{"article":{"id":112878,"heading":"Sweeping stun guns to target crowds","author":"...","created":"2004-06-18 17:08:48","modified":"2004-06-19 05:45:56","last_modified":"Sat, 19 Jun 2004 12:45:56","article":"<br><br>  <a href=\"http:\/\/www.newscientist.com\/news\/print.jsp?id=ns99996014\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.newscientist.com\/news\/print.jsp?id=ns99996014<\/a>  <br><br>  <br>  <br> Sweeping stun guns to target crowds  <br><br> 19:00 16 June 04  <br><br> Exclusive from New Scientist Print Edition.  <br><br> Weapons that can incapacitate crowds of people by sweeping a lightning-like  <br>  <br> beam of electricity across them are being readied for sale to military and  <br>  <br> police forces in the US and Europe.  <br><br> At present, commercial stun guns target one person at a time, and work only  <br>  <br> at close quarters. The new breed of non-lethal weapons can be used on many  <br>  <br> people at once and operate over far greater distances.  <br><br> But human rights groups are appalled by the fact that no independent safety  <br>  <br> tests have been carried out, and by their potential for indiscriminate use.  <br><br>  <br>  <br> Taser success rates by distance  <br><br> The weapons are designed to address the perceived shortcomings of the Taser,  <br>  <br> the electric-shock gun already used by 4000 police departments in the US and  <br>  <br> undergoing trials with some police forces in the UK.  <br><br> It hits the victim with two darts that trail current-carrying wires, which  <br>  <br> limit its range to a maximum of seven metres (see graphic). As a single  <br>  <br> shot, short-range weapon, the Taser is of little use in crowd control. And  <br>  <br> Tasers have no effect on vehicles.  <br><br>  <br>  <br> Ionised gas  <br><br>  <br>  <br> These limitations are beginning to be overcome. Engineers working for the US  <br>  <br> Department of Defense's research division, DARPA, and defence companies in  <br>  <br> Europe have been working out how to create an electrically conductive path  <br>  <br> between a gun and a target without using wires.  <br><br> A weapon under development by Rheinmetall, based in Dorf, Germany, creates a  <br>  <br> conducting channel by using a small explosive charge to squirt a stream of  <br>  <br> tiny conductive fibres through the air at the victim (New Scientist print  <br>  <br> edition, 24 May 2003).  <br><br> Meanwhile, Xtreme Alternative Defense Systems (XADS), based in Anderson,  <br>  <br> Indiana, will be one of the first companies to market another type of  <br>  <br> wireless weapon. Instead of using fibres, the $9000 Close Quarters Shock  <br>  <br> Rifle projects an ionised gas, or plasma, towards the target, producing a  <br>  <br> conducting channel. It will also interfere with electronic ignition systems  <br>  <br> and stop vehicles.  <br><br> \"We will be able to fire a stream of electricity like water out of a hose at  <br>  <br> one or many targets in a single sweep,\" claims XADS president Peter Bitar.  <br><br>  <br>  <br> Solid-state lasers  <br><br>  <br>  <br> The gun has been designed for the US Marine Corps to use for crowd control  <br>  <br> and security purposes and is due out in 2005. It is based on early, unwieldy  <br>  <br> technology and has a range of only three metres, but an operator can  <br>  <br> debilitate multiple targets by sweeping it across them for \"as long as there  <br>  <br> is an input power source,\" says Bitar.  <br><br> XADS is also planning a more advanced weapon which it hopes will have a  <br>  <br> range of 100 metres or more. Instead of firing ionised gas, it will probably  <br>  <br> use a powerful laser to ionise the air itself. The idea has been around for  <br>  <br> decades, says LaVerne Schlie, a laser expert at the US Air Force Research  <br>  <br> Lab in Kirtland, New Mexico. It has only become practical with advances in  <br>  <br> high-power solid-state lasers.  <br><br> \"Before, it took a laser about the size of two trucks,\" says Schlie. \"Now we  <br>  <br> can do it with something that fits on a tabletop.\"  <br><br> The laser pulse must be very intense, but can be brief. So the makers of the  <br>  <br> weapons plan to use a UV laser to fire a 5-joule pulse lasting just 0.4  <br>  <br> picoseconds - equating to a momentary power of more than 10 million  <br>  <br> megawatts.  <br><br> This intense pulse - which is said not to harm the eyes - ionises the air,  <br>  <br> producing long, thread-like filaments of glowing plasma that can be  <br>  <br> sustained by repeating the pulse every few milliseconds. This plasma channel  <br>  <br> is then used to deliver a shock to the victims similar to a Taser's  <br>  <br> 50,000-volt, 26-watt shock.  <br><br>  <br>  <br> Instrument of torture  <br><br>  <br>  <br> HSV Technologies of San Diego, California is also working on stun and  <br>  <br> vehicle-stopping shock weapons with ranges of over 100 metres. And another  <br>  <br> company, Ionatron of Tuscon, Arizona, is due to supply a prototype wireless  <br>  <br> vehicle-mounted weapon to the US Department of Defense by the end of 2004.  <br><br> But the advent of wireless stun weapons has horrified human rights groups.  <br>  <br> Robin Coupland of the Red Cross says they risk becoming a new instrument of  <br>  <br> torture. And Brian Wood of Amnesty International says the long-range stun  <br>  <br> guns could \"inflict pain and other suffering on innocent bystanders\".  <br><br> And there are safety concerns. Of the 30,000 times US police officers have  <br>  <br> fired Tasers, in 40 instances people stunned by them later died. The deaths  <br>  <br> have been attributed to factors such as overdoses of drugs and alcohol, or  <br>  <br> fighting with officers, rather than the electric shock.  <br><br> In a statement, Taser International chief Rick Smith said: \"In every single  <br>  <br> case the medical examiner has attributed the direct cause of death to causes  <br>  <br> other than the Taser.\" Amnesty is not convinced, however, and wants an  <br>  <br> independent study of the effects of all existing and emerging electric-shock  <br>  <br> weapons.  <br><br>  <br>  <br> \n","contact":"","link":"http:\/\/www.newscientist.com\/news\/print.jsp?id=ns99996014","address":"","phone":"","parent_id":0,"mime_type":"text\/plain","summary":"Weapons that can incapacitate crowds of people by sweeping a lightning-like beam of electricity across them are being readied for sale to military and police forces in the US and Europe. \r\n","numcomment":1,"fileurl":"\/uploads\/","filesize":null,"article_url":"\/news\/2004\/06\/112878.php"},"attachments":[],"comments":[{"id":112909,"heading":"Good work, free market!","article":"Anarchists and other clowns should be kissing the feet of these CAPITALIST scientists who are inventing non-lethal weapons, which are only too good for them.\r\n\r\nNow millions of dollars in property won't be destroyed or looted by wild animals wearing an 'A' during riots cleverly masked as &quot;peaceful protests.&quot;  \r\n\r\nThe 'A'-nimals can be safely stunned, scooped and arrested. \r\n\r\nGood work, Capitalism!  Tame the beasts.","author":"Anti-thug life","parent_id":112878,"mime_type":"text\/plain","created":"2004-06-19 05:45:56","modified":"2004-06-19 05:45:56","fileurl":""}]}