{"article":{"id":262844,"heading":""COINTELPRO" U.K.: Exposing the integral role of British human rights "lawyers"","author":"Parliament Square Peace Campaign","created":"2014-01-18 10:42:12","modified":"2014-01-18 10:42:12","last_modified":"Sat, 18 Jan 2014 17:42:12","article":"
\r\n


\r\nCharing\r\nCross Police Station, London, 4 September 2006<\/span>\r\n<\/p>\r\n<\/div>\r\n
\r\n


\r\n 
\r\n\"COINTELPRO\"\r\nU.K.: Exposing the integral role of British human rights...\"lawyers\"
\r\n
\r\nParliament\r\nSquare Peace Campaign, 17 January 2014 <\/span>
\r\n
\r\n
\r\nThe purpose of this article is to show (beyond the obvious of why), who\r\n& -how- the biggest “Human\r\nRights”...lawyers in the U.K, not only, work hand in hand\r\nwith, but are integral -to- COINTELPRO style, state operations, in the\r\nU.K.
\r\n
\r\nAll around the world from Eastern Europe to Cairo and a place called\r\nMedia, in the U.S, people have for years, been\r\n“liberating” state files, that expose state lies.
\r\n
\r\nIllegal operations such as COINTELPRO have long been the bread and\r\nbutter tactics, of violent state oppression, including state murder,\r\naround the world.
\r\n
\r\nIt may be true that today you could not simply leave a note, rather\r\nmarvellously asking that any kind of \"door\" was left open, so that you\r\ncould \"liberate\" information.
\r\n
\r\nIt remains however, that the people can continue to try to go in by\r\n-the front door- to legally challenge head on, the state.
\r\n
\r\nThe people can -legally- bring down criminal states, through\r\ngroundbreaking actions such as ours, in the High Court, that seek to\r\nexpose the truth, to try and protect...life.
\r\n
\r\n\"Inspector\" Wareing (who will go to prison along with Chief\r\nSuperintendent Peter Terry and Superintendent Andrew Robinson..)\r\ndescending....vampire like....upon me, in what was a very serious\r\nkidnap.
\r\n
\r\nIt has long been obvious, that our own very long campaign, has long\r\nbeen, the subject of numerous COINTELPRO style operations, where the\r\nonly “tactic” the business state has been left\r\nwith, is to try to murder us -or- we really will -legally- bring down\r\nthe U.K State through groundbreaking High Court actions, before a jury.\r\n
\r\n
\r\nPart of our actions would necessarily involve explaining to a jury how\r\nfar from impartial \"Judges\" like to \"direct\" juries, away\r\nfrom...evidence and law.
\r\n
\r\nWhat in some senses made us quite vulnerable, which was -the way- we\r\nlong campaigned, also, turned out more than equally, in many ways, to\r\nbe strengths, that worked in our favour.
\r\n
\r\nFor example, no-one could really argue that we have for many, very long\r\nyears, been doing anything else, other than trying to do our bit, to\r\nprotect...life.
\r\n
\r\nWhat is not yet perhaps sufficiently understood (because of the great\r\nlengths that are gone to, to conceal the fact) is the very real role\r\nthat high flying, British “human rights” lawyers\r\nwho are hand in hand with government, play in trying to smash,\r\ncampaigns who are doing, what the high flying human rights lawyers, are\r\nnot doing, which is..law.
\r\n
\r\nHelpfully, the egos of high flying human rights lawyers, like those of\r\nformer Commissioners of the Metropolitan Police, like Lord Blair, still\r\nrequire their ubiquitous and somewhat vicariously sounding, vanity\r\nprojects, called “memoirs”.
\r\n
\r\nIn early 2006, the U.K State understood, that the hundreds upon\r\nthousands of pounds, they had already spent on inventing phoney\r\nlegislation and so on, in a big push to smash our campaign on May 23rd\r\n2006, was not going to realize their objective.
\r\n
\r\nI was unlawfully arrested and falsely imprisoned on May 23rd 2006, in a\r\ncase that the state had never intended to have, because they knew they\r\ncould never win, by playing the legal system, against Brian, who wasn't\r\nbreaking any law.
\r\n
\r\nThe U.K State knew that when they failed in legal proceedings against\r\nBrian that also meant that we would both be open to pursue the U.K\r\nState for the rest of our...lives, because that one case would would of\r\nitself, legally go a very long way, to -legally- bringing down the\r\ncriminal U.K State.
\r\n
\r\nThe police foolishly hoped to just rely on the far from get out of jail\r\nfree card, that Parliament (“both houses and black\r\nrod”) told them to do it, so the police could fall back on,\r\njust following...\"orders\".
\r\n
\r\nWhat I know, is that the Metropolitan Police Authority, including the\r\ngrandstanding Green...ie, Jenny Jones had to get in the big lawyers,\r\nalong with Nick Hardwick, who was the Chair of the IPCC at that time,\r\nto try and work out what they were going to do over the illegality of\r\nthe following...\"orders\"...scenario.
\r\n
\r\nThey could not come up with anything, because simply following\r\n“orders”, and worse from, Parliament !!!!...is\r\nillegal.
\r\n
\r\nThat is a truth that Ms Jones, from the Green Party dares not whisper.\r\nShe gets far more mileage out of playing the role of\r\n(controlled)...supposed...opposition.
\r\n
\r\nSomewhere there is an email that was sent to me showing what Jenny\r\nJones, very stupidly thought she was saying behind our backs, which\r\nalso showed what a cynical back stabbing political bitch she generally\r\nis, way beyond us.
\r\n
\r\nOne former Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police Lord Blair confirmed\r\nin his memoirs, called “Policing Controversy”, that\r\nit was indeed true that he had intended to remove our campaign, in May\r\n2006, (which they hoped would sidestep the need for far from legal\r\nproceedings against Brian). He goes on about Jenny Jones and Brian\r\nPaddick which was all froth. They might all have internal squabbles,\r\nbut they are all united in their desire to screw -the people- over for\r\nfinancial gain.
\r\n
\r\nAnyway, in legal terms, on that dreadful night, in May 2006, when\r\ncolumns upon columns, of fluorescent yellow zombies suddenly marched\r\nout of the darkness, around 2am, we just had to make sure that some of\r\nthe banners remained, which we did.
\r\n
\r\nThe few banners, along with my unlawful arrest, meant they were\r\nlegally...out-manoeuvered for eternity.
\r\n
\r\nThe U.K State and their media mouthpieces then understood, that the\r\ncampaign would survive, which also meant that the absolute treachery of\r\nmany, could ultimately be exposed, in legal proceedings against the\r\nState, in the High Court.
\r\n
\r\nThe government, the media and the lawyers then -all- knew they had a\r\nvery big problem.
\r\n
\r\nAs long as our campaign survived -and- challenged the State, it was\r\nalways going to become clear at some point, that some pretty high\r\nflying human rights lawyers who were not actually doing anything to\r\nprotect us, were in bed with the state, which was not going to do their\r\ncareers or firms much good.
\r\n
\r\nThe one thing we were very well known for in Westminster Village, was\r\nour determination.
\r\n
\r\nIt is absolutely true that the state only consider who will challenge\r\nthem and are they serious.
\r\n
\r\nWestminster Village has always very much feared the fact that we are\r\nquite properly, so...serious.
\r\n
\r\nYou can only be serious when it is real people's lives you are trying\r\nto protect.
\r\n
\r\nIn 2006, Steve Grosz from Bindmans in essence boasted to Brian, when\r\nBrian was demanding that Bindmans do something about the fact the\r\npolice had no power of seizure, that he (Steve Grosz) was too busy\r\n\"transferring\" his ill gotten gains...in the Bahamas.
\r\n
\r\nMeanwhile, the biggest problem for the Metropolitan Police was that\r\nthey simply could not continue going around unlawfully arresting and\r\nfalsely imprisoning us, because there was always the danger that sooner\r\nor later all what became (48) unlawful arrests, against just me (for\r\nexample) was going to come back and bite them, very big time.
\r\n
\r\nObviously, no lawyer was going to ever help us with civil claims.
\r\n
\r\nNevertheless, by September 2006, there were already too many unlawful\r\narrests and false imprisonments of myself and other members of our\r\ncampaign.
\r\n
\r\nSo one particularly vicious clandestine operation the government tried\r\nto pull off in October 2006 was called FTAC.
\r\n
\r\n“The Fixated Threat Assessment Centre”.
\r\n
\r\nThis is how FTAC happened.
\r\n
\r\nFTAC was set up completely off the radar of, and independent of any\r\npolitical or legal scrutiny.
\r\n
\r\nThere was no Parliamentary legislation to back it up, and no judicial\r\noversight.
\r\n
\r\nFTAC is a completely illegal, COINTELPRO style operation.
\r\n
\r\nIt was created in panic by the U.K State, over what our campaign could\r\nexpose.
\r\n
\r\nWhat FTAC does, therefore is part of our High Court Civil Action in\r\nHQ12X02745 where the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police has tried\r\nto claim the old chestnut of \"public interest immunity\" !!
\r\n
\r\nIn fact, on September 3rd 2006, a PC Volger specifically targeted and\r\nthreatened me, when I was one of a group of five others, including\r\nSteve Jago, outside Downing Street. I wasn't doing anything different\r\nfrom the others, who were not threatened.
\r\n
\r\nPC Volger threatened to have me sectioned under the Mental Health Act.\r\nHis quite irrational, “rationale” was, that I might\r\nbe “whacked” (hit)...!! (the term \"whacked\" can\r\nalso mean to be...\"assassinated\", so it was a very serious threat in\r\nevery way)
\r\n
\r\nIn legal terms what I told this particularly cretinous tool, I had\r\nnever come across before in my life, was this.
\r\n
\r\nI told PC Volger, (who made a point of saying he really did work for\r\nthe Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police) I would summons him to\r\nrepeat that shit on the witness stand, in a test case I subsequently\r\nlived to win on September 14th 2006. I could see his tiny brain ticking\r\nover the consequences of how that -legal- response, might pan out.
\r\n
\r\nIn response to the FOI REQUEST, (which does not have any number) the\r\npolice in their own words, essentially admits FTAC could only be used,\r\nif it can be prove that it is an alleged \"mental illness\", that causes\r\nyou to break the...law.
\r\n
\r\nSo you can see the first rather large hurdle the criminal state could\r\nnot get over.
\r\n
\r\nThe criminal state could not prove, I was “breaking\" any\r\nlaw\"...
\r\n
\r\nA psychological flaw, that fatally undermines the whole psycho-babble\r\nof the morons running FTAC, is that FTAC have completely failed to take\r\ninto account several important facts...that would ...protect life,\r\nwhich is not what FTAC are really about.
\r\n
\r\nIt is obvious to any responsible person that the apologists and\r\ncollaborators who make up FTAC do not apply the same \"rules\", they\r\napply to the public, to those in...public office.
\r\n
\r\nYet it is very obvious, to most sentient human beings -around the\r\nworld- these days, that it is those hiding behind public office, to\r\ncommit serious criminal acts, who are in fact, the real danger to, the\r\nreal lives of...millions of innocent civilians everywhere.
\r\n
\r\nBombs that are brutally murdering, innocent civilians...do not just\r\nmagically appear out...of thin air.
\r\n
\r\nAnyway, on September 3rd 2006, a furious Brian came to Downing Street\r\nand sensibly rang the police to report the actions of PC Volger, who it\r\nturned out, had been seconded to Charing Cross Police, from\r\n“Central Ops”.
\r\n
\r\n
\r\nSEPTEMBER 4TH 2006.
\r\n
\r\nBetween September 4th & 5th 2006, Steve Jago then saved my\r\nlife, when he was unlawfully arrested and falsely imprisoned, when I\r\nanswered police bail at Charing Cross Police Station over an unlawful\r\narrest and false imprisonment on August 5th 2006 (where as usual what\r\nwas missing was any -evidence- against me).
\r\n
\r\nNevertheless, Laura Higgs from Bindmans Solicitors, had written to me\r\nto say that an Inspector Wareing from Charing Cross Police, had\r\ninformed her that I was going to be (albeit maliciously) charged, with\r\nobstructing the highway on August 5th 2006 during a Stop the War Rally,\r\nso the lawyers did not need to accompany me, for what should have been\r\na...formality.
\r\n
\r\nWhat Bindmans Solicitors will never be able to explain away in any\r\ncourt of law, is how after events unfolded rather differently, on\r\nSeptember 4th 2006, their lawyer -left- Charing Cross Police Station,\r\nlate at night, still without my having been charged over what I had\r\nanswered police bail expecting to be charged over at...9am that\r\nmorning.
\r\n
\r\nIt was clear that maliciously charging me with anything...was the last\r\nthing the police wanted to do.
\r\n
\r\nThe Metropolitan Police had just planned to disappear me by any means.
\r\n
\r\nIt was Steve Jago who saved my life, no thanks to lawyers. It is the\r\nold case of you can’t just disappear two bodies at the same\r\ntime from a...police station. Steve Jago turned out to be way too big a\r\nfly in the ointment, of any plan, whichever way they tried to play it,\r\nbecause he was a witness to much.
\r\n
\r\nWhat actually happened on our arrival at Charing Cross Police Station\r\non September 4th 2006, was that Steve Jago calmly raised with police,\r\nthe question of why police had threatened me, when I was with four\r\nother people, outside Downing Street, the previous day.
\r\n
\r\n(There was also an earlier, clearly connected\r\n“event” on the morning of September 4th 2006, where\r\na naked woman with Mental Heath problems was taken away in an ambulance\r\nfrom Parliament Square while it was sealed off by police, because she\r\nclaimed that she had been raped. What people who passed Parliament\r\nSquare would remember was...a)naked woman, b)ambulance and c)police.)
\r\n
\r\nAnyway, when Steve raised the question of the previous day outside\r\nDowning Street we were eventually -both- “invited”\r\ninto a corridor behind the reception area, in Charing Cross Police\r\nStation, which the police subsequently claimed was without CCTV, where\r\nSteve began to film their response (it was agreed in court that it was\r\nlawful for Steve to film)
\r\n
\r\nSo the Metropolitan Police illegally attempted to stop Steve lawfully\r\nfilming, when they suddenly violently attacked him, which took me\r\ncompletely by surprise too.
\r\n
\r\nThis situation then unfolded thus.
\r\n
\r\nI see Steve to my right, being suddenly violently attacked by a gang of\r\nplain clothes criminals, some of whom, like Detective Inspector Woods\r\nare...very \"fucking\"...large.
\r\n
\r\nMeanwhile, to my left, I have this person in plain clothes who turns\r\nout to be Inspector Wareing, standing under a doorway further away from\r\nme, probably to try to obscure what he was doing from CCTV, the police\r\nclaimed they never had, which was that he was bizarrely beckoning me to\r\ngo with him.
\r\n
\r\nHad I gone with the man who was only later identified, as Inspector\r\nWareing, this would mean, by extension, leaving Steve Jago who was\r\nbeing violently assaulted, to an...unknown fate, which it would never\r\nin a million years have crossed my mind to do.
\r\n
\r\nWhat I actually did was take a deep breath, and hope like hell the door\r\nin front of me, we had just come through, was not locked, before I\r\nslammed the door handle down once, with what Steve says was one very\r\nloud bang, to run like hell to try and get help...for Steve.
\r\n
\r\nWhat the subsequent police “interview” tape has me\r\nexplaining quite honestly, is that I was trying to go and get help for\r\nSteve, who was being violently assaulted by plain clothes...criminals\r\nwe had never come across before in our lives. We had no idea who these\r\npeople even were. I was just trying to get enough time to use my mobile\r\nphone, to alert Brian or a lawyer to get some help for...Steve !!.
\r\n
\r\nWhat Inspector Wareing will never get away with not being able to\r\nexplain before any jury, is the fact he illegally concealed evidence by\r\nremoving audio from the CCTV in the reception area of Charing Cross\r\nPolice Station.
\r\n
\r\nInspector Wareing concealed audio that showed:
\r\n
\r\na) Steve Jago asking questions about the incident outside Downing\r\nStreet, which leads to the police inviting us both behind closed doors
\r\n
\r\nb) Steve Jago then asking while I am running trying to get help, if\r\nsomeone could please get some real police, because the police had been\r\nviolently assaulting him.
\r\n
\r\nWhat the whole incident had actually triggered was a fight for\r\nour...lives response.
\r\n
\r\nWhat had gone through my mind in a flash (back) was that this unfolding\r\nincident was remarkably identical to corrupt plain clothes police in\r\nTurkey, putting a gun to my head, when I was travelling with an\r\nAmerican friend in 1984. In that incident, we had ended up fighting for\r\nour...lives, in the most desperate circumstances.
\r\n
\r\nThe sequence of photos does show Steve then later being assaulted\r\nagain, by police officers in the downstairs custody area, at Charing\r\nCross, when he only asked for....a lawyer.
\r\n
\r\nEventually I was released from City of Westminster Magistrates, on\r\nSeptember 5th 2006, after District Judge Nicholas Evans had to concede\r\nthat he could not legally remand me to prison over an alleged\r\nobstruction of the highway (which was not imprisonable), just because\r\nthe fruitcakes at the Crown Persecution Service were demanding that he\r\ndid.
\r\n
\r\nThe documents disclosed thus far, prove that the U.K State did not ever\r\nintend to remand me for an...obstruction of any highway.
\r\n
\r\nThe original actual records say the police were prior to events\r\nunfolding, seeking some sort of remand over what remain...unknown\r\n“offences”.
\r\n
\r\nHowever, the events on September 4th 2006, were not yet finished with.
\r\n
\r\n
\r\nOCTOBER 14TH 2006.
\r\n
\r\nThe police had illegally bailed me back to Charing Cross Police Station\r\nunusually on a...Saturday afternoon, October 14th 2006, over allegedly\r\n\"obstructing the police\", on September 4th 2006.
\r\n
\r\nIt was utter loony tunes on the part of the police to even suggest\r\nsomeone actually answering police bail, to be (albeit maliciously)\r\ncharged, could have been wilfully obstructing the police, who we\r\nsubsequently proved anyway, had not been acting in the \"lawful\r\nexecution of any duty\" at any time.
\r\n
\r\nBy October 2006, not just the Metropolitan Police were in very serious\r\ntrouble, after I had just won my “test case” over\r\nthe phoney legislation (SOCPA 2005 ss 132-138) at the Magistrates !! on\r\nSeptember 14th 2006, proving the new legislation had no legs.
\r\n
\r\nIt was David Emanual from Garden Court Chambers who subsequently said,\r\n(and worked to cover up the fact) \"no-one\" had ever \"beaten legislation\r\nat the Magistrates Court\".
\r\n
\r\nBy October 2006, FTAC, was in place.
\r\n
\r\nThe last thing police wanted was to charge me with anything else -or-\r\nleave any door open for the obviously massive civil actions that have\r\nbegun to follow.
\r\n
\r\nThe traditional theory behind police or others using the Mental Health\r\nAct to section “activists”, is that the state can\r\nthen do whatever they like to the person. Whatever the outcome of any\r\n“section” under the Mental Health Act, the U.K\r\nState claim you need the \"permission\" of their courts to bring...civil\r\nproceedings, against the U.K State, if you have been sectioned.
\r\n
\r\nOf course following May 23rd 2006, the lawyers who were never going to\r\nhelp us with civil actions had every reason to see me...disappeared,\r\neven as early as September 2006.
\r\n
\r\nWhat then happened on October 14th 2006 looked bizarre.
\r\n
\r\nThe police in the custody area, of Charing Cross Police Station were\r\naccording to my own lawyer, more arsey than usual, obviously hoping to\r\nprovoke something, during a ridiculously long winded...and overly\r\ndramatic...search.
\r\n
\r\nThe search failed to provoke any response from me, and while my lawyer\r\nand I were sitting around for ages, the police then dropped on us, that\r\nthey had two psychiatrists there, who they wanted to\r\n“assess” me.
\r\n
\r\nWell, I spoke to my lawyer and here is what was said between us.
\r\n
\r\nThe lawyer, Maggie Pederson said they would section me, just because\r\nthey could, because they had me in a police station, although it was\r\nunlikely I would be held for longer than 72 hours. In legal terms, this\r\nwould nevertheless mean, job done for the police, in terms of ... my\r\n\"relatively easily\", bringing civil actions...against the police.
\r\n
\r\nI instructed my lawyer to write down the questions these so called\r\n“psychiatrists” asked me -and- my responses.
\r\n
\r\nMy response was relayed to the police and\r\n“psychiatrists”, who ran like hell.
\r\n
\r\nNo-one wanted any record of any “interview” with\r\nme.
\r\n
\r\nAfter all, whatever I chose to say, about anything, would be\r\ncorroborated by...Steve Jago, and others.
\r\n
\r\nMaggie, who was the lawyer on that day, is a very good and decent\r\nlawyer, who was in no way responsible for what the partners at\r\nBindmans, she was contracted to, were up to. Steve says Maggie was pale\r\nand in shock, when she walked out of Charing Cross Police station, to\r\nupdate him over that crap.
\r\n
\r\n(The police had continued to further try to delay illegally charging\r\nme, by saying the police still wanted me to see a medical doctor, which\r\nMaggie told them in no uncertain terms was just not going to happen)
\r\n
\r\nAnd at that time, FTAC was a completely -clandestine- unit, that no-one\r\nyet knew about, which was set up, precisely to avoid any...legal\r\nscrutiny of COINTELPRO style government operations\r\nagainst...campaigners.
\r\n
\r\nIn fact, the U.K State could only have used FTAC if I would willingly\r\nwalk or be trapped into their hands, which was just not going to\r\nhappen.
\r\n
\r\nThe fact that it is now proved that the U.K State used FTAC to try and\r\nprevent legitimate civil actions, over seriously malicious\r\nprosecutions, would -substantially- compound any damages.
\r\n
\r\nMy purpose however, in pursuing claims, is to bring effective change\r\nfor everyone, to protect life.
\r\n
\r\nHQ12X02745 is a very unusual example (to ever see the light of day) of\r\nrepeated state criminality to try and cover up mounting state\r\ncriminality.
\r\n
\r\nFTAC could not make out any case that I was “breaking\r\nlaws” -because- I was...mentally ill, because I\r\nhadn’t as a strating point, actually...broken...any laws.
\r\n
\r\nThe most the U.K State had against me was one seriously illegal ruling\r\n(see: CO\/4002\/2006) trying to...ban me from campaigning.
\r\n
\r\nThat ridiculous \"ruling\", only exposes the murderous U.K State\r\nas...criminally...insane.
\r\n
\r\n
\r\nCO\/4002\/2006: TUCKER V DPP
\r\n
\r\n http:\/\/www.bailii.org\/ew\/cases\/EWHC\/Admin\/2007\/3019.html\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
\r\nIn practical and legal terms, the use of FTAC who we would have made\r\nmincemeat of, legally, would only have hastened...exposure of\r\nParliament’s (“both houses and black\r\nrods”) attempt to smash our campaign on May 23rd 2006.
\r\n
\r\nOn September 3rd 2006, I had told PC Volger I\r\nwould...“summons him to repeat his shit”, just as\r\nwe would have with the entirely illegal and clandestine, FTAC, who\r\nwould have been publicly humiliated.
\r\n
\r\nAnyway, all that particular, but very dirty legal shenanigans, then had\r\nto disappear and we returned to the relatively normally, way things\r\nplay out through the corrupt courts in the usual way, until we\r\nfinally...won, all those cases.
\r\n
\r\nWe won over the unlawful arrests and false imprisonments over August\r\n5th 2006, at City of Westminster Magistrates on July 9th 2007, (when\r\nthe CPS had no evidence to offer against me, while telling the court it\r\nhad always been illegal to..charge me)
\r\n
\r\nAnd we then won on appeal at Southwark Crown Court, in December 2007,\r\n(over the obstruct pc September 4th 2006 case which was unusually heard\r\nat City of Westminster in January 2007 until it was\r\n“adjourned” until May 2007) long after corrupt\r\nlawyers who also wanted to bury us, had run from what became civil\r\nclaims that will -legally- bring down the criminal U.K State.
\r\n
\r\nFootnote: I wasn’t meant to win on Appeal at Southwark Crown\r\nCourt, in December 2007. Knowing the script is mostly written in\r\nadvance, I waited and finally quite literally, pulled out of my back\r\npocket, what became, the winning legal argument, written in pencil, on\r\na scrap of paper.
\r\n
\r\nSteve Jago had been found to have no case to answer at half time, so it\r\nwas clear I was the one, they were still going for, when they continued\r\nagainst me.
\r\n
\r\nI trumped the mendacity of the Crown Court, using a higher court ruling\r\nfrom a case called Wilmott v Atack, which says, unless there is malice,\r\nthere cannot be any wilful ...obstruction.
\r\n
\r\nThe Judges at Southwark Crown Court, sent us out -twice- for cigarette\r\nbreaks while they took instructions on how they were supposed to\r\nover-rule a higher court ruling, which was impossible.
\r\n
\r\nFinally, the Judges churlishly thanked me from between gritted teeth\r\nfor \"bringing the higher court ruling to their attention\", while the\r\npolice from Charing Cross, looked on absolutely...fuming.
\r\n
\r\nInfiltration of the campaign had not been able to forewarn them, of\r\nthat sting to their own tail.
\r\n
\r\nI also got five hundred pounds back in “costs”, in\r\ncash, in a brown envelope !! when I told the court, I would Judicially\r\nReview the court trying to give me a cheque, when I handed over a\r\nreceipt for...the cash, corrupt lawyers who no longer acted for us, had\r\npocketed.
\r\n
\r\nWhat I have the evidence to prove in a court of law, before a jury,\r\nabout high flying corrupt human rights lawyers, who work hand in hand\r\nfor the government, to smash campaigns, is this.
\r\n
\r\nFOOTNOTE: It is clear that my refusal to be bought off in the High\r\nCourt, on December 6th 2012,is what is most likely to have led to the\r\nMayor of London and the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police,\r\ndeciding to breach an EU Directive to violently kidnap Neil on December\r\n8th 2012.
\r\n
\r\n
\r\nSPECIFICS.
\r\n
\r\nIan McDonald who is the senior partner at GARDEN COURT CHAMBERS (along\r\nwith a junior called David Emanual) sought with -all- the Partners at\r\nBindmans Solicitors, including Steve Grosz, Mike Schwarz, Paul Ridge\r\nand John Halford, to cover up that the police had no power of seizure\r\non May 23rd 2006 which was the big public...media push to smash our\r\ncampaign.
\r\n
\r\nThis included the very COINTELPRO use of Wallinger’s State\r\nBritain (which was paid for by the government) to try and hijack the\r\nvoice of our campaign, again through the media.
\r\n
\r\nThe police, courts and lawyers could not put us on any witness stand\r\nwith the...lawyers there, over the illegal seizure on May 23rd 2006.
\r\n
\r\nThis is why they all talk about Ian McDonalds grandstanding when Brian\r\nwas found to have no case to answer, in January 2007, yet the display\r\nof Genocide was not returned.
\r\n
\r\nI can then prove that Bindmans (and then Birnberg Pierce) then\r\nillegally refused to represent me in High Court civil actions, over the\r\nyears, over numerous illegal searches which were used from July 29th\r\n2008 onwards.
\r\n
\r\nIt is beyond either on the balance of probabilities or a reasonable\r\ndoubt, that the illegal searches happened -because- we had effectively\r\nwon on July 15th 2008 in CO\/11393\/2007 at the High Court. We\r\neffectively won, when I asked for a court order for the immediate\r\nreturn of property, which the Judges refused...without giving reasons,\r\nwhich they must !!
\r\n
\r\nI can then prove that (& the Bar Society knew that) Mike\r\nSchwarz, a partner at Bindmans then seriously illegally, used\r\n-financial blackmail- against Michael Mansfields, Tooks Chambers.
\r\n
\r\nMike Schwarz from Bindmans told a barrister called Annabel Timan who\r\nwas with Michael Mansfield’s Tooks at that time, (before she\r\nmoved to Doughty who do have some dirt on their hands) that she would\r\nnot get any more work, if she did not withdraw on the day of trial,\r\nfrom representing me in a \"test case\" in February 2010, when I could\r\nhave been imprisoned.
\r\n
\r\nThe only reason Brian and I were not imprisoned then, when the state\r\nwas quite desperate, following my naming the agent provocateur in\r\nseparate proceedings, was because Brian kept his lawyer.
\r\n
\r\nBrian kept his lawyer, because had we gone to prison the lawyers would\r\nall have been -legally- embarrassed trying to explain that.
\r\n
\r\nBy 2010, Brian had however, just dropped Bindmans, after we had a\r\nmeeting with Mike Schwartz in Central Hall in Westminster. At that\r\nmeeting, Brian and I saw with our own eyes, that it was clear Bindmans\r\nwere trying to help the police cover up, that six members of the TSG\r\nhad attempted to murder me at Belgravia Police Station on September 4th\r\n2009.
\r\n
\r\nBindmans can never explain in a million years why they did not\r\nimmediately have that CCTV footage, when they knew we intended, if they\r\ndid nothing, to bring a private prosecution.
\r\n
\r\nThere was a memorable conversation quite a long time before that, when\r\nBrian challenged Mike Schwarz from Bindmans, with the line:\r\n“Babs asks if you will continue (going round in circles with\r\nthe police) “arguing” over the police 101st set of\r\n(pointless) conditions, (or do your job) ?” to which Schwartz\r\ncould not answer.
\r\n
\r\nSo by the time Mansfield from Tooks finishes his self serving memoirs\r\nin June 2010, (not long after February 2010) Mansfield knows that his\r\nfirm Tooks, has been successfully -blackmailed- by Bindmans, to keep\r\nsilent about Bindmans and Tooks, direct involvement in government\r\nefforts to...smash our campaign.
\r\n
\r\n________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________\r\n
\r\n
\r\nThe provable -fact- of lawyers being open to and subject to, financial\r\nblackmail, over representing a client, who could be imprisoned, would\r\nof itself be enough, if a jury should ever hear of it, to lead to both\r\nBindmans Solicitors and Mansfield’s Tooks Chambers, being\r\nstruck off.
\r\n________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
\r\nThat provable fact, makes reading Mr Mansfield's ubiquitous vanity\r\nproject in 2010, where he styles himself as a “radical\r\nlawyer”, much more revealing.
\r\n
\r\nI am not sorry that Mr Mansfield is retiring. I only believe that the\r\nreal reason Mr Mansfield, was so pissed off in the Duggan trial in\r\nSeptember 2013, was because he discovered that his own firm was going\r\nto be pissed on, by the same state he pretended to challenge.
\r\n
\r\nI do genuinely believe that rather than Mr Mansfield’s quite\r\nappalling public grandstanding, years earlier, over the Ricin plot, Mr\r\nMansfield would have provided a far better service to his client, had\r\nhe dealt with the fact that there was no evidence of Ricin, long before\r\nany show trial.
\r\n
\r\nMr Mansfield knew that the CPS have an ongoing duty to\r\nreview...”evidence”, in a case that should never\r\nhave been allowed to go to trial, because there was no evidence of any\r\nricin.
\r\n
\r\nIt was in May 2010, Mr Mansfield’s good friends at Birnberg\r\nPierce which he helpfully names in his memoirs, as including Marcia\r\nWillis Stewart, were then brought in to try and help the Mayor of\r\nLondon (and Birnberg’s own Matt Foot) cover up all that had\r\ngone before, including CO\/11393\/2007 and the illegal searches (although\r\nthere was by then, much else for lawyers to try and cover up too)
\r\n
\r\nMr Mansfield and Co. were of course, also helping out another of his\r\ngood friends he unsurprisingly names as Ian McDonald of Garden Court\r\nChambers.
\r\n
\r\nOverall, Mr Mansfield’s \"memoirs\" adopt the familiar tone of\r\nthe patronizing Establishment.
\r\n
\r\nParasitic human rights lawyers know damn well, that doing law, which is\r\nnot what these parasitic lawyers are doing, does not require\r\nanyone’s...approval. The \"plight\" of Palestinians, does after\r\nall, involve human rights lawyers in the U.K, choosing to not really\r\ntake the U.K State to task...through the courts....over the Balfour\r\nDeclaration.
\r\n
\r\nI should also mention that it was Matt Foot (one of Paul Foot's sons\r\nand the nephew of Michael Foot) from Mansfield’s \"friends\" at\r\nBirnberg Pierce, who had illegally refused for two whole years to go to\r\nthe High Court over the illegal searches), is the person directly\r\nresponsible (along with Bindmans Solicitors), for my ending up\r\nillegally imprisoned in Holloway in 2011, because I was without legal\r\nrepresentation and so the court had no reason to bother with the\r\nniceties of any...trial.
\r\n
\r\nOf course in 2010, the Mayor of London never had any evidence against\r\neither Brian or I, and the Judge choked in 2011, when I mentioned (and\r\nso the Judge was forced to concede) that no costs could be awarded\r\nagainst Brian and I, that would go to the Mayor of London’s\r\nequally corrupt lawyers, because CO\/11393\/2007 (for example) is\r\nstill...outstanding.
\r\n
\r\nIt was Paul Ridge a partner at Bindmans who fronted the legal \"defence\"\r\nof the Mayor of London’s phoney...COINTELPRO style, Democracy\r\nVillage that...everyone has relentlessly tried to\r\n“join” us with.
\r\n
\r\nI would actually like to see Paul Ridge imprisoned for a very long\r\ntime. Mr Ridge actually...smirked...when he was confronted, in a pretty\r\nmuch behind the scenes argument, in the High Court, over the\r\ninvolvement of Bindmans in the police attempting to murder me at\r\nBelgravia Police Station on September 4th 2009.
\r\n
\r\nI guess the U.K State needed a super psycho lawyer like Ridge, who\r\nreally had no conscience whatsoever, to “represent”\r\nthe phoney COINTELPRO style Democracy Village\/Peace Strike in 2011\r\n& 2012 in proceedings involving the Mayor of London and\r\nWestminster Council etc, and us.
\r\n
\r\nIt was onlookers who were repeatedly surprised to discover that\r\nBirnberg Pierce were supposed to be Brian’s own..lawyers, in\r\nthe claim brought against us by the Mayor of London, because Birnberg\r\nPierce behaved as anything...but, Brian’s own lawyers.
\r\n
\r\nIn legal terms, it all started to come unstuck for the U.K State,\r\nbefore the wheels came flying off their carriage completely (over years\r\nof abuse), and the tables turned, with my still existing counterclaim\r\nin HQ11X00563 against Westminster Council and others.
\r\n
\r\nThat began when, you guessed it, my very dearest friend, Steve Jago,\r\nfiled papers, in HQ11X00563 while I was illegally imprisoned in\r\nHolloway, in August 2011.
\r\n
\r\nI had learned during the long drawn out proceedings against us, brought\r\nby the Mayor of London, that the Judge will just bury any Application\r\nthat you make, which happened to be an Application that there was no\r\nevidence against us. This Application was buried until the day of\r\ntrial, when the Judge was able to just carry on regardless, knowing\r\none, had no opportunity, to Appeal that Application.
\r\n
\r\nI had filed the Application that the Mayor had no evidence against\r\nBrian or I, on September 13th 2010, when the hearing of our Appeal in\r\nthe Court of Appeal had led to a -retrial- back in the High Court in\r\nMarch 2011.
\r\n
\r\nMarcia Willis Stewart from Birnberg Pierce who represented Brian, never\r\nmade any such Application, while no-one ever produced a single shred of\r\nanything that could be called -evidence- against our campaign.
\r\n
\r\nOf course on January 16th 2012, the police once again illegally used\r\nhurried new legislation (ss 141-150 of The Police Reform and Social\r\nResponsibility Act 2011) that like SOCPA 2005 ss 132-138 which was then\r\nrepealed, could never really be used to “prosecute”\r\nus over, this time either.
\r\n
\r\nIn particular they could not use new legislation -because- of the\r\noutstanding counterclaim in HQ11X00563, that grew into other claims.
\r\n
\r\nThe state cannot -legislate- to try to make by any means, including\r\nyour death, existing civil claims...disappear (HQ12X03564)
\r\n
\r\nThe fact that the state did do -all- that, is actually evidence that\r\nthey knew we would -legally- bring down the U.K State through the High\r\nCourt in our groundbreaking actions.
\r\n
\r\nBy 2012-2013, Birds Solicitors (along with numerous other law firms who\r\ncould not fly the coop quick enough around that time, one after the\r\nother) did not have a hope in hell of covering everything up, including\r\nthe involvement of numerous high flying humans rights lawyers, who had\r\ngone before.
\r\n
\r\nBirds were first used by Brian over his unlawful arrest on August 2010,\r\nwhich involved a malicious prosecution. Neil, Steve Jago and I,\r\nconcluded the case against Brian, in Brian's favour, by publishing the\r\nvideo that continues to be evidence in all other proceedings, of the\r\nillegal use of agent provocateurs.
\r\n
\r\nIt is too easy to explain to any jury -why- Birds Solicitors, illegally\r\nrefused to go to Bishopsgate Police Station in the City of London on\r\nApril 10th 2013, to get Neil released, after Neil was kidnapped by\r\nsecret 666 police, after we left the High Court on April 10th 2013.
\r\n
\r\nBirds Solicitors could never explain in a million years before any jury\r\n-why- Neil was illegally held at Bishopsgate Police Station in the City\r\nof London, on the basis of an unsigned warrant Charing Cross Police\r\nclearly filled in themselves, leaving blank the part the Judge...must\r\nsign.
\r\n
\r\nHad Birds gone to Bishopsgate Police Station which they were legally\r\nobliged to do, because there was no valid warrant, Neil would have had\r\nto be released.
\r\n
\r\nBut Birds Solicitors, refused without lawful excuse, to go to\r\nBishopsgate, because they did not want Neil released either.
\r\n
\r\nIn fact there was a very serious and quite furious argument, relatively\r\n-\"behind the scenes\"- the following day, when Birds Solicitors, were\r\ntrying to refuse to represent Neil at Westminster Magistrates, because\r\nof that very fact, relating to the bogus warrant, (and of\r\ncourse...everything else).
\r\n
\r\nIdeally lawyers would like you to keep going to one lawyer after\r\nanother lawyer, instead of lawyers, having their noses rubbed in\r\ntheir...own dirt.
\r\n
\r\nIt is very clear from our website, that Birds Solicitors should have\r\ngone to the High Court, a very long time ago, to stop the state trying\r\nto, by this stage openly...pretty much...murder us.
\r\n
\r\nOur website from January 2012 to February 2013 shows our being\r\nsubjected to the most appallingly relentless state abuse, that very\r\nclearly put our lives at very serious...risk.
\r\n
\r\nAnd on April 10th 2013, Neil and I could so easily have become yet more\r\nMark Duggans, when Neil was driving out of London after our leaving the\r\nHigh Court.
\r\n
\r\n
\r\nvideo:   http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=byxFMGTvKoA\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
\r\nOf course while Neil in his own right, as a gifted film maker, poses\r\nhis own quite extraordinary “threat” to the U.K\r\nState, because it is legal to record and publish court proceedings, the\r\nU.K State also knew only too well, as fellow campaigners do, of my\r\npersonal relationship with Neil.
\r\n
\r\nNeil can be quite gorgeous :)
\r\n
\r\nBy April 2013, many high flying “human rights”,\r\nlawyers had...so many vested business interests, in seeing Neil, Steve\r\nand I, all...dead.
\r\n
\r\nNot a single one shed a tear when Brian died, which all the very many\r\nlawyers, very clearly bear, very substantial responsibility for too.
\r\n
\r\n
\r\nvideo:   <\/span>http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=bjqnTrCNW5w\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
\r\nOn April 11th 2013, Neil who should have been brought before City of\r\nWestminster Magistrates, in the morning session, which was usual for\r\nthose held overnight, was held in court cells, until late in the\r\nafternoon, because Birds Solicitors were arguing behind the scenes\r\nabout...coming to court,to represent him !!
\r\n
\r\nIt was Steve Jago who quietly but firmly...persisted, until Birds had\r\nno choice but to send along a lawyer to City of Westminster\r\nMagistrates. Of course, the court played their part by trying to keep\r\ncalling the “case” on, only to be repeatedly told,\r\nthe lawyer inexplicably still hadn't..showed up.
\r\n
\r\nWe swiftly resolved the malicious prosecution against Neil over April\r\n19th 2013, in our favour, by filing witness statements, that we wrote,\r\nhad to be put on the court record, while refusing to physically go back\r\nto City of Westminster Magistrates. An outstanding malicious\r\nprosecution the Mayor of London brought against me was similarly\r\nterminated in our favour, at Southwark Crown Court around the same\r\ntime.
\r\n
\r\nThe point is this.
\r\n
\r\n
\r\nCONCLUSION:
\r\n
\r\nOur groundbreaking High Court actions (and sadly there are many other\r\nclaims to still bring) -include- exposing the very serious dirt on the\r\nbiggest high flying “human rights” lawyers in the\r\nU.K, who remain, not only hand in hand with, but integral to, the\r\nCOINTELPRO style operations, run by the State.
\r\n
\r\nThis state of affairs, involving bogus human rights lawyers, cannot\r\ncontinue.
\r\n
\r\n________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________\r\n
\r\n
\r\nA jury is going to seriously ponder, over what the lawyers were -NOT-\r\ndoing to protect us, which we hope will improve legal representation,\r\nfor others.
\r\n________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
\r\nWe will nevertheless, continue to bring law, into all we do, to protect\r\nlife.
\r\n
\r\n
\r\n<\/div>\r\n\n","contact":"","link":"http:\/\/brianhaw.tv\/index.php\/blog\/2042-cointelpro-u-k-the-integral-role-of-british-human-rights-lawyers","address":"","phone":"","parent_id":0,"mime_type":"text\/html","summary":"The purpose of this article is to show (beyond the obvious of why), who & -how- the biggest \u201cHuman Rights\u201d...lawyers in the U.K, not only, work hand in hand with, but are integral -to- COINTELPRO style, state operations, in the U.K.","numcomment":0,"fileurl":"\/uploads\/","filesize":null,"article_url":"\/news\/2014\/01\/262844.php"},"attachments":[],"comments":[]}