{"article":{"id":294281,"heading":"The Rise of the New Left Political Vocabulary","author":"Stephen D'Arcy","created":"2016-11-19 15:09:24","modified":"2016-11-19 15:09:24","last_modified":"Sat, 19 Nov 2016 22:09:24","article":"

The Rise of the New Left Political Vocabulary

by Stephen D'Arcy, 2014

https:\/\/zabalazabooks.files.wordpress.com\/2015\/09\/the-rise-of-the-post-new-left-political-vocabulary-stephen-d-arcy.pdf<\/a>

A liberation focus and a systems focus share a common understanding: that the purpose of the Left is to defeat systems of exploitation and oppression. Challenging immediate impacts is important, but not enough. It is necessary, but by no means sufβicient. Moreover, the way we challenge everyday impacts should be informed by our understanding that they are not produced simply by individual actions, but by the operation of large-scale systems. The Left needs a vocabulary, and a self-understanding that highlights and foregrounds the importance of constructing and expanding anti-systemic movements that aim to defeat systems of oppressive and exploitative power. It is hard not to think that the older vocabulary better expresses this insight, even as it obstructs our access to other critical insights that are also indispensable.

One could certainly say more about the gains and losses associated with adopting either of these two vocabularies. But perhaps it is enough, in the context of a blog post, to have sketched an approach to thinking about the question. Both vocabularies have been formed to address indispensably important concerns, so we should be reluctant to give up on either one.

A Shift in Priorities from Ultimate Victory to Challenging Everyday Impacts.

The older vocabulary looked at capitalism, racism, and sexism (for example) as social systems or institutions that could and probably would be defeated, once and for all, in the foreseeable future. Accordingly, activists of that era deβined and described their movements as struggles for “socialism,” “black liberation,” or “women’s liberation.” By contrast, the new vocabulary tends to suspend judgment on (without denying) the prospects for ultimate victory, and to focus its attention on challenging everyday impacts of capitalism, racialization and gender, in the here and now.<\/p>\n","contact":"marc1seed@yahoo.com","link":"www.freembtranslations.net","address":"","phone":"","parent_id":0,"mime_type":"text\/plain","summary":"The older vocabulary looked at capitalism, racism, and sexism (for example) as social systems or institutions that could and probably would be defeated, once and for all, in the foreseeable future.","numcomment":0,"fileurl":"\/uploads\/","filesize":null,"article_url":"\/news\/2016\/11\/294281.php"},"attachments":[],"comments":[]}