{"article":{"id":145807,"heading":"A Canadian Soldier's Life Held in Contempt - The Verdict","author":"J. Wizard","created":"2006-01-30 04:29:39","modified":"2013-11-11 00:37:46","last_modified":"Mon, 11 Nov 2013 07:37:46","article":"

When we cancel other people's human rights, we cancel our own.

= Highwater =



----

The Verdict

The Winnipeg Police Department is running a fencing operation

out of their \"Exploitation\" Unit. Disclosed by a current

serving officer in the Unit during the preliminary. In one

case used as an example, a law abiding Winnipeg business owner

had 50,000 dollars worth of business equipment stolen, and if

he wanted it back, he would have to make costly \"legal\"

efforts through a corrupted Justice system in Winnipeg that

holds Canadian Soldiers in complete contempt by \"Law\". The

Crown has not only refusing to co-operate with defending

Winnipeg citizenry, in relationship to the, National problem

of fencing through bad lawed Police action operations, and the

lotteries [information forwarded in part by the elected

Premier of our Province], but also, in respect to our

sacrificing soldiers. Soldiers who Canada now knows without

shadow of doubt, are being maliciously propagandized through

the corporate mouth pieces of the most heinous war criminal of

history, the ungodly enemy of Creation responsible for

instituting the terrorist crimes of 9\/11. Obstructing Justice

by aiding and abetting the terrorist crimes of first degree

mass murder in New York City is suppose to be a serious

offence in Canada. So, as treasonous to Canadian Liberty, the

Crown in my case is refusing to have the police chief, or

other Crowns look into this matter. [I suggested by my Court

motion to our Court system to consider contacting another

office from a different province perhaps.] While the Judge,

publicly for the Winnipeg record, agreed to side with the

Crown instead, without stating the whys - that Justice for

Canada would not be served under his rule on my suggestion.

Just put a soldier in prison if they should dare stand up in

defense with their lives for Canada is what this unjust case,

yet to be reported on by our national press, is turning out to

be actually. I would ask you once again, to please make some

effort to get on local Winnipeg Radio, or Coast to Coast to

plead for some defense on this matter of morality. You know,

this Freedom thing does involve you too. So, George Norrie

and the rest of you lot, listen, I think you've made some

horrible judgment calls, and I'm asking you now, to live up

to your responsibilities to my America, and invite me on for

free discussions on these matters.

All I want is to challenge the man.



Merci.

P.S. Maybe Harper won't be so bad... Doh!



---

A Soldier's Life Held in Contempt





The way I see it, is that I am completely documented correct

on who was responsible for the terrorist crimes of 9\/11. I

have my own theories on why our media and police services have

failed our Soldiers by refusing to support my cause directly

thus far, but I am far without hope.

I believe the failures of me gaining direct wide support

through our police services and the Court of Queen’s Bench, is

much more so for fear of uncertainty, and lack of leadership,

than a general, across the board support of furthering Bush’s

war crime sprees by going still silent while Canadian soldiers

are left forsaken. I speak out publicly often regarding the

911 evidence in America, and email campaigns of my writings,

done for public recognition, I’m told, continue to swell to

near epic proportions. Intelligence officers the world over

most certainly know of my position on this matter. Those who

may support the fight for Bush rule in our police services,

can mostly only do so, risking in dishonorable blind personal

fear of the great unknown I figure. And, crazy as this may

sound, I believe there is a spooky cool God, for I’m walking a

groove most all of the time.



The affidavit that starts “1. National Security Issues” was

submitted in conjunction with my motion to request assistance

from the Court. The additional paper “Stand Together or

Don’t”, was an added part of the same affidavit.

The affidavit with 38 positions was submitted with the two

motions, “Order of Production” and “for the Crown to Stay

Proceedings”. Duplicate copies of the same affidavit were

submitted in each respect.



----



http:\/\/radio.indymedia.org\/uploads\/looking_out_for_number_one.mp3<\/a>

\"Holy Christ..\"

---

http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/articles\/A25177-2004Mar25.html<\/a>

\"Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage contradicted

Rice's claim that the White House had a strategy before Sept.

11 for military operations against al Qaeda and the Taliban.\"

This indicates that with the foreknowledge gained through

prior experiences of Muslim fundamentalists, such as the

Taliban, being forbidden by their religion [Jihad] to

persecute the innocent, left the Bush Administration with only

needing to do, and had officially done, was to use no evidence

to back up allegations to insure invasion plans, and as a

result, a deliberate treasonous criminal strategy to not

follow the crime scene leads at the real murder scene to nab

to true evil doers. For otherwise - spoil the top secret

plot.



http:\/\/www.indybay.org\/uploads\/news-tunes.mp3<\/a>

http:\/\/newmexico.indymedia.org\/uploads\/2006\/01\/news-tunes.mp3<\/a>

These are the motions than were filed on behalf of Johnny

Wizard's defense in Winnipeg. A man arrested for threatening the

continuing existence of the lawless demon anti-Christ, Our Mr.

bush Jnr. The demon nazi who murdered thousands in New York

City as God's enemy. I, beg and plead my case to ALL that

will listen. The tyrannies of suffering on our God happen

when good people go silent in the face of evil. Please do not

forsake all that is good within yourself, by leaving my call

unheard from.

--------

AFFIDAVIT

AFFIDAVIT OF JOHNNY WIZARD



I, Johnny Wizard, in the city of Winnipeg, Province of Manitoba

MAKE OATH AND SAY:



1.

Pakistani ISI Director General Ahmad orders an aide to wire

transfer about $100,000 to hijacker Atta. Ahmad later resigns

after the transfer is disclosed in India and confirmed by the

FBI. [Dawn, 10\/8\/01, Times of India, 10\/9\/01, Wall Street

Journal, 10\/10\/01, AFP, 10\/10\/01] The individual who makes the

wire transfer at Ahmad's direction is Saeed Sheikh, later

convinced for kidnapping and murdering reporter Daniel Pearl

in February 2002. ABC News later reports, \"federal

authorities have told ABC News they've now tracked more than

$100,000 from banks in Pakistan to two banks in Florida to

accounts held by suspected hijack ringleader Mohamed Atta.\"

[ABC News, 9\/30\/01] CNN also reports the $100,000 transfer,

and the New York Times specifies that it came in 2000. [CNN,

10\/1\/01, CNN, 10\/6\/01, New York Times, 7\/10\/02] Ahmad's order

must have preceded June 2000, since that's when Atta and

others started opening bank accounts and receiving the money

($109,910 is received by Atta and Marwan Alshehhi between June

19 and September 18). [MSNBC, 12\/11\/01]

2.

On March 3, 2002, MSNBC's Jim Miklaszewski reported that he

had received anonymously, top secret presidential war strategy

documents dated September 9th, 2001, originating from

Condolezza's office, outlining a strategy to invade

Afghanistan premised on blaming bin Laden a terrorist, but

providing no evidence to back up the allegations, thereby

guaranteeing criminal invasion. Only workable if Laden pleads

innocence to a crime that hadn't yet taken place, a crime

serious enough to \"justify\" sacrificing American GIs truly for

a liquefied natural gas pipe line for pension thieving Enron.

[\"The Dahbol Working Group\" and Bridas] Any evidence for any

offense would have been sufficient to have Muslim

fundamentalists hand Laden immediately over, as they had

offered [as others of other nations had also] repeatedly

during the Clinton years.

CBC and CNN have still, to this day, consciously refused to do

any follow up on the intelligence, deciding instead on behalf

of dying people everywhere, our public devolvement of a just

society.

3.

RTÉ News - US rejects Taliban bin Laden evidence calls

21 September 2001 17:41

The White House has rejected requests from Afghanistan's

ruling Taliban for proof that Osama bin Laden was responsible

for last week's attacks. According to the US Secretary of

State, Colin Powell, the United States has enough evidence to

try bin Laden in an American court.

The US Government said there would be no negotiations.





4.

[This following document was the official damning account]

Responsibility for the terrorist atrocities in the United States

4 October 2001

http:\/\/www.pm.gov.uk\/output\/page3554.asp<\/a>

[This Internet Domain is Britain's Prime Minister's]

\"This document does not purport to provide a prosecutable case

against Usama Bin Laden in a court of law.\"

The document doesn’t hold ANY case, as that was the strategy.... See?

5.

Investigating the Investigation

http:\/\/www.alternet.org\/story.html?StoryID=17816<\/a>

After playing a tape of Cheney's statement, Russert asked

Daschle, \"Did the vice president call you and urge you not to

investigate the events of Sept. 11?\" Daschle flatly

contradicted Cheney: \"Yes, he did, Tim, on Jan. 24, and then

on Jan. 28 the president himself at one of our breakfast

meetings repeated the request.\"

....\"[T]hat request was made\" by Cheney not only on Jan. 24

and by Mr. Bush four days later, but \"on other dates

following\" as well.

6.

ABCNEWS.com : FBI Called off Terror Investigations

http:\/\/abcnews.go.com\/sections\/primetime\/DailyNews\/FBI_whistleblowers021219.html<\/a>

Two veteran FBI investigators say they were ordered to stop

investigations into a suspected terror cell linked to Osama

bin Laden's al Qaeda network and the Sept. 11 attacks...

`You Will Not Open Criminal Investigations'

7.

October 9 2001 - The Times of India



\"While the Pakistani Inter Services Public Relations claimed

that former ISI [the \"Pakistani CIA\"] director-general Lt-Gen

Mahmud Ahmad sought retirement after being superseded on

Monday, the truth is more shocking. Top sources confirmed

here on Tuesday that the general lost his job because of the

\"evidence\" India produced to show his links to one of the

suicide bombers that wrecked the World Trade Center. The U.S.

authorities sought his removal after confirming the fact that

$100,000 were wired to WTC hijacker Mohammed Atta from

Pakistan by Ahmad Umar Sheikh [Omar Saeed] at the instance of

General Mahmud [Ahmad]. Senior government sources have

confirmed that India contributed significantly to establishing

the link between the money transfer and the role played by the

dismissed ISI chief. While they did not provide details, they

said that Indian inputs, including [Omar Saeed's] mobile phone

number, helped the FBI in tracing and establishing the link.\"





8.

No evidence was brought against Laden for nine eleven, none.

[So according to Bush's official top secret Presidential

directives] While Laden himself claimed he played no part in

911. Still, to save the lives of third worlders on the brink

of starvation, Laden agreed to hand himself over, but Bush

refused the offer, while CBC and CNN denied to report on that

fact for the behalf of now dying dismembered American GIs.

Once the indiscriminate bombing began, targeting almost every

building in the country of Afghanistan, Laden then claimed he

had no choice but to fight back to defend US innocent from the

ungodly enemies of Creation\/Freedom. Then the clear to all

fake video came out with an actor who's face wasn't even close

to looking remotely like Laden, but for almost the facial

hair. [Bridge of the Jamaican actor's nose is HALF as long in

proportion to Laden’s for example, and surely frightfully

shocking for some, the actor doesn't even take blame for 911

either!] Photos comparing the two faces never aired on CBC and

CNN available in about twelve seconds with the power of the

Internet.

9.

former FBI deputy director and murder victim John O'Neill

\"the main obstacles to investigating Islamic terrorism were

U.S. oil corporate interests and the role played by Saudi

Arabia.\"

10.

Alex Jones interviewing Former German Defense Minister Andreas Von Buelow

\"Bush signed W199I months before 911 ordering the FBI not to

stop Al-Qaeda. They threatened to arrest FBI agent Robert

Wright if he tells us what he knows.\"

11.

Mr. Bush was quoted somewhere regarding Mr. Laden's guilt of

complete innocence with \"We don't need any evidence, we know

he's guilty.\"

12.

www.govexec.com\/column\/forwardTodaysColumn.cfm?sectionID=14

\" [FBI's] Edmonds concluded that documents clearly showed that

the Sept. 11 hijackers were in the country and plotting to

use airplanes as missiles. She said documents also included

information relating to their financial activities. \"

13.

The honorable Argentinean oil company Bridas' relationship can

not be understated as the Bush Administration's primary motive

on criminal invasion of Afghanistan to save his biggest

corporate backers, the American pension thieving Enron.



From \"An American demands the truth from you\" by Karl W. B. Schwarz

\" I demand to know what energy companies were in that Cheney

Energy Task Force meeting and what discussions there were as

to the steps that would be taken to remove the Taliban and

Bridas Corporation as the last remaining obstacle to the

United States controlling the Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline. I

met that company in 1999 and have known since then about the

Bridas v Unocal, $15 billion interference of contract lawsuit

in US District Court, Southern District of Texas. I also know

about the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals decision on September

9, 2003 that upheld the Bridas $500 million arbitration

settlement and the March 22, 2004 denial of Writ of Certiorari

at the United States Supreme Court, Case 03-1018, Turkmenneft

v Bridas.\"

14.

From \"Fresh Memories of War\" by Kandea Mosley, The Ithaca Journal (New

York), 25 May 2002:

\"We were told there were no friendly forces,\" said [Army

Private Matt] Guckenheimer, an assistant gunner with the 10th

Mountain Division at Fort Drum. \"If there was anybody there,

they were the enemy. We were told specifically that if there

were women and children to kill them.\"

15.

Quote from \"A Dossier on Civilian Victims of United States' Aerial Bombing of

Afghanistan: A Comprehensive Accounting\"

by Professor Marc W. Herold Ph.D., M.B.A., B.Sc.

Departments of Economics and Women's Studies McConnell Hall

Whittemore School of Business & Economics University of New Hampshire

When U.S warplanes strafed [with AC-130 gunships] the farming

village of Chowkar- Karez, 25 miles north of Kandahar on

October 22-23rd,killing at least 93 civilians, a Pentagon

official said, \"the people there are dead because we wanted

them dead.\" The reason? They sympathized with the Taliban.1

When asked about the Chowkar incident, Rumsfeld replied, \"I

cannot deal with that particular village.\"

16.

US TROOPS ADMIT SHOOTING IRAQI CIVILIANS

http:\/\/www.veteransforpeace.org\/us_roops_admit_061903.htm<\/a>

\"American troops today admitted they routinely gun down Iraqi

civilians - some of whom are entirely innocent.

And in an admission that directly contrasts with the line

coming out from the Pentagon's spin doctors Specialist

Corporal Michael Richardson added: \"There was no dilemma when

it came to shooting people who were not in uniform, I just

pulled the trigger.\"



The Crown would argue this issue isn’t in her jurisdiction,

however, it is in mine as a expressive communicator fighting

for freedom from real tyranny. An irrational tyranny that

only stands exercised by corporate \"news bite\" censorship, and

false imprisonments. An American Prosecutor put Sergeant

Benderman in prison for refusing to kill God’s children. Now,

what do you really think America would do, if \"they\" knew that

too?

17.

Bush demands total impunity on the war crimes he is personally responsible for

http:\/\/www.wsws.org\/articles\/2002\/oct2002\/icc-o12.shtml<\/a>

18.

http:\/\/english.aljazeera.net\/NR\/exeres\/FD57CF75-62E8-4C43-BF2D-2D0F0F89437B.htm<\/a>

\"Marines said the men fired on them. A senior officer said

they had no weapons, but that with shots coming in the men

were legitimate targets because they ran.\"

19.

http:\/\/www.yellowtimes.org\/article.php?sid=1872<\/a>

CAIR also wants the Pentagon to investigate a photograph

circulating the Internet of two Iraqi boys and a U.S.

soldier. A smiling soldier stands besides the two boys who

are giving a \"thumbs up\" sign, as one of boys holds a sign

written in English that reads, \"Lcpl Boudreaux killed my Dad,

th[en] he knocked up my sister!\"

(Link to photo: http:\/\/www.cair-net.org\/images\/lcpl11.jpg<\/a>)

20.

Guardian Wednesday 7, 2001 - \"FBI claims bin Laden inquiry was frustrated\"

[this story was on Bush’s top secret W199i directive]

This information would take a well paid intelligence officer,

or CBC reporter no more that thirty seconds to look for follow

ups. For, I know, the BBC did also a national news report on

it.

21.

INTERVIEWER: Are you aware that this tank is contaminated with radiation?

SOLDIER: No, it isn't radioactive.

INTERVIEWER: But we have measured it.

SOLDIER: No, it isn't radioactive, not this tank.

\"Basra is on a river,\" he noted. \"A DU shell poisons the

water in a river. It poisons the grasses and the grains. It

sinks into the ground and poisons the water table. When it

gets into the body, it does incredible damage. The

combination of radioactivity and heavy metal toxicity is such

that it affects the DNA in such a way that you get genetic

alterations.\"

[thousands of tons of measured radio-active toxic waste, heavy

metals, oxidized to microscopic particles as small as a tenth

of a micron have been deposited in our airspace, however, CBC

and CNN have refused to inform ourselves on the scientifically

measurable extremely serious health concern issue..]

22.

Justice Department lawyer John Yoo, \"In the exercise of his

plenary power to use military force,\" Yoo insisted, \"the

President's decisions are for him alone and are unreviewable.\"

Yoo was also quoted recently on CBC national news report

regarding the torturing of innocent people to death, to state

something like \"President Bush doesn’t have to justify his

opinions to Canada or even to the United States for that

matter.\"

23.

The incriminating FBI email dated 22 May 2004, indicates that president Bush personally

signed off on certain interrogation techniques in an executive order.\"

(See original at http:\/\/globalresearch.ca\/articles\/FBI.121504.4940_4941.pdf<\/a>)



24.

U.S. deserter 'didn't want to have to kill babies'

\"Mr. House will argue that American soldiers are guilty of

war crimes and that forcing Mr. Hinzman to fight in Iraq

would have made him a war criminal.

He will call as a witness former U.S. Marine Staff Sergeant

Jimmy Massey, who is expected to testify that he and other

soldiers shot more than 30 unarmed Iraqis, including women and

a six-year-old child, at a U.S. military checkpoint.\"

25.

http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/articles\/A45373-2004Dec7.html<\/a>

that a clandestine military task force in Iraq was beating

detainees, ordering Defense Intelligence Agency debriefers out

of the room during questioning, confiscating evidence of the

abuse and intimidating the debriefers when they complained.\"

26.

http:\/\/www.truthout.org\/docs_04\/printer_121004W.shtml<\/a>

A sacked CIA official is reportedly suing the agency for

allegedly retaliating against him for refusing to falsify his

reports on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction to support the

White House's pre-war position.

27.

``I was faced with being deployed to Iraq to do what the

infantry does, kill people, and I had no justification for

doing so,'' he testified. ``This was a criminal war. Any act

of violence in an unjustified conflict is an atrocity.''

28.

Williams's squad stopped a dump truck, and an Iraqi climbed

out. \"Light him up!\" the sergeant ordered, according to

testimony, and the squad opened fire, killing the unarmed man.

Williams and a squadmate reportedly got into an argument over

which of them had scored Company C's first kill.

29.

It gets worse. We already knew about the Franklin County,

Ohio, precinct that tallied 4,258 votes for Bush when only 638

people had actually voted.

30.

http:\/\/middleeastinfo.org\/forum4970<\/a>

http:\/\/wallofhate.com<\/a>

Israeli Soldiers Going In For The Kill: A 13 year old

Palestinian [JEWISH] school girl is about to die

\"It's a little girl. She's running defensively eastwards, a

girl of about 10. She's behind the embankment, scared to

death.\"

\"Anyone who's mobile, moving in the zone, even if it's a

three-year-old, needs to be killed.\"

31.

US forces unleashed more than 20 air strikes and some 60

artillery rounds on Monday, said Major Todd Desgrosseilliers.

[...] An AFP reporter in the Jolan district said one building

in every 10 had been flattened. As US-led troops closed in on

the neighborhood overnight, at least four 900-kilogram bombs

were dropped in the city's northwest.

[destructive radius of a 900-kilogram bomb is half a

kilometer, and all TRUE accounts of death rates for Fallujah

alone, a city where the population was forbidden to leave,

exceed two hundred thousand innocent souls.]

32.

The Bush Administration

In rush to defend White House, Rice trips over own words

Friday, March 26 @ 10:12:40 EST

By Walter Pincus and Dana Milbank, San Francisco Chronicle

\"Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage contradicted

Rice's claim that the White House had a strategy before Sept.

11 for military operations against al Qaeda and the Taliban.

The CIA contradicted Rice's earlier assertion that Bush had

requested a CIA briefing in the summer of 2001 because of

elevated terrorist threats. And Rice's assertion this week

that Bush had told her on Sept. 16, 2001, that \"Iraq is to

the side\" appeared to be contradicted by an order signed by

Bush on Sept. 17 directing the Pentagon to begin planning

military options for an invasion of Iraq.\"

[ And...]

http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/articles\/A25177-2004Mar25.html<\/a>

\"Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage contradicted

Rice's claim that the White House had a strategy before Sept.

11 for military operations against al Qaeda and the Taliban.\"

This indicates that with the foreknowledge gained through

prior experiences of Muslim fundamentalists, such as the

Taliban, being forbidden by their religion [Jihad] to

persecute the innocent, left the Bush Administration with only

needing to do, and had officially done, was to use no evidence

to back up allegations to insure invasion plans, and as a

result, a deliberate treasonous criminal strategy to not

follow the crime scene leads at the real murder scene to nab

to true evil doers. For otherwise - spoil the top secret

plot.

33.

Blix nor Elbaradei, nor Kofi, suggested, implied, or stated,

that Iraq had failed to comply with the newest U.N.

resolution: 1441.

HANS BLIX: \"And at this juncture, we are able to perform

professional no-notice inspections all over Iraq and to

increase aerial surveillance...\"

With complete, one hundred percent access to go where ever the

Bush Administration pleased without delay, left a situation of

an unjust war only detrimental to an ability to bring about

any good or better thing. American soldiers are being

sacrificed for no better good or reason understood, for if

progress will ever be made, it will be when they work to bring

about a political situation that was there in Iraq before the

Bush Administration starting murdering innocent people for

nothing . Well, not completely, for Bremer shipped 19 billion

to Greenspan early on, then, hundreds of millions were sent

back.



34.

Professor Steven E. Jones, a tenured BYU professor, went

public several weeks ago after releasing a 19 page academic

paper, essentially showing how the laws of physics do not

support the WTC's freefall and, consequently, the official

government story. It should be known that World Trade Center

Building Seven was not struck by an airplane, yet fell exactly

the same as the two towers.

Below both towers were found pools of molten steel, only

creatable with the heating by high explosives.

Excerpts from \"Me, Art Bell, and 9-11 by Lisa Guliani\"

The official version of the WTC collapses defy both Galileo's

Law of Falling Bodies, and also Isaac Newton's First Law of

Motion.

..if we know that hydrocarbon fires can only reach a maximum

temperature of 1517 degrees Fahrenheit, how could they

possibly have melted this steel, when the melting point of

steel is 2,795 degrees and the boiling point of steel (when it

becomes a molten liquid) is 5,182 degrees Fahrenheit.

The existence of these burning pools of molten steel were confirmed by:

- Mark Lorieux of Controlled Demolition, Inc

- Peter Tully, President of Tully Construction

- and the American Free Press newspaper



35.

\"To be truthful about it, there was no way we could have got

the public consent to have suddenly launched a campaign on

Afghanistan but for what happened on September 11...\"

Tony Blair Speaking To House of Commons Liaison Committee

36.

The Washington Post, 23 September 2001.

At American urging, Ahmed traveled ... to Kandahar,

Afghanistan. There he delivered the bluntest of demands.

Turn over bin Laden without conditions, he told Taliban leader

Mohammad Omar, or face certain war with the United States and

its allies.

Mahmoud's meetings on two separate missions with the Taliban

were reported as a \"failure.\" Yet this \"failure\" to extradite

Osama without providing a shred of eidence was part of

Washington's documented design, providing a pretext for a

military intervention which was already in the pipeline. If

Osama had been extradited, the main justification for waging a

war \"against international terrorism\" would no longer hold.

Nor would the ready to go Patriot Act. Incidentally, when

MSNBC contacted the Whitehouse regarding the top secret

invasion of Afghanistan plan, it was confessed that the plan

had been \"fully implemented\"



38.

\"Why of course the people don't want war ... But after all it

is the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it

is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it

is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or

a communist dictatorship ... Voice or no voice, the people

can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is

easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being

attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism

and exposing the country to danger.\" -- Hermann Goering, Nazi

leader, at the Nuremberg Trials after World War II

39.

On the wall of the National Holocaust Museum: \" Thou shall

not be a victim, thou shall not be a perpetrator, and thou

shall not be a by-stander\"



----------------



When we cancel other people's human rights, we cancel our own.

=Helen & Harry Highwater=

---

HELP ME FOR CHRIST SAKE!

Please, I beg you to assist me in this cause immediately!

Ack! It turns out that there IS a criminal conspiracy run out of the

Winnipeg Police Department's Exploitation Unit!

Ack!! It turns out that the Crown IS aiding and abetting the

terrorist crimes of first degree mass murder!!

Ack!!! It turns out the Judge threw this whole Revelation thing out

without any consideration offered, while the Crown is currently

working on a public ban of disclosure in Winnipeg on these

continuing documented crimes!!!

50,000!! a pop! Stolen from law abiding business owners!!!

Crimes forwarded to the public in part by the concern of Manitoba's Premier!!!!!

SEND THIS TO EVERY RCMP OFFICER OR SOLDIER OF FORTUNE YOU CAN FIND!

Send this post for me to also Winnipeg media persons or to anyone who

will listen. If you don't, then, you ain't my friend. Come on! Do

something for us, and I promise to help you out later if I can.

Help me through the goodness of your heart, so we won't get

railroaded into prison fraudulently by those that hide in darkness

as pirates of our human will. The will to be free.



The Crown's interpretations of my possessions are not my expressions!!

I AM INNOCENT.

The Judge through this whole thing out for the defense

without any consideration offered to OUR COURT!

HELP!!!

---

Since I am representing myself on these particular criminal

matters, Legal Aid is not required to lend assistance on the

grounds that I'm not co-operating with the system as it

operates through professional Barred representations. [I am

eligible for walk in consultations but nothing of the sort of

assistance I am requesting] Considering the complexity of my

judicial matter, I would request legal assistance from the

Court in these following areas.

1. National Security Issues

I need assistance in understanding the legal statutes that our

national security services are obligated to practice under, to

insure our national security matters are being truly defended

in my respect. No change in summation of my character was

altered, after they were granted a search warrant to verify it

was me who publicly spoke out for honorable FBI officers

denied their rights to speak freely, then as the Court knows,

instead of doing what they argued to grant such privilege to

infringe on my personal liberty, enforced a less than perfect

law that most others would buckle under, even if they harbored

no criminal intent, and would never do anything to infringe on

the rights of any child. For I challenge; it does not serve

Canada's interest (in particular our teen soldiers) to

knowingly have Canada propagandized under the serious failures

of CBC and the National Security Services to lend no wanting

cry to hear REAL FBI officers who factually allege, with

evidence and everything, President Bush's business partner,

(who was at the Whitehouse Sept. 9th working on the top

secret invasion of Afghanistan strategy to heavily arm heroin

pushers who war to keep women as slaves while weaponizing

children - done all for a liquefied gas pipe line to profit

his darling dear Enron) funded 9\/11's \"mastermind\"

\"ringleader\" Mohammad Atta. Inside sources from the RCMP have

notified me, that in the last four years, Section D's salaried

employees, have done practically nothing to serve Canada's

interest in this respect. While Canada's CSIS does not have

the legal ability to speak out publicly regarding the criminal

transgressions of President Bush, and because of this nature

of CSIS's position, they have almost only fears to live with

by trying. A CSIS officer told me, many were completely aware

of President Bush's criminality regarding his hugely

treasonous actions of mass murder on 9\/11, but could do

practically nothing about it outside of filing the reports

with the federal government, or maybe anonymously sending

something to CBC, with no promises that anyone would actually

read it. All the while, the senior CSIS boss brags

contemptuously in public about his ties and commitment to his

friends in the ISI. Perceived easily\/mistakenly I'd imagine

as a threat to all of Canada's Honorable police officers and

Judges. [General Ahmad was the Bush junta's appointed head of

the ISI.] I think Canada's Prime Minister Paul Martin is

genuinely a good man, but it is hard to see him publicly take

a stand on this issue, [if he even received said reports] on

behalf of honorable police officers and soldiers everywhere,

in defense of the human race, risking everything, considering

he already does bring about a great deal of good for Canadians

where he stands. [Compared to you know, a let's send the kids

to war for whatever Harper, or nobody in Winnipeg

(\"officially\" 86%) wants us to give away the public assets so

let's do it anyway for ourselves privately Filmon] But to know

the RCMP's Section D, sides that they can't tell us the top

secret reason they have not perused Justice for the sake of

Canadian soldiers who bravely put their lives on the line, of

which some have already died, is a situation no Canadian would

tolerate if they knew these freely available facts to decide

for themselves. Sure we can be counted lucky that only so few

Canadians have died thus far, but when will the sacrifice of

Americans, Afghanis, Iraqis, and soon to be Iranians with the

Syrians, along with more than fifty other countries officially

marked for death by the lawlessly irrational bushite

terrorists, be more than YOUR willing to bare? As publicly

reported repeatedly in European press, Mr. Sattler ordered

the bombing of health care clinics in Fallujah as first strike

targets because he didn't want doctors or nurses to \"falsely\"

report that his forces target primarily the innocent to steal

more from America in blood and treasure. Then under Sattler's

command, they proceeded to monstrously murder more than two

hundred thousand innocent souls, while covering the region in

radio-active toxic waste that will continue to kill for a

scientifically estimated billion or two years. Hell on Earth

is what un- arrested Sattler represents as an enemy to all

living things. God included. An aside: Did you know the

commander of the Third Infantry, Maj. Gen. Buford 'buff'

Blount III, is truly a Saudi Wahhabist in disguise, who took

up the job at the request of the Bush junta, and subsequently

left near 170 tons of plastic explosives unprotected for

looting in Qaqaa? Why? Well when asked why he commanded to

leave the weapons unattended to instead, go carnage Baghdad,

with, I'm serious, sanctioned thieving expeditions, he

replied, he just wanted to let us know he was there. \"We just

wanted to let them know that we're here.'' In Basra, the

coalition is still leaving as of last week, more than 30 known

weapons storage facilities unprotected. See, the neo-con

peenacker gang can't steal everything without a stupid man war

going. Left continuing unattended without national

discussions, leaves further in it's wake, more innocent

victims of war crimes fallen undefended. I would ask that

instead of me seeking to find where it is written, that the

RCMP must be committed to getting the man for nine eleven,

perhaps I can just request we work together, for a national

CBC radio forum kicked off by some kinda joint, international

press release acknowledging briefly our failures to

communicate in the past, and politely request where Canada

could go through open line discussions on these very serious

matters. We must not allow our soldiers to be made

misinformed by CBC's unwillingness to bravely with honor,

defend our great Nation. Or, perhaps, Canada might want to

consider hiring me on as, we'll see how it goes honorary RCMP

spokesperson?, a paid consultant for my expertise in

recognizing the real bad guys, and then I'll go out there, and

win the good fight by using praise with fewer insults. If we

stay committed to defending freedom by defeating war

criminals, we all will be the better for it. Now, take me to

your leader.

2. Local Police Issues

As so was brought to the attention of the Courts in the

previous motions, through considering the charge that was

brought against me, (where no criminal intent in alleged, and

nobody can possibly see a digital image until it is already at

least in one's possession, case closed, I'm free to go still

without my stolen computer gear.) I discover, the child

exploitation unit is not operating in a manner that would

effectually reduce the proliferation of truly illegal

materials. They have included images to demonize me that they

must know are left legal to distribute, or for those couple

images categorized as for sure illegal unto themselves, are

left publicly unhindered when it comes to Police questioning

in a manner that would concern illegal public expressions.

Now, I personally don't believe the Courts are consciously

operating in a nefarious manner deliberately to steal computer

gears to sell as sadomasochists who enjoy seeing lovers of

life go to prison falsely for five year stints, but come on,

something seriously needs to be done in how things there are

run. I believe the failures are, in part, do to the personal

fears officers have of the information universe; for to

acknowledge information sharing through p2p networks or

Usenet, would be to witness criminal code violations by the

score going corporately unaddressed. Like Bush being guilty

for high treason in God's America for example, Iraqi church

goers slaughtered by faithful Bush lovers, women raped by

\"freedom fighting\" GIs, the sex slave trade, or that VLT's are

being run criminally (section 209, 380(1) 380(2), 181, 52(1-4)

with a math game scam that even a sixth grader can figure, but

not the \"Free Press\" editor, or commercial savvy CJOB's Vic

G-----. Being our city's big Bush backers, where our dying

universe is simpler, like \"we don't need any evidence, we know

he's guilty\", refuses a, trying to be responsible citizen to

formulate their own conclusions through our media on why we

have laws. Anyway, I need to have some one to cross check the

\"illegal\" images through recorded internet domains, to see

which ones are\/were located in Canada and elsewhere, and what

if any attempt the exploitation unit tried to limit found

providers. I suspect many providers they would claim they

can't do anything about, are so not because a crime is

occurring, but in that respect, actual evidence of criminal

conduct would be required before an internet provider, server,

or site owner could be recommended for censorship. Not this,

twenty year olds look like they could be ten year olds, or

that, simply naked children being human should not be viewed

in their\/our minds as something youthfully beautiful.

To Police effectually, I would suggest a public domain

transparently coded checksum program checker to automatically

recognize, known illegal materials made available free, with a

downloadable database updated by the work of one or two

officers monitoring currently available internet image traffic

- classifiable almost near the speed of electricity across the

country. This action is good to take despite my personal

innocence or fraudulent guilt, for media labelings are

completely impossible to designate content\/control, but as

such, shouldn't forbid Police services from locating where

possibly actual hugely offensive content is being distributed

through. With volunteer co- operation of programming, a user,

server, or internet service provider could be warned of

material almost in their possession as expression is

classified criminal so then simply delete it, and carry on.

I'm confident such Police planning with open for public

appeals to fine tune further, would end putting the hugely

profitable exploitation units across the continent almost

completely out of business. Now, who truly wants that?

3. Constitutional Challenges

This possession charge absent intent, where everybody is auto

guilty to lose all their stolen computer gear through

fraudulent demonization of the innocent included, is a for

sure, crime in progress. I'd imagine if we had a public

inquiry, we'd find what the exploitation crews are doing, is

needing to locate only a small few arguably illegal

depictions, then trumping up a lot of fraudulent totals.

Figuring, I'd imagine, if they openly started convicting

individuals for a couple of images they perhaps deleted when

witnessed, people might begin to ask, just how much money is

the unit taking in sold stolen merchandise? Perhaps 50,000

dollars in a single case where the business owner of said

stolen property wasn't even charged for a criminal offense!

No troublesome Court appearance required to protect your

public business image even! Generally, in cases that do reach

trial, all images are seldomly reviewed by the Courts, and at

the \"professional\" porno viewers discretion, or the Crown, a

small sample is only offered. [The professional naked people

person they have in my case I suspect is lost somewhere in

bushville as the clinically insane, or just extremely helpful

to my Judicial cause, thanks big guy, either way.] This has

worked largely unhindered because lawyers for the defense

wouldn't generally see a connection. For only one freely

available image that you couldn't see until you already had

it, is all that is needed to put a, loss for words Canadian,

in prison for half a decade. Not only that, but such

convictions insist irrationally that the guilty must also be

sexually deviant and require professional counseling. The law

enforced absent rights infringed needs to be Constitutionally

challenged as clearly unjust, and the sentencing structure as

being seriously cruel. [What does one guilty of an actual

assault for comparison get, or better yet, threat of assault

that was never truly made?] So, as a result, I need the

assistance of Constitutional lawyers who would provide me

consultations on prepatory requirements and on the relevant

Constitutional questions regarding this specific challenge.

And maybe co-operation with the Crown or Police chief to tally

records and total sales figures on cases under similar

circumstances to consider the exploitation unit for

re-evaluation. [Example: The foolish, faith in ignorance

argument given by all similar units, is that nothing can be

securely deleted from a hard drive is assuredly patently

ridiculous. Truly indicative however, that we do indeed have

a real hidden problem here regarding their\/our intelligence

gathering capabilities.] While maybe supporting public

discussions on how to even improve further, the valuable work

that the exploitation unit surely does do already somewhere

I'm sure to operate for our interests. We may together have

to overthrow CJOB with our human skills at demanding some

space to talk about bettering our lives by communicating

without two minute commercials every five minutes, and opening

up the phone lines to talk about whatever. They take too much

from us as the clearly disenfranchised already. Like, so

who's talk radio station is it anyway?

4. The Crown's Crown

I have concerns regarding the job requirements that our

community asks a Crown to bravely achieve. One, would be to

pursue Justice for the principled betterment of our society.

It is clear to anyone familiar with my case, that our

corporate media managers have decided for one fear or another,

that such noble reaches must be left from the grasp of

Canadian soldiers and their loving giving families. This

place the Court holds of a principle that all people should be

treated fairly, includes those we know Bush has already had

murdered in America under these left silenced demands for a

true accounting by good police work completed already. The

fear that every criminal Court Crown shrugs off when proudly

defending the innocent in our legal challenges, seems thus

far, absent in support of Justice for Johnny. When I read

statements from the Crown stating, John's legal arguments

against traitor Bush is irrelevant to the case our Crown

hold's against myself, in our name as Canadians, smacks of an

unjust and blind totalitarian state. Corporately broadcasted

uncertainty is forsaking the innocent lives of Bush's

continuing real murder victims. Certainly, the Crown has a

responsibility to pursue just causes, and granted, can falsely

suspect I don't hold the best of intentions towards life with

everything I am. However, the Crown's summations of my

character will never change the official FBI's conclusions

arrived at by following the crime scene leads, at the real

murder scene, to discover who personally is still escaping

arrest for mass murder of our good friends in New York City on

9\/11. A crime who's principle perpetrators obviously

faithfully count on this form of injustice to dictate

continuous failures by our Crown to serve our public interest.

For whatever reason, my case documents a corporate news agenda

of non-committal in our pursuit of Justice for ourselves as

the little people. Ourselves, including the Crown's of all

Canada, are, without doubt, denied fair representation by CBC

standards. Canada is being left not defending honorable

American police officers, doing their jobs to the best of

their ability, should not leave too, our Public's Crown

unrepresented. (If the Crowns of Canada so willed it in our

names.) So, I would ask that the Crown's refusal to speak out

for Canada, while fighting to silence my cries with an unjust

as cruel prison sentence, be investigated for obstructing

Justice, and therefore, aiding and abetting the terrorist

crimes of first degree mass murder. Now, how to do this...

I'm not sure. Perhaps the Court's assistance of aid in the

form of one or two Crown offices from a different province in

Canada could be considered, or a Constitutional Law firm more

up on what all I got to work with here. Look, somebody has

tricked my nation, and subsequently our naiver youths, into

excepting Canadians can not hear the silenced screams of

global tyranny. If soldiers the world over need to die for

Bush, let it be for something worth fighting. Freedom must be

Canada, a Canada that would go if asked, in favor of Universal

Justice always. Just ask US.



Your Friend,

John W.

-----------------

I know I'm innocent under the law as it currently stands, and

in addition, I wished to teach our Courts why the law stands

unjust against our public in other respects. With no criminal

intent to obtain or distribute something illegal alleged

against myself, and the simple truth that one can not perceive

an image until it is at the very least, already in one's

possession, says enough by itself. But most importantly, the

Crown's interpretations of my possessions are not my

expressions. Example: I could have in my possession a

written work from one who espouses the glories of war criming,

but I, personally, am diametrically opposed to it's unwise

declarations. I still use it however to gain understanding of

my world in which I politically work to improve God's World

through indivisibly principled reason.



Feel free to do with this as you will.



---------------





THE QUEEN'S BENCH



WINNIPEG CENTRE





NOTICE OF MOTION

For an Order of Production



BETWEEN:





HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN,



and



JOHNNY WIZARD





Accused.





This Notice of Motion regarding an Order of Production is to

have disclosed to the defense, the complete evidence without

undue hindrance, evidence the Crown holds against the accused

as a member of our public. These following arguments are the

reasons why Justice must prevail in these proceedings:



Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms section 7. \"No person

shall be deprived of life, liberty or security of the person

except in accordance with the principles of fundamental

justice.\"

R. v. Stinchcombe \"[...] counsel for the Crown is under a

general duty to disclose all relevant information.\"

In R. v. Stinchcombe, the Supreme Court of Canada held once

again, as any legitimate Court of any land would, that the

accused in criminal cases has a Constitutional right to full

and complete disclosure of the Crown's case. Yet, in the

criminal case involving myself, the Crown's refusal to return

my legal property [such as including my actual expressions] is

motivated by contempt for fundamental justice - for true

accountability - by intentionally working to deceive our

Courts through denying the evidence of one: the charge

against me is truly fraudulent under our law as it stands

currently, and two: that I don't already have the silent

moral support of every honorable top secret intelligence

officer this world over.



Canada's \"Commission of Inquiry into the Actions of Canadian

Officials in Relation to Maher Arar\"

\"The RCMP notes that because national security investigations

are criminal investigations, the possibility of judicial

scrutiny always exists and the presence of this possibility

acts as an indirect accountability mechanism.\" [Maher Arar was

an innocent Canadian tortured and left for murdered by the

irrational as criminal pro-bush forces negatively influencing

Canadian jurisprudence.]



Firstly, I, like any, need ready easy access to all the

evidence the Crown holds against myself, to indicate a

possibly hidden motive behind her criminal allegations. For

it is in our authority as a free society that the Crown holds

any legitimacy.

It would be unfair for our Courts to side with the unjust

Crown on not giving me ready easy access to the evidence, but

for only by hugely limiting degrees that include costly bus

rides, or as the seriously impractical, hundreds of thousands

of printed texts that would likely fill roomfuls.

I need to provide the evidence of my actual expressions to

counter balance the false interpretations the Crown alleges,

when it comes to asking where specifically the rights of a

child are being compromised when she makes her defined as

sexually dysfunctional inferences. All the images on my

computer, deleted and otherwise, are not my expressions.

Similarly, are all the written texts on my computer those of

words I hold to be my own personal philosophy. As indicated

by the Supreme Court of Canada's Sharpe case, a defense

against fraudulent accusations regarding the Rights of our

children being compromised, can be readily addressed early on

by understanding the possession charge in relative context to

the personal life of the accused.



R. v. Sharpe

\"Section 163.1(6) creates a further defence for material that

serves an \"educational, scientific or medical purpose\". This

refers to the purpose the material, viewed objectively, may

serve, not the purpose for which the possessor actually holds

it.\"

So, purpose of digital media as determined illegal must

therefore, be backed firstly by criminal intent, for without

any intent you have no purpose. A defense is made available

by the Sharpe decision on personalprofessional conduct to

indicate actual established purpose of accused to prevent

blind \"overreaching\". The Supreme Court of Canada's deep

concerns of \"overreaching\" are very much apparent in my

particular criminal matter. Conduct of individuals who have

lost their purpose in Police keeping, who aren't being managed

to express through our Police actions, a public interest in

where the \"offensable\" images are coming from, or came, but

instead, where it's all going as potential new innocent porno

victims with millions of dollars worth of stuff they can get

away stealing. [I've read porno cops in America recently

acquired 300,000 more American names of households to raid,

off of one single server found managed in violation, but have

taken a pause before then moving on to arrest anybody who has

ever used the internet for whatever, to consider, just what

have we gotten ourselves into here.] See, perfectly legal

imagery can be made into illegal thoughts relatively quickly

by the weaker irrationals that exist within our police

services. Where, to prove for the record, a twenty two year

old is only twelve, even when she has in her possession all

her proper paperwork, completed puberty, a living mother, a

popular working web site and historical documentations, is

just foolishly impossible. While at Your end Mr. Surfer

Citizen, your demonized guilty, until proven innocent of

thinking their faulting criminal perceptions, they do

practically nothing to verify. Without needing to establish

intent, they make off like bandits. See, under a simple

possession charge, there is no allegations of intent to obtain

or distribute something illegal, and likewise, not found a

responsible public's interest in seeking the means of which

the criminal content was as could be LEGALLY provided. The

last thing we want in our dying world is a setup where private

legal businesses are selling, promoting, and releasing content

that only becomes illegal when the exploitation unit comes

into your home to steal your stuff by grossly misunderstanding

what the threat actually is.

By exercising our right to perceive representations of that

which is made freely available, is of in itself, important to

the sociologist, psychologist, concerned parent, and of

course, the conceptualizing artist reflecting on our shared

reality.

My private and public expressions are more tuned to those who

are personally responsible in escaping arrest for running

death squads against innocent children in Afghanistan financed

by the undefended as uniformed American tax paying Public,

[10th Mountain Division] a criminal enterprise still cashing

in on the rewards of bush's mass murder campaigns. Or, the

dropping of cluster dud land mines throughout residential

school districts to murder our children indiscriminately.

Mercury tainted vaccines that for sure cause irreparable

damage to North American children, or as currently, about John

DeCamp's just released updated 2005 edition, about the secret

White House-linked national child sex-ring entitled \"The

Franklin Cover-up.\" However, the real motivating factor

[intent] in the Crown's purpose by attempting to pirate our

public's right to defend Ourselves judiciously, is more

specifically because I articulate the HONORABLE FBI's official

publicly available findings on who orchestrated, and funded

the crimes of 911. Namely, Mr. Bush Jnr. along with his

business partner, the still escaping Lieutenant General

Mahmoud Ahmad.



[University of Ottawa Professor Michel Chossudovsky, has

researched the Ahmad\/Bush relationship as documented by CNN

ABC et al, and can be quested for at www.globalresearch.ca]

http:\/\/www.globalresearch.ca\/articles\/CHO206A.html<\/a>

http:\/\/www.prisonplanet.com\/new_revelations_on_911.htm<\/a>

The Crown to not fight on our behalf regarding this easily

verifiable mass murder issue, is indicative of an intention,

to cast aside the concern of all children who benefit from my

communicating higher truths for the betterment of the entire

public body. I ask our Court, who, in Canada, informs our

public truthfully as I do, that the \"scumbags\" Canada's own

General Hillier is referring to get Canadian youths for sure

killed over in his nationally broadcasted barbaric adolescent

bigotry, against all the INNOCENT students of Afghanistan, is

of a People who factually opened up schools for girls under

the Taliban's getting better through communicating

leadership?, and who outlawed Bush's heroin production, and

the slavery and rape of women? Women who were when working at

the Taliban's newspaper, were not required to wear burkas

despite CBC's propaganda to the contrary? The Crown would

suggest her ignorance on such subjects is irrelevant to her

case against me, for those children's lives, and others like

them, are not who she is working to protect. So, where I

demand is a crime against our real God occurring I ask the

hiding in darkness Crown to explain herself publicly in the

light of these proceedings to our Honorable Lord.

The Crown's case argues that a determined selection of legal

images, can be sited under a labeled classification of

\"collateral images\", as somehow, unto it's separated self,

being an indicator, or summation of my unbridled character.

Therefor, to question such interpretations I need the luxury

and comforts of a stress free environment to ponder the

significant meaning of each of these collateral damages

against ourselves as the innocent the Crown argues for as a

weapon of Justice. For, those personally responsible for

making repeatedly easily verifiable faulting expressions with

the evidence the Crown refuses to return to me as my legal

property, are in all likelihood, still blabbering corporately

un-accosted, the completely blind support of indiscriminate

mass murder in thoughtless praise for war criminal traitor to

Humanity George Bush Jr., their supreme no nothing about squat

leader. While myself, am a well documented public defender of

children's rights and a studious observant researcher on media

matters, who is schooled in the field(s) of Psychology and

Genetics, Sexuality and Religion, along with the chaotic order

to the indivisible nature of life ourselves. [And who when

not terribly busy building this needed defense against the

Crown's alleged criminality, still champion the written word

for Justice being - US all as treated fairly.]]

I also need to show, how I come to be in possession of

another's expressions, of some managed images, or some strewn

texts.

It would be unfair for our Courts to side with the unjust

Crown on not giving me ready easy access to the evidence, but

for only by hugely limiting degrees that include costly bus

rides, or as the seriously impractical, hundreds of thousands

of printed texts that would likely fill roomfuls. While

sitting just outside my police door, could be the public

accuser who professes proudly the deeply ignorant ungodly

beliefs of cop killing and heroin dealing to push US all over

the top with Bush as it's global mastermind. Knowing such an

enemy of freedom who taunts all our judicial matters with true

personal self contempt, is there still escaping public

ridicule, wearing our community's Police Officer uniform,

could create unto itself, an unneeded frustration on my part,

for, I am a honorable defender to all that is Just. A

honorable defender that is needing by threat of false

imprisonment to concentrate on Justice for just myself

personally currently. As the Court well knows, a bushite's

favored public intent is well established by the evidence, as

documented truly criminal being the ungodly. [Hypnotized

lawless through the mechanics of suggestion I would diagnose

for the don't know knowing any better.] There exists no

evidence against bin Laden for 911, nor, was any factually

alleged to exist, and despite what Bush broadcasts

unchallenged nationally on our airwaves privately, Saddam did

actually let the inspectors in to go where ever they wanted

without delay. Furthermore, indiscriminately murdering people

with tens of thousands of cluster dud land mines, 9000

missiles targeting public infrastructure, many multiple 2000

pound bombs containing radio-active toxic waste, along with

the new and improved napalm and phosphorous poison gas clouds

all because we are in the approximate age range of 15 to 55 is

a for sure real war crime going unaddressed publicly by the

Crown, but not by myself. So, the Crown's interest is in

jeopardizing the lives of our children for sure by working to

silence my extremely rare public cries for true accountability

here in Winnipeg.

I am sworn to protect all as indicated by my recorded actions

and praised world wide word. The National Supreme Court of

Canada's Sharpe decision allows this defense to be made on our

behalf.

By Our Honorable Court's \"Lord\" siding to support claims made

by my false accusers - as the running definitive summation of

what can be claimed as \"collateral images\" - [legal relative

media content present on my computer,] while judging to refuse

to have returned my therefore stolen legal property so I can

adequately prepare a counter defense against the Crown's

confusions, is nothing short of a crime in progress. At least

it should be. By denying me the evidence the Crown holds in

contempt of our Court, would create an undue hardship on my,

seeking to illuminate the facts from our vantage points.

Having to travel back and forth across the city to view

hundreds of thousands of media messages pertinent to my case

at hand, left denied search tools, and a comfortable

atmosphere, is unduly unfair for all concerned. Now, I know,

I have to deal personally with those who support such a

criminal ungodly nature when I have no choice to, but to have

them located in the same listening vicinity throughout all my

inquiries on stolen legal media content, to spew their

boastful chauvinistic fascist state partiality of how great

George W. Bush is as their master thinking celebrated

American Cop Killer, would leave me unfairly tensioned. I

need the meditative comforts of home study with good coffee

and private friends to ponder my adroit, to the point defense

with the evidence I demand the fair right to contend.



I hold children's rights paramount in the public defense

stands I've made for near a decade, and privately, I'm free to

think my way on anything. The Crown has no right to dictate

what my private thoughts are, especially, if I'm not granted

to speak on her conclusions with the ready made evidence she

don't want me to have returned possession of. My legal

property that the Crown's crew has plans to sell! God, are

you listening?

I need the luxury of computer processing that the Crown used

to surmise her relative faulting judgment of my worth to our

society.

I need returned all my legal possessions, like my real

expressions such as public communications, to fairly challenge

the Crown's refusal to consider such objectiveness on who the

one holding criminal intent actually is on this serious

matter. So therefore, the Crown's crew should not be allowed

by our law to sell my stolen property as they are planning,

while surely as sadomasochists, destroying a life time of my

written works they know mean a great deal to me personally.

Wishing to deprive our rights as the community, to be granted

fair treatment in our Court systems of accountability, is

surely what will happen if our Honorable Judge does not Judge

honorably against the Crown and grant me the legal return of

my stolen property. I need to establish the mechanics of my

specifically unique computer system, so I can establish my

fair defense made available by the Supreme Court of Canada's

Standing Sharpe decision.

The Court recognizes finding that all declared illegal

possessions serve a criminal purpose without any intent,

unless found serving otherwise by made available evidence from

the defense. [ergo my Constitutional challenge] Evidence of

real purpose the Crown doesn't want to grant our Court,

because usually, guilty or innocent, they do sell everybody's

stolen stuff actually. And truly, the Crown has expressed no

interest in assisting our Police agencies in apprehending

those known responsible by the evidence for first degree mass

murders. [Instead, pick on the helpless innocent little

Jewish man bearing a cross, as cowardly brown shirt jack boot

nazi fascists under Hitler would have too. [surprising for

many, it is formally illegal to be Jewish currently in God's

Israel. As for the Crowns in my case, and the Judge, well

they seem to be not all that bad over all. [So far... But

this innocent people go to prison for speaking un-contended

truths thing for me is just some extreme to the core serious

business of ours, and good or bad, the Judges, and the Crowns,

and the Police Officers have a paid job to do by following the

rules designed ultimately in purpose to protect both me and

you. So, can't we all just find a way to get our public news

agencies to live up to our responsibilities by recognizing

standing laws not yet enforced against the un-elected

dictator, the monstrous war mongering American traitor

criminal, 911's George Bush Jnr., instead of present

company???]]]

I need returned my 37,333 [minus the contended for argument]

images to sensibly c<\/p>\n","contact":"","link":"","address":"","phone":"","parent_id":0,"mime_type":"text\/plain","summary":"A Canadian Soldier's Life Held in Contempt - The Verdict","numcomment":0,"fileurl":"\/uploads\/","filesize":null,"article_url":"\/news\/2006\/01\/145807.php"},"attachments":[],"comments":[]}