{"article":{"id":200880,"heading":"Motion for Remand : Denied","author":"lowell keef jr.","created":"2007-06-16 22:27:48","modified":"2013-11-11 00:48:47","last_modified":"Mon, 11 Nov 2013 07:48:47","article":"



Our Motion for Remand was denied on May 16, 2007 as we expected . The Motion was based on the errors our second attorney made . Some of those errors are pointed out in reference material, see: OSB disciplinary. My father and I were convinced by the attorney, our testimony concerning my son’s Motion for new Attorney would not be needed . Only after we lost the trial, did we learn our testimony could not be allowed in the appeal, because we did not testify . The Motion for Remand was the only hope for us to testify.

The written transcripts to the Motion for new Attorney are incorrect . See reference material: Audio Record, notice the difference in the time reading. My father, my son and I were all present on Feb. 11 2002 and we were shocked by something our Attorneysaid .I purchased the tape recorded transcripts by Fran Hooten . This tape was correct and had no static, we heard Mr.Coggins repeat his statement over and over again . Mom who once worked in the Judge Advocate

Generals office, said Judge Barron should have removed Mr. Coggins from the case, for defending the credibility of the confidential informant .

Due to the fact that we will not be testifying in a court of law, I will begin testifying here and will include my story and experiences along the way. My site has just been renewed and I will be posting soon. I believe we can all learn something from my story, please feel free to check in once and a while.

Lowell V. Keef Jr.<\/p>\n","contact":"lowellkeef@yahoo.com","link":"http:\/\/scint-stinks.com","address":"Coos County","phone":"","parent_id":0,"mime_type":"text\/plain","summary":"Getting behind the scene of a sting operation","numcomment":0,"fileurl":"\/uploads\/","filesize":null,"article_url":"\/news\/2007\/06\/200880.php"},"attachments":[],"comments":[]}