{"article":{"id":33468,"heading":"The Weekly Spin","author":"PR Watch","created":"2003-03-06 23:17:15","modified":"2003-03-06 23:17:15","last_modified":"Fri, 07 Mar 2003 06:17:15","article":"<p>The Weekly Spin features selected news summaries with links to  <br>  <br> further information about current public relations campaigns.  <br>  <br> It is emailed free each Wednesday to subscribers.  <br><br> SHARE US WITH A FRIEND (OR FIFTY FRIENDS) <br>  <br> Who do you know who might want to receive Spin of the Week? <br>  <br> Help us grow our subscriber list!  Just forward this message to  <br>  <br> people you know, encouraging them to sign up at this link: <br><br> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/cmd\/subscribe_sotd.html\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/cmd\/subscribe_sotd.html<\/a> <br><br> --------------------------------------------------------------------- <br>  <br> THIS WEEK'S NEWS <br><br> 1. No More Beers for America <br>  <br> 2. Hot Flash, Cold Cash <br>  <br> 3. Feed a Flack, Bomb Iraq <br>  <br> 4. Unleashing \"Shock And Awe\" At Home &amp; Abroad <br>  <br> 5. Star Wars <br>  <br> 6. Psyops in Iraq <br>  <br> 7. Words vs. Deeds <br>  <br> 8. Swallow This <br>  <br> 9. Marching on Washington for Peace - Virtually <br>  <br> 10. Grassroots PR for Nuclear Power <br>  <br> 11. Pentagon Denies That Depleted Uranium Keeps On Killing <br>  <br> 12. MSNBC Cans Donahue <br>  <br> 13. US Radio Station Alter Playlists for War on Iraq <br>  <br> 14. TV Networks Censor Anti-War Ads <br>  <br> 15. Media Questioned Over War Protest Coverage <br>  <br> 16. Bush Faces Increasingly Poor Image Overseas <br>  <br> 17. Bogus \"Consumer Group\" Stripped of Domain Names <br>  <br> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- <br><br> 1. NO MORE BEERS FOR AMERICA <br>  <br> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2003\/03\/04\/international\/middleeast\/04BEER.html?pagewanted=print\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2003\/03\/04\/international\/middleeast\/04BEER.html?pagewanted=print<\/a> <br>  <br>   \"Charlotte Beers, the former advertising executive who has been in <br>  <br>   charge of the Bush administration's global campaign to enhance the <br>  <br>   image of the United States among Muslims, resigned today for what <br>  <br>   she said were health reasons,\" reports Steven Weisman. Under Beers' <br>  <br>   supervision, the U.S. State Department produced videos, pamphlets, <br>  <br>   booklets and other materials, but her efforts were largely seen as <br>  <br>   ineffective. Most of the comments on the O'Dwyer's PR web site <br>  <br>   celebrated her departure, saying \"Good riddance!\" and \"About time! <br>  <br>   She was horrible and the U.S. has lost all post-9\/11 support.\" <br>  <br> SOURCE: New York Times, March 4, 2003 <br>  <br> More web links related to this story are available at: <br>  <br>    <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/spin\/March_2003.html#1046754000\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/spin\/March_2003.html#1046754000<\/a> <br>  <br> To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit: <br>  <br>    <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/forum\/discuss.php?id=1046754000\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/forum\/discuss.php?id=1046754000<\/a> <br><br> 2. HOT FLASH, COLD CASH <br>  <br> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonmonthly.com\/features\/2001\/0301.mundy.html\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.washingtonmonthly.com\/features\/2001\/0301.mundy.html<\/a> <br>  <br>   \"Last April, several hundred black-tie and couture-clad worthies <br>  <br>   crowded into the ornate ballroom of the Washington Ritz-Carlton for <br>  <br>   one more dinner on the spring charity circuit,\" writes Alicia Mundy <br>  <br>   - namely, the annual gala of the once-respected Society for Women's <br>  <br>   Health Research (SWHR), a Washington, DC-based nonprofit <br>  <br>   organization whose stated mission is \"to improve the health of <br>  <br>   women through research.\" In recent years, however, SWHR has become <br>  <br>   increasingly dependent on corporation contributions from <br>  <br>   pharmaceutical companies. Last year's gala was underwritten by <br>  <br>   Wyeth, which makes Prempro, the drug most widely used in <br>  <br>   hormone-replacement therapy (HRT) for post-menopausal women. The <br>  <br>   event celebrated HRT, complained one participant, \"like they were <br>  <br>   doing an ad for Wyeth.\" Worse yet, SWHR has attacked research by <br>  <br>   the National Institutes for Health showing that Prempro increases <br>  <br>   women's risk of heart attacks, stroke, blood clots, and breast <br>  <br>   cancer. <br>  <br> SOURCE: Washington Monthly, February\/March 2003 <br>  <br> To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit: <br>  <br>    <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/forum\/discuss.php?id=1046742022\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/forum\/discuss.php?id=1046742022<\/a> <br><br> 3. FEED A FLACK, BOMB IRAQ <br>  <br> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.odwyerpr.com\/members\/0303get_iraq_over_with.htm\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.odwyerpr.com\/members\/0303get_iraq_over_with.htm<\/a> <br>  <br>   \"Let's have this damn war and get it over with it,\" said Doug <br>  <br>   Dowie, a senior vice president at the Fleishman-Hillard PR firm. <br>  <br>   Speaking at a Los Angeles meeting of the Public Relations Society <br>  <br>   of America, Dowie complained that uncertainty connected with the <br>  <br>   Iraq war has paralyzed client spending. \"The sooner we get there <br>  <br>   the better off most of us are going to be,\" he predicted. <br>  <br> SOURCE: O'Dwyer's PR Daily, March 3, 2003 <br>  <br> To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit: <br>  <br>    <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/forum\/discuss.php?id=1046667600\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/forum\/discuss.php?id=1046667600<\/a> <br><br> 4. UNLEASHING \"SHOCK AND AWE\" AT HOME &amp; ABROAD <br>  <br> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.laweekly.com\/ink\/03\/15\/on-powers.php\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.laweekly.com\/ink\/03\/15\/on-powers.php<\/a> <br>  <br>   \"[O]n the first day of Gulf War II: Die Harder, the Pentagon <br>  <br>   reportedly intends to launch 300 to 400 cruise missiles at targets <br>  <br>   in Iraq -- more than during the entire 40 days of the first Gulf <br>  <br>   War. '[Y]ou have this simultaneous effect, rather like the nuclear <br>  <br>   weapons at Hiroshima, not taking days or weeks but in minutes,\" <br>  <br>   says Harlan K. Ullman, who ... did co-author the 1996 book that <br>  <br>   defined the strategy that the U.S. military will be following. <br>  <br>   Euphemistically known as 'Shock and Awe,' the plan is designed to <br>  <br>   cow those Iraqis it doesn't blow up into immediate submission. A <br>  <br>   similar strategy has been employed here at home. ... Seeking to <br>  <br>   unite the republic with fear, the government has cranked up the <br>  <br>   scare tactics -- orange alerts, anti-aircraft missiles on the Mall, <br>  <br>   talk of Iraqi drone planes dropping biochemical weapons on American <br>  <br>   cities. Meanwhile, in an infuriatingly circular bit of reasoning, <br>  <br>   Vice President Dick Cheney has argued ... that we must use our <br>  <br>   troops precisely because we've committed them -- if not, we'll seem <br>  <br>   weak.\" It might shock some to learn that  Mr. Ullman himself is <br>  <br>   rather skeptical of Bush's pending attack on Iraq. The St. <br>  <br>   Petersburg Times reports that \"Having fought wars, studied them and <br>  <br>   written about them, he's not convinced that this one, at this time, <br>  <br>   makes sense.\"  <br>  <br> SOURCE: LA Weekly, St. Petersburg Times, March 2, 2003 <br>  <br> More web links related to this story are available at: <br>  <br>    <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/spin\/March_2003.html#1046581202\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/spin\/March_2003.html#1046581202<\/a> <br>  <br> To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit: <br>  <br>    <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/forum\/discuss.php?id=1046581202\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/forum\/discuss.php?id=1046581202<\/a> <br><br> 5. STAR WARS <br>  <br> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.usatoday.com\/life\/2003-03-02-stars-war_x.htm\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.usatoday.com\/life\/2003-03-02-stars-war_x.htm<\/a> <br>  <br>   The conservative organization Citizens United has teamed with Fred <br>  <br>   Thompson, the former U.S. Senator turned actor on NBC's \"Law and <br>  <br>   Order,\" to produce and air a TV commercial supporting war on Iraq. <br>  <br>   Citizens United president David Bossie says his ad is necessary to <br>  <br>   \"combat the left-wing propaganda\" he says has come from such stars <br>  <br>   as Martin Sheen, Susan Sarandon and Janeane Garofalo. Other <br>  <br>   celebrities who have expressed anti-war sentiments include Sean <br>  <br>   Penn, Ed Norton, Spike Lee, Martin Scorsese, George Clooney, Dustin <br>  <br>   Hoffman and Richard Gere. <br>  <br> SOURCE: USA  Today, March 2, 2003 <br>  <br> More web links related to this story are available at: <br>  <br>    <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/spin\/March_2003.html#1046581201\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/spin\/March_2003.html#1046581201<\/a> <br>  <br> To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit: <br>  <br>    <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/forum\/discuss.php?id=1046581201\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/forum\/discuss.php?id=1046581201<\/a> <br><br> 6. PSYOPS IN IRAQ <br>  <br> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bayarea.com\/mld\/cctimes\/news\/5300247.htm?template=contentModules\/printstory.jsp\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.bayarea.com\/mld\/cctimes\/news\/5300247.htm?template=contentModules\/printstory.jsp<\/a> <br>  <br>   The U.S. has already launched psychological warfare operations in <br>  <br>   Iraq, including \"leafleting, radio and TV broadcasts, even personal <br>  <br>   phone calls and e-mails, as well as secret techniques the public <br>  <br>   knows little about,\" reports Michael Kilian. \"Since Jan. 18, U.S. <br>  <br>   psyops planes have made no fewer than 10 runs over southern Iraq, <br>  <br>   dropping as many as 480,000 leaflets at a time.\" Other psyops <br>  <br>   planners are discussing strategies such as sending misleading text <br>  <br>   messages to the cell phones of Iraqi commanders, hacking computers, <br>  <br>   jamming radar, and disrupting bank accounts. <br>  <br> SOURCE: Contra Costa Times, March 2, 2003 <br>  <br> More web links related to this story are available at: <br>  <br>    <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/spin\/March_2003.html#1046581200\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/spin\/March_2003.html#1046581200<\/a> <br>  <br> To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit: <br>  <br>    <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/forum\/discuss.php?id=1046581200\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/forum\/discuss.php?id=1046581200<\/a> <br><br> 7. WORDS VS. DEEDS <br>  <br> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.house.gov\/appropriations_democrats\/caughtonfilm.htm\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.house.gov\/appropriations_democrats\/caughtonfilm.htm<\/a> <br>  <br>   Democrats on the U.S. House Appropriations Committee have produced <br>  <br>   a web page titled \"Caught on Film: The Bush Credibility Gap,\" which <br>  <br>   contrasts statements by George W. Bush at various photo ops around <br>  <br>   the country with his actual deeds. <br>  <br> To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit: <br>  <br>    <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/forum\/discuss.php?id=1046357694\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/forum\/discuss.php?id=1046357694<\/a> <br><br> 8. SWALLOW THIS <br>  <br> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.odwyerpr.com\/members\/0227ephedra.htm\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.odwyerpr.com\/members\/0227ephedra.htm<\/a> <br>  <br>   PR Watch has reported previously on the dietary supplement <br>  <br>   industry's successful campaign to evade federal safety regulations. <br>  <br>   Now O'Dywer's PR Daily reports that the Ephedra Education Council <br>  <br>   (EEC), a PR front created by the PR firm of Aker Partners, is <br>  <br>   \"handling crisis PR to counter a media firestorm following the <br>  <br>   death of Baltimore Orioles pitcher Steve Bechler.\" A coroner's <br>  <br>   report suggested that Bechler's death could be linked to ephedra, <br>  <br>   and the Food and Drug Administration has reports of at least 100 <br>  <br>   deaths and thousands of adverse reactions linked to the supplement. <br>  <br>   The EEC has been trying to suppress or attack scientific studies <br>  <br>   critical of ephedra, including a study last year that found it was <br>  <br>   \"by far the most dangerous herbal product on the market.\" <br>  <br> SOURCE: O'Dwyer's PR Daily, February 27, 2003 <br>  <br> More web links related to this story are available at: <br>  <br>    <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/spin\/February_2003.html#1046322000\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/spin\/February_2003.html#1046322000<\/a> <br>  <br> To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit: <br>  <br>    <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/forum\/discuss.php?id=1046322000\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/forum\/discuss.php?id=1046322000<\/a> <br><br> 9. MARCHING ON WASHINGTON FOR PEACE - VIRTUALLY <br>  <br> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.winwithoutwarus.org\/html\/new.html\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.winwithoutwarus.org\/html\/new.html<\/a> <br>  <br>   The burgeoning US anti-war movement is showing a sophistication for <br>  <br>   grassroots lobbying normally only used by major corporate PR <br>  <br>   efforts. Today, for instance, hundreds of thousands of US citizens <br>  <br>   are participating in \"a massive march on Washington without leaving <br>  <br>   your living room. The Virtual March on Washington is a <br>  <br>   first-of-its-kind campaign from the Win Without War coalition. <br>  <br>   Working together, we will direct a steady stream of phone calls -- <br>  <br>   about one per minute, all day -- to every Senate office in the <br>  <br>   country, while at the same time delivering a constant stream of <br>  <br>   e-mails and faxes. Our message: Don't Attack Iraq. To register to <br>  <br>   send a free fax and make phone calls to Senate offices and the <br>  <br>   White House, visit: MoveOn.org\" <br>  <br> SOURCE: Win Without War <br>  <br> More web links related to this story are available at: <br>  <br>    <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/spin\/February_2003.html#1046267447\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/spin\/February_2003.html#1046267447<\/a> <br>  <br> To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit: <br>  <br>    <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/forum\/discuss.php?id=1046267447\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/forum\/discuss.php?id=1046267447<\/a> <br><br> 10. GRASSROOTS PR FOR NUCLEAR POWER <br>  <br> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.reformer.com\/Stories\/0\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.reformer.com\/Stories\/0<\/a>,1413,102%257E8862%257E1205372,00.html <br>  <br>   \"Less than a week before a Town Meeting Day vote on the future of <br>  <br>   Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant, a David-and-Goliath-style <br>  <br>   public relations war is heating up between the multibillion dollar <br>  <br>   corporation that owns the plant and a small group of volunteers who <br>  <br>   want the plant closed in 2012,\" writes Eesha Williams. \"Nuclear <br>  <br>   Free Vermont, the citizens' group, is spending about $2,000 to <br>  <br>   distribute 'Vote Yes' yard signs to supporters, mail literature, <br>  <br>   and possibly air a handful of radio ads. Meanwhile, the <br>  <br>   Entergy-funded Coalition Against Shutting Down Vermont's <br>  <br>   Electricity Options is in the midst of a $200,000 public relations <br>  <br>   blitz that includes mass-mailings, newspaper ads, and 'Vote No' <br>  <br>   radio ads featuring the voice of a former Vermont governor.\" <br>  <br> SOURCE: Brattleboro Reformer, February 26, 2003 <br>  <br> More web links related to this story are available at: <br>  <br>    <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/spin\/February_2003.html#1046235600\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/spin\/February_2003.html#1046235600<\/a> <br>  <br> To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit: <br>  <br>    <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/forum\/discuss.php?id=1046235600\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/forum\/discuss.php?id=1046235600<\/a> <br><br> 11. PENTAGON DENIES THAT DEPLETED URANIUM KEEPS ON KILLING <br>  <br> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bayarea.com\/mld\/mercurynews\/news\/politics\/5258148.htm\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.bayarea.com\/mld\/mercurynews\/news\/politics\/5258148.htm<\/a> <br>  <br>   \"If war again comes to Iraq, depleted uranium munitions will be a <br>  <br>   mainstay of the American arsenal. For years, the Pentagon has <br>  <br>   discounted reports that the shells and bullets, made of solid <br>  <br>   nuclear-waste byproduct and used for the first time on a large <br>  <br>   scale in the Iraq war, bore calamity. ... 'There just isn't any <br>  <br>   scientific foundation to draw a connection between exposure and the <br>  <br>   incidents of leukemia, other cancers or birth defects,' said <br>  <br>   Michael Kilpatrick, deputy director of deployment health support at <br>  <br>   the Pentagon. ... Last month, the Bush administration, intent on <br>  <br>   launching those munitions again if war breaks out, accused Iraq of <br>  <br>   tricking the media into reporting on false links to depleted <br>  <br>   uranium arms and cancer deaths. ... Dr. Doug <br>  <br>   Rokke...worked...securing depleted uranium depots for the army. <br>  <br>   Today,  Rokke ... has become an opponent of depleted uranium arms . <br>  <br>   All of the soldiers assigned to the cleanup in Iraq have suffered <br>  <br>   chronic health problems, he said. ... 'When you go to war, you go <br>  <br>   to kill. The problem with (depleted uranium),' he said, 'is that it <br>  <br>   keeps on killing.' \" <br>  <br> SOURCE: San Jose Mercury News, February 25, 2003 <br>  <br> More web links related to this story are available at: <br>  <br>    <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/spin\/February_2003.html#1046149201\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/spin\/February_2003.html#1046149201<\/a> <br>  <br> To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit: <br>  <br>    <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/forum\/discuss.php?id=1046149201\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/forum\/discuss.php?id=1046149201<\/a> <br><br> 12. MSNBC CANS DONAHUE <br>  <br> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2003\/02\/25\/business\/media\/25CND-PHIL.html?pagewanted=print\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2003\/02\/25\/business\/media\/25CND-PHIL.html?pagewanted=print<\/a> <br>  <br>   MSNBC has abruptly cancelled the Phil Donahue show. To fill his <br>  <br>   slot, the network is expanding the news show that precedes him on <br>  <br>   the air, \"Countdown: Iraq.\" Although the network cites poor ratings <br>  <br>   as the reason for the cancellation, the New York Times reports that <br>  <br>   Donahue \"was actually attracting more viewers than any other <br>  <br>   program on MSNBC, even the channel's signature prime-time program <br>  <br>   'Hardball with Chris Matthews.'\" According to an internal NBC <br>  <br>   report, however, Donahue was axed because he presented a \"difficult <br>  <br>   public face for NBC in a time of war. ... He seems to delight in <br>  <br>   presenting guests who are anti-war, anti-Bush and skeptical of the <br>  <br>   administration's motives.\" The report went on to outline a possible <br>  <br>   nightmare scenario where the show becomes \"a home for the liberal <br>  <br>   antiwar agenda at the same time that our competitors are waving the <br>  <br>   flag at every opportunity.\" A source close to Donahue says, \"It's <br>  <br>   not a coincidence that this decision comes the same week that MSNBC <br>  <br>   announces it's hired Dick Armey as a commentator and has both Jesse <br>  <br>   Ventura and Michael Savage joining the network as hosts. They're <br>  <br>   scared, and they decided to take the coward's road and slant <br>  <br>   towards the conservative crowd that watches Fox News.\" <br>  <br> SOURCE: New York Times, February 25, 2003 <br>  <br> More web links related to this story are available at: <br>  <br>    <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/spin\/February_2003.html#1046149200\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/spin\/February_2003.html#1046149200<\/a> <br>  <br> To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit: <br>  <br>    <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/forum\/discuss.php?id=1046149200\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/forum\/discuss.php?id=1046149200<\/a> <br><br> 13. US RADIO STATION ALTER PLAYLISTS FOR WAR ON IRAQ <br>  <br> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2003\/02\/24\/business\/24RADI.html?ex=1047624093&amp;ei=1&amp;en=4831937ce4eb754f\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2003\/02\/24\/business\/24RADI.html?ex=1047624093&amp;ei=1&amp;en=4831937ce4eb754f<\/a> <br>  <br>   \"After the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, listeners denounced many <br>  <br>   radio stations for playing songs insensitive to a nation in <br>  <br>   mourning. Now, program directors are planning to adjust their <br>  <br>   playlists if the United States goes to war with Iraq. Expect to <br>  <br>   hear more patriotic tunes, and songs that appear right for the <br>  <br>   moment. ... Music stations will also increase their news reports if <br>  <br>   war breaks out. Because radio has become so segmented in the last <br>  <br>   15 years, news had vanished from many music stations. But since <br>  <br>   Sept. 11, stations have added feeds at the top of every hour. <br>  <br>   'We're certainly stepping up our news coverage,' said Gabe Hobbs, <br>  <br>   vice president of news for Clear Channel Radio, part of Clear <br>  <br>   Channel Communications, which owns 1,200 stations. 'We have all <br>  <br>   sorts of plans and they vary from market-to-market. But overall, <br>  <br>   we're prepared to offer news twice an hour on our music stations.' <br>  <br>   \" <br>  <br> SOURCE: New York Times, February 24, 2003 <br>  <br> To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit: <br>  <br>    <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/forum\/discuss.php?id=1046062803\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/forum\/discuss.php?id=1046062803<\/a> <br><br> 14. TV NETWORKS CENSOR ANTI-WAR ADS <br>  <br> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.adage.com\/news.cms?newsId=37202\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.adage.com\/news.cms?newsId=37202<\/a> <br>  <br>   \"The political battle over the Bush administration's planned war in <br>  <br>   Iraq is filtering down to impact the U.S. media and advertising <br>  <br>   industry. A growing number of groups opposed to the war allege <br>  <br>   cable networks are censoring citizens' political views by refusing <br>  <br>   to accept placements of their anti-war TV ads. Some peace groups <br>  <br>   are thwarting the networks' rejection by buying local time in major <br>  <br>   cities for the same anti-war ads. One set of spots seen last week <br>  <br>   in Washington feature Ben Cohen and Jerry Greenfield, co-founders <br>  <br>   of Ben and Jerry's ice cream, and were produced for <br>  <br>   TrueMajority.org by Too Much Media. Mr. Cohen, who has been active <br>  <br>   in efforts by True Majority and the Business Leaders for Sensible <br>  <br>   Priorities, expressed dismay last week that CNN would not allow <br>  <br>   True Majority to buy time on Larry King Live. He said one spot that <br>  <br>   was rejected by CNN features actress Susan Sarandon asking former <br>  <br>   U.S. Iraq ambassador Ed Peck, 'Before our kids start coming home <br>  <br>   from Iraq in body bags and women and children start dying in <br>  <br>   Baghdad, I need to know what did Iraq do to us?' \" <br>  <br> SOURCE: Ad Age, February 24, 2003 <br>  <br> More web links related to this story are available at: <br>  <br>    <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/spin\/February_2003.html#1046062802\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/spin\/February_2003.html#1046062802<\/a> <br>  <br> To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit: <br>  <br>    <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/forum\/discuss.php?id=1046062802\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/forum\/discuss.php?id=1046062802<\/a> <br><br> 15. MEDIA QUESTIONED OVER WAR PROTEST COVERAGE <br>  <br> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.usatoday.com\/life\/columnist\/mediamix\/2003-02-24-media-mix_x.htm\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.usatoday.com\/life\/columnist\/mediamix\/2003-02-24-media-mix_x.htm<\/a> <br>  <br>   \"Did the media stumble on Iraq, downplaying opposition to war with <br>  <br>   Saddam Hussein until the USA's recent confrontation with Germany <br>  <br>   and France in the United Nations and worldwide protests gave them <br>  <br>   no choice?\" asks Peter Johnson. New York Times columnist Paul <br>  <br>   Krugman writes, \"For months both major U.S. cable news networks <br>  <br>   have acted as if the decision to invade Iraq has already been made, <br>  <br>   and have in effect seen it as their job to prepare the American <br>  <br>   public for the coming war.\" <br>  <br> SOURCE: USA Today, February 24, 2003 <br>  <br> More web links related to this story are available at: <br>  <br>    <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/spin\/February_2003.html#1046062801\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/spin\/February_2003.html#1046062801<\/a> <br>  <br> To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit: <br>  <br>    <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/forum\/discuss.php?id=1046062801\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/forum\/discuss.php?id=1046062801<\/a> <br><br> 16. BUSH FACES INCREASINGLY POOR IMAGE OVERSEAS <br>  <br> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/ac2\/wp-dyn\/A55326-2003Feb23?language=printer\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/ac2\/wp-dyn\/A55326-2003Feb23?language=printer<\/a> <br>  <br>   \"The messages from U.S. embassies around the globe have become <br>  <br>   urgent and disturbing,\" reports the Washington Post. \"Many people <br>  <br>   in the world increasingly think President Bush is a greater threat <br>  <br>   to world peace than Iraqi President Saddam Hussein.\" <br>  <br> SOURCE: Washington Post, February 24, 2003 <br>  <br> To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit: <br>  <br>    <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/forum\/discuss.php?id=1046062800\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/forum\/discuss.php?id=1046062800<\/a> <br><br> 17. BOGUS \"CONSUMER GROUP\" STRIPPED OF DOMAIN NAMES <br>  <br> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cspinet.org\/new\/200302201.html\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.cspinet.org\/new\/200302201.html<\/a> <br>  <br>   The Center for Consumer Freedom, a front group for the restaurant, <br>  <br>   alcohol and tobacco industries, has been forced to give up the <br>  <br>   domain names of two web sites used to attack the Center for Science <br>  <br>   in the Public Interest (CSPI), in what CSPI called an \"Orwellian\" <br>  <br>   effort to create confusion among Internet users looking for CSPI's <br>  <br>   websites. CCF, part of a \"shadowy trio of tax-exempt front groups <br>  <br>   run by Washington lobbyist Richard Berman\" has been involved in <br>  <br>   several other failed attempts to impersonate web sites owned by <br>  <br>   health, consumer and enviromental groups. <br>  <br> SOURCE: CSPI news release, February 20, 2003 <br>  <br> More web links related to this story are available at: <br>  <br>    <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/spin\/February_2003.html#1045717202\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/spin\/February_2003.html#1045717202<\/a> <br>  <br> To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit: <br>  <br>    <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/forum\/discuss.php?id=1045717202\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/forum\/discuss.php?id=1045717202<\/a> <br><br>  <br>  <br> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- <br><br> The Weekly Spin is compiled by staff and volunteers at PR Watch. <br>  <br> To subscribe or unsubcribe, visit: <br>  <br> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/cmd\/subscribe_sotd.html\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/cmd\/subscribe_sotd.html<\/a> <br><br> Daily updates and news from past weeks can be found at the <br>  <br> Spin of the Day\" section of the PR Watch website: <br>  <br> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/spin\/index.html\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/spin\/index.html<\/a> <br><br> Archives of our quarterly publication, PR Watch, are at: <br>  <br> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/prwissues\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.prwatch.org\/prwissues<\/a> <br><br> PR Watch, Spin of the Day and the Weekly Spin are projects  <br>  <br> of the Center for Media &amp; Democracy, a nonprofit organization  <br>  <br> that offers investigative reporting on the public relations  <br>  <br> industry. We help the public recognize manipulative and  <br>  <br> misleading PR practices by exposing the activities of  <br>  <br> secretive, little-known propaganda-for-hire firms that  <br>  <br> work to control political debates and public opinion. <br>  <br> Please send any questions or suggestions about our <br>  <br> publications to: <br>  <br> <a href=\"mailto:editor@prwatch.org\" rel=\"nofollow\">editor@prwatch.org<\/a><\/p>\n","contact":"","link":"www.prwatch.com","address":"","phone":"","parent_id":0,"mime_type":"text\/plain","summary":"THE WEEKLY SPIN, Wednesday, March 5, 2003\r\n---------------------------------------------------------------------\r\nsponsored by PR WATCH (www.prwatch.org)\r\n---------------------------------------------------------------------","numcomment":0,"fileurl":"\/uploads\/","filesize":null,"article_url":"\/news\/2003\/03\/33468.php"},"attachments":[],"comments":[]}