{"article":{"id":201873,"heading":"CIA Finally Releases 1973 &quot;Family Jewels&quot; Document - Partial Notes on Ch 1","author":"Varlet","created":"2007-06-27 23:31:59","modified":"2007-06-29 17:08:23","last_modified":"Sat, 30 Jun 2007 00:08:23","article":"<p>The CIA has, after a long battle against activists and journalists using the \"Freedom of Information Act\", finally released a document outlining the \"most sensitive operations\" it had undertaken from the 1950s through 1973.  <br>  <br> This is a document that raises far more questions than it answers.  A partial synopsis of the 703-page tome follows. <br><br> To follow along with the page numbers of the actual document I used to write this, you must go to the George Washington University's \"National Security Archive\" and download the complete, full version at this link: <br>  <br> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.gwu.edu\/~nsarchiv\/NSAEBB\/NSAEBB222\/family_jewels_full.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.gwu.edu\/~nsarchiv\/NSAEBB\/NSAEBB222\/family_jewels_full.pdf<\/a> <br><br> It's 27 MB of sickening details of Murder, Inc's operations.  I mean the CIA.  The Mafia, AKA Murder, Inc. is a sometime CIA contractor. <br><br> The news media is full of (yawn) \"revelations\" that the CIA hired the Mafia to kill Castro.  We've known that for decades.  Some of these other things are not so well known. <br><br> ******************************** <br><br> P 53 of 703 <br><br> John Warner, then Acting General Counsel [for Watergate  <br><br> Investigating Committee or CIA (?)], agreed to limit testimony of  <br><br> subpoenaed officials who would report on CIA-Washington  <br><br> Metro Police covert activities undertaken against antiwar  <br><br> activists in DC and other more sensitive matters which the CIA  <br><br> did not want to be revealed, and which this \"family jewels\"  <br><br> document seems not to reveal, either. <br><br> ***************************** <br><br> P. 62 of 703 <br><br> Dec. 1970 <br><br> Robt Ingersoll, head of Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous  <br><br> Drugs, was so convinced that his agency \"had been heavily  <br><br> infiltrated by dishonest and corrupt elements [inherited from the  <br><br> Federal Bureau of Narcotics], who were believed to have ties  <br><br> with the narcotics smuggling industry\" [interesting choice of  <br><br> words - V] that he asked then CIA head Helms to help him set  <br><br> up a group within BNDD that would spy on its own agents to  <br><br> make sure that they weren't working for drug traffickers. <br><br> This \"newly released\" CIA document is heavily censored. More  <br><br> than 2\/3 of it remains blacked out. <br><br>  <br>  <br> ******************* <br><br> P. 71 <br><br> Ever wonder how Senators charged with oversight of CIA operations  <br><br> conspire to stay \"out of the loop\" so they can deny knowledge of embarrassing CIA operations later on?   <br>  <br> It's remarkably easy!  When they are briefed on  <br><br> sensitive CIA activities, they \"[ask] not to be briefed in detail\"!   <br><br> Senator Russell and Rep. Mahon took this action when they  <br><br> were briefed on how CIA money was transfered to the FBI for  <br><br> still-classified operations, and how the CIA and NSA exchanged  <br><br> equipment for other still-classified operations.  This blows away  <br><br> the fraud that there exists a firewall between the CIA, NSA and  <br><br> FBI when it comes to domestic operations, as well as the charade that Congress actually exercises \"oversight\" of the CIA. <br>  <br> In this case, the CIA gave cashiers checks to the FBI to pay for its operation(s)  <br><br> and also the CIA gave cashiers checks to the NSA to help pay  <br><br> for its operations.  Also, the CIA gave money to the State Dept.  <br><br> \"to help State Department defer Presidential representational  <br><br> expenses of President Lyndon B. Johnson's trip to Southeast  <br><br> Asia.\"  The State Dept had sought $3 million from CIA, but the  <br><br> then-Director of the CIA thought that was too much. <br><br> *************************** <br><br> P.82 and attachments <br><br> CIA's Warren D. Magnusson, Deputy Director for Liaison and  <br><br> Planning, Office of Finance worked with John Brown, White  <br><br> House staff secretary, NSA and State Dept. to handle political  <br><br> mailings on behalf of Nixon administration in reply to a torrent of  <br><br> letters Nixon received from citizens after he revealed the secret  <br><br> bombing of Cambodia in a 1970(?) speech(?).  State Dept. handled all the  <br><br> anti-bombing mail: CIA was tapped to pay for pro-bombing  <br><br> mail.  CIA would pay for \"postage, addressing and printing\" of  <br><br> replies to the pro-Nixon correspondents.  The actual addressing would be done \"by an outside  <br><br> firm\" but would be paid for by CIA. <br><br> The CIA, White House and the various agencies conspired to  <br><br> handle the accounting for the mailing so that the fact that the CIA  <br><br> was involved would not be revealed in public reports. <br><br> Smoking gun on page 93 <br><br> ************************* <br><br> P.105 <br><br> The CIA provided?  provides?  dozens or hundreds of its  <br><br> employees to act in various capacities \"in the immediate office of  <br><br> the White House per se\", including \"secretaries, clerical  <br><br> employees and certain professional employees... and one young  <br><br> man detailed to their Communications Section\"... also \"couriers,  <br><br> telephone operators, a laborer assigned to the grounds and a  <br><br> graphics man who designed invitiations for State dinners\".  These  <br><br> people are \"hired as bona fide White House employees.\"  I  <br><br> wonder if the White House staff are aware that all their security  <br><br> screening of prospective employees is absolutely unnecessary,  <br><br> since Langley has taken care to see to it that all available  <br><br> candidates have already passed muster and are employees of the Company? <br><br> How nice to have all these people from diverse backgrounds,  <br><br> holding all those many different opinions about important issues  <br><br> of the day surrounding you when you are trying to make  <br><br> decisions as the Chief Executive of the US!  It's nothing less than a Potemkin- <br>  <br> cross-section of American public opinion! <br><br> Let's see what the gardener thinks about such and such  <br><br> proposal... Maybe run it by the cook, or the secretary...  <br><br> It doesn't matter: their \"opinions\" have been decided in advance  <br><br> by the CIA as part of their \"cover backgrounds\". <br><br> I can see it now:  \"OK Agent Not-So-Smart, we're assigning you to be a lawn maintenance  <br>  <br> technician working the Rose Garden.  You'll be one of the few blacks working in the White House, <br>  <br> so we hope that the Chief will take a shine to you.  Your cover is as follows:  you were an organizer for SNCC in the early 60s, <br>  <br> who advocated for armed self-defense for blacks in the Deep South during the Civil Rights struggle. <br>  <br> You became disaffected with the group after seeing the rise of the Black Panthers and realizing what your <br>  <br> ideology must ultimately lead to.  Disillusioned, you joined the Peace Corps and worked in Africa. You'll <br>  <br> have a case officer assigned to you, and you will report to him every morning at 4:30 AM to acquire your opinions on the  <br>  <br> hot topics of the day.\" <br><br> What an interesting guy that gardener is!  Too bad it's all just a cover story intended to lure the President into seeking <br>  <br> out a friendship with a \"salt of the Earth\" type!  I bet that works pretty good, too! <br><br> Was George Stephanopoulous aware of any such arrangement during the  <br>  <br> 2 Clinton Administrations?  How about Comedy Central's John Stewart,  <br>  <br> who once worked at the State Dept?  I always wondered how such a \"staunch <br>  <br> opponent of US Government policy\" like Stewart could snag to appear on his show  <br>  <br> such war criminal luminaries as Gen. Peter Pace and George Tenet,  <br>  <br> and probable long-time CIA asset Dictator General Musharraf of Pakistan. <br><br> ******************************** <br><br> P.105-106 <br><br> The CIA also has \"technical specialists\" and \"security officers  <br><br> detailed to the Department of State to protect foreign visitors\". <br><br> ******************* <br><br> P 106: <br><br> CIA agents worked at the Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs (now the DEA) <br><br> and a CIA agent actually \"served for over ten years as Director  <br><br> of the Office of Public Safety for\" the Agency for International  <br><br> Development (AID). <br><br> ************************* <br><br> Also P 106: <br><br> \"Contract Personnel Division [of the CIA] prepares and  <br><br> executes contracts with individuals engaged by the Agency to  <br><br> carry out domestic activities.  We also process Staff Agents who  <br><br> are domestically assigned.\"  Domestic activities?  Isn't this  <br><br> supposed to be in violation of the CIA's charter?  Tsk, tsk! Of course, no details are given. <br><br> *********************** <br><br> P 107: <br><br> Howard Hunt, \"sometime between March and May, 1972\"  <br><br> contacted the CIA's \"External Employment Assistance Branch\"  <br><br> (it helps \"ex\"-CIA spooks find post-\"retirement\" employment) to  <br><br> see if they \"had a retiree or resignee who was accomplished at  <br><br> picking locks\".  One \"Frank O'Malley of EEAB... sent him a  <br><br> resume on Thomas Amato who retired 31 July 1971.\"  They do  <br><br> not elaborate on whether or not Mr. Amato actually went to  <br><br> work for Hunt. <br><br> *********************** <br><br> P.112 <br><br> In this section, regarding \"sensitive\" disclosures pertaining to the  <br><br> activities of the CIA's \"Office of Logistics\", which includes,  <br><br> apparently the \"Technical Services Division\" (makers of James  <br><br> Bond-like items like the CIA's infamous poison dart guns and such) we find that it was the  <br><br> opinion of one John F. Blake, former Director of Logistics, that  <br><br> lending out surveillance equipment, motor vehicles, gas masks  <br><br> and even guns to non-Agency Federal and local police agencies is legally permitted  <br><br> thanks to the \"Economy Act of 1925\" which \"authorizes one  <br><br> agency to support the needs of, or provide a service for, another  <br><br> Government agency when such action would be more  <br><br> economical and eliminate the need for one agency of  <br><br> Government to duplicate facilities readily available from another.\" <br><br> The equipment loaned out to or bought for other government  <br><br> agencies includes \"telephone analyzer[s]\" for the White House  <br><br> Communications Agency, as well as the State Dept., Air Force  <br><br> and Atomic Energy Commission (AEC); camera sets, TV  <br><br> cameras and \"actuators [&amp;] recorders\" for the FBI; a \"special  <br><br> purpose electrical\" cable ordered in 1970 for the White House  <br><br> Communications Agency and \"Ink, Special Formula\" from the  <br><br> Technical Services Division for use by the Immigration and  <br><br> Naturalization Service. <br><br> For at least one of the nation's domestic police departments,  <br>  <br> the Dept. of Logistics provided: <br>  <br> 396 gas masks <br>  <br> 231 steel helmets and liners <br>  <br> 287 protective vests <br>  <br> 84 \"Chemical Baton[s]\" (with \"various quantities and types of  <br><br> replacement chemical cartridges, loading kits and batteries\" for  <br><br> these weapons <br>  <br> 3 stun guns <br>  <br> 6 \"Mustang 35 Pistol[s]\" <br><br> It is possible that the primary or even sole police department that  <br>  <br> received all these things was the Washington, DC police <br>  <br> department in order to defend Langley from \"violent\" anti-war demonstrators, <br>  <br> but that is not specified in the memo. <br><br> ********************** <br>  <br> P 134 <br><br> List of \"computer processing projects which the Office of Joint  <br><br> Computer Support has participated in or is aware of and which  <br><br> might be considered sensitive issues\".  The report, dated 11  <br><br> May, 1973, lists 3 \"Most Sensitive Projects\", one of whose  <br><br> name is still blacked out; 2 \"Sensitive Projects\", both of whose  <br><br> names are still blacked out; and 5 classified \"Sensitivity  <br><br> Unknown, but Possibly a Matter for Concern\", all of which are  <br><br> either entirely blacked out or which have significant portions of  <br><br> the terse, one-sentence descriptions blacked out.  Glasnost,  <br><br> anyone? <br><br> One interesting program was codenamed \"DMVREC\" and (was? is?)  <br><br> a \"File of automobile license numbers\". <br><br> Two other interesting ones are dedicated to \"anti-drug\" efforts. <br><br> Another's code name is blacked out: it (was? is?) a \"Statistical  <br><br> analysis of psychological data\", and was listed as \"Sensitive\"  <br><br> because of the \"source of data\" and the fact that \"contractors are  <br><br> involved with this project\". <br><br> ******************************* <br><br> P 143 <br><br> \"During the[1972?] Democratic and Republican conventions, [DELETED] supported requirements levied by the Secret Service concerning name traces and other intelligence information relating to subversive influences which might affect those conventions.  WHD [Western Hemisphere Division of the CIA] should be able to provide a detailed resume of activities supported in this matter\".  Too bad that the \"detailed resume\" somehow avoided inclusion in this section. <br><br> *************************** <br><br> I'll have to continue my notes later on this week, as time does not permit me to continue. <br><br> Enjoy reading, brothers and sisters! <br><br> Workers of the World, Unite! <br><br> Varlet <br>  <br> <\/p>\n","contact":"","link":"","address":"","phone":"","parent_id":0,"mime_type":"text\/plain","summary":"The CIA has, after a long battle against activists and journalists using the &quot;Freedom of Information Act&quot;, finally released a document outlining the &quot;most sensitive operations&quot; it had undertaken from the 1950s through 1973. ","numcomment":6,"fileurl":"\/uploads\/","filesize":null,"article_url":"\/news\/2007\/06\/201873.php"},"attachments":[],"comments":[{"id":202020,"heading":"how about","article":"Did this expose' mention that Claw Shaw was an agent involved with the JFK assassination?  They must have forgotten this little project of executive action.","author":"Claw Shaw and JFK","parent_id":201873,"mime_type":"text\/plain","created":"2007-06-29 08:56:35","modified":"2007-06-29 08:56:35","fileurl":""},{"id":202021,"heading":"Typo","article":"Typo.\r\nNot Claw Shaw. Wrong person.  Clay Shaw and his Permindex world  market where JFK was going to visit after Dallas.\r\nThe CIA denied his status as an agent of the CIA during the trial of Clay Shaw.\r\nThey lie.  All the time.","author":"How about Clay Shaw & JFK?","parent_id":201873,"mime_type":"text\/plain","created":"2007-06-29 09:05:26","modified":"2007-06-29 09:05:26","fileurl":""},{"id":202048,"heading":"Wel,actually......","article":"......what we need to do is to check and see if they released all the pertinent documents about Guy Bannister....a  PI who was renting office space in the same building in NO as Oswald and his &quot;Fair Play for Cuba Committee'....this is what they have refused to release for over 40 yrs now.....my guess is they didnt release them  now either","author":"Lord Locksley","parent_id":201873,"mime_type":"image\/jpeg","created":"2007-06-29 15:23:31","modified":"2007-06-29 15:23:31","fileurl":"\/usr\/local\/www-domains\/la.indymedia.org\/public\/uploads\/2007\/06\/autopsy1.jpg","image":{"original":"\/usr\/local\/www-domains\/la.indymedia.org\/public\/uploads\/2007\/06\/autopsy1.jpg"}},{"id":202049,"heading":"Whoops!!!","article":"  THIS is the pic I should have included with my above post.,....","author":"Lord Locksley","parent_id":201873,"mime_type":"image\/jpeg","created":"2007-06-29 15:26:03","modified":"2007-06-29 15:26:03","fileurl":"\/usr\/local\/www-domains\/la.indymedia.org\/public\/uploads\/2007\/06\/autopsy1.jpgt28j6h.jpg","image":{"original":"\/usr\/local\/www-domains\/la.indymedia.org\/public\/uploads\/2007\/06\/autopsy1.jpgt28j6h.jpg"}},{"id":202053,"heading":"what?","article":"did the Lord hack his own post?\r\nThis might explain the same photo being posted with only one going through.\r\nGuy Banister, former ONI was just another employee of the shadow government which took over the USA on 22 Nov 63 when they blew JFK away.","author":"wow","parent_id":201873,"mime_type":"text\/plain","created":"2007-06-29 16:53:38","modified":"2007-06-29 16:53:38","fileurl":""},{"id":202056,"heading":"Well,somebody did.....","article":".....hack my post,that is....that first pic isn't even on my computer","author":"Lord Locksley","parent_id":201873,"mime_type":"text\/plain","created":"2007-06-29 17:08:23","modified":"2007-06-29 17:08:23","fileurl":""}]}