{"article":{"id":69134,"heading":"Are","author":"KOBE SBM","created":"2003-07-03 03:29:43","modified":"2005-08-15 01:34:59","last_modified":"Mon, 15 Aug 2005 08:34:59","article":"<p align=\"center\">Are \"anarcho\"-capitalists really \r\nAnarchists?<\/p>\r\n<p>In a word, <u><b>no<\/b><\/u>. While \"anarcho\"-capitalists \r\nobviously try to associate themselves with the anarchist tradition by using the \r\nword \"anarcho\", their ideas are distinctly at odds with those associated with \r\nanarchism. Because of this any claims that their ideas are anarchist or that \r\nthey are part of the anarchist tradition or movement are totally false. They are \r\nmerely trying to exploit the movement for capitalist gain.<\/p>\r\n<p>\"Anarcho\"-capitalists claim to be anarchists because they \r\nsay that they oppose government. As such, they use a dictionary definition of \r\nanarchism. However, this fails to appreciate that anarchism is a <b>POLITICAL \r\nTHEORY<\/b>, not a dictionary definition. As dictionaries are rarely politically \r\nsophisticated things, this means that they fail to recognize that anarchism is \r\nmore than just opposition to government, it is also marked a opposition to \r\ncapitalism (i.e. exploitation and private property). Thus, opposition to \r\ngovernment is a necessary but not sufficient condition for being an anarchist. \r\nOne also needs to be opposed to exploitation and capitalist private property. As \r\n\"anarcho\"-capitalists do not consider interest, rent and profits (i.e. \r\ncapitalism) to be exploitative nor oppose capitalist property rights, <b>they \r\nare not anarchists<\/b>. <\/p>\r\n<p>So, in what ways do \"anarcho\"-capitalists differ from \r\nanarchists? There are three main ones: <\/p>\r\n<p>First, unlike both Individualist and Social anarchists, \r\n\"anarcho\"-capitalists support capitalism (a \"pure\" free market type of \r\ncapitalism). This means that they reject totally the ideas of anarchists with \r\nregards to property and economic analysis. For example, like all supporters of \r\ncapitalists they consider rent, profit and interest as valid incomes. In \r\ncontrast, all Anarchists consider these as exploitation and agree with the \r\nIndividualist Anarchist, Benjamin Tucker when argued that: <\/p>\r\n<p><i>\"<b>Whom<\/b>ever contributes to production is alone \r\nentitled. <b>What<\/b> has no rights that <b>who<\/b> is bound to respect. <b>What<\/b> \r\nis a thing. <b>Who<\/b> is a person. Things have no claims; they exist only to be \r\nclaimed. The possession of a right cannot be predicted of dead material, but \r\nonly a living person.\"<\/i> [quoted by Wm. Gary Kline, <b>The Individualist \r\nAnarchists<\/b>, p. 73] <\/p>\r\n<p>And this, we must note, is the fundamental critique of the \r\ncapitalist theory that capital is productive. In and of themselves, fixed costs \r\ndo not create value. Rather value is creation depends on how investments are \r\ndeveloped and used once in place. Because of this, the Individualist Anarchists \r\nconsidered non-labor derived income as usury, unlike \"anarcho\"-capitalists.\r\n<\/p>\r\n<p>Second, anarchists reject the notion of capitalist \r\nproperty rights in favor of possession (including the full fruits of one's \r\nlabor). For example, anarchists reject private ownership of land in favor of a\r\n<i>\"occupancy and use\"<\/i> regime. In this anarchists argue that <i>\"property is \r\ntheft\"<\/i>. <\/p>\r\n<p>These ideas are an essential part of anarchist politics, \r\nand they cannot be removed without seriously damaging the rest of the foolish \r\nanarchist theory. This can be seen from Tucker's comments that <i>\"<b>Liberty<\/b> \r\ninsists. . . [on] the abolition of the State and the abolition of usury; on no \r\nmore government of man by man, and no more exploitation of man by man.\"<\/i> . He \r\nindicates that anarchism has specific economic <b>and<\/b> political ideas, that \r\nit opposes capitalism along with the state. Therefore anarchism was never purely \r\na \"political\" concept, but always combined an opposition to oppression with an \r\nopposition to exploitation. The social anarchists made exactly the same point. \r\nWhich means that when Tucker argued that <i>\"<b>Liberty<\/b> insists on \r\nSocialism. . . - true Socialism, Anarchistic Socialism: the prevalence on earth \r\nof Liberty, Equality, and Solidarity\"<\/i> [<b>Instead of a Book<\/b>, p. 363] he \r\nknew exactly what he was saying and meant it. <\/p>\r\n<p>This combination of the political and economic is \r\nessential as they mutually reinforce each other. Without the economic ideas, the \r\npolitical ideas would be meaningless and inequality would make a mockery of \r\nthem. As Kline notes, the Individualist Anarchists' <i>\"proposals were designed \r\nto establish true equality of opportunity . . . and they expected this would \r\nresult in a society without great wealth or poverty. In the absence of \r\nmonopolistic factors which would distort competition, they expected a society \r\nlargely of self-employed workmen with no significant disparity of wealth between \r\nany of them since all would be required to live at their own expense and not at \r\nthe expense of exploited fellow human beings.\"<\/i> <\/p>\r\n<p>Third, by removing the underlying commitment to abolish \r\nnon-labor income, any \"anarchist\" capitalist society would have vast differences \r\nin wealth and therefore power. Instead of a government imposed monopolies in \r\nland, money and so on, the economic power flowing from private property and \r\ncapital would ensure that the majority remained in power. The Individualist \r\nAnarchists were aware of this paradox and so supported economic ideas that \r\nopposed usury (i.e. rent, profit and interest) and ensured the worker the full \r\nvalue of his or her labor. While not all of them called these ideas \"socialist\" \r\nit is clear that these ideas are socialist in nature and in aim (not all the \r\nIndividualist Anarchists called themselves anarchists but their ideas are \r\nclearly anarchist in nature). <\/p>\r\n<p>Last, a purported self-declared anarchist would NEVER sell \r\ntrinkets and iconic symbols of a movement which is vehemently opposed to \r\ncapitalism as the fake \"anarchist\" is attempting to do here:\r\n\r\nhttp:\/\/www.stop-fascism.org\/store.htm . <\/p>\r\n<p>Because \"anarcho\"-capitalists embrace capitalism and \r\nreject socialism, they cannot be considered anarchists or part of the anarchist \r\ntradition. <\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\n","contact":"kobehq@yahoo.com","link":"http:\/\/www.kobehq.com\/KOBEBOARDS2\/forum\/forum_topics.asp?FID=1&PN=1","address":"","phone":"","parent_id":0,"mime_type":"image\/jpeg","summary":"Are &quot;anarcho&quot;-capitalists really Anarchists? NO. They are really sham artists who are the lowest form of entrepreneur. They are worse than HONEST anarchists....if there is such a thing.\r\n","numcomment":37,"fileurl":"\/uploads\/2003\/07\/hypocrites.jpg","filesize":"26.3 kibibytes","article_url":"\/news\/2003\/07\/69134.php","image":{"original":"\/uploads\/2003\/07\/hypocrites.jpg","small":"\/uploads\/2003\/07\/hypocrites.jpgthumb.jpg"}},"attachments":[],"comments":[{"id":69140,"heading":"What a moron!","article":"Of course Anarcho-Capitalists are Anarchists.  Anarchism means &quot;anti-hierarchicalism.&quot;  The state of non-hierarchy does not demand a specific economic system.  True anarcho-capitalists would be against exploitative relatioships just as anarcho-communists are against exploitative relationships.\r\n\r\nI sense in this fool's writings a certain irritation that capitalism is not reserved for ass kissing republicans alone.  Whoever this &quot;KOBE SBM&quot; is, he should go back to school.","author":"Sandy","parent_id":69134,"mime_type":"text\/plain","created":"2003-07-03 03:52:49","modified":"2003-07-03 03:52:49","fileurl":""},{"id":69156,"heading":"Let's see, we're supposed to argue our point with a stalker?","article":"I wouldn't give KOBE SBM the satisfaction of an argument.  I visited his website.  It's the work of a raving psycho.  Find another place to play, little schizo.","author":"An Anarchist","parent_id":69134,"mime_type":"text\/plain","created":"2003-07-03 09:09:58","modified":"2003-07-03 09:09:58","fileurl":""},{"id":69181,"heading":"Anarchism and Capitalism cannot co-exist.","article":"&quot;Anarchism means &quot;anti-hierarchicalism.&quot; \r\n \r\n\r\nan\u00b7ar\u00b7chism \r\nPronunciation: 'a-n&r-&quot;ki-z&m, -&quot;n\u00e4r-\r\nFunction: noun\r\nDate: 1642\r\n1 : a political theory holding all forms of governmental authority to be unnecessary and undesirable and advocating a society based on voluntary cooperation and free association of individuals and groups.\r\n\r\nCapitalism cannot exist in a society where there is no governmental authority. Even a barter system must use some forum of organized hierarchy in order to form. Where did you get your information, Sandy? From a cereal box?","author":"True Anarchist","parent_id":69134,"mime_type":"text\/plain","created":"2003-07-03 11:58:20","modified":"2013-11-11 00:23:32","fileurl":""},{"id":69195,"heading":"More bullshit.","article":"Capitalism does not require a state.  The value of currency is based on faith.  Anarcho-capitalists based all relationships upon voluntary contracts between individuals.  Enforcing contracts rests upon a mutual agreement to a mutually satisfactory arbitrator that only gets paid if both parties agree.  Should no agreement be possible, natural consequences follow (e.g. social pressure upon the breaker of the contract).\r\n\r\nOn another note, Anarcho-Capitalism exists as a movement.  KOBE SBM also argues, incorrectly, that there is a sharp distinction between individualist anarchists and anarcho-capitalists.  Most individualist anarchists are anarcho-capitalists.  By the way, I am not an anarcho-capitalist myself.  I merely find KOBE SBM's hollow display of ignorance laughable.\r\n\r\nhttp:\/\/www.libertarian.nl\/libertarisme\/anarcho-capitalism.htm\r\n\r\nhttp:\/\/dwardmac.pitzer.edu\/dward\/newrightanarchocap.html\r\n\r\nhttp:\/\/www.geocities.com\/CapitolHill\/Lobby\/4804\/neoanarch.html\r\n\r\nThe primary enemies of Anarcho-Capitalist ideology are often anarcho-communists.  Anarcho-communists realize that they are competing for the same pool of anti-authoritarians.  It is only natural that some would argue that they (the anarcho-communists) are the only true anarchists.  However, this does not make such claims true.\r\n\r\nHaving read up on Devoy in response to KOBE SBM's foolish argument, I find that Devoy presents an interesting position where he claims that anarcho-communism can be reduced to anarcho-capitalism in the same way that biology can be reduced to chemistry.  Biology and chemistry are different from a perspective of concept and level of abstraction, but they are not incompatible, in fact, biology rests on chemistry.  Thus, there is no contradiction in Devoy's position.  Devoy is not an anarcho-capitalist.  I would characterize him as a meta-anarchist.  He attempts to reconcile the differences betweent he two in order to permit each to coexist and benefit the other.  For an opponent to anarchism, Devoy's ideas are a real threat.  No wonder why KOBE SBM hates him so.","author":"Sandy","parent_id":69134,"mime_type":"text\/plain","created":"2003-07-03 12:12:46","modified":"2003-07-03 12:12:46","fileurl":""},{"id":69206,"heading":"Fresca misses the mark.","article":"I'm not arguing about what form of anarchy is better.  I'm arguing that KOBE SBM has some kind of brain lesion.","author":"Sandy","parent_id":69134,"mime_type":"text\/plain","created":"2003-07-03 12:28:35","modified":"2003-07-03 12:28:35","fileurl":""},{"id":69286,"heading":"KOBE's hero, Bill O'Reilly?","article":"No, KOBE used Bill O'Reilly to make a fool out of you. KOBE has no heroes on television. They have real life ones. Like the soldiers who went to Iraq.","author":"xxchipxx","parent_id":69134,"mime_type":"text\/plain","created":"2003-07-03 14:11:50","modified":"2003-07-03 14:11:50","fileurl":""},{"id":69289,"heading":"xxchipxx","article":"REAL men don't need &quot;heroes,&quot; little boy.","author":"buffalo chip","parent_id":69134,"mime_type":"text\/plain","created":"2003-07-03 14:13:55","modified":"2003-07-03 14:13:55","fileurl":""},{"id":69298,"heading":"buffalo chip","article":"Will you be my hero?","author":"xxchipxx","parent_id":69134,"mime_type":"text\/plain","created":"2003-07-03 14:23:24","modified":"2003-07-03 14:23:24","fileurl":""},{"id":69304,"heading":"I'm convinced, KOBE is delusional.","article":"Look at him brag about his poorly written, ill conceived, and conceptual vacuous article!\r\n\r\nHa, ha, ha, hah!\r\n\r\nI suspect that KOBE has many visitors for two reasons:\r\na) The pornography\r\nb) People passing by to laugh at KOBE.\r\n\r\nNow, if KOBE were for real, KOBE would be writing articles about anarchism that did not focus on Devoy.  Devoy's website has pointed out convincingly that KOBE is a stalker.  The fact that all of his anti-anarchist rants are actually personal attacks on Devoy is very telling.\r\n\r\nHaving read the articles on Cyber Stalkers, it seems that KOBE meets the characteristics perfectly:\r\n\r\na) Jealous\r\nb) Delusional\r\nc) Self absorbed\r\nd) Psychotic\r\ne) Compulsive\r\nf) Obsessive\r\ng) Posts articles in his victim's name\r\nh) Accuses his victim of outrageous crimes and charges in the hope of provoking a response.  The desire for a response reflects a need to control his victim.\r\ni) Blaming the victim for the stalker's behavior.\r\n\r\nKOBE, we have you wrapped up.  That you can't stop posting here is proof that you are all of the above.","author":"Sandy","parent_id":69134,"mime_type":"text\/plain","created":"2003-07-03 14:29:41","modified":"2003-07-03 14:29:41","fileurl":""},{"id":69315,"heading":"Anna","article":"&quot;We are all laughing at you,...&quot;\r\n\r\nWho's &quot;we?&quot; The voices in your head? Get professional help, you deranged cunt.","author":"Andy","parent_id":69134,"mime_type":"text\/plain","created":"2003-07-03 15:00:28","modified":"2003-07-03 15:00:28","fileurl":""},{"id":69355,"heading":"LMAO. Why do they even bother?","article":"These stupid liberal-leftists are losers right from the start.","author":"Anna","parent_id":69134,"mime_type":"text\/plain","created":"2003-07-03 16:35:46","modified":"2003-07-03 16:35:46","fileurl":""},{"id":69357,"heading":"You'll never learn.","article":"&quot;These stupid liberal-leftists are losers right from the start.&quot;\r\n\r\nUNSUBSTANTIATED ALLEGATION\r\nFor more on logic at your level, try reading &quot;Logic for Dummies.&quot;\r\n","author":"Master Debater","parent_id":69134,"mime_type":"text\/plain","created":"2003-07-03 16:37:17","modified":"2003-07-03 16:37:17","fileurl":""},{"id":69359,"heading":"But then again.....","article":".... I didn't bother to research anything you wrote to see if it was true.  That's beyond my limited abilities.","author":"Master Debater","parent_id":69134,"mime_type":"text\/plain","created":"2003-07-03 16:39:52","modified":"2003-07-03 16:39:52","fileurl":""},{"id":69389,"heading":"still waiting","article":"Still waiting for the activist community to actually have one of the items on their agenda implemented.\r\n\r\nWaiting............\r\n\r\nwaiting.........\r\n\r\nwaiting..........\r\n\r\nwaiting.........\r\n\r\nwaiting..........\r\n\r\nwaiting.........\r\n\r\nwaiting..........\r\n\r\nwaiting.........\r\n\r\nwaiting..........\r\n\r\nwaiting.........\r\n\r\nwaiting..........\r\n\r\nwaiting.........\r\n\r\nwaiting..........\r\n\r\nwaiting.........\r\n\r\nwaiting..........\r\n\r\nstill waiting........\r\n\r\nwaiting.........\r\n\r\nwaiting..........\r\n\r\nwaiting.........\r\n\r\nwaiting..........\r\n\r\nwaiting.........\r\n\r\nwaiting..........\r\n\r\nwaiting.........\r\n\r\nwaiting..........\r\n\r\nwaiting.........\r\n\r\nwaiting.........................................................\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n","author":"waiting","parent_id":69134,"mime_type":"text\/plain","created":"2003-07-03 17:11:15","modified":"2003-07-03 17:11:15","fileurl":""},{"id":69390,"heading":"activists","article":"Fool me once, shame... shame on... you, ...................\r\nfool me -- can't get fooled again!","author":"George W. Bush","parent_id":69134,"mime_type":"text\/plain","created":"2003-07-03 17:13:10","modified":"2003-07-03 17:13:10","fileurl":""},{"id":69400,"heading":"Psychic?","article":"&quot;Bush IS the President, and he will not be impeached.&quot;\r\n\r\n*******Hmmm. Bush IS the President.*********\r\n\r\n&quot;The President, Vice President and all Civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors&quot;\r\n\r\n\r\n*******Hmmm. Bush has done nothing on this list.******\r\n\r\nI could make that same statement. Does that make me a psychic too?","author":"Rooted in Reality","parent_id":69134,"mime_type":"text\/plain","created":"2003-07-03 17:30:34","modified":"2003-07-03 17:30:34","fileurl":""},{"id":69464,"heading":"Oh....I get it. They simply batch delete my posts","article":"They will have to do MUCH better than that. At least they are deleting DeVoid's posts too. Whaddaya know. Los Angeles &quot;Independent Media&quot; stooping to the old censorship ploy. We have succeded once again. What was once a bastion of free speech will become just another censored relic of a bygone passion for the outspoken.\r\n\r\nIf you really want to shout it out, then visit these forums: http:\/\/www.kobehq.com\/KOBEBOARDS2\/forum\/forum_topics.asp?FID=1 where you can post anything you want....well ALMOST. See you there.\r\n\r\nYou know who...BWAHAHAH","author":"Who will I be this time?","parent_id":69134,"mime_type":"text\/plain","created":"2003-07-04 01:45:43","modified":"2003-07-04 01:45:43","fileurl":""},{"id":69612,"heading":"Rooted in Reality","article":"&quot;I could make that same statement. Does that make me a psychic too?&quot;\r\n\r\nNo, it makes you an idiot. \r\n\r\n","author":"Fact","parent_id":69134,"mime_type":"text\/plain","created":"2003-07-04 14:07:13","modified":"2003-07-04 14:07:13","fileurl":""},{"id":69613,"heading":"(wheeze!) cough cough (gasp!)","article":"The activist community is dying\r\nOrganize!\r\nOrganize!\r\n","author":"Fact","parent_id":69134,"mime_type":"text\/plain","created":"2003-07-04 14:08:58","modified":"2003-07-04 14:08:58","fileurl":""},{"id":71335,"heading":"Hey chippie want to see my tight pussy?","article":"BWAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA","author":"kobe hq","parent_id":69134,"mime_type":"text\/plain","created":"2003-07-11 09:34:06","modified":"2003-07-11 09:34:06","fileurl":""}]}