{"article":{"id":178561,"heading":"Zimbabwe and Pan-African Liberation","author":"Gregory Elich","created":"2006-09-15 08:32:10","modified":"2013-11-11 00:44:18","last_modified":"Mon, 11 Nov 2013 07:44:18","article":"

Zimbabwe and Pan-African Liberation

An interview with Netfa Freeman, Director of the Social Action & Leadership

School for Activists

by Gregory Elich

Netfa Freeman is one of the more dedicated and clear thinking political

activists committed to making the world a better place. Working primarily on

issues relating to Africa and the African Diaspora, he is also an organizer

in the No War on Cuba Movement and an advocate for the anti-imperialist

cause in general.

In the West, there is a dearth of first-hand information on Zimbabwe, so

when

I learned that Netfa had recently returned from a trip to Zimbabwe, I

contacted

him and suggested an interview so that he could share his thoughts on his

trip.

He was kind enough to take time from a busy schedule to answer the following

questions.

[Q] You've just returned from Zimbabwe, where you visited the Ujamma Youth

Farming Project. Before we talk about your trip, please tell us about the

organization you head, the Social Action and Leadership School for Activists

(SALSA).

[Freeman] Yes, I am the Director of the Social Action & Leadership School

for Activists (a.k.a. SALSA), but SALSA is not an organization unto itself.

SALSA is actually a program of the larger Institute for Policy Studies

(IPS). Since 1963 IPS has sought to transform ideas into action for peace,

justice, and the environment by linking and strengthening social movements.

IPS is a Washington DC based non-profit, multi-issue think tank that has

been working with movements from the U.S. Civil Rights era onwards.

SALSA is just one of several programs\/projects of IPS which was started in

1994 as successor to IPS' Washington School. I’ve been with SALSA and IPS

since 2000. SALSA is a skills training program that offers classes or

workshops in various aspects of social justice activism and organizing.

Secondly, SALSA offers free public political education forums on various

issues ranging in scope from the local DC area, to national and

international. The skills classes fall under general categories, such as

organizational development, communications, money matters, leadership and

management, techno-activism, etc. We generally refer to the forums in the

political education category as our “policy” forums. There are no confines

as to what subjects we cover in our policy forums but because the program

basically reflects my own ideological leaning, the forums tend to have a

more revolutionary regard that is more left than liberal.

Frankly, although IPS and my colleagues at IPS often refer to themselves as

liberal, I’m not a liberal. Personally I’m definitely more left than

liberals tend to be. In fact the organization I voluntarily belong to, which

better reflects my affinity for, and commitment to Africa in general and

Zimbabwe in particular is PALO, the Pan-African Liberation Organization.

Instead of a philosophy, PALO regards “pan-Africanism” as an objective,

which is the total liberation and unification of Africans on the continent

and in the Diaspora under scientific socialism. This is in line with the

practical and theoretical contributions of the late President Kwame Nkrumah.

[Q] Kwame Nkrumah’s revolutionary theory continues to be an inspiration for

the pan-African movement, and many regard Zimbabwe as the focal point of

that struggle. What are your thoughts on the role of Zimbabwe in the

pan-African movement?

[Freeman] As Africa herself must be the land base for the pan-African

Movement, it’s crucial for there to be at least one beacon of revolutionary

progress and resistance against imperialism for Africa’s people, scattered

and suffering around the world. Zimbabwe’s anti-imperialist stance makes her

that beacon. Nkrumah referred to such bases as liberated zones and urged

pan-African revolutionaries to protect our liberated zones at all costs.

This is because such zones are to serve as the launching pads of the

struggle for a Unified Socialist Africa.

Zimbabwe has a very pivotal role in this neocolonial phase of the

pan-African Movement for several reasons. Not the least of which are the

land reforms that have boldly swept the country. Nowhere on the continent

have Africans taken as radical a measure toward land reform as we have in

Zimbabwe. And not only have Zimbabwe’s land reforms been an inspiration for

people in other African states, they have gained respect in Diasporan

countries such as Venezuela and Bolivia. Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez

has publicly praised Zimbabwe’s land reform process as a model he would like

to emulate in that country. Another thing that makes Zimbabwe pivotal is its

role regarding our sister states: such as aiding Mozambique against the

foreign inspired counter insurgency of RENAMO; military assistance for SWAPO

’s liberation struggle in Namibia; recently helping the Congo to secure its

borders against CIA backed incursions; and lending troops to the AU mission

to stabilize Sudan. No other African state is upholding such a cooperative

position at this time. Zimbabwe even strategically held off on its land

reforms at the request of South Africa and other Southern African states, so

not to strengthen the belligerence of white settler colonialists in those

countries. And they did this at great cost to the integrity of their own

struggle. These things are concrete expressions of pan-African cooperation.

Furthermore, President Mugabe is a leader who also publicly keeps the

inspiration of Kwame Nkrumah alive. That is, not only have all the

aforementioned things been done under the leadership of Mugabe, he also

often mentions Nkrumah and his ideals in speeches addressing other Africans.

He is not afraid to speak of socialism at a time when no other African

leader dares utter the word. President Mugabe openly condemns imperialism

with the boldness and clarity we have only come to expect from leaders such

as Fidel Castro or Hugo Chavez. That is why President Mugabe receives such

resounding applause wherever he goes on the continent of Africa or when he

speaks at UN or AU summits. No other African leader is doing what he is

doing right now, and because he is, Zimbabwe stands as an inspiration to

African people the world over. We need to see and hear such things. They

serve as political education for pan-Africanism.

[Q] You’ve put your ideals into action through, among other things, your

work with the Ujamma Youth Farming Project. Tell us about that project, and

your purpose in visiting it.

[Freeman] An integral part of any genuine social justice movement or

revolution is the empowerment of the working class, the women in society and

the youth. The Ujamma Youth Farming Project (UYFP) was established in June

2005 by a group of Zimbabwean university students who saw Zimbabwe’s land

reform as a means to empower youth. The project is an African youth-led

farming cooperative that has secured a 100-acre plot in the central city of

Gweru under the government’s A1 resettlement program and is registered under

the Ministry of Youth, Gender and Employment Creation. (1) Led by the

project’s chairman and cofounder, Kwanisai Mafa (age 32), the leadership

core of UYFP is a very socially conscious group that stands against poverty

and for the development of the African family, nation and continent toward

their fullest potential. Our mission is to empower African youth through

gainful farming initiatives so that they’re able to get the essential skills

necessary to function as lifelong productive citizens in Africa’s

development.



The first goal is to grow into an agribusiness that can eventually offer

produce to wholesalers and retail outlets in and around Midlands province in

Zimbabwe. But a longer-term goal is to establish a training program so that

youth of African descent from outside of Zimbabwe and even outside of Africa

will be able to visit, meet, train\/work, and bond with their youth

counterparts on the farm. I began working with the UYFP from here in the

U.S. in August of 2005, serving as U.S. liaison to help raise mostly

pan-African support for it. Since the formation of UYFP we’ve learned that

our biggest challenge has been in mobilizing resources to kick-start the

project. So that has been my main role: to secure resources and promote the

project. While we have every intention of becoming self-sufficient, we don’t

qualify for loans from local banks and the land can’t be used as collateral

because it was acquired under the A1 village development scheme for

non-commercial farmland.



My purpose for recently visiting the project is basically to finally see

first hand what I’ve been supporting since last year and also to get first

hand experience of Zimbabwe’s political situation; the effects of U.S. and

British sanctions, etc. This, because I’ve also been working as an organizer

with PALO to expose the misinformation against Zimbabwe by Britain, the U.S.

and Western world in general. I’ve become pretty familiar with the political

situation through my own research into the things a person can glean from

historical and geopolitical context, but I wanted to also fortify that

knowledge with a physical visit to the country. As you’re well aware Greg,

there is an intense propaganda assault of misinformation and lies being

waged against Zimbabwe, and so many people only respect what someone has to

say about a place when the person has been there. So I went there, to do a

site visit of the farm and to see what else I could learn about the

political situation. Although UYFP does not refer to itself as a political

initiative, the political implications of the project are obvious to me and

that is what really motivates my work with it.

[Q] There is indeed an unrelenting propaganda campaign by Western

governments and media. You saw a good deal of the country while you were

there. As an eyewitness to the current situation in Zimbabwe, how does what

you saw compare with reports in the corporate media? I am also interested in

your assessment of the impact of Western sanctions on the nation, as well as

how well the spirit of the people is holding up under that onslaught.

[Freeman] Well, there is no short answer to that question but I’ll try. Yes,

we did see a good deal of the country, my partner and I. We were able to

travel from what’s basically the northeast of the country -- Harare -- into

the center provinces where Gweru is, further south to Bulawayo, then up

toward the northwest to the great Mosi-oa-Tunya Falls (what the settlers

renamed Victoria Falls), then back through all those areas to Harare again.

We did all this taking the people’s public transportation, buses and what

are called kombis (2).

It was a very educational and gratifying trip to say the least. Politically,

Zimbabwe is in an intriguing situation that is grossly misrepresented by the

Western World and even by too many so-called progressives, Africans alike.

As you say in your book, Greg, complexity and context are neglected in the

analysis\/information that is readily available about Zimbabwe. The police

and the state news media (at least TV news) consist overwhelmingly of young

people, below the ages of 30, and many women. Now in my view, youth and

women are generally the sectors of society that are too zealous about

justice and too courageous to be in the majority in carrying out the

maintenance of a repressive state. Claims of an atmosphere of repression and

volatility that are propagated by British and U.S. media are pure lies. From

what we saw, life is relatively peaceful. The police don’t even carry guns,

as they all do in the U.S. What kind of dictator or repressive government is

it when the police don’t even carry guns? In fact, we barely saw any

uniformed police presence in the cities we visited. They were mostly on the

main roads where they had checkpoints trying to catch smugglers of currency

and foreign exchange.

The sanctions have exacerbated a shortage of foreign exchange and also, as a

result, instigated a black market in exchange of Zimbabwean currency for

foreign currency. This is reaping crippling effects on the economy, making

foreign currency that much more scarce for the government and banks, which

of course need it to conduct business in the international economy. Because

the Zimbabwean currency had become too physically cumbersome to carry and

complicated to calculate, the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe introduced a new

currency while we were there that slashes three zeros from the bills. They

were phasing in this new currency while phasing out the old. The measure

wasn’t expected to reduce the hyperinflation but merely to make currency

more manageable.

Western reports regularly imply that there is repression of news media that

is not state-owned. But we saw opposition papers being sold openly on the

streets by vendors and we saw people reading them. However, more people

seemed to be reading the Herald and the Sunday Mail, the state’s papers. The

state-owned news -- TV or print -- also reports on corruption among

government officials. So the suggestions that the state’s news institutions

are less reliable simply on the grounds that they are state-run is bogus in

my view. It’s the content of the news that should be the gauge of

reliability, not just the source. We also found that people are very

distrustful of foreigners. They know that there is a propaganda assault on

their country and that people have come there for video footage and

interviews as a means to present things out of context. We had several

people urge us that when we returned to the U.S. to tell the truth about

Zimbabwe. It was disheartening to have my own African sisters and brothers

hold this level of skepticism about me but I understood it.

The effects of the illegal and immoral sanctions are evident. I refer to

sanctions as “war without guns or bloodshed.” Only the imperialist powers

have the ability to enforce sanctions and are therefore always exempt from

them. Because of this reason sanctions are always immoral. It’s a blatant

lie that the sanctions are confined to travel and financial assets of

government officials. (3) In fact maybe I should not say it’s a lie because

those imposing the sanctions publish public information that would easily

dispel such a misrepresentation. Basic needs such as gasoline have become

scarce, making it susceptible to exploitation on the black market. While the

black market offers national currency at much lower than official rates, it

offers gasoline for triple, sometimes four times, the official market price.

People need gasoline, so if they have the money, they pay it. Almost

everywhere we went there were power outages. Because the country imports

electricity the outages are a means of conserving energy. In spite of all

these things the people seemed to adjust to the challenges and for many

sanctions seem to harden them with either animosity and\/or the resolve to

oppose the governments of Britain and the U.S.

The fuss over Operation Murambatsvina is another propaganda ploy. (4)

Western news hasn’t ceased mentioning the government’s demolition of

shantytowns in Zimbabwe last year. But what is always neglected is Operation

Garikai, which I’ve seen with my own eyes. (5) This noble operation is

rebuilding brand new homes for all those displaced by Operation

Murambatsvina that are of course far better than their previous homes. You

can see that construction of the homes has been interrupted by sanctions,

but why does no one even talk about it? I’ve taken video footage of them. Is

it ignorance or intentional omission? I tend to believe the latter because

when I’ve presented these facts to so-called progressives they all but

physically run from them. We cannot let the enemies of Africa and enemies of

all humanity dictate how we see the world or Africa. They’ve become very

sophisticated in how they advance their misinformation so we must become

that much more sophisticated in how we get ours.

[Q] That is beautifully put. You’ve touched on a curious aspect of a segment

of the Western Left. It rightly condemns U.S. intervention in the Middle

East, while simultaneously favoring sanctions, covert operations and war

against other manufactured enemies, such as was the case with the bombing of

Yugoslavia, or as is happening today with the economic strangulation of

Cuba, North Korea and Zimbabwe. It often seems that there are those on the

Western Left who have lost their bearing, and are thus prey to appeals to

support imperial adventures under the pretext of human rights, when in fact

other motives are at play. How does Western policy against Zimbabwe relate

to the invasion and occupation of Iraq? And finally, is there anything else

you would like to add concerning Zimbabwe or the pan-African Liberation

struggle?

[Freeman] This is a complicated question that is directly related to

ideology. On the one hand there is the class in the West that is reflected

by governments and business corporations, and which are incestuous in many

ways. We can refer to this as the capitalist class. This class has the power

to imbue society with its ideas and values, fooling much of society into

believing that they share the same economic and political interests as the

capitalist class. Then there are others in society who unwittingly adopt

those values and ideas, or else see the contradictions in them and reject

that. Many on the Western Left have chosen to adopt enough of these values

and ideas that they cannot go far enough left. They’re stuck in a middle

ground trying to reconcile things that are irreconcilable.



More simply put, Western policies against both Zimbabwe and Iraq are not

motivated by any desire to see democracy or justice for the people of those

countries. They are in fact motivated by the need to dominate and exploit

the labor and resources of those countries. Because the West is so much less

than democratic or just, exploitation is the only thing that can motivate

its policies. Yet many on the Western Left cannot accept this fact. Even

though all facts and history reveal this, they cannot accept that the ideas

and values of democracy and justice are complete hypocrisies and lies on the

part of these governments and corporations. On some level they acknowledge

the injustices of the policies but on another level they believe these are

isolated incidents or merely the result of shortsightedness. If they didn’t

believe this, then they would have to reassess their understanding of

reality in general. For example, often we hear from those among the Western

Left denouncing such things as the U.S. blockade against Cuba, saying “It’s

a failed policy”; “It has failed to bring freedom and democracy to Cuba,” as

if the policy is really to bring those things to Cuba. Moreover they would

not dare consider that Cuba is already a democracy. Even when this Left

doesn’t accept Western policies against a country, they generally do accept

some degree of demonizing propaganda, whether true or false. We can see this

with Zimbabwe, Cuba and even Venezuela to an extent.



A practical reason is that most of this Left works through non-profit

organizations or NGOs. And because most get their funding from, either their

government, a corporate foundation, or some rich individual(s) with no

interest in seriously challenging the system or world order, the West has

effectively co-opted the Left by funding its activities. They then are torn

between biting the hand that feeds them -- that is, speaking complete truth

to power -- or acquiescing to merely an acceptable level of protest against

them by speaking only select truths to power.



So more to the relationship between policies toward Zimbabwe and Iraq, you

also have varying factors at work such as the racial stereotypes and what

the people will put up with. The Arab world is effectively stereotyped as

fanatical terrorists that have irrational hatred for the West and everyone

in it. They can be bombed and outright invaded because the outcry will not

garner enough support to effectively stop it. Yugoslavia was and still is to

a large extent unknown by the masses in the U.S., so bombing that nation was

not such a big deal; especially since some of the blame can be shared with

NATO and there is no obvious racism that would upset anybody. But for Africa

it is a different story. While most Africans\/Black people around the world

are politically disorganized and too imbued with Western values and ideas to

take an effective stand against Western policies toward Africa, the easiest

way to get us organized and energized around Africa would be for the West to

bomb or invade her. Somalia did not go well or last long and Zimbabwe stands

out more as a Black Liberation struggle against racist settler colonialism.

So instead they use covert operations by mercenaries and the fostering of

internal destabilization. This works because our stereotype is a bit

different from our Arab sisters and brothers. We are pegged as not being

able to get along and being naturally violent toward each other. You can see

this regarding our populations, even within the Western countries

themselves, and many of us have accepted this stereotype and self fulfill

the prophecy if you will.



So in short, policies toward all these countries are essentially the same:

to maintain Western hegemony over countries that refuse to dance to its

tune. And the dilemma of the Western Left essentially is to try protesting

against the injustices of those policies while at the same time not

upsetting the powers that be too much, or questioning their own class

privileged perceptions of reality and stereotypes. They can only appeal for

the powers that be to simply become a little less oppressive and “more

benevolent,” instead of working to organize and fight “with” (instead of

“for”) the people who are under subjugation in order to completely transform

the world order. That is, fight to dilute the dominance of the powers that

be and turn them into ordinary folk who are no longer capable of

exploitation and oppression.



The one thing I would like to add about the pan-African Movement is that

revolutionary pan-Africanism recognizes the interconnectedness of humanity.

All just people around the world must recognize the value in a United

Socialist Africa. I’d like to quote Ho Chi Minh of Vietnam who said simply,

“The Liberation of Africa is the Liberation of man.”

For further information, contact:

The Social Action and Leadership School for Activists

http:\/\/www.hotsalsa.org\/<\/a>

The No War On Cuba Movement

http:\/\/www.nowaroncuba.org<\/a>

The Ujamma Youth Farming Project

http:\/\/ujammafarming.org\/<\/a>

The Pan-African Liberation Organization

panafricanlib@yahoo.com<\/a>.

To make a donation to the Ujamma Youth Farming Project

http:\/\/ujammafarming.org\/donate.htm<\/a>

Gregory Elich is the author of Strange Liberators: Militarism, Mayhem, and

the Pursuit of Profit

http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/gp\/product\/1595265708\/sr=8-1\/qid=1156814483\/ref=pd_bbs_1\/002-5343377-5198403?ie=UTF8<\/a>

Notes

(1) There are two programs comprising Zimbabwe's land reform process. The A1

model is intended to create small family farms for landless peasants or

those previously farming in areas unsuitable for agriculture. The aim of the

A2 model is to create commercial farms for those who have the means to

become rapidly productive.

(2) Kombi - a mini-van bus

(3) On December 21, 2001, President Bush signed into law S. 494, the

Zimbabwe Democracy and Economic Recovery Act of 2001. Senator Jesse Helms of

North Carolina, the one-time supporter of apartheid Rhodesia, sponsored the

bill. The law instructed American officials in international financial

institutions to \"oppose and vote against any extension by the respective

institution of any loan, credit, or guarantee to the government of

Zimbabwe,\" and to vote against any reduction or cancellation of debt. The

law also authorized President Bush to fund opposition media and

organizations in Zimbabwe. U.S. officials in international financial

institutions were joined by British and Western European officials in

ensuring the near-total cutoff of foreign currency flowing into Zimbabwe, a

crippling blow for a nation that had to import 100 percent of its oil and 40

percent of its electrical power supply.

(4) Operation Murambatsvina was the first phase of a program to improve

living conditions for the urban poor. In this phase, squalid slum dwellings

were torn down.

(5) Operation Garikai is the second phase of that effort, in which new homes

are being constructed for the urban poor. The intent is to provide decent

housing installed with plumbing to former slum dwellers. It is indicative of

the nature of Western reporting that much emphasis was given to Operation

Murambatsvina, while Garikai has been almost entirely ignored. Western media

thereby managed to deliberately distort the project and portray it as simply

a malevolent effort to drive people into homelessness.

<\/p>\n","contact":"gelich@worldnet.att.net","link":"http:\/\/www.llumina.com\/store\/strangeliberators.htm","address":"","phone":"","parent_id":0,"mime_type":"text\/plain","summary":"An interview with Netfa Freeman, just returned from Zimbabwe","numcomment":1,"fileurl":"\/uploads\/","filesize":null,"article_url":"\/news\/2006\/09\/178561.php"},"attachments":[],"comments":[]}