{"article":{"id":118788,"heading":"E-vote fraud? On election night Karen Hughes told Bush he\u2019d lost!","author":"G. LoBuono","created":"2004-11-09 23:31:28","modified":"2013-11-11 00:31:33","last_modified":"Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:31:33","article":"<p>In the following article <a href=\"http:\/\/www.commondreams.org\/views04\/1106-30.htm\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.commondreams.org\/views04\/1106-30.htm<\/a> Thom Hartmann reports that on election night, an Associated Press bulletin said that at 12:30 a.m. Karen Hughes sat Bush down to tell him that, based on exit polls, Kerry had won the election. Bush sat, stone-faced. Then, when electronic votes began to come in, Bush&rsquo;s loss &ldquo;flipped&rdquo; to become a victory, instead. <br><br> In fact, in smaller Florida counties where registered Democrats are as much as 70 percent of voters, voters saw the counties&rsquo; votes &ldquo;flipped&rdquo; when electronic counts were done: the amount that should be registered Democrats is for Bush, instead. Be sure to click on the first link in the story&mdash;a chart showing bizarrely reversed Democrat majorities seemingly &ldquo;flipped&rdquo; to favor Bush. Hinting that there is more to be done in to expose this case, former Clinton consultant, Dick Morris said, &ldquo;I suspect foul play.&rdquo; ABC exit polls showed Kerry won swing states Florida, Ohio, New Mexico, Colorado, Nevada, and Iowa, but when un-recountable e-votes came in, Bush showed a win in each case. <br><br> Given this situation, a clearly inconsistent &ldquo;winner&rdquo; based upon method that doesn&rsquo;t meet constitutional standards of reliable tally (there can be no e-vote recount, plus, as Bev Harris of Black Box Voting demonstrated, the computer code for e-votes is easily changed to flip the votes in seconds), Democrats would do well to subpoena suspected computers and run a check on the electronic record of how suspicious votes were processed. There should be an electronic record of altered commands.  <br><br> In short, if e fraud can be documented, a new kind of court case may be possible. Unlike the Rehnquist Court&rsquo;s appointment of Bush in 2004, this fast-developing situation could lead to direct action of a refreshing, new sort.  <br>  <br> <\/p>\n","contact":"globuo01@hotmail.com","link":"http:\/\/www.commondreams.org\/views04\/1106-30.htm","address":"","phone":"","parent_id":0,"mime_type":"text\/plain","summary":"Major trouble brewing for Bush","numcomment":0,"fileurl":"\/uploads\/","filesize":null,"article_url":"\/news\/2004\/11\/118788.php"},"attachments":[],"comments":[]}