{"article":{"id":102863,"heading":"THE REAL MOVEMENT OF THE SOCIETY","author":"Francisco Trindade","created":"2004-02-12 19:44:06","modified":"2013-11-11 00:28:44","last_modified":"Mon, 11 Nov 2013 07:28:44","article":"

THE REAL MOVEMENT OF THE SOCIETY



http:\/\/www.franciscotrindade.com<\/a>

DIALECTIC OF PROUDHON METHOD AND REAL MOVEMENT OF THE SOCIETY

Technical responsible for the totality of the site

The friend always José Carlos Fortuna.

http:\/\/www.franciscotrindade.com<\/a>



DIALECTIC OF PROUDHON AS METHOD AND AS REAL MOVEMENT OF THE SOCIETY

We will undertake an analysis about the conception of dialectic of Proudhon. Proudhon is extremely hostile to the dialectic of Hegel. He criticizes her not only in the bottom as in the applications. Clearly formulated in the works of maturity, the whole work of Proudhon is of impregnated facto of this hostility. The antinomic is not solved; it is in this that the fundamental addiction of the whole philosophy of Hegel resides. The two have that compose the antinomic they oscillate, he wants to each other, he wants among other terms antinomics; what leads to new results \" (De la Justice dans la Révolution et dans l'Église - vol.IV, 1858, pág.148) \" The terms antinomics are not solved, as the opposed pôloses of a pile electric they are not destroyed. The problem is not in finding their coalition that would be your death, but your balance always unstable, second variable the own development of the society \" ( Théorie de la Propriété, 1865, pág.52) \" The unstable balance among the two have, he is not born of a third, but of your reciprocal \" action. In a word, the formula of Hegel is only a triad for pleasure or mistake of the Master, that sees her three terms where two only exist and that he didn't see that the antinomic is not solved, but that implicates he wants an oscillation he wants an antagonism, the only susceptible of balances. Of this point of view, all the system of Hegel should be re-done \". (De la Justice dans la Révolution et dans l'Église, 1958, Vol.I, págs.28-29).

<\/p>\n","contact":"","link":"","address":"","phone":"","parent_id":0,"mime_type":"text\/plain","summary":"THE REAL MOVEMENT OF THE SOCIETY ","numcomment":1,"fileurl":"\/uploads\/","filesize":null,"article_url":"\/news\/2004\/02\/102863.php"},"attachments":[],"comments":[{"id":102864,"heading":"I concur","article":"The bit about the "opposed poloses of the pile electric", hell, I've been saying that for years.","author":"Venkman","parent_id":102863,"mime_type":"text\/plain","created":"2004-02-12 20:00:50","modified":"2004-02-12 20:00:50","fileurl":""}]}