{"article":{"id":262955,"heading":"Media Scoundrels Target Ukraine","author":"Stephen Lendman","created":"2014-01-30 07:43:40","modified":"2014-01-30 07:43:40","last_modified":"Thu, 30 Jan 2014 14:43:40","article":"<p>Media Scoundrels Target Ukraine <br><br> by Stephen Lendman  <br><br> They do it in editorials. It's in commentaries. It's in feature op-eds. More on this below. <br><br> Previous articles discussed Ukraine. It's under attack. Western dark forces want regime change.  <br><br> At stake is its national sovereignty. What's ongoing involves weakening and isolating Russia.  <br><br> Western-sponsored violence continues. It erupted in November. Police showed remarkable restraint. They still do. <br><br> Western officials wrongfully blame President Viktor Yanukovych government for street thug violence. So do US media scoundrels. <br><br> On January 29, Russia's Federation Council (its upper parliamentary house) passed a resolution. It condemned Western interference in internal Ukrainian affairs. <br><br> It \"expressed indignation at a number of Western politicians unceremoniously interfering...and consciously provoking destabilization in the country.\" <br><br> It blamed opposition groups for ongoing violence. It called them part of a \"well-organized campaign to discredit and overthrow the legitimate government.\" <br><br> \"Pogroms and fire-raising in Kiev and other Ukrainian cities, the storming of an administrative building, aggressive actions against law enforcement officers that have led to deaths and a significant number of injured are occurring with the approval of those who have brought people to the streets,\" it said. <br><br> It expressed \"confidence that the brotherly Ukrainian people and their leadership will find a way to restore peace in the country.\" <br><br> It's nowhere in sight. On January 28, Ukraine's parliament repealed its days earlier enacted anti-protest law. <br><br> Prime Minister Mykola Azarov resigned. Yanukovych accepted his resignation. He signed a decree. It dismissed his other cabinet officials. <br><br> He promised other concessions. He appointed a committee to propose constitutional revisions. <br><br> It didn't help. Protests continue. Violence accompanies them. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov condemned \"fascistic youths.\"  <br><br> He warned against external interference. Russia \"stands for a political settlement within the framework of Ukrainian law,\" he said. <br><br> Street thug \"roughnecks\" prevent it. They control areas around Kiev's Independence Square.  <br><br> Barricades protect them. They occupy government building. They do so in all western regions of Ukraine except one. <br><br> On January 28, Russian President Vladimir Putin addressed a press conference. He did so following a Brussels-based EU-Russia summit. <br><br> \"Russia will never interfere in\" internal Ukrainian affairs, he stressed. <br><br> \"I can only imagine how our European partners would have reacted if amid a crisis, say, in Greece or in Cyprus, our foreign minister had appeared at an anti-European rally and started making calls.\"  <br><br> \"We believe this is not very good in general, and, taking into consideration certain specifics of relations between Russia and Ukraine, this is simply unacceptable and impossible for us.\" <br><br> Russia will fully honor its bilateral Ukrainian agreements, Putin added. He mentioned what hasn't been explained elsewhere. <br><br> He cited an unnamed religious leader. He's a radical extremist. He called on Ukrainians to rally in Kiev. He preached insurrection.  <br><br> He urged Yanukovych's ouster. He wants his legitimate government replaced. He used racial epithets. He said Russians, Jews and Blacks should be excluded from ruling Ukraine. <br><br> His agenda has no place in civil society, said Putin. It shows what peaceful Ukrainians are up against.  <br><br> Washington's dirty hands are manipulating things. EU officials share blame. Hardball viciousness reflects ongoing policy. It's longstanding Western practice.  <br><br> It's ruthlessly exploitive. It operates globally. It harms ordinary people horrifically. Ukrainians supporting Yanukovych's government have cause for concern. <br><br> US media scoundrels aren't neutral. They blame Yanukovych for street thug violence. New York Times editors pointed fingers the wrong way.  <br><br> They urged Washington to \"make abundantly clear to Mr. Yanukovich and his lieutenants that they will pay a price if they try to use the talks simply to gain time, or if they order a bloody crackdown.\" <br><br> Revoking visas for Ukrainian officials \"was a good start,\" they said. They urged additional measures. <br><br> They wrongfully accused Yanukovych of \"undermin(ing) his legitimacy.\" He did so, they said, by rejecting an EU deal. <br><br> They claimed it \"could have opened the way to a brighter economic future.\" <br><br> The lied saying so. Western deals are one-way. They're all take and no give. They're exploitive. They ignore popular interests. <br><br> Ukraine dodged a bullet by rejecting what no responsible government would accept. <br><br> Not according to Times editors. On January 28, they gave four former US Ukrainian ambassadors feature op-ed space. They gave none to Yanukovych supporters. <br><br> John Herbst heads Washington's National Defense University's Center for Complex Operations. <br><br> William Green Miller is a Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars senior policy scholar. <br><br> Steven Pifer heads the Brookings Institution Arms Control and Non-Proliferation Initiative. <br><br> William Taylor, Jr. is United States Institute of Peace Middle East and Africa vice president. <br><br> All four groups are Western establishment organizations. Their views are slanted. They're one-sided. They lack credibility.  <br><br> So do former US ambassadors. Rare exceptions prove the rule. They're paid to lie. They support policies demanding rejection. <br><br> They headlined \"What the West Must Do for Ukraine.\" <br><br> What's responsible was excluded from their commentary. Imperial priorities were featured. International law was ignored. <br><br> Things are \"on the verge of spinning out of control,\" they said. They pointed fingers the wrong way. <br><br> They blamed \"authoritarian (Yanukovych) policies.\" They lied saying so. They haven't abandoned their old ways. <br><br> \"If the United States and European Union wish to encourage a peaceful resolution, they must use their leverage now,\" they said. <br><br> Peaceful Ukrainians deplore outside interference. They want dirty hands kept off their country.  <br><br> Former ambassadors wrongfully accused Yanukovych of \"employ(ing) force.\" <br><br> He's been remarkably restrained. Western governments attack peaceful protesters violently.  <br><br> They do it consistently. They use brute force. Media scoundrels ignore what demands condemnation. <br><br> Yaukovych concessions are \"too little, too late,\" said the ambassadors. He's gone way out of his way to be conciliatory.  <br><br> Opposition thugs respond with more violence. They occupy government buildings. <br><br> If something similar happened in America or EU countries, police and other security forces would intervene forcefully. They'd do it violently. In some cases perhaps with guns blazing. <br><br> Injuries would follow. Maybe deaths. Mass arrests for sure. Media scoundrels would applaud supportively. So would former ambassadors. <br><br> They want \"coordinate(d) Western action.\" Doing so ignores fundamental international law. <br><br> Nations are prohibited from interfering in the internal affairs of others. Self-defense is the only exception. Not according to former Ukrainian ambassadors. <br><br> \"United States and European Union officials should make clear to Mr. Yanukovych that he must refrain from the use of force and must negotiate seriously to find a resolution to the crisis.\"  <br><br> \"That means going beyond his latest proposals. He must offer shared control over state security organs with the opposition.\" <br><br> Imagine if former Russian officials demanded Washington share power with anti-government opposition independent parties.  <br><br> Imagine public rage. Imagine condemnation. Imagine the harsh response. Imagine media scoundrel editorials and commentaries denouncing unacceptable meddling. <br><br> Do what we say, not do, is official US policy. Former ambassadors don't forget. <br><br> \"American and European officials should directly engage Mr. Yanukovych&rsquo;s inner circle and underscore that they need to act now to promote a settlement or face Western visa and financial sanctions,\" they said. <br><br> \"American and European officials...should leave Mr. Yanukovych a way out. He could still order the police to move against demonstrators.\" It would \"hasten his departure from office.\" <br><br> Responsible governments confront lawless insurrections. They're not tolerated. They shouldn't be.  <br><br> The alternative is anarchy. The worst of Ukrainian opposition elements aren't \"demonstrators.\" <br><br> They're Western manipulated provocateurs. They're street thugs. They're ultranationalists. They're fascists. They're lawless. <br><br> Former ambassadors ignored what demands highlighting. They urged greater Western involvement. \"Brussels needs to maintain a high-level team in Kiev for the duration of the crisis,\" they said. <br><br> Imagine if Russian officials said Moscow must do something similar in Washington to assure pro-Kremlin policy. <br><br> Former ambassadors want US and EU officials \"visibly monitor(ing)\" Kiev streets. <br><br> Who gives them the right to dictate Ukraine policy? Former ambassadors want them sending Moscow a \"coordinated message.\" <br><br> They want Putin \"caution(ed).\" He \"should understand that rough stuff with Ukraine would cast a shadow over\" February's Sochi Winter Olympics. <br><br> They endorse hardball Western meddling. They call it the right thing to do. It bears full responsibility for inciting violence.  <br><br> At stake is Ukrainian sovereign independence. Former ambassadors want pro-Western governance replacing it.  <br><br> They want ordinary Ukrainians denied say over their own futures. They want them ruthlessly exploited. <br><br> They want Ukraine's resources stolen. They want another Western colony. They want what the vast majority of Ukrainians reject. <br><br> Why Times editors gave them feature op-ed space, they'll have to explain.  <br><br> It wasn't the first time. It won't be the last. It's longstanding Times policy. So is supporting wrong over right. <br><br> Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached at <a href=\"mailto:lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net\" rel=\"nofollow\">lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net<\/a>.  <br><br> His new book is titled \"Banker Occupation: Waging Financial War on Humanity.\" <br><br> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.claritypress.com\/LendmanII.html\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.claritypress.com\/LendmanII.html<\/a> <br><br> Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com.  <br><br> Listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network. <br><br> It airs Fridays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening. <br><br> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.progressiveradionetwork.com\/the-progressive-news-hour\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.progressiveradionetwork.com\/the-progressive-news-hour<\/a><\/p>\n","contact":"lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net","link":"sjlendman.blogspot.com","address":"","phone":"","parent_id":0,"mime_type":"text\/plain","summary":"Ukraine","numcomment":0,"fileurl":"\/uploads\/","filesize":null,"article_url":"\/news\/2014\/01\/262955.php"},"attachments":[],"comments":[]}