{"article":{"id":115903,"heading":"Film IN PLANE SIGHT Shocks Sacramento Citizens","author":"nwv","created":"2004-08-20 17:42:33","modified":"2004-08-20 17:42:33","last_modified":"Sat, 21 Aug 2004 00:42:33","article":"<br><br>  <br>  <br> <a href=\"http:\/\/newswithviews.com\/NWVexclusive\/exclusive34.htm\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/newswithviews.com\/NWVexclusive\/exclusive34.htm<\/a>  <br><br> 9\/11 VIDEO SHOCKS SACRAMENTO CITIZENS  <br><br> August 13, 2004  <br><br> Posted 1:010 AM Eastern  <br><br> NewsWithViews.com  <br><br> A new 9-11 video was screened last night in Sacramento, California, leaving  <br>  <br> the audience stunned. '911 in Plane Site' is basically presented in two  <br>  <br> parts. The first segment is 52 minutes and designed for showing on  <br>  <br> television with the balance of a one hour time slot reserved for  <br>  <br> commercials. Part II continues with more film and analysis. This video is  <br>  <br> digitally mastered making details sharp and clear.  <br><br> '911 in Plane Site' presents actual film from that fateful day and careful  <br>  <br> analysis focusing on the Pentagon and the two World Trade Center buildings.  <br>  <br> By slowing down the actual news feeds that day from networks like CNN, FOX,  <br>  <br> the BBC and others, what you see is quite different from what most people  <br>  <br> saw in \"real time\" that day. Live footage from the Pentagon and what was  <br>  <br> missed by most because of the smoke and confusion was captured up close by  <br>  <br> the media. Following the showing, a retired vet remarked, \"How did we miss  <br>  <br> this all this time? I've seen media clips of the front of that building [the  <br>  <br> Pentagon] many times, but I wasn't really seeing what was there. I feel  <br>  <br> sick.\"  <br><br> One particular interview that brought gasps from the audience and many  <br>  <br> looking around with shock etched on their faces was an interview conducted -  <br>  <br> live at the time - by FOX News. This intense interview with Mark Burnback,  <br>  <br> an employee of FOX News, contains the following narrative, paraphrased:  <br>  <br> Burnback was close to the path of the second plane and had a good long look  <br>  <br> at what he describes was not a commercial airliner. The plane that hit the  <br>  <br> second tower had no windows, Burnback was very clear about that. The plane  <br>  <br> had some kind of blue logo on the front near the nose and looked like a  <br>  <br> cargo plane. This point was driven to the viewer several times along with  <br>  <br> the comment from this FOX employee that \"this plane wasn't from around here  <br>  <br> or anything you'd see take off from the airport.\"  <br><br> Other footage includes several women who had a very clear view watching the  <br>  <br> second plane hit were yelling, \"That wasn't American Airlines....It wasn't  <br>  <br> American Airlines going into the building.\" These interviews were played  <br>  <br> that morning once on FOX News, never to be replayed again, despite the  <br>  <br> massive saturation and repetition by the media for many days to come.  <br><br> Other extremely disturbing segments of this video are the clear, slow motion  <br>  <br> shots of the second plane going into the towers which show a flash right  <br>  <br> before the nose of the plane hits the building and a pod attached to the  <br>  <br> bottom of the plane. This strange flash is clearly recorded from four  <br>  <br> different angles from four different cameras. While there is only one known  <br>  <br> piece of film showing the first plane hitting the first tower, in slow  <br>  <br> motion one can clearly see - as with the second plane - a flash from the  <br>  <br> nose section right before impact. What caused this?  <br><br> This video raises extremely disturbing questions about the planes that hit  <br>  <br> the Pentagon and the World Trade Centers, but no conclusions or accusations  <br>  <br> are made by the commentator. To date, only one piece of film has been  <br>  <br> released by DoD of the front of the Pentagon. The question raised in the  <br>  <br> video is where is all the other film footage from the Pentagon? The heart  <br>  <br> beat of America's military and security, with a building and perimeter  <br>  <br> loaded with cameras, but no film for the public to view of events as they  <br>  <br> unfolded except from one camera?  <br><br> According to the producers, the purpose of '911 in Plane Site' is to  <br>  <br> demonstrate that Americans saw one thing that morning that was so shocking,  <br>  <br> so horrific and so massive, the finer details weren't really being picked  <br>  <br> up. The producer reinforces to the viewer that after one broadcast of many  <br>  <br> very controversial interviews live on the spot, these particular interviews  <br>  <br> were never broadcast again, i.e. firefighters on the spot talking about the  <br>  <br> explosions and bombs inside the towers. Since 9-11, it has been reported  <br>  <br> that \"Building Seven\" collapsed because of the two World Trade Center towers  <br>  <br> collapsing. However, the footage on this video tells a different story and  <br>  <br> raises more questions.  <br><br> '911 in Plane Site,' distributed by Power Hour Productions (866-773-9469),  <br>  <br> leaves one with many questions as demonstrated by a very upset senior  <br>  <br> citizen who requested her last name be withheld. Mary asked, \"If these  <br>  <br> weren't commercial airliners, where are those flights? Where are the  <br>  <br> passengers? My, God what really happened that day?\" Indeed, this seemed to  <br>  <br> be the biggest question expressed by viewers after the lights came back on,  <br>  <br> but for which there were no answers. Some viewers were visibly upset, angry  <br>  <br> and \"want damn answers\" from the Bush Administration. Others just walked out  <br>  <br> the door in silence. One upset man commented on the way out of the viewing,  <br>  <br> \"It's time to get this on PBS and every investigative news program on TV. We  <br>  <br> need answers.\"  <br><br> \n","contact":"","link":"","address":"","phone":"","parent_id":0,"mime_type":"text\/plain","summary":"Highly recommended and without the flaws or dubious sponsorship of moores bs...","numcomment":0,"fileurl":"\/uploads\/","filesize":null,"article_url":"\/news\/2004\/08\/115903.php"},"attachments":[],"comments":[]}