{"article":{"id":97736,"heading":"Web Address To Help Dean's Campaign","author":"KL","created":"2003-12-18 06:01:22","modified":"2013-11-11 00:28:03","last_modified":"Mon, 11 Nov 2013 07:28:03","article":"<p>Democratic hopefuls hit Dean on his stance against war in Iraq <br>  <br> By James G. Lakely <br>  <br> THE WASHINGTON TIMES <br>  <br> Published December 17, 2003 <br><br> - <br>  <br>     Democratic presidential hopefuls attacked front-runner Howard Dean yesterday over <br>  <br> his opposition to the Iraq war, attempting to use the country's elation at Saddam Hussein's <br>  <br> capture to bring down their rival.  <br>  <br>     Sen. Joe Lieberman, Connecticut Democrat, urged his party yesterday to abandon Mr. <br>  <br> Dean, saying the former Vermont governor's \"anger\" and \"extremism,\" especially on the <br>  <br> war, will lead to the re-election of President Bush.  <br>  <br>     \"Governor Dean has made a series of dubious judgments and irresponsible statements <br>  <br> in this campaign that together signal that he would in fact take us back to the days when <br>  <br> we Democrats were not trusted to defend America's security,\" Mr. Lieberman said.  <br>  <br>     The contrast between Mr. Dean's opposition to the war and widely broadcast images of <br>  <br> Saddam in custody may have already hurt him in the polls.  <br>  <br>     An NBC News\/Wall Street Journal survey conducted Sunday -- the day Saddam's <br>  <br> capture was announced -- put President Bush's job-approval rating at 58 percent, the <br>  <br> highest since the end of major combat operations in May.  <br>  <br>     The poll also showed that Mr. Bush has a 21-point lead over Mr. Dean in a <br>  <br> head-to-head matchup for the presidency in 2004, up from a 15-point lead a month ago. <br>  <br> Other polls conducted over the weekend show a similar bump for Mr. Bush.  <br>  <br>     In addition, a CBS-New York Times poll released last night showed that public <br>  <br> approval of efforts to oust Saddam increased just after his capture, to 54 percent from 47 <br>  <br> percent. The share of the people surveyed who said removing Saddam from power was <br>  <br> not worth it fell to 37 percent from 43 percent.  <br>  <br>     The CBS poll used two samples: one of 1,057 adults from last Wednesday to Saturday, <br>  <br> before the announcement of Saddam's capture, and another of 635 adults Sunday and <br>  <br> Monday, the two days afterward.  <br>  <br>     The trailing Democratic candidates see these polls and the capture of Saddam as an <br>  <br> opportunity to pounce on what they perceive as Mr. Dean's greatest weakness: his <br>  <br> opposition to the war and inexperience in foreign policy.  <br>  <br>     \"In an age of terrorism, [voters] are not going to leave the president that is in office and <br>  <br> go to someone who they doubt has the steady hand of experience,\" said Rep. Richard A. <br>  <br> Gephardt, Missouri Democrat, in a conference call with reporters yesterday.  <br>  <br>     On Monday, Mr. Dean delivered what was billed as his campaign's defining <br>  <br> foreign-policy address, and made it clear that his opposition to the war in Iraq \"has not <br>  <br> changed.\"  <br>  <br>     Mr. Bush, he said, \"launched the war in the wrong way, at the wrong time\" and \"the <br>  <br> capture of Saddam has not made America safer.\"  <br>  <br>     Mr. Dean also told his Los Angeles audience that he would have only invaded Iraq <br>  <br> \"had the United Nations given us the permission,\" adding that it was \"the U.N.'s job\" to <br>  <br> enforce the 17 U.N. resolutions over a dozen years demanding Saddam disarm, not <br>  <br> America's.  <br>  <br>     Mr. Lieberman attacked this position.  <br>  <br>     \"How many people here agree that we are safer with Saddam Hussein in prison? <br>  <br> Howard Dean says no,\" Mr. Lieberman said in a speech to a group of Democrats in <br>  <br> Manchester, N.H. \"I'm afraid Howard Dean has climbed into his own spider hole of <br>  <br> denial.\"  <br>  <br>     Sen. John Kerry, Massachusetts Democrat, said Mr. Dean is aligned with those in his <br>  <br> party \"who threaten to take us down a road of confusion and defeat.\"  <br>  <br>     \"Those who doubted whether Iraq or the world would be better off without Saddam <br>  <br> Hussein, and those who believe we are not safer with his capture, don't have the judgment <br>  <br> to be president -- or the credibility to be elected president,\" Mr. Kerry said.  <br>  <br>     Dean spokesman Jay Carson said Mr. Dean has come under attack because his primary <br>  <br> opponents can't come up with a positive message of their own and the front-runner is far <br>  <br> outpacing them in fund raising.  <br>  <br>     \"The Washington politicians are engaged in exactly the kind of negative politics that <br>  <br> the American people are tired of,\" Mr. Carson said.  <br>  <br>     Mr. Kerry accused Mr. Dean of being \"all over the lot\" on the Iraq war, saying he <br>  <br> himself has been in favor of toppling Saddam \"all along.\" But as recently as Dec. 11, Mr. <br>  <br> Kerry was touting his own antiwar credentials.  <br>  <br>     \"For months, Howard Dean has been going around the country saying, 'What are all <br>  <br> these other people doing who voted for the president's war? I'm the only guy who was <br>  <br> against it,' \" Mr. Kerry said on CNBC's \"Capital Report.\"  <br>  <br>     Mr. Kerry voted for the resolution that authorized Mr. Bush to use force to oust <br>  <br> Saddam, but he voted against spending $87 billion on troop support and the <br>  <br> reconstruction of Iraq, a contradiction that he has spent weeks explaining to Democratic <br>  <br> voters.  <br>  <br>     Mr. Kerry told an audience in Florida last month that he voted against the troop <br>  <br> funding to \"send a message\" urging Mr. Bush to build a broader coalition -- essentially <br>  <br> securing the approval of France and Germany -- and work more closely with the United <br>  <br> Nations.  <br>  <br>     \"But oh, no, this president rushed to war,\" Mr. Kerry told Florida Democrats on Nov. <br>  <br> 20.  <br>  <br>     Yet yesterday, Mr. Kerry assailed Mr. Dean for his statement that the United States <br>  <br> needed U.N. permission before taking action in Iraq.  <br>  <br>     \"Perhaps it reflects inexperience, but for Howard Dean to permit a veto over when <br>  <br> America can or cannot act not only becomes little more than a pretext for doing nothing, <br>  <br> it cedes our security and presidential responsibility to defend America to someone else -- <br>  <br> a danger for both our national security and global stability,\" Mr. Kerry said.  <br>  <br>     On the morning Saddam's capture was announced, however, Mr. Kerry suggested on <br>  <br> \"Fox News Sunday\" that a broader U.N. coalition could have located Saddam faster than <br>  <br> the Army's 4th Infantry Division did.  <br>  <br>     \"If we had done this in a globalized way, if we had brought more people to the table, <br>  <br> we might have caught Saddam Hussein sooner,\" Mr. Kerry said. \"We might have had less <br>  <br> loss of life. We would be in a stronger position today with respect to what we're doing.\"  <br>  <br>      <br><br>  <br><br> Copyright &copy; 2003 News World Communications, Inc. All rights reserved. <br><br>  <br><br>  <br>  <br> <\/p>\n","contact":"","link":"http:\/\/www.deanforamerica.com\/site\/PageServer?pagename=emailSignup&s_oo=Uwnsw","address":"","phone":"","parent_id":0,"mime_type":"text\/plain","summary":"Web Address to Help Dean's Campaign:\r\nhttp:\/\/www.deanforamerica.com\/site\/PageServer?pagename=emailSignup&s_oo=Uwnsw\r\nPoOSyePLhYs3lnipg..","numcomment":1,"fileurl":"\/uploads\/","filesize":null,"article_url":"\/news\/2003\/12\/97736.php"},"attachments":[],"comments":[{"id":97752,"heading":"Dean will need more than...","article":"...a web address to help his campaign.","author":"nonanarchist0647","parent_id":97736,"mime_type":"text\/plain","created":"2003-12-18 11:57:01","modified":"2003-12-18 11:57:01","fileurl":""}]}