{"article":{"id":20544,"heading":"UCI Faculty say NO to war on Iraq","author":"UCI Faculty for Peace and Justice","created":"2002-10-24 13:11:50","modified":"2005-08-15 01:03:26","last_modified":"Mon, 15 Aug 2005 08:03:26","article":"<p>\"No\" to War in Iraq <br>  <br> October 2002 <br><br> In response to the Chancellor's call for positive engagement on world  <br>  <br> issues, we write to voice our opposition to war against Iraq.  We are  <br>  <br> historians, specialists on international politics, humanists, and  <br>  <br> social scientists with expertise in Western and non-Western societies  <br>  <br> and cultures.  We believe such a war is indefensible on moral and  <br>  <br> legal grounds.  It will have terrible consequences for public safety  <br>  <br> and the economy here in the U.S., and even more tragic more outcomes  <br>  <br> abroad. <br><br> Why War? <br>  <br>   *  The Bush Administration has consistently failed to demonstrate  <br>  <br> that Saddam Hussein is a critical threat to the U.S. and the world.  <br>  <br> The U.S. enacts a double standard, supporting anti-democratic regimes  <br>  <br> throughout the region, and the Administration's own estimates put  <br>  <br> Iraq behind Pakistan, India, North Korea, and other hotspots in the  <br>  <br> development and delivery capability of various types of weapons of  <br>  <br> mass destruction. Moreover, the CIA states that the Iraqi government  <br>  <br> is not likely to strike the U.S. unless it believes a U.S. attack is  <br>  <br> imminent (The World Today, 10\/11\/02). <br><br> *  War would interrupt a successful UN inspection process.  Evidence  <br>  <br> shows that the UN inspection program in Iraq resulted in considerable  <br>  <br> disarmament from 1992 to 1998.  Many experts believe that Iraq's  <br>  <br> nuclear, chemical, and biological capabilities are still lower today  <br>  <br> than in 1991 because of inspections. Both nuclear and  <br>  <br> chemical\/biological experts on inspections are confident they can  <br>  <br> move disarmament forward through inspections, even if imperfect. <br><br> National Insecurity and Global Disorder <br>  <br> *  The new, so-called \"Bush Doctrine\" that attempts to justify  <br>  <br> preventive war against any adversary is an extremely dangerous  <br>  <br> foreign policy precedent. No previous administration has ignored  <br>  <br> history and international law so blatantly as to promulgate such a  <br>  <br> destabilizing doctrine. <br><br> *  Anti-American sentiment on the ground in many parts of the world  <br>  <br> (including the Middle East, Indonesia, Jammu and Kashmir) is at  <br>  <br> explosive levels, as the tragic bombing in Bali demonstrates. We  <br>  <br> ignore this sentiment to our peril.  This war and the accompanying  <br>  <br> doctrine leave us no moral or legal justification to protest  <br>  <br> preventive war by India or Pakistan, Israel or its adversaries, or  <br>  <br> China against Taiwan. <br><br> Consequences <br>  <br> *  A war against Iraq will cause hardship for service families and  <br>  <br> take the lives of young American men and women as well as innocent  <br>  <br> Iraqi civilians, most of whom do not support Saddam Hussein.  The  <br>  <br> street-to-street fighting now forecast by our military cannot be  <br>  <br> waged without bloodshed on both sides, adding to the anguish of a  <br>  <br> people still suffering medical consequences from depleted uranium 238  <br>  <br> shells used in the Persian Gulf War (SFChronicle, 10\/10\/02). <br><br> *  The estimated economic costs of this war are huge. The  <br>  <br> Administration acknowledges a base price of between $100 and $200  <br>  <br> billion, without calculating the costs of reconstruction. In the  <br>  <br> Persian Gulf War the first Bush Administration traded favors to  <br>  <br> obtain financial and military support from wealthy allies including  <br>  <br> Saudi Arabia, Germany, and Japan. In contrast, the justifiable  <br>  <br> opposition of most of the world to this war means that the current  <br>  <br> Administration is attempting to negotiate enormous concessions simply  <br>  <br> to get our allies to be quiet. The costs of this war will fall on the  <br>  <br> American people, especially the poor and working-class.  The costs to  <br>  <br> U.S. social service programs, education, and health care are  <br>  <br> unacceptable. <br><br> *  When we invaded Afghanistan we promised its people that we would  <br>  <br> ensure its rebuilding, but we are far from attaining this goal.  <br>  <br> Attacking Iraq would divert resources from reconstruction in  <br>  <br> Afghanistan, not to mention from the Administration's stated goal of  <br>  <br> incapacitating the instigators of the 9\/11 attacks. The  <br>  <br> Administration has failed to explain how, especially given our  <br>  <br> flagging economy, we would pay for this venture. Instead, it is  <br>  <br> making profligate promises to occupy and reconstruct Iraq, promises  <br>  <br> which even Bush supporters like Henry Kissinger oppose (NYTimes,  <br>  <br> 10\/11\/02). <br><br> The American people are rightly skeptical of an administration whose  <br>  <br> war-mongering comes in the midst of its officials' well-known desire  <br>  <br> to control the world's second-largest oil reserves.  Whether this  <br>  <br> Administration wants war against Iraq because of its oil interests,  <br>  <br> its anger that Saddam Hussein was not deposed in 1991, its need to  <br>  <br> deflect attention from corporate scandals, or a sincere belief that  <br>  <br> Saddam Hussein poses a future threat, its current course of action  <br>  <br> betrays an imperial arrogance in wielding U.S. power.  Statements  <br>  <br> from right-wing pundits and even Administration officials making a  <br>  <br> favorable comparison between the U.S. and the Roman Empire  <br>  <br> demonstrate a chilling neglect of brutal historical realities. <br><br> Despite the congressional vote in favor of a resolution granting the  <br>  <br> Bush administration the power to use force against Iraq even without  <br>  <br> the sanction of the United Nations, a significant minority in both  <br>  <br> the House and the Senate, a number of high-ranking military  <br>  <br> officials, past administration officials of both major parties, and  <br>  <br> substantial numbers of citizens are uneasy about such a war.  We  <br>  <br> applaud the thousands of people throughout the U.S. and the hundreds  <br>  <br> of thousands around the world who have demonstrated peacefully  <br>  <br> against this war. <br><br> We believe that the Administration's course of action is  <br>  <br> unconscionable, and we write in the hope that there is still time to  <br>  <br> turn the tide in favor of peace.  We support the graduate students'  <br>  <br> Teach-In on Iraq: Wednesday, October 23rd, 3-5 p.m. in the Cross  <br>  <br> Cultural Center, and urge all members of the UCI\/Orange County  <br>  <br> community to engage in education and positive debate about this most  <br>  <br> serious of public issues <br><br> The following is a list of groups through which to learn more and  <br>  <br> express opposition: <br><br> Americans Against War with Iraq (www.aawi.org) <br>  <br> Business Leaders for Sensible Priorities <br>  <br> MoveOn (www.moveon.org) <br>  <br> Not in Our Name (<a href=\"mailto:lanotinourname@hotmail.com\" rel=\"nofollow\">lanotinourname@hotmail.com<\/a>) <br>  <br> People for the American Way <br>  <br> OC 911 Peace Coalition (714-637-8647) <br>  <br> Professors for Peace (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.action-tank.org\/pfp\/\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.action-tank.org\/pfp\/<\/a>) <br>  <br> True Majority  (www.truemajority.com) <br>  <br> <a href=\"mailto:uci-peace-justice@uci.edu\" rel=\"nofollow\">uci-peace-justice@uci.edu<\/a> <br><br> UCI Faculty for Peace and Justice <br><br>  <br>  <br> <\/p>\n","contact":"","link":"","address":"","phone":"","parent_id":0,"mime_type":"application\/pdf","summary":"&quot;No&quot; to War in Iraq\r\nOctober 2002","numcomment":0,"fileurl":"\/uploads\/2002\/10\/facultyflier.pdf","filesize":"22.0 kibibytes","article_url":"\/news\/2002\/10\/20544.php"},"attachments":[],"comments":[]}