{"article":{"id":126052,"heading":"designer smallpox in this world of the bush coven","author":"x","created":"2005-05-07 12:34:24","modified":"2013-11-11 00:33:11","last_modified":"Mon, 11 Nov 2013 07:33:11","article":"<p>Subject:&nbsp;    [Sunshine] Smallpox: WHO DG Questions Committee Recommendation <br>  <br> Date:&nbsp;    Fri, 6 May 2005 09:45:09 -0500 <br>  <br> The Sunshine Project  <br>  <br> News Release - 6 May 2005  <br>  <br> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sunshine-project.org\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.sunshine-project.org<\/a>  <br><br> WHO Director-General Questions Smallpox Advisory Committee Recommendation  <br>  <br> -------------------------------------------------------------------------  <br><br> World Health Assembly to Consider Dangerous Genetic  <br>  <br> Engineering Recommendations Beginning May 16th  <br><br> The Director General of the World Health Organization (WHO) has  <br>  <br> raised questions about the proposal by a WHO Advisory Committee to  <br>  <br> dramatically increase risky research with live smallpox virus. In a  <br>  <br> paper released in mid-April (WHA A 58\/10), Director General Lee  <br>  <br> Jong-wook concludes that the Committee's recommendation to permit  <br>  <br> insertion of smallpox genes into related viruses, such as monkeypox  <br>  <br> and cowpox, should be rejected. The Director General was silent,  <br>  <br> however, on the Advisory Committee's other suggestions, including the  <br>  <br> genetic engineering of variola (smallpox) virus itself and a far  <br>  <br> wider distribution of smallpox DNA.  <br><br> According to the Sunshine Project, the Director-General's position is  <br>  <br> notable for its recognition that the Variola Advisory Committee's  <br>  <br> proposals have received inadequate review. \"We are pleased that the  <br>  <br> Director-General has acted to block one of the Variola Advisory  <br>  <br> Committee's recommendations, now we need to address the others.\" says  <br>  <br> Sunshine Project Director Edward Hammond, \"The set of recommendations  <br>  <br> remains substantially unreviewed by experts in public health, safety  <br>  <br> of genetically modified organisms, and preparedness for deliberate  <br>  <br> outbreaks of disease.\"  <br><br> According to non-governmental organizations, both the recommendations  <br>  <br> and the committee that produced them are problematic. The  <br>  <br> recommendations because they will dramatically increase the risk of  <br>  <br> an accidental or deliberate release of smallpox virus and represent  <br>  <br> WHO endorsement of genetic engineering experiments with extremely  <br>  <br> dangerous viruses. NGOs have criticized the Advisory Committee as  <br>  <br> using intransparent meeting methods and as being geographically and  <br>  <br> scientifically imbalanced. The committee is weighted towards a small  <br>  <br> number of countries and scientists with a personal and institutional  <br>  <br> interest in prolonging retention of and research with the otherwise  <br>  <br> eradicated virus. Major world regions have been underrepresented or  <br>  <br> not represented at all at committee meetings.  <br><br> Says Hammond, \"Ambiguous language in the report to be considered by  <br>  <br> the WHA would, if adopted, exacerbate the problems with this runaway  <br>  <br> committee. Rather than strengthening the hand of a failing and  <br>  <br> politicized 'technical' mechanism, the WHA should confine the  <br>  <br> Advisory Committee to its original mandate to be a short-term review  <br>  <br> mechanism in a fixed time interval before virus destruction. WHA  <br>  <br> should also follow-on the Director-General's recommendation by  <br>  <br> clarify that the committee cannot review its own proposals because  <br>  <br> its membership and mandate fall far short of representing the range  <br>  <br> of relevant expertise and perspectives to set WHO policy on live  <br>  <br> virus research.\"  <br><br> The Sunshine Project and Third World Network, backed by an  <br>  <br> international group of a dozen non-profits, opposes the genetic  <br>  <br> engineering of smallpox and wants WHO to put the virus stocks back on  <br>  <br> a fast track for destruction. (The US and Russia balked at  <br>  <br> destruction dates in 1999 and 2002.) They have established a website,  <br>  <br> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.smallpoxbiosafety.org\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.smallpoxbiosafety.org<\/a>, where members of the public can  <br>  <br> send a letter to WHO and find contacts for their national  <br>  <br> representatives at the WHA. So far, well over a thousand people from  <br>  <br> more than sixty countries have sent letters.  <br><br> The World Health Assembly will meet in Geneva, Switzerland for a week  <br>  <br> and a half, beginning on May 16th. The smallpox virus destruction  <br>  <br> issue is early in its agenda, and discussion of it should begin  <br>  <br> shortly after the meeting opens. Third World Network and the  <br>  <br> Sunshine Project will hold a briefing for WHA delegates on May 17th  <br>  <br> at the Palais des Nations.  <br><br> The Sunshine Project strongly encourages members of the public,  <br>  <br> scientists, and non-profits to send a letter to the WHO Director  <br>  <br> General at www.smallpoxbiosafety.org and to contact their health  <br>  <br> ministry to urge that national government oppose the relaxation of  <br>  <br> restrictions on smallpox virus research.  <br><br> --  <br><br> Guess who wants to genetically engineer smallpox?  <br><br> Learn more and send a letter to WHO at:  <br>  <br> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.smallpoxbiosafety.org\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.smallpoxbiosafety.org<\/a>  <br><br> Designer smallpox is a Pandora's Box  <br>  <br> Let's not open the lid!  <br>  <br> <\/p>\n","contact":"","link":"","address":"","phone":"","parent_id":0,"mime_type":"text\/plain","summary":"-----------","numcomment":0,"fileurl":"\/uploads\/","filesize":null,"article_url":"\/news\/2005\/05\/126052.php"},"attachments":[],"comments":[]}