{"article":{"id":265688,"heading":"Irresponsibly Blaming Russia for US-Led Western Crimes","author":"Stephen Lendman","created":"2014-09-05 21:47:38","modified":"2014-09-05 21:47:38","last_modified":"Sat, 06 Sep 2014 04:47:38","article":"<p>Irresponsibly Blaming Russia for US-Led Western Crimes <br><br> by Stephen Lendman <br><br> Washington is public enemy No. 1. It's the real evil empire. It's a longstanding serial aggressor. Rogue Western partners share blame.  <br><br> Southeastern Ukraine's conflict is Obama's war. Behind the scenes US manipulation controls things.  <br><br> Kiev is infested with CIA and FBI operatives. Blackwater USA (now Academi) type mercenaries operate in Southeastern Ukraine. Perhaps alongside covert US special forces. <br><br> Since conflict erupted in April, Russia went all-out for diplomatic resolution. It has no ongoing military campaign.  <br><br> It didn't invade Ukraine. It's not shelling cross-border. Or from inside Ukrainian territory. <br><br> Its troops aren't involved in fighting. It's not out to seize Ukrainian territory. Western sources lie claiming otherwise. <br><br> In mid-July, NATO supreme commander General Philip Breedlove headlined his Wall Street Journal op-ed \"The Meaning of Russia's Military Campaign Against Ukraine.\" <br><br> He lied claiming \"Moscow has broken the trust that many worked long to build. Now NATO must adapt to this new security threat.\" <br><br> None whatever exists. Claiming otherwise is false. In contrast, Western belligerence threatens Russian security. <br><br> Breedlove's claims featured a litany of Big Lies. He outrageously accused Russia of \"us(ing) military, political and economic forces to fundamentally destabilize a European nation and change internationally recognized borders by illegally annexing Crimea.\" <br><br> He claimed \"Russia's military actions in and around Ukraine have not been, and are not now, defensive in nature.\"  <br><br> He ludicrously accused Moscow of conducting a \"military operation against Crimea relied on pre-deployed regular and covert forces and unbadged 'little green men' conducting unconventional warfare as well as cyberattacks and significant information-warfare activity, using conventional media and the Internet to spread its propaganda.\"  <br><br> He claimed Moscow uses \"strategic deception\" to achieve its \"political goals.\" <br><br> He turned truth on its head accusing Russia of conducting \"military actions inside and along Ukraine's border.\" <br><br> He ludicrously called Russia's \"new military model\" destabilizing. He claimed it threatens Europe's security. <br><br> NATO must adopt \"long-term changes in its posture and responsiveness,\" he said. <br><br> He barely stopped short from urging direct confrontation. Rogue US-led NATO policies seem headed in this direction. <br><br> On September 2, Wall Street Journal editors echoed the same narrative. They headlined \"Deterring a European War.\" <br><br> They called this week's NATO summit meeting \"one of the most important in its 65-year history.\"  <br><br> \"(It) needs to prove it is serious about deterring the no longer unthinkable prospect of another major war in Europe.\" <br><br> They hyped the misinterpretation and distortion of Putin telling European Commission president Jose Manual Barroso that he \"can take Kiev in two weeks.\" <br><br> They lied claiming he aims to annex \"Kharkiv, Luhansk and Donetsk in eastern Ukraine as well as Odessa on the Black Sea.\" <br><br> They called Crimeans' near unanimous choice to join Russia Moscow's \"stealthy seizure.\" <br><br> They lied claiming Russia \"invad(ed) eastern Ukraine last month.\" They accused Moscow of planned aggression. They did so despite no corroborating proof whatever. <br><br> They ignored multiple examples of post-9\/11 US-led, instigated, and\/or supported Western aggression.  <br><br> From Afghanistan to Iraq to Libya to Syria to Ukraine, again Iraq, and perhaps planned confrontation with Russia. <br><br> Journal editors want NATO \"to respond forcefully.\" They praised NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen urging members spend more on so-called \"defense,\" saying: <br><br> \"We must shift the argument from the cost of defense to the cost of no defense.\" <br><br> It bears repeating what other articles stressed. NATO is a global killing machine. It exists for offense, not defense. <br><br> It's a rogue monster. It threatens humanity's survival. It wants to expand to a global military force.  <br><br> It currently includes one-third of the world's nations as members or partners on five continents. <br><br> It actively operates on four. It wants unlimited expansion. It's a virtual extension of Pentagon power. <br><br> It's part of Washington quest for unchallenged dominance. It's willing to risk global war to achieve its goals. <br><br> Journal editors hyped the Big Lie about Russia threatening Europe's security. They urged confronting Moscow forcefully. <br><br> \"Far from clear,\" they said, \"is whether Western political leaders share (a) sense of urgency&hellip;Social media aren't sending those Russian tanks toward Donetsk.\" <br><br> \"The only way to deter (Russian) aggression is with a show of comparable military and political resolve.\" <br><br> NATO's idea of a brigade-sized rapid-reaction force able to be deployed on two days notice is a \"useful&hellip;way to counter Mr. Putin's infiltration tactics&hellip;\" <br><br> \"But it isn't enough.\" Journal editors urge permanently stationing large numbers of troops in Eastern Europe close to Russia's border. <br><br> The 1997 NATO-Russia Founding Act prohibits doing so. It doesn't matter. Journal editors irresponsibly called Russian democracy \"an autocracy seeking to dominate its neighbors.\" <br><br> MSM call Putin a \"Russian strongman,\" an \"autocrat,\" a \"despot,\" \"Europe's new Bonaparte, and other pejoratives. <br><br> \"His goal is to break NATO,\" say Journal editors. \"(H)e'll succeed unless the alliance's leaders respond forcefully to his threat.\" <br><br> Other MSM editors, correspondents and contributors repeat similar Big Lies. So do Republicans and Democrats. <br><br> Anyone suggesting a different narrative risks McCarthyite ostracism.  <br><br> His ideological airs infest media boardrooms, editorial staffs, the halls of Congress, the administration, academia, well-known think tanks and other centers of influence. <br><br> Edmund Burke once said \"(t)he only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.\" <br><br> He also said \"(a)ll tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent.\" <br><br> The official Ukraine narrative proliferates. It features Big Lies. John Mearsheimer in part challenged it in Foreign Affairs' September\/October issue. <br><br> He headlined \"Why the Ukraine Crisis Is the West's Fault.\" The official narrative wrongfully blames Putin. <br><br> America and its European allies share blame. At issue \"is NATO enlargement&hellip;(T)o move Ukraine out of Russia's orbit.\" To \"integrate it into the West.\" <br><br> Russia \"adamantly oppose(s) NATO enlargement\" for good reason. Doing so encroaches on its border. It threatens its security. <br><br> \"For Putin,\" forcibly ousting democratically elected Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych \"was the final straw.\" <br><br> He calls incorporating Georgia and Ukraine into NATO a \"direct threat\" to Russia's security. <br><br> \"When Russian leaders look at\" what happened in Ukraine, \"they worry that their country might be next.\" Their fears are \"hardly groundless.\" <br><br> The combination of NATO enlargement, EU expansion, and democracy promotion in name only promises potential East\/West confrontation. <br><br> Former US diplomat George Kennan predicted that NATO expansion would provoke a crisis. Putin is wrongfully blamed for irresponsible Western policies. <br><br> Mearsheimer calls him \"a first-class strategist&hellip;\" A leader to \"be feared and respected by anyone challenging him on foreign policy.\" <br><br> He's no revanchist. \"If Putin was committed to creating a greater Russia, signs of his intentions would almost certainly have arisen (long) before\" Washington's orchestrated coup ousted Yanukovych on February 22. <br><br> He has no designs on incorporating Ukrainian territory within the Russian Federation. Claims otherwise are false. <br><br> He knows \"trying to subdue Ukraine would be like swallowing a porcupine. His response to events there has been defensive, not offensive.\" <br><br> Mearsheimer's solution to the Ukrainian crisis requires fundamental new thinking, he says. <br><br> Washington and EU allies should abandon plans to Westernize Ukraine. Instead it should aim for \"a neutral buffer between NATO and Russia&hellip;\" <br><br> \"T)he goal should be a sovereign (independent) Ukraine.\" Plans to incorporate it into NATO should be abandoned. <br><br> An economic rescue plan is needed to rescue its crumbling economy. Western interference in Ukrainian internal affairs should end. <br><br> Washington and its EU allies can either continue current reckless policies or \"switch gears\" for a neutral independent Ukraine and continental peace. <br><br> Mearsheimer's analysis leaves vital issues unaddressed or not as fully as they should be.  <br><br> Who gave Washington the right to oust its democratically elected government? <br><br> To replace it with unelected neo-Nazi infested fascists? Their rogue state status. Their police state practices. <br><br> Why didn't Mearsheimer denounce their war without mercy on their Southeastern citizens? Their murdering civilians in cold blood. <br><br> Their appalling human rights record. Their war on freedom. Their anti-Semitism.  <br><br> Their crackdown on dissent. Their silencing opposition media and independent voices. <br><br> Washington's support and encouragement. Big Lies blaming Russia for US-led Western crimes. <br><br> Risking possible global war. World peace depends on multi-world polarity replacing America's quest for hegemonic dominance. <br><br> It requires challenging US-led NATO's killing machine responsibly. Its war on humanity. Mearsheimer didn't explain. <br><br> Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached at <a href=\"mailto:lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net\" rel=\"nofollow\">lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net<\/a>.  <br><br> His new book as editor and contributor is titled \"Flashpoint in Ukraine: US Drive for Hegemony Risks WW III.\" <br><br> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.claritypress.com\/LendmanIII.html\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.claritypress.com\/LendmanIII.html<\/a> <br><br> Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com.  <br><br> Listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network. <br><br> It airs three times weekly: live on Sundays at 1PM Central time plus two prerecorded archived programs.  <br><br> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.progressiveradionetwork.com\/the-progressive-news-hour\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.progressiveradionetwork.com\/the-progressive-news-hour<\/a> <\/p>\n","contact":"lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net","link":"sjlendman.blogspot.com","address":"","phone":"","parent_id":0,"mime_type":"text\/plain","summary":"Ukraine","numcomment":0,"fileurl":"\/uploads\/","filesize":null,"article_url":"\/news\/2014\/09\/265688.php"},"attachments":[],"comments":[]}