\r\nThis time it was about Obama's\r\n\"angst\" as a kid at Punahou School, an elite prep school in Hawaii.\r\n<\/p>\r\n
\r\n\r\n\r\nObama Classmates Saw a Smile, But No Racial Turmoil\r\n<\/b>
\r\n\r\n\r\nby Richard A. Serrano
\r\nLos Angeles Times, Sunday, March 11, 2007\r\n<\/b>\r\n<\/p>\r\n\r\n
\r\nThe kicker says: \"Hawaii classmates recall him as a happy kid who fit in. They\r\nsay they had no idea of the racial tension inside.\"\r\n<\/p>\r\n\r\n
\r\nThey say that today Sen. Obama is\r\n\"trying to show that he understands the indignities of racism and the economic\r\ntroubles that many believe continue to flow from the legacy of slavery.\"\r\n<\/p>\r\n\r\n
\r\nExcuse me? What’s that reference to \"economic troubles that flow\"?\r\n<\/p>\r\n\r\n
\r\nHow about \"economic troubles that flow\" from gross inequality, discrimination, bad schools, deindustrialization,\r\noutsourcing to countries with ridiculously low wages, crony capitalism, and a\r\ngenerally f**ked-up<\/i> corrupt Republican-dominated Establishment?\r\n<\/p>\r\n\r\n
The election is a year and a half away and this African-American is already sick and tired of \r\nMSM bull****<\/i> about Obama’s \"blackness.\"\r\n<\/p>\r\n\r\n
\r\nThe Times<\/i> published a picture from the school yearbook:\r\n<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n
\r\nThe caption says: \"A 1976 photo from the Punahou School yearbook shows ninth-grader Barack Obama -- front row, fourth\r\nfrom right -- with his class.\"<\/p>\r\n\r\n
\r\nThe kid looks cool. Were you that\r\ncool in the 9th grade? I, myself, was a total geek. So, the kid went through\r\nchanges in adolescence. So what? That’s what kids do in adolescence!\r\n<\/p>\r\n\r\n
\r\nNobody worries about the \"angst\" of the very self-righteous Rudolph Giuliani \r\ngrowing up in a large extended family that included cops, criminals, firefighters \r\nand Mafia hoodlums.\r\n<\/p>\r\n\r\n
\r\nMy dear wife does not agree with my FLAME-ON<\/strong> about this article. \r\nShe says if all the talk about Obama raises the consciousness of a lot of clueless folks \r\nabout the perniciousness of racism\r\nthat's a good thing.\r\n<\/p>\r\n\r\n \r\nI respectfully disagree. Want to\r\nhave a serious discussion about U.S. Sen. Barack Obama for president? Talk\r\nabout the issues and the man’s philosophy.<\/p>\r\n\r\n \r\nWant to have a serious discussion about racism and the \"economic troubles that flow\" \r\nfrom the U.S. Establishment? Bring it on. <\/p>\r\n\r\n <\/span><\/p>\r\n\r\n \r\nTo read more and leave a comment. Go to my Blog at \r\n\r\nCalifornia Greening\r\n\r\n<\/p>\r\n\n<\/body><\/html>\n","contact":"AlexCathy@aol.com","link":"cagreening.blogspot.com","address":"","phone":"","parent_id":0,"mime_type":"text\/html","summary":"Sunday's Los Angeles Times had yet another silly article about Sen. Barack Obama. This time it was about Obama's "angst" as a kid in an elite prep school in Hawaii. What MSM hokum! ","numcomment":5,"fileurl":"\/uploads\/","filesize":null,"article_url":"\/news\/2007\/03\/195003.php"},"attachments":[],"comments":[{"id":195005,"heading":"How Barack Obama learned to love Israel","article":"How Barack Obama learned to love Israel\r\nAli Abunimah, The Electronic Intifada, 4 March 2007\r\n\r\n(EI Illustration)\r\n\r\nI first met Democratic presidential hopeful Senator Barack Obama almost ten years ago when, as my representative in the Illinois state senate, he came to speak at the University of Chicago. He impressed me as progressive, intelligent and charismatic. I distinctly remember thinking 'if only a man of this calibre could become president one day.'\r\n\r\nOn Friday Obama gave a speech to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) in Chicago. It had been much anticipated in American Jewish political circles which buzzed about his intensive efforts to woo wealthy pro-Israel campaign donors who up to now have generally leaned towards his main rival Senator Hillary Clinton.\r\n\r\nReviewing the speech, Ha'aretz Washington correspondent Shmuel Rosner concluded that Obama "sounded as strong as Clinton, as supportive as Bush, as friendly as Giuliani. At least rhetorically, Obama passed any test anyone might have wanted him to pass. So, he is pro-Israel. Period."\r\n\r\nIsrael is "our strongest ally in the region and its only established democracy," Obama said, assuring his audience that "we must preserve our total commitment to our unique defense relationship with Israel by fully funding military assistance and continuing work on the Arrow and related missile defense programs." Such advanced multi-billion dollar systems he asserted, would help Israel "deter missile attacks from as far as Tehran and as close as Gaza." As if the starved, besieged and traumatized population of Gaza are about to develop intercontinental ballistic missiles.\r\n\r\nObama offered not a single word of criticism of Israel, of its relentless settlement and wall construction, of the closures that make life unlivable for millions of Palestinians.\r\n\r\nThere was no comfort for the hundreds of thousands of people in Gaza who live in the dark, or the patients who cannot get dialysis, because of what Israeli human rights group B'Tselem termed "one cold, calculated decision, made by Israel's prime minister, defense minister, and IDF chief of staff" last summer to bomb the only power plant in Gaza," a decision that "had nothing to do with the attempts to achieve [the] release [of a captured soldier] nor any other military need." It was a gratuitous war crime, one of many condemned by human rights organizations, against an occupied civilian population who under the Fourth Geneva Convention Israel is obligated to protect.\r\n\r\nFrom left to right, Michelle Obama, then Illinois state senator Barack Obama, Columbia University Professor Edward Said and Mariam Said at a May 1998 Arab community event in Chicago at which Edward Said gave the keynote speech. (Image from archives of Ali Abunimah)\r\n\r\nWhile constantly emphasizing his concern about the threat Israelis face from Palestinians, Obama said nothing about the exponentially more lethal threat Israelis present to Palestinians. In 2006, according to B'Tselem, Israeli occupation forces killed 660 Palestinians of whom 141 were children -- triple the death toll for 2005. In the same period, 23 Israelis were killed by Palestinians, half the number of 2005 (by contrast, 500 Israelis die each year in road accidents).\r\n\r\nBut Obama was not entirely insensitive to ordinary lives. He recalled a January 2006 visit to the Israeli town of Kiryat Shmona that resembled an ordinary American suburb where he could imagine the sounds of Israeli children at "joyful play just like my own daughters." He saw a home the Israelis told him was damaged by a Hizbullah rocket (no one had been hurt in the incident).\r\n\r\nSix months later, Obama said, "Hizbullah launched four thousand rocket attacks just like the one that destroyed the home in Kiryat Shmona, and kidnapped Israeli service members."\r\n\r\nObama's phrasing suggests that Hizbullah launched thousands of rockets in an unprovoked attack, but it's a complete distortion. Throughout his speech he showed a worrying propensity to present discredited propaganda as fact. As anyone who checks the chronology of last summer's Lebanon war will easily discover, Hizbullah only launched lethal barrages of rockets against Israeli towns and cities after Israel had heavily bombed civilian neighborhoods in Lebanon killing hundreds of civilians, many fleeing the Israeli onslaught.\r\n\r\nObama excoriated Hizbullah for using "innocent people as shields." Indeed, after dozens of civilians were massacred in an Israeli air attack on Qana on July 30, Israel "initially claimed that the military targeted the house because Hezbollah fighters had fired rockets from the area," according to an August 2 statement from Human Rights Watch.\r\n\r\nThe statement added: "Human Rights Watch researchers who visited Qana on July 31, the day after the attack, did not find any destroyed military equipment in or near the home. Similarly, none of the dozens of international journalists, rescue workers and international observers who visited Qana on July 30 and 31 reported seeing any evidence of Hezbollah military presence in or around the home. Rescue workers recovered no bodies of apparent Hezbollah fighters from inside or near the building." The Israelis subsequently changed their story, and neither in Qana, nor anywhere else did Israel ever present, or international investigators ever find evidence to support the claim Hizbullah had a policy of using civilians as human shields.\r\n\r\nIn total, forty-three Israeli civilians were killed by Hizbullah rockets during the thirty-four day war. For every Israeli civilian who died, over twenty-five Lebanese civilians were killed by indiscriminate Israeli bombing -- over one thousand in total, a third of them children. Even the Bush administration recently criticized Israel's use of cluster bombs against Lebanese civilians. But Obama defended Israel's assault on Lebanon as an exercise of its "legitimate right to defend itself."\r\n\r\nThere was absolutely nothing in Obama's speech that deviated from the hardline consensus underpinning US policy in the region. Echoing the sort of exaggeration and alarmism that got the United States into the Iraq war, he called Iran "one of the greatest threats to the United States, to Israel, and world peace." While advocating "tough" diplomacy with Iran he confirmed that "we should take no option, including military action, off the table." He opposed a Palestinian unity government between Hamas and Fatah and insisted "we must maintain the isolation of Hamas" until it meets the Quartet's one-sided conditions. He said Hizbullah, which represents millions of Lebanon's disenfranchised and excluded, "threatened the fledgling movement for democracy" and blamed it for "engulf[ing] that entire nation in violence and conflict."\r\n\r\nOver the years since I first saw Obama speak I met him about half a dozen times, often at Palestinian and Arab-American community events in Chicago including a May 1998 community fundraiser at which Edward Said was the keynote speaker. In 2000, when Obama unsuccessfully ran for Congress I heard him speak at a campaign fundraiser hosted by a University of Chicago professor. On that occasion and others Obama was forthright in his criticism of US policy and his call for an even-handed approach to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict.\r\n\r\nThe last time I spoke to Obama was in the winter of 2004 at a gathering in Chicago's Hyde Park neighborhood. He was in the midst of a primary campaign to secure the Democratic nomination for the United States Senate seat he now occupies. But at that time polls showed him trailing.\r\n\r\nAs he came in from the cold and took off his coat, I went up to greet him. He responded warmly, and volunteered, "Hey, I'm sorry I haven't said more about Palestine right now, but we are in a tough primary race. I'm hoping when things calm down I can be more up front." He referred to my activism, including columns I was contributing to the The Chicago Tribune critical of Israeli and US policy, "Keep up the good work!"\r\n\r\nBut Obama's gradual shift into the AIPAC camp had begun as early as 2002 as he planned his move from small time Illinois politics to the national scene. In 2003, Forward reported on how he had "been courting the pro-Israel constituency." He co-sponsored an amendment to the Illinois Pension Code allowing the state of Illinois to lend money to the Israeli government. Among his early backers was Penny Pritzker -- now his national campaign finance chair -- scion of the liberal but staunchly Zionist family that owns the Hyatt hotel chain. (The Hyatt Regency hotel on Mount Scopus was built on land forcibly expropriated from Palestinian owners after Israel occupied East Jerusalem in 1967). He has also appointed several prominent pro-Israel advisors.\r\n\r\nMichelle Obama and Barack Obama listen to Professor Edward Said give the keynote address at an Arab community event in Chicago, May 1998. (Photo: Ali Abunimah)\r\n\r\nObama has also been close to some prominent Arab Americans, and has received their best advice. His decisive trajectory reinforces a lesson that politically weak constituencies have learned many times: access to people with power alone does not translate into influence over policy. Money and votes, but especially money, channelled through sophisticated and coordinated networks that can "bundle" small donations into million dollar chunks are what buy influence on policy. Currently, advocates of Palestinian rights are very far from having such networks at their disposal. Unless they go out and do the hard work to build them, or to support meaningful campaign finance reform, whispering in the ears of politicians will have little impact. (For what it's worth, I did my part. I recently met with Obama's legislative aide, and wrote to Obama urging a more balanced policy towards Palestine.)\r\n\r\nIf disappointing, given his historically close relations to Palestinian-Americans, Obama's about-face is not surprising. He is merely doing what he thinks is necessary to get elected and he will continue doing it as long as it keeps him in power. Palestinian-Americans are in the same position as civil libertarians who watched with dismay as Obama voted to reauthorize the USA Patriot Act, or immigrant rights advocates who were horrified as he voted in favor of a Republican bill to authorize the construction of a 700-mile fence on the border with Mexico.\r\n\r\nOnly if enough people know what Obama and his competitors stand for, and organize to compel them to pay attention to their concerns can there be any hope of altering the disastrous course of US policy in the Middle East. It is at best a very long-term project that cannot substitute for support for the growing campaign of boycott, divestment and sanctions needed to hold Israel accountable for its escalating violence and solidifying apartheid.\r\n\r\nAli Abunimah is the co-founder of The Electronic Intifada and author of One Country: A Bold Proposal to End the Israeli-Palestinian Impasse\r\n","author":"I-Witness Palestine","parent_id":195003,"mime_type":"text\/plain","created":"2007-03-14 13:41:33","modified":"2007-03-14 13:41:33","fileurl":""},{"id":195025,"heading":"AIPAC hiding amongst Americans","article":"Obama is just another pro-zionist ass-kisser who knows when to bend over to the zionazi AIPAC just like the rest of the undemocratic party. There really isn't that much of a difference between them and the neo-cons on that note. Meanwhile U.S. tax dollars go to one of the most oppressive and genocidal regimes in the Middle East, a.k.a. Israel, while progressive jews get silenced on the matter when they speak out against the nazi-like polices of the pseudo-Jewish state that acts as the bulwark of the Anglo imperialsts.","author":"true jews against zionazis","parent_id":195003,"mime_type":"text\/plain","created":"2007-03-14 17:47:36","modified":"2007-03-14 17:47:36","fileurl":""},{"id":195026,"heading":"Ok, So AIPACS NOT EXACTLY HIDING","article":"Ok, so they're not exactly hiding.","author":"true jews against zionazis","parent_id":195003,"mime_type":"image\/jpeg","created":"2007-03-14 17:54:53","modified":"2007-03-14 17:54:53","fileurl":"\/usr\/local\/www-domains\/la.indymedia.org\/public\/uploads\/2007\/03\/cheney-aipac.jpg","image":{"original":"\/usr\/local\/www-domains\/la.indymedia.org\/public\/uploads\/2007\/03\/cheney-aipac.jpg"}}]}