{"article":{"id":273147,"heading":"The Russians Are Coming, Again","author":"Stephen Lendman","created":"2015-09-15 10:59:25","modified":"2015-09-15 10:59:25","last_modified":"Tue, 15 Sep 2015 17:59:25","article":"<p>The Russians Are Coming, Again <br><br> by Stephen Lendman <br><br> At an ongoing Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) summit in Dushanbe, Tajikistan, Vladimir Putin affirmed Russia&rsquo;s support for Syria &ldquo;against terrorist aggression. We assist it and will keep rendering necessary military-technical assistance,&rdquo; he said. <br><br> He urged the international community to cooperate with Moscow and Syria in combating terrorism, adding: <br><br> &ldquo;(W)ithout participation of the Syrian army&hellip;against the Islamic State, terrorists cannot be expelled from the country and the region as a whole. The&hellip;Syrian people cannot be protected against destruction, enslavement and barbarity.&rdquo; <br><br> Putin urged cooperative international community efforts with Assad&rsquo;s government, Kurdish militias, and moderate internal opposition elements against a common terrorist enemy. <br><br> &ldquo;Elementary common sense and responsibility for global and regional security require concerted efforts of the international community against this threat,&rdquo; he stressed. <br><br> Syria&rsquo;s ambassador to Russia was clear and unequivocal, saying &ldquo;(a)ny talk about the presence of Russian troops in Syria is a lie propagated by Western countries and the United States.&rdquo; <br><br> &ldquo;We think that a new conspiracy is being plotted against our country to penetrate into our territory under the pretext of Russian troops&rsquo; presence.&rdquo; <br><br> &ldquo;Weapons are being supplied under the agreements that were signed between our countries rather long ago. As for Russia&rsquo;s position, it is based on international law, on our sovereignty and territorial integrity.&rdquo;  <br><br> &ldquo;We have been cooperating with Russia in various spheres, including the defense sector, for 30-40 years. Yes, we do receive weapons and military hardware.&rdquo; <br><br> &ldquo;Since the very beginning of the current developments in 2011 and up till now, we have to face terrorist groups that are relying on the help and support from outside.&rdquo; (Washington and its anti-Syrian allies) call actions taken by terrorist groups, including murders, destruction, executions, seizure of property, ousting civilian population as manifestations of freedom and democracy&rdquo; building.  <br><br> &ldquo;But as a matter of fact, they only sought to achieve a vile political goal -to bend Syria to the United States and those countries that support it.&rdquo; <br><br> US-led Western countries &ldquo;are fighting not against but by means of the Islamic State,&rdquo; actively supporting its terrorism. <br><br> Ending Obama&rsquo;s war on Syria depends on observing earlier agreed on &ldquo;Moscow principles,&rdquo; including respecting Syrian sovereignty, its territorial integrity, the right of its people alone to choose who&rsquo;ll lead them with no outside interference, and a unified struggle against imported terrorism. <br><br> Instead, Washington insists Assad must go, State Department spokesman Admiral John Kirby repeating the demand Monday, saying he &ldquo;cannot be part of the solution against ISIL&rdquo; - blaming him for US-imported terrorists devastating the country with US air support, adding: <br><br> &ldquo;(T)here&rsquo;s not going to be any solution against ISIL that would involved assisting, aiding, cooperating with, communicating with Bashar al-Assad. It&rsquo;s not going to happen.&rdquo; <br><br> Previous articles explained Washington uses imported Islamic State and other takfiri terrorists as proxy foot soldiers against Assad - aiming for regime change to install a US-controlled stooge government, pursuing the same objective globally, waging endless wars on humanity for unchallenged dominance. <br><br> Washington floods the Middle East with heavy weapons for naked aggression. Moscow justifiably helps arm Syria for self-defense against foreign invaders. There&rsquo;s nothing civil about ongoing conflict. <br><br> Irresponsible Russia bashing remains intense. Accusations about sending troops to aid Assad are malicious Big Lies. No evidence exists to prove what The New York Times recklessly calls &ldquo;an escalating buildup that could give Moscow its most significant military foothold in the Middle East in decades.&rdquo; <br><br> Its source: unnamed &ldquo;American officials,&rdquo; no fact-checking to verify their claims, accepting willful lies as facts, saying Moscow may use a Syrian airfield &ldquo;as a staging area for airstrikes in support of Syrian government forces.&rdquo; <br><br> Russia openly admits supplying Syria with contractually agreed on weapons and military supplies. Sergey Lavrov explained &ldquo;(t)hey are inevitably accompanied by Russian specialists, who help adjust the equipment and train Syrian personnel&rdquo; on how to use what&rsquo;s provided. <br><br> All countries supplying weapons and technology do the same thing. Washington and supportive media want Syria rendered increasingly defenseless and isolated. <br><br> Neocon Washington Post deputy editorial page editor Jackson Diehl headlined &ldquo;Putin shifts fronts in Syria and Ukraine,&rdquo; repeating the long ago discredited Big Lie about &ldquo;Russian forces in eastern Ukraine ke(eping) up a daily drumbeat of attacks on the Ukrainian army.&rdquo; <br><br> Now Putin is &ldquo;shifting fronts&rdquo; to Syria, he blustered. On the one hand, claiming &ldquo;9,000 (nonexistent) regular troops (and) more than 30,000 (undefined) irregulars&rdquo; in Ukraine. <br><br> On the other, ludicrously saying &ldquo;Putin&rsquo;s use of force&hellip;induce(d) the West to accept his Ukraine demands - and he is trying to repeat his triumph in a second theater.&rdquo; <br><br> A litany or more Big Lies followed. Cold, hard truths are polar opposite Diehl&rsquo;s duplicitous invective, typical of WaPo editorial reporting. <br><br> Wall Street Journal editors operate the same way. On September 13, they headlined &ldquo;Putin&rsquo;s Syria Play,&rdquo; irresponsibly accusing him of intervening militarily to aid Assad. <br><br> Saying he won&rsquo;t defeat ISIS but might save him, &ldquo;giving Moscow a new sphere of influence in the Middle East.&rdquo; <br><br> Journal editors urge establishing no-fly and &ldquo;no-drive&rdquo; zones on the ground - illegal without Security Council authorization not forthcoming.  <br><br> Mostly, they want a hawkish Republican succeeding Obama in 2017 - to wage greater war on Syria and elsewhere than already, especially confronting Russia and China more aggressively. Maybe they want WW III. <br><br> Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached at <a href=\"mailto:lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net\" rel=\"nofollow\">lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net<\/a>.  <br><br> His new book as editor and contributor is titled \"Flashpoint in Ukraine: US Drive for Hegemony Risks WW III.\" <br><br> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.claritypress.com\/LendmanIII.html\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.claritypress.com\/LendmanIII.html<\/a> <br><br> Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com.  <br><br> Listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network. <br><br> It airs three times weekly: live on Sundays at 1PM Central time plus two prerecorded archived programs. <\/p>\n","contact":"lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net","link":"sjlendman.blogspot.com","address":"","phone":"","parent_id":0,"mime_type":"text\/plain","summary":"Syria","numcomment":0,"fileurl":"\/uploads\/","filesize":null,"article_url":"\/news\/2015\/09\/273147.php"},"attachments":[],"comments":[]}