{"article":{"id":297260,"heading":"Contra Costa-Hawkins","author":"imc link","created":"2018-10-25 03:48:54","modified":"2018-10-25 03:49:31","last_modified":"Thu, 25 Oct 2018 10:49:31","article":"<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC \"-\/\/W3C\/\/DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional\/\/EN\" \"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/TR\/REC-html40\/loose.dtd\">\n<html><body><p>Jared Baxter wrote a strong refutation to supply-side, market-based arguments against 10. Costa Hawkins has failed to deliver on promises of increased housing construction. <br><br> \"Twenty-three years after the passage of the bill, and nineteen years after the law's full implementation, it is clear that these arguments reflected, at best, a na&iuml;ve belief that unleashing the forces of supply and demand would help produce a \"market equilibrium\" that would benefit tenants. On the contrary, the effects of repealing vacancy control were dramatic and went in precisely the opposite direction.\" <br><br> Read the damning essay at the link.<\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","contact":"","link":"https:\/\/konkret.la\/contra-costa-hawkins\/","address":"","phone":"","parent_id":0,"mime_type":"image\/jpeg","summary":"Excellent facts about the housing market post Costa-Hawkins, and why we must vote Yes on 10.","numcomment":0,"fileurl":"\/uploads\/2018\/10\/screenshot_from_2018-10-24_20-47-38.jpg","filesize":null,"article_url":"\/news\/2018\/10\/297260.php","image":{"original":"\/uploads\/2018\/10\/screenshot_from_2018-10-24_20-47-38.jpg"}},"attachments":[],"comments":[]}