Feel free to forward this post for publication consideration.
--
I wrote this letter the day a single complaint arrived to the station,
With the threat that the ADL would soon be contacted. This following
letter was provided in advance of the next day, of the time scheduled
for the complainant to return for a recording of the questionable broadcast.
The station manager refused to give the complainant my letter, and insured
me that I would no longer be allowed to produce a show for our community.
Is this fair to our Jewish brothers and sisters? Is this fair to you?
------------------
Jew Boy Johnny and the anti-Semites
- or -
"The Zionist Conspiracy"
Monday, January 31st, around 3 pm, I called the station manager to ask
how my afternoon recorded broadcast went, and to discuss the new
week's tentative guest spot with an update regarding the falsely
maligned, Mr. And Mrs. Benderman. The station manager informed me
my phone number had been misplaced, and was managing with stress
trying to put together an apology letter to a single individual, who
came into the station, while the interview was still running, to
demand action be taken regarding the anti-Semitic broadcast that he
was certainly going to report to the ADL about. I told her the Felton
interview itself was about bigotry through the demonization of the
innocent, what the Jews of world war II suffered through, and, that I
was a huge defender of religious Jewish teaching. I told her, to
offer the individual a chance to publicly speak regarding the issue,
with me, or by himself regarding Felton, to try getting specifically
to what has got him so much, by himself, upset about allowing my voice
heard defending Jewish rights within our community. She told me that
she would likely, none the less, have to let me go to appease the sole
complainant, for what if a lawsuit should result? I told her to
consider her options, reminded her that it was only one single
individual who hadn't even heard the show's context, and that the
broadcast in every other way had been going well, doing good. She
told me she was very busy, and said goodbye. Then a short while
later, phoned me back to ask if I would write a letter, and have it at
the station next day before the complainant arrived for his copy of
the broadcast. I said sure, said it would be a great challenge, and
proceeded immediately to do just that. The next day, I contacted the
station to ask if my arrived letter was forwarded to the individual,
and was informed no, he didn't receive it. It wasn't the apology the
station was looking for, and my show was now officially terminated. I
told her it was very unfair to me, to not allow him to read my formal
response, and that I couldn't in good conscience, back down from
defending my rights to be heard on this issue, or to allow us, as our
public, to hear the complainant's actual complaint about my, freedom
for all broadcast. She said she would try to get the letter to him,
but that the show was over. Case closed.
Stand up for Jews, and look at where it gets you, Jeeze.
Let us not put aside, the station manager's legitimate concerns. Who
has the money or the time for a frivolous lawsuit? Why do expensive
independent research, when the Bush Administration can hand us all the
free news they want us to have directly without any costly questions?
Saddam wouldn't let the inspectors in, right? Why risk standing up
for someone else's rights, when doing so, will get the (anti)
Jewish-Defamation League calling you an anti-Semite (Semite=Arab) for
communicating some understanding with Felton? Felton, is bizarrely
quirky as interesting, for his recent book is about the demonization
of the innocent, (you know? Nazi gas chambers and ovens?) and as
such, we can learn from, as too, we can teach. If he'll listen.
Ariel Sharon is not Jewish my friend, NOT JEWISH!!!
Open the gates, it's getting late.
John.
-----------------
http://radio.indymedia.org/uploads/big-package.mp3
Greg Felton : "The fear is necessary for two reasons. And the principle
reason has nothing to do with Iraq. it has to do with the government itself.
The bush government is criminal. [...] The problem is: how do you keep
people from paying attention to this? You keep them focused on an external
enemy. [..] so they forment this fascistic hatred of a definable group of
people. So, the war on terrorism so called, is not much a way for the United
States to protect itself against it's enemy, it is a way for it to create
enemies, to justify the kind of repressive measures that would otherwise be
intolerable in peace time."
To whom it may concern,
regarding the January 31st broadcasted interview with Greg Felton.
May I, on behalf of only myself, ask that you pardon my failures in judgment,
in not allowing what I should have gave: an immediate re-dress regarding,
'who is the Zionist label?', or 'What Holocaust are you referring to?', during
the broadcast of January 31st. (bet you we can't get two Christians that agree
on everything.) However, I can offer perhaps a show centralized on a chance
to exercise your personal views, be they pro or con on where you think we
should go from here, or whatever may have you regarding said interview. Or,
if you would like, you may wish to do only, or else include, a written work
that I promise, will reach as far as the original broadcast. So, actually,
this could be a prime moment to have a dialog regarding racism, bigotry, and
intolerance. I confess, I may be unaware, and still have much to learn, when
it comes to communicating well with all others. But, I know I'm getting
better, and I'll tell you, the Justice-Freedom thing, sure seems to be our
ultimate calling.
I was not so surprised that the broadcast interview with Greg Felton would be
considered controversial, (as every show I've ever done always has), although
I wasn't prepared to hear criticism against the show as being defamatory to a
group, or groups of people. As certainly that was not my intent, but however
was the difficult subject addressed within the interview. The fundamental
teachings of Law, as it pertains to justice and freedom, along with every
legitimized religion, is that all free people should be thought of as equals
to each other in vigilant protection. And by doing so, one would be serving
G-d's interests. (Even if a G-d doesn't exist - an Atheist too, could become
a proponent by understanding Jihad). Thereby insuringrealizing that a just
intelligent life force rules our chaotic timeless universe in service
ultimately to ourselves individually. Giving us in the Torah of Moses, ``all
people are created in God's image'' teaching all peoples are Sacred. And as
such, would be so in God's interests to defend as the innocent. While in
eternal pursuit of happiness and prosperity for all through just means.
Under Greg's definition as being a "Zionist" conspiracy, negates the failure
of himself personally to recognize the public connotation is too vague, and
that Hitler's Nazi Germany, like Bush's America, is politically expressing an
inability to represent ourselves with respect as truly worthy of fair
deliberations amongst ourselves. Sacred, every-one. (Or as in, to rise to
the defense of those we know to be irrationally victimized as the godly and
innocent, victimized in our un-addressed names.)
Greg "This is why the Holocaust is such a very dangerous thing to talk about
because, it's not really understood. It's preached at us like a sermon.
We're suppose to accept at face value what we're told about it, as if to,
criticize it, is some how disrespectful. Much of what we know about the
Holocaust has been propagated by the Zionists, and can be shown quite untrue"
I replied shortly later "One thing about the whole situation is that innocent
people were targeted for murder. End of story. That's what the war was.
All wars are like that."
Greg's mistake I believe, centered in his Zionist labeling through an
apparent bigotry expressed, and as such, was too narrowly defining the larger
established history of the Holocaust, as being the struggle of the human
species in halting, the demonization and then subjugation of the innocent
millions, Jewish or otherwise. Perhaps it was strangely on his part a
testimony to a real struggle we all have when it comes to identifying
ourselves to others. Considering it is the exact subject matter he wrestles
with in his book writing, regarding our corporate media's perception of
ignoring an innocent people's concern or cries. That said however, for Greg
to blankly criticize Greg's false construct of what is publicly understood
about the Holocaust, is to deny that much for sorrow and suffering took place
against the whole of Humanity, especially, of those who held the practiced
Jewish faith. To think the nazi regime would have the gas chambers and the
ovens, while the whole of humanity were not strong enough to communicate the
unjustness of it all to the German people while it was happening. I have
read of a recent documentary that provides film footage of nazi soldiers
committing the worst war crimes imaginable to god loving Jews, interspersed
with film from the same dated period where, the German people were living
civilized lives, left unaware of the atrocities that were being committed
against God in their names. Same as America and Canada today, with
Fallujah’s 300,000 People being, the undeniable example. Or, are you too, a
convinced denier of that which is fully documented? (Needless and irrational
was the indiscriminate murder of the people of Fallujah, but for to have more
American soldiers sacrificed in a conflict created by an unjust as immoral
totalitarian dictate.) The Holocaust deniers are those the same of today, who
refuse our Humanity to nationally communicate those screams of mercy, or for
justice regarding the People of Iraq to be served in our true interests as
legitimate. More than ten million Russians died fighting the evil eugenic
scourge of the "superior" nazi regime, and like those in Poland, Britain and
France, as elsewhere testified our established history, (albeit only later),
the sadistic ungodly as lawless barbarity that Nazism inflicted upon the
general masses, went largely undeterred from our "informative" television and
radio broadcasts. The same, almost word for word, and action for action, can
be found in Rumsfeld's "blitzkrieg". Bush's freedom by tyranny doctrine. Or
the criminally sanctioned unchallenged news pronouncements of a Mark Kimmit,
Buford Blount, Steven Russell, Mattis, Allawi or Sattler, when it pertains to
accepting without our objection, to the victimizing of Iraqis collectively as
an indiscriminate act of criminality, like murder. As like in the policies
of Ariel Sharon, where an innocent, haven't committed an accused crime in
their life Christian Palestinian, is denied the earned home they worked and
paid for, on a parcel of land shared up until recent times for countless
millennia. My personal struggle has been to inform the public on the
"forgotten" importance of established evidence, being the only requirement to
convince ourselves on who is a bigot, tyrant, a criminal, or a murderer.
Will you not therefore, as a fellow humanitarian of this shared world, speak
against those you know of, who victimize the innocent to thieve from? Sure
you would, if you knew as much for certain about God and this universe, or
the under reported, freed to go General Ahmad, funding the mastermind ring
leader Mohammad Atta of Bush's 9/11 game. But will together our Humanity
ever learn? Well, my plan is to search for guests to speak with, that I'll
try not to offend early on. Greg knows, like the Pope knows, as every
legitimate police officer worth their grain of salt knows, as so too does
include a great many Jewish Jews, George W. Bush used absolutely no evidence
to substantiate his therefore, false accusations in our names against bin
Laden, while then ardently with Cheney, worked to close outstanding criminal
investigations regarding their extremely suspicious behavior. All according
to his official publicly documented plan. And speaking the news as thus,
does not make anyone anti-Semitic, anti-American, or anti-Human, but
pro-Jewish, pro-Christian, pro-Muslim, pro-Justice pro-Freedom, almost
wholely human like even. Not of a long gone as lost and forgotten religious
dogma, but for now as it always has been found, a mutual respect for all life
as we find ourselves being part of. Or, so we would for Atheists, argue in
all likelihood to get to the same reasoned to be, just political decision, to
this or any another life and death matters matter.
Because the unjustified criminal war actions of George W. Bush are our
shared documented history, others, with an ulterior agenda to propagate their
weakness through bigotry or racism, will arbitrarily blame a subjective
grouping of people, instead of demanding by godly individual might, the
arrest of specific individuals who are actually responsible according to the
established as public evidence. So, now who's fault is that? We live in
difficult times. To admit weaknesses regarding our corporate news control
content decisions, is to seek a better world for our lives through stronger
open communications.
I believe the defense of the Jewish faith is found in the indivisible
properties of Creation, and who's central belief is made simpler than any
other. Hillel was asked: Rabbi, who is a Jew truly? Hillel answered, "What
is hateful to you do not do to your neighbor. That is the whole Torah. The
rest is commentary -- go and learn it." So my challenge in defense of the
Jewish faith during the interview, was that those who practice criminal
misdeeds, are therefore found by the official definition taught by Hillel, to
be not practicing the "Golden Rule" of the Jewish Faith. (as so pronounced
by the religion's recognized ancient oratator.) By calling alleged criminal
actions, the conduct of an entire people, faith, or branch thereof, is to
fall into the fascist minutia of bigotry, or racism, held by those who judge
us "others" unfairly. After re-hearing the interview, I did find the
allegations made by Greg, regarding the Holocaust being blanketed by
falsehoods, generally, a failure on his part to recognize the true horror of
what that war wrought. And in light of our desperate challenges today of
defeating the enemies of Humanity as specific unjust individuals in "hiding",
an ignorantly stupid thing to say. While I, perhaps wasn't thinking along
those conceived lines, where at that time, I had just left the thought of:
the struggles of the Jewish faith, are the same struggles all young adults go
through by naturally establishing our associative identities. Who are you I
truly ask? How many news channels even allow us as Humanity to know about
the absent reason for the bombing of the Jews of Samara? The Jews of
Fallujah? The torturing of completely innocent People to death, as in
Guantanamo? Or still unaddressed publicly: the willful lawless criminality
implemented by the, therefore tyrannical Bush Administration in suffering
God's Iraq? (See missing ``Development Fund of Iraq'', or private
mercenaries discipling for Bush as deemed un-accountable to every conceived
``natural'' law? [see the entire Bible for the judgment call on that one...]
or, Bush's declarative, he magically owns everything in stolen Iraq now,
[where did it go?] and I can't say anything because he signed his John to
13303 some time back, but as still is left unreported in Your dying world?)
Publicly question our reality, by taking the station up on doing an interview
with me, along with your own impressions of our world. Or, if you prefer,
you can do a solo written piece, or a recorded statement for the station. I
look forward to finding common ground with your concerns. I hope I have got
you wondering more, about what trying to save our world from injustice and
slavery, in whatever way we can is all about for me really. In these words I
can say, I apologize to you, for a resulted perception, that wasn't with
better words, my true intent towards us people together.
I will, after some small revisions of this paper, include it as well as the
broadcast package. So I do thank you for bringing up your important view,
that otherwise, would have gone farther without this opportunity, that I
offer as a starting point for deliberation, or argument regarding my
foolishness. Thanks for speaking, and I hope I have met most of your
concerns with a positive light on where I'm trying to come from.
John.
--------
http://radio.indymedia.org/uploads/benderman.mp3
The Benderman Cause
I felt compelled to support the Benderman's cause in
any way I could, so I am providing America some
arguments that I would use in a court of law to
defend your freedoms. If America would so desire,
I would also be prepared to make a recorded
statement from here in Canada. (I have been
denied access into the U.S..) My positions of
rational argument are naturally based upon our
established facts, and as such, are something few
Americans are afforded the luxury of through
corporate channels. I hope my forcefulness on these
issues does not fear you to doubt I have the best of
intentions when it comes to serving the interests
indivisibly inherent within the American
Constitution. God, I believe is just, and as such, the
ungodly war actions of George W. Bush dictate are
criminal in the worst degree, being a harbinger of
suffering and misery against all of Humanity as
US being the innocent. The innocent in our entirety,
is my "God" that I love with all I can will. I am
compelled as a living human being to defend America
to the last bush supporter praised if need be. I fight
the enemy of God and Humanity with reason,
understanding, Akeido, and a conviction that our
justice system must prevail for me to be truly myself
really.
"He explained to "60 Minutes," "I was told in basic
training that, if I'm given an illegal or immoral order,
it is my duty to disobey it. And I feel that invading
and occupying Iraq is an illegal and immoral thing to
do."
The war was declared "illegal" by the U.N..
Why? Because Saddam wasn't found in breach
of the internationally agreed upon resolution 1441,
(Saddam did EVERYTHING POSSIBLE that was
asked of Iraq by the bush administration, and then
some Mr. Bush refused to even take him up on.
Like national Iraqi television broadcasts.) despite
the lies quoted by corporate news America. There
was no need for the conflict to begin with as was
so reported internationally on march 7th, 2003. U.N.
inspectors had complete unrestricted access to go
anywhere without delay, and known stock piles of WMD
were burned, so could not possibly be
completely accounted for by evidential findings
due to the fact that they were destroyed beyond
recognition. American soldiers were put in harms
way to be sacrificed for no better good, but for to
allow as has happened, the misappropriation, or as
some have alleged, the criminal theft of Iraqi
resources, including monies of the Iraqi Development
Funds through Presidential decree 13303. Which
include the unappropriated, desperately needed,
humanitarian aid provisions still denied innocent
Iraqis, such as potable drinking water and food
stuffs. Democratic principles are DENIED the
Iraqis by the neo-con military forces, such as holding
all individuals equally accountable to a rule of law.
The outlawing of torture, or the outlawing of false
imprisonment has not been professed as the action of
the neo-con "liberating" force. Mercenaries are not
obliged to obey any laws for example. And, "Dr.
Germ", and "Dr. Anthrax" are held solely for the
fact that they know of the scientific hazards of
depleted uranium, and may have warned the
uninformed sacrificing American GI, if not held
illegally against their wills by the enemy.
Commanders such as irrational war criminal
Sattler, forbade all men and boys between 15 to 50
from leaving the city of Fallujah, while refusing to
negotiate with anyone, (because as so was openly
confessed, Sattler had no evidence that Zaqari was
in Fallujah) then leveled the city to kill all it's
inhabitants, estimated at that time near 300,000
people. Using a napalm type WMD, cluster dud
land mine munitions, and as reported, nine two
thousand pound bombs in a city 3 1/2 km by 4 km.
Serving for a military not strong enough collectively
to prosecute such lawless criminal barbarity, is
serving for a military not principled in the American
virtues of freedom and democracy. In truth,
serving for such ungodly criminal command is a
cowardly act of treason. George W. Bush is an
enemy of our Humanity.
Copy and distribute this personal challenge freely.
Thanks.
--
Psychological Warfare - An American soldier's perspective
An in-depth discussion regarding the tools used by corporate interests to manipulate the America belief system by the art of suggestion. (Hypnosis)
http://radio.indymedia.org/uploads/psychological-warfare_.mp3
--
I know we're all expected to be selfish, in helping out those others who cry out for our help, but I beg you, I can't do this alone. My show did make a positive difference. I need your help in asking I face my accuser, and politely, with reason, using communication, and understanding, bring about a better world.
World Productions.
