{"article":{"id":102388,"heading":"Stop the National ID!!","author":"W. Hobbs\/ASUF","created":"2004-02-06 00:53:10","modified":"2004-02-07 23:36:45","last_modified":"Sun, 08 Feb 2004 06:36:45","article":"<p>Since 1996, at least nine states have rejected schemes that would have required fingerprints for the driver's license.  Alabama, Washington, New Jersey, Michigan, Wisconsin, Ohio, Illinois, Pennsylvania and Virginia have rejected such measures, and Nebraska has rejected a biometric identifier generally. <br><br> The current administration has announced a program that will require fingerprints of immigrants.  <br><br> See <a href=\"http:\/\/www.whyfingerprint.com\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.whyfingerprint.com<\/a>. <br>  <br> <\/p>\n","contact":"","link":"","address":"","phone":"","parent_id":0,"mime_type":"text\/plain","summary":"The Association to Stop Unconstitutional Fingerprinting (ASUF) is an organization that opposes mass fingerprinting and biometrics generally.","numcomment":1,"fileurl":"\/uploads\/","filesize":null,"article_url":"\/news\/2004\/02\/102388.php"},"attachments":[],"comments":[{"id":102501,"heading":"And the problem with this is...","article":"...what, exactly?\r\n\r\nDo you see it as an invasion of privacy?  How?  You'd best start wearing gloves allt he time, then...'cause you're leaving your &quot;private fingerprints&quot; all over the place.\r\n\r\nAnything that identifies threats to my family or the security of my country, and removes those threats from the street, is a good thing.\r\n\r\nI can't believe anyone is against this.\r\n\r\nnonanarchist","author":";lkhkljgjlg","parent_id":102388,"mime_type":"text\/plain","created":"2004-02-07 23:36:45","modified":"2004-02-07 23:36:45","fileurl":""}]}