{"article":{"id":50469,"heading":"Epidemic of Exaggerations","author":"Paul King","created":"2003-04-16 18:48:36","modified":"2003-04-16 20:17:23","last_modified":"Thu, 17 Apr 2003 04:17:23","article":"<br>  <br> After the first speaker, Le Ann Dolan of AIDS Calgary, the local HIV\/AIDS service organization spoke for about five minutes about the burgeoning <br>  <br> AIDS epidemic in Canada a member of the press interjected her first question.  <br>  <br> \"How many new AIDS cases were there in Canada last year?\" Le Ann stopped, looked puzzled, and did not answer. The answer to this  question <br>  <br> turned out to be that that there were only 221 new cases of AIDS diagnosed in 2001 (2002 figures are not available yet). And, that is no anomaly, the <br>  <br> case count has declined every year from a peak of  <br>  <br> 1,759 in 1993 [LCDC, 2002]  <br><br>  <br>  <br> ----- <br><br>  <br>  <br> Author Michael Fumento, in his book The Myth of Heterosexual AIDS, offers substantial evidence that white, middle-class, non IV drugabuser heterosexuals are in less danger of contracting AIDS thru non-anal,  <br>  <br> sexual intercourse than they are of dying from shark attacks, being hit by lightning, or accidentally drowning in the bathtub. The <br>  <br> book is very well referenced and documented.  <br><br> The book was reviewed by the Journal of the American Medical Assn as \"the best single source available to enable heterosexual persons to assess their personal risk.\" <br><br> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.fumento.com\/pozaids.html\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.fumento.com\/pozaids.html<\/a>  <br><br> THE MYTH OF TEENAGE AIDS <br><br> CDC statistics show that only 4,061 teenagers have contracted AIDS  in 21 years in the entire United States.. <br><br>  <br>  <br> Source: - CDC <br><br>  <br><br> ----- <br><br>  <br><br> The New York State Quarterly AIDS Report (table 4A)  reported: - <br><br> In the first half of 2000 there was not one single caucasian teenage female AIDS case attributed to heterosexual sex. <br>  <br> In the first half of 2000 there was not one single teenage male AIDS case (of any race) attributed to heterosexual sex. <br><br>  <br>  <br> ----- <br><br>  <br><br>  <br>  <br> MONTANA  <br><br> Total teenage cases since 1985  - 2 (TWO)  <br>  <br> Heterosexual cases (male and female) since 1985 - 67 (SIXTY SEVEN)  <br>  <br> Children one to seven in age since 1985  -  4 (FOUR)  <br>  <br>    <br>  <br>    <br><br> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dphhs.state.mt.us\/hpsd\/pubheal\/disease\/pdf\/aids1200.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.dphhs.state.mt.us\/hpsd\/pubheal\/disease\/pdf\/aids1200.pdf<\/a>  <br><br>  <br>  <br> ---- <br><br>  <br><br> Oklahoma statistics: -  <br>  <br> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.health.state.ok.us\/program\/hivstd\/epi\/1202_4.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.health.state.ok.us\/program\/hivstd\/epi\/1202_4.pdf<\/a>  <br><br> HIV POSITIVE CUMLATIVE FIGURES  <br><br> 121 deaths in 19 years (approx 6 per year).  <br>  <br> Pediatric deaths - ONE  <br><br> Hardly an epidemic in Oklahoma  <br><br> (No breakdown of hetero percentage available). \n","contact":"","link":"","address":"","phone":"","parent_id":0,"mime_type":"text\/plain","summary":"Why does the AIDS Estiblishment continue to lie to us about this non-epidemic? Is AIDS simply a way of detering people from causal sex and maintaining conformity?","numcomment":3,"fileurl":"\/uploads\/","filesize":null,"article_url":"\/news\/2003\/04\/50469.php"},"attachments":[],"comments":[{"id":50525,"heading":"I got one word for you skeptical white liberals on this issue..","article":" and it is AFRICA","author":"mediawatcher","parent_id":50469,"mime_type":"text\/plain","created":"2003-04-16 19:59:40","modified":"2003-04-16 19:59:40","fileurl":""},{"id":50526,"heading":"mediawatcher","article":"White? What are you, a racist?","author":"Turd Ferguson","parent_id":50469,"mime_type":"text\/plain","created":"2003-04-16 20:01:20","modified":"2003-04-16 20:01:20","fileurl":""},{"id":50533,"heading":"On the subject of Africa","article":"\r\nThe AIDS researchers in Africa including those from the CDC and WHO also admit that immune deficiency in Africa \r\n                  has existed for a considerable time and this has not been due to HIV: &quot;Africans are frequently exposed to hygienic \r\n                  conditions and other factors, to a wide variety of viruses, including CMV, EBV, and HSV, all of which are known to \r\n                  modulate the immune system...Furthermore, the Africans in the present study are at an additional risk for immunologic \r\n                  alterations since they are frequently afflicted with a wide variety of diseases, such as malaria, trypanosomiasis, and \r\n                  filariasis, that are also known to have a major effect on the immune system&quot; [CMV=cytomegalovirus; \r\n                  EBV=Epstein-Barr virus; HSV=herpes simplex virus]. Although the Bangui definition does not require a test for \r\n                  immunodeficiency, the definition states that a patient is considered an AIDS case only &quot;in the absence of known \r\n                  causes of immunosuppression such as cancer or severe malnutrition or other recognised etiologies&quot; (WHO, 1986). \r\n                  Thus, since eminent HIV\/AIDS researchers admit that sick Africans have many causes of immunosuppression then, \r\n                  by definition, there should be very few, if any, African AIDS cases. Thus one must agree with the WHO and other \r\n                  researchers that acquired immune deficiency (AID) and certain diseases (S) are long standing in Africa, but are not \r\n                  induced by HIV. Nevertheless, the same researchers presume that the world will willingly accept that we are in the \r\n                  midst of witnessing a new phenomenon in Africa caused by a new virus. \r\n\r\n                  The evidence for the existence of HIV in Africa is based on the random testing of Africans for the presence of HIV \r\n                  antibodies. (Ironically, the test in not required for the diagnosis of AIDS in Africans and in fact surveys have indicated \r\n                  that only approximately half of African &quot;AIDS&quot; cases have a positive test. The HIV antibody tests (the &quot;AIDS test&quot;) \r\n                  relies on the presence or absence of reactions between antibodies present in patients' blood and certain proteins which \r\n                  are believed to be unique to HIV. Because non-HIV antibodies can react with the &quot;HIV proteins&quot; producing positive \r\n                  tests in individuals who are not HIV infected, before the test is used to diagnose HIV infection the test's specificity \r\n                  must be determined. This means that one must determine how often false-positive tests occur, and the only \r\n                  scientifically valid method for ascertaining this fact is by an examination, in a large number of suitable individuals, of \r\n                  the results of antibody testing performed concurrently with HIV isolation. Bizarre as it may seem, even today, no such \r\n                  data has ever been reported, neither in the West nor in Africa. The AIDS scientific literature remains silent on this \r\n                  most basic requirement of test evaluation (Papadopulos- Eleopulos et al., 1993). \r\n  ","author":"Paul King","parent_id":50469,"mime_type":"text\/plain","created":"2003-04-16 20:17:27","modified":"2003-04-16 20:17:27","fileurl":""}]}