{"article":{"id":263275,"heading":"Scoundrel Media War on Russia","author":"Stephen Lendman","created":"2014-03-04 07:50:47","modified":"2014-03-04 07:50:47","last_modified":"Tue, 04 Mar 2014 14:50:47","article":"<p>Scoundrel Media War on Russia <br><br> by Stephen Lendman <br><br> Scoundrel media editors find new ways to embarrass themselves. They mock legitimate news and opinion.  <br><br> They suppress it. They violate fundamental journalistic standards doing so. <br><br> They suck up to power. They support monied interests. They deplore popular ones. They endorse Western aggression. They do it repeatedly. <br><br> They blame victims for horrific US crimes committed against them. They condemn Putin for responsibly defending the safety and security of endangered Russian nationals. <br><br> Thank heavens he's around. He's the one world leader challenging the damn fool in the White House responsibly. <br><br> He's our best hope for world peace. He deserves worldwide support. His best efforts may not be enough. <br><br> Neocons infest Washington. They threaten everyone. The damn fool in the White House risks starting WW III. <br><br> His damn fool Secretary of State John Kerry said \"we're now discussing all of the options.\" <br><br> He outrageously accused Russia of \"aggression.\" No nation commits it more often against more nonbelligerent nations than America. <br><br> It wages one lawless war after another. It ravages and destroys countries doing so. Kerry is an unindicted war criminal. So is the damn fool in the White House. <br><br> They threaten world peace. They risk potential armageddon. Media scoundrels cheerlead what demands condemnation. <br><br> They denounce what demands praise. When America goes to war or plans one, they march in lockstep. They do it disgracefully. <br><br> New York Times editors stand out. They masquerade as legitimate journalists. They feature managed news misinformation rubbish.  <br><br> They endorsed Ukrainian putschists. They ousted a democratically elected government. They did so with well-planned US help.  <br><br> Stop NATO's Rick Rozoff called their coup the most overt one since Mussolini's 1922 march on Rome. It's no exaggeration. Nothing in recent memory matches their brazenness.  <br><br> Times editors are mindless of mob rule governance. Fanatical putschists run things. They scare hell out of everyone paying attention. <br><br> Times editors turn a blind eye. Journalism the way it's supposed to be is verboten. On March 2, they headlined \"Russia's Aggression.\"  <br><br> They outrageously accused Putin of \"exploit(ing) the Ukrainian crisis to seize control of Crimea (as well as) any other power grab he may be hatching.\" <br><br> They ludicrously claimed \"an immediate threat to Ukrainian Russians is empty.\" Crimean self-defense volunteers already put down an attempt by Kiev infiltrators to seize government buildings. <br><br> Times editors ignore what refutes their arguments. They lied claiming Ukrainians in Crimea are endangered.  <br><br> They have nothing to fear from responsible governance. Democrats in charge prioritize public safety. <br><br> Times editors wrongfully accused ousted President Viktor Yanukovych of coup plotter killings.  <br><br> They murdered civilians in cold blood. They gunned down Kiev security forces. They did so in Independence Square.  <br><br> Neo-Nazi snipers fired from rooftops. They operated from windows in nearby buildings. Everything that happened was well choreographed in advance.  <br><br> Washington's dirty hands manipulated things. Obama bears full responsibility. He partnered with fascist thugs. He's got another imperial trophy.  <br><br> Keeping it is another matter entirely. Ukrainians nationwide won't likely tolerate what's planned for them. Perhaps real revolutionary fervor will erupt. <br><br> Times editors are consistent. They're on the wrong side of history. They ignore facts. They bury them.  <br><br> They make stuff up. They lie for power. They do it to defend the indefensible. <br><br> They lied claiming Putin wants \"control over Crimea.\" He wants to \"humiliate Ukraine,\" they said. <br><br> They want Obama, NATO and EU leaders challenging Putin \"if (he) escalates his intervention in Ukraine.\" <br><br> He supports its sovereign independence. He opposes Washington's direct role in replacing democratic Ukrainian governance with mob rule fascists. Don't expect Times editors to explain. <br><br> Neocon Washington Post editors want more direct US intervention. They support ousting Syria's Assad forcibly. They endorse fascists usurping power in Ukraine. <br><br> They headlined \"President Obama's foreign policy is based on fantasy.\" They bashed Assad, China's Xi Jinping and Putin. <br><br> They want Obama confronting them more aggressively. If he \"doesn't make the case for global engagement, no one else\" will for him, they said. <br><br> They claimed \"the tide of democracy in the world\" is \"retrenching.\" They ignored Washington's direct role in subverting it at home and abroad.  <br><br> In previous editorials, they barely stopped short of urging direct US intervention. They support Ukrainian fascists retaining power. <br><br> David Ignatius is one of many WaPo neocon columnists. He has longstanding close US intelligence ties. He's no journalist. He's a propagandist. <br><br> He openly favors arming anti-Assad death squads. He reports what Washington bullies want stressed.  <br><br> Inconvenient facts are dismissed. Lies, damn lies and misinformation substitute. On March 2, he headlined \"Putin's error in Ukraine is the kind that leads to catastrophe.\" <br><br> He lied claiming he \"invad(ed) Crimea.\" He did no such thing. He'll deploy military forces to protect Russian nationals if needed. Any responsible leader would do the same thing. <br><br> Ignatius turned facts on their head. He claimed \"former Soviet satellites\" are \"prosperous\" EU members.  <br><br> He ignored deepening poverty, unemployment and deprivation throughout its member states. <br><br> He ludicrously claimed countries making up the former Yugoslavia \"emerged as strong democracies.\" Pro-Western puppet governments run them. <br><br> He blamed Yanukovych for fascist street thug crimes. They \"courageous(ly) braved the cold and police brutality to protest,\" he said. <br><br> They committed cold-blooded murder. They ousted Ukraine's democratically elected government. They rule by brutal force. Don't expect Ignatius to explain. <br><br> He ludicrously envisions \"a cascading chain of error that brings Russian troops deeper into Ukraine and sets the stage for civil war.\" <br><br> Putin wants it avoided. He's going all-out for stability and security. Fascist coup plotters will bear full responsibility if internal conflict erupts. <br><br> Ignatius is militantly hawkish. Obama \"would be wise to seek to deter Russian aggression without specifying too clearly what the US ladder of escalation might be,\" he urged. <br><br> His commentary excluded what's most important for readers to know. Truth was systematically suppressed. <br><br> Wall Street Journal editors match the worst of outrageous opinion writers. Rupert Murdoch rules apply. On March 2, they headlined \"Putin Declares War.\" <br><br> They lied saying he \"seized Ukraine's Crimean peninsula by force (and) now has his sights on the rest of his Slavic neighbor.\" <br><br> \"(B)razen aggression,\" they screamed. War threatens Europe's heartland \"for the first time since the end of the Cold War,\" they claimed. <br><br> Post-WW II, it never once did until now. Washington's orchestrated coup ups the stakes. Obama threatens world peace. <br><br> Putin is the world's best chance to preserve it. Whether he's able deter possible US aggression remains to be seen. <br><br> Journal editors turned truth on its head. It's hard imagining more convoluted rubbish. They accused Putin of \"moving to carve up Ukraine&acirc;&euro;&brvbar;\" <br><br> They claim \"a popular democratic uprising\" toppled Yanukovych. They ignored a US-orchestrated fascist coup d'etat. <br><br> They called Russia's parliament \"rubber-stamp.\" They lied accusing its members &nbsp;of \"approv(ing) military intervention anywhere in Ukraine, which is nothing less than a declaration of war.\" <br><br> They called Obama's full responsibility for crisis conditions in Ukraine \"made entirely in Moscow.\" <br><br> Putin and Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov are world class diplomats. They're democrats. They're polar opposite Western fascists.  <br><br> They're worthy Nobel Peace Prize nominees. They're more deserving than any other world leaders.  <br><br> Nobel Committee members have their own system. They honor war criminals. Peacemakers needn't apply. <br><br> Journal editors write what responsible ones wouldn't touch. They claimed Putin seeks \"entrench(ed) authoritarianism in client states.\" <br><br> He wants them \"prevent(ed) from joining free Europe,\" they said. Freedoms in Western dominated areas are fast disappearing.  <br><br> Neoliberal harshness is official policy. Ordinary people are ruthlessly exploited. Don't expect Journal editors to explain. <br><br> They lied claiming Russia's upper house Federation Council \"approved (a) declaration of war.\" <br><br> They lied again calling Kiev's coup d'etat parliament democratic. They quoted Obama lying. He called Moscow's legitimate defense of Russian nationals a \"breach of international law.\" <br><br> Journal editors urge aggressive anti-Russian measures. They want their officials targeted. They want Sixth Fleet warships patrolling Black waters close to Crimea. <br><br> Imagine their howls if Russian naval vessels entered the Gulf of Mexico. Imagine likely Washington countermeasures.  <br><br> They want other NATO countries confronting Moscow. \"Mr. Obama and the West must act,\" they said. They must do more \"than merely threaten...\" <br><br> They absurdly called Ukraine \"a casualty of Mr. Obama's failure to enforce his 'red line' on Syria.\" <br><br> \"Ukrainians can't be left alone to face Russia, and the Kremlin's annexation of Crimea can't be allowed to stand,\" they said. <br><br> They called Putin \"the leading edge of what could quickly become a new world disorder.\" <br><br> Journal editors and commentators specialize in reinventing history. Their rubbish doesn't wash. They consistently turn truth on its head.  <br><br> They suppress what readers most need to know. They disgrace themselves in the process. <br><br> A previous article quoted former Chicago columnist Mike Royko (1932 - 1997) saying: \"No respectable fish would (want to) be wrapped in\" a Murdoch paper. It's more than ever true now. <br><br> Ongoing crisis conditions persist. War winds threaten to become gale force. Potential East\/West conflict is real.  <br><br> Obama bears full responsibility if it erupts. Bellowing scoundrel media liars share it. <br><br> Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached at <a href=\"mailto:lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net\" rel=\"nofollow\">lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net<\/a>.  <br><br> His new book is titled \"Banker Occupation: Waging Financial War on Humanity.\" <br><br> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.claritypress.com\/LendmanII.html\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.claritypress.com\/LendmanII.html<\/a> <br><br> Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com.  <br><br> Listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network. <br><br> It airs Fridays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening. <br><br> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.progressiveradionetwork.com\/the-progressive-news-hour\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.progressiveradionetwork.com\/the-progressive-news-hour<\/a><\/p>\n","contact":"lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net","link":"sjlendman.blogspot.com","address":"","phone":"","parent_id":0,"mime_type":"text\/plain","summary":"Ukraine","numcomment":0,"fileurl":"\/uploads\/","filesize":null,"article_url":"\/news\/2014\/03\/263275.php"},"attachments":[],"comments":[]}