{"article":{"id":194749,"heading":"Nuclear Power is Green - NOT","author":"reposted","created":"2007-03-08 19:12:52","modified":"2013-11-11 00:47:25","last_modified":"Mon, 11 Nov 2013 07:47:25","article":"<p>South African solar research eclipses rest of the world <br>  <br> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.int.iol.co.za\/index.php?set_id=1&amp;click_id=116&amp;art_id=vn20060211110132138C184427\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.int.iol.co.za\/index.php?set_id=1&amp;click_id=116&amp;art_id=vn20060211110132138C184427<\/a>  <br><br> ***************************************************************************************** <br><br> How green is nuclear power? <br>  <br> By Mark Clayton  | Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor <br><br> \"Saying nuclear is carbon-free is not true,\" says Uwe Fritsche, a researcher at  <br>  <br> the &Ouml;ko Institut in Darmstadt, Germany, who has conducted a life-cycle analysis  <br>  <br> of the plants. <br><br> Nuclear power has more than just a little greenhouse gas attached to it, when  <br>  <br> mining uranium ore, refining and enriching fuel, building the plant, and operating  <br>  <br> it are included. A big 1,250 megawatt plant produces the equivalent of 250,000  <br>  <br> tons of carbon dioxide a year during its life, Dr. Fritsche says. <br><br> Officials in the nuclear power industry say references to carbon-free energy in their  <br>  <br> promotions refer only to the power-plant operation &ndash; and are not intended to describe  <br>  <br> carbon emissions during the entire nuclear life cycle. <br>  <br>   <br>  <br> ....new reactors gives two to 10 times less climate solution for the amount of  <br>  <br> coal-power displaced than if you had bought cheaper solutions with the same dollars.\" <br><br> Found on the Climate Crisis Coalition website: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.climatecrisiscoalition.org\/blog\/\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.climatecrisiscoalition.org\/blog\/<\/a> <br><br> Click the link below for the entire article: <br>  <br> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.csmonitor.com\/2007\/0307\/p01s04-sten.html?page=1\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.csmonitor.com\/2007\/0307\/p01s04-sten.html?page=1<\/a><\/p>\n","contact":"","link":"","address":"","phone":"","parent_id":0,"mime_type":"text\/plain","summary":"Here is an article that talks of a new study \r\nthat shows nuclear to be not green, and the\r\nstudy did not even take into account the huge\r\ncost of decommissioning the plants after thier\r\n40 years of production which must be done with \r\nrobots because of the extreme radiation. The \r\nauthor apparently also has not been informed of \r\nthe new Solar Voltaic panels that bring the cost \r\nof solar equal to coal plants.","numcomment":0,"fileurl":"\/uploads\/","filesize":null,"article_url":"\/news\/2007\/03\/194749.php"},"attachments":[],"comments":[]}