{"article":{"id":95566,"heading":"JUDGE CRISTOL AND HISTORIAN BREGMAN CLASH OVER USS LIBERTY","author":"USS LIBERTY","created":"2003-11-26 23:40:56","modified":"2013-11-11 00:27:45","last_modified":"Mon, 11 Nov 2013 07:27:45","article":"<p>There are two people, outside the Israeli government who have heard and transcribed <br>  <br> the tapes: Cristol and Dr. Ahron Bregman. Dr. Bregman, the Israeli author of &ldquo;A History of Israel&rdquo;, gave the following response to an <br>  <br> inquiry about the accuracy of Cristol&rsquo;s translation in a letter dated <br>  <br> February 5, 2003: <br><br> &ldquo;I understand from your letter (31 Jan 2003) that according to Dr, Jay <br>  <br> Cristol the only difference between my and his interpretation of the <br>  <br> conversations of the pilots before and during the attack on USS <br>  <br> Liberty is the \"tone\" of those conversations. Yes, the tone seems to <br>  <br> be one issue on which we disagree, but then the tone is very important <br>  <br> for in these tapes the tone sometimes makes the music. It is <br>  <br> sufficient to listen to the tone of Robert (here I am using the names <br>  <br> used by Cristol in his book) at 1353 where he says: \"What do you say?\" <br>  <br> to realize that, in fact, he refers to the previous suggestion of L.K. <br>  <br> that it might well be that the ship is American. It seems that when it <br>  <br> suits him Cristol himself refers to the tone of conversations. At <br>  <br> 1412, according to Cristol, Kislev says: \"Leave her!\" and Cristol then <br>  <br> adds in brackets: \"There is a dramatic change in the tone of Kislev's <br>  <br> voice\". So here we are. The tone is indeed a matter that should be <br>  <br> taken into consideration when analyzing the tapes. <br><br> But it seems that Cristol and me differ on substance as well. You see, <br>  <br> Cristol is not a plumber, or a mechanic but rather a Judge - a Federal <br>  <br> Judge - and as such his is the world of words and he fully understands <br>  <br> - I am pretty sure - the meaning of words and the need to be accurate <br>  <br> when using them. But when it comes to the audiotapes it seems as if <br>  <br> Cristol no longer understands the importance of words and in his text <br>  <br> there are omissions and the text itself is sometimes heavily edited. <br>  <br> Here is an example (and for the sake of accuracy I am not even quoting <br>  <br> from &ldquo;A History of Israel&rdquo; but rather straight from the tapes): <br><br> Cristol's version:  <br>  <br> 13:54 <br>  <br> LK: What is that? Americans?  <br>  <br> Shimon: What Americans? <br>  <br> Kislev: Robert, what did you say? [No one answers.] <br><br> Bregman's version:  <br>  <br> 13:53  <br>  <br> LK: What is it? American? <br>  <br> Shimon: How do you mean, American? <br>  <br> Kislev: Robert, what do you say? [namely: what's your opinion and <br>  <br> clearly a reference to the query just raised regarding the ship's <br>  <br> identity - AB) <br>  <br> Robert: I didn't say (the tone: I don't want to know - AB) <br><br> Why did Cristol) edit the text by saying that \"no one answers\" where <br>  <br> in fact Robert does answer by saying \"I didn't say\" in a tone which <br>  <br> suggests \"1 don't want to know\" or \"no comment\"? <br><br> Another critical moment in the audiotapes comes a bit later: <br><br> Cristol's version:  <br>  <br> 14:13 <br>  <br> Menachem: Kislev, what country? [Menachem has become concerned.]  <br>  <br> Kislev: Possibly American. <br><br> Bregman's version:  <br>  <br> 14:14 <br>  <br> Menachem: Kislev, what state? <br>  <br> Kislev: Probably American  <br>  <br> Menachem: What? <br>  <br> Kislev:  Probably American. <br><br> Why did Cristol) shorten this passage?? In order that the word <br>  <br> \"American\" will not ring in our ears for too long? True, this latter <br>  <br> passage is far from being a \"Smoking gun\", but why to edit such a <br>  <br> critical moment in the event?? <br><br> if Judge Cristol was chosen to be the messenger whose task it is to <br>  <br> put an end to a terribly painful debate then - in my opinion - the <br>  <br> opposite was achieved.&rdquo; <br><br> It would seem that there are some serious questions about the accuracy <br>  <br> of Cristol&rsquo;s translation, as well as questions about Cristol&rsquo;s <br>  <br> honesty. If Bregman is correct, then Cristol deliberately falsified <br>  <br> the transcripts. Of course the difference could just be that Bregman, <br>  <br> an Israeli scholar, is a native speaker of Hebrew, where Cristol does <br>  <br> not speak Hebrew fluently. That still wouldn&rsquo;t explain the omissions.<\/p>\n","contact":"","link":"","address":"","phone":"","parent_id":0,"mime_type":"text\/plain","summary":"JUDGE JOE CRISTOL AND HISTORIAN AHRON BREGMAN CLASH OVER ISRAELI ATTACK ON USS LIBERTY","numcomment":0,"fileurl":"\/uploads\/","filesize":null,"article_url":"\/news\/2003\/11\/95566.php"},"attachments":[],"comments":[]}