleged planes´ alleged occupants are the most suspect 911 victims of all.
The Naudet video purporting to show us American Airlines 11 striking WTC1, shows us nothing at all but a flying dot which when enlarged looks like a flying pig and nowhere near like a boeing, as the late great Rosalee Grable and Scott Loughrey proved long ago - there are GRAVE questions re the authenticity of that video.
Therefore AA11 is NOT identifiable as such in the naudet video - no evidence at all that AA11 ever struck WTC1 on 911. The naudet video might just be a fake.
Taking into account the likelihood that the handful of alleged WTC-planes eyewitnesses might as well be plants, including the "small-plane" ones, I proposed the nothing-hit-nothing idea :
THERE IS NO HARD EVIDENCE AT ALL THAT ANY FLYING OBJECT HIT EITHER THE WTC OR THE PENTAGON OR THE SHANKSVILLE HOLE.
IT WAS ALL AN INSIDE JOB VIA CONTROLLED DEMOLITION/BOMBS WITH THE FAKE PLANE-IMPACT VIDEOS MEANT TO FOOL THE GULLIBLE.
WE´VE BEEN FOOLED BY CARTOONS, AS THE VERY GREAT ROSALEE GRABLE APTLY PUT IT STARTING IN 2002 :
I´d only add to these great and conclusive videos, that positing drones or small planes or missiles hit the towers and the pentagon instead of the official boeings, is completely and utterly unfounded and unnecessary : it is much easier to fake videos than to hit such targets with any flying weapon and project holograms in the sky in real time - Occam´s razor really should give us pause here : nothing hit nothing on 911 : it was all real bombs planted inside the buildings for their controlled demolition - and fake videos for fooling humanity.
" DAVID SEIMA AOYAMA "
This alleged person is an alleged 911 victim : alleged passenger on alleged flight AA11 that allegedly hit the north tower of the WTC or WTC1.
Now if you entered David Seima Aoyama´s name in the social security death index, you got "no data found " as of October 1, 2005. That is to say, 4 years after 911, "Aoyama" was not on record as having died - or ever having lived at all for that matter. Absence from the ssdi is not per se, conclusive evidence that someone didn´t exist or didn´t die - but it surely gives one pause.
There is no evidence whatsoever that a David Seima Aoyama ever died a victim on 911 or that he was a real person to begin with. I cannot rule out either, that he is real, and faked his own death and is still alive .
Online obituaries, profiles, tributes and the like, tell us he was Japanese, 48, married with 2 children one of whom called Emily, a buddhist with cult SGI (Soka Gakkai International), either in the capacity of accountant, or itinerant missionary.
SGI USA is headquartered in Santa Monica, and Aoyama is reported as having been living in Culver City at the time of his alleged death, so I called SGI up ( 310 260 89 00 ) in 2005 and this is what happened.
I asked the operator whether she´d ever heard of him : she casually replied : " Yeah, the guy who was on that plane " - as if the only thing she knew about him was from the news !!
But when I asked whether or not Seima Aoyama had been working at SGI Santa Monica prior to his death as my sources said, she suddenly turned embarassed, hasty and anxiously put me through to someone else.
This next person was extremely suspicious of me and refused to reply to any of my questions.
So I called the Chicago Cultural Center because obituaries stated Aoyama had worked there prior to moving to Santa Monica. The operator had never heard of him. She connected me to a fellow Mr Amada or something, who again refused to reply to my questions and told me I had better call SGI Santa Monica !!!
These people are either under a gag order or whatever - the very mention of David Seima Aoyama scares them to death or annoys the hell out of them.
Now check this one out :
" Is Seima D Aoyama still alive or has Seima D Aoyama died? "
Yes, Seima is alive. "
DAVID SEIMA AOYAMA IS EITHER STILL ALIVE AND FAKED HIS OWN DEATH ON 911, OR THE TERRORIST US ESTABLISHMENT STOLE OR PURCHASED HIS ID IN ORDER TO FABRICATE A BUDDHIST 911 VICTIM PROFILE THAT WOULD SO MUCH MOVE THE AVERAGE NEW-AGER. OR HE IS AN ENTIRELY FABRICATED PERSON WHO NEVER EXISTED AT ALL.
ONE THING IS FOR SURE : HE NEVER DIED A VICTIM OF THE 911 ATTACKS BECAUSE AA11 NEVER EVER IMPACTED THE NORTH TOWER AND VERY LIKELY NEVER EVEN FLEW ON THAT DAY.
ANNA WILLIAMS ALLISON
Another alleged AA11 victim. Another " no data found " in the ssdi.
From her alleged obituaries I found out her husband´s name is or was Blake, and that she used to live in Stoneham Massachusetts at the time of her alleged death.
So I called up Blake Alllison and he hung up on me.
Another news item stated this :
" Neighbor Antonio Mercurio, 74, said the two were very close. ' They always held hands, and they were always kissing ' (Richard Dalton, Newsday, Sept. 13, 2001) :
well I called up Mr Mercurio of Stoneham in November 2005...and he utterly and firmly denied the story !!! " You have the wrong person " he said to me !!!
The dalton news item was nothing but the umpteenth fake news originating from the bush-regime terrorist propaganda section with the purpose of stirring the emotions of the average white simpleton in order to gain war consensus.
How could dalton, by press time on the 12th (since the article appeared on the 13th) already have identified not only anna allison as a victim, but also antonio mercurio as her neighbor, and interviewed him ??? Clearly this fake news had been concocted well in advance of 911.
Anna Allison is the seventh one listed here :
Click on " more free details " and it takes you here :
And again, lo & behold :
" Is Anna S Allison still alive or has Anna S Allison died?
Yes, Anna is alive. "
Except she now disguises herself as Anna S Allison.
So much for the alleged AA11 victims.
Alleged AA77 doesn´t stand up to scrutiny either :
Another telltale indicator that the official 911 victims total of "2,996" is inflated, surfaced in the associated press, Aug. 23, 2002, 07:44 ET (" Few Sept.11 Families Apply for Aid "):
ONLY 662 SEPT.11 VICTIMS FAMILIES HAD APPLIED TO THE FEDERAL VICTIMS COMPENSATION FUND BY AUG. 23, 2002 (CLOSE TO 1 YEAR AFTER)!
AND SINCE WE'RE TALKING A MILLION BUCKS PER FAMILY, IT'S HIGHLY DOUBTFUL THAT THE OTHER ALLEGED 2,359 (3,021 [the official total back then] - 662) SEPT.11 VICTIMS FAMILIES (THAT IS THE VAST MAJORITY) WOULDN'T HAVE APPLIED!
Summing it all up : roughly 2,400 out of the the official 3,000 or so 911 dead are a lie : the vast majority. Of those 2,400 fake dead :
- some existed for real and faked their own deaths on the govt´s payroll : such were and are barbara olson and anna allison and most likely, david seima aoyama too ;
- others might have been fabricated and never have existed at all ;
- others might be real people who had died 911-unrelated deaths, or were alive and unaware, whose IDs were stolen or bought and fraudulently added to the total.
Again : the purpose of such a massive fraud was creating a bigger-than-Pearl-Harbor total to be used in order to artificially stir up war consensus.
WAR OUGHT TO BE THE FIRST CASUALTY OF THE TRUTH.
Originally written july 2005.
Revised/updated in 2007 and 2019.
September 28, 2019