{"article":{"id":19437,"heading":"Short ILWU Analysis- whats at stake","author":"Paul H. Rosenberg","created":"2002-09-30 22:10:10","modified":"2002-10-04 19:28:35","last_modified":"Sat, 05 Oct 2002 02:28:35","article":"<p>The ILWU may be \"only\" 10,500 strong, but it's arguably one of the strongest and <br>  <br>  most militant unions in the US.  It's never a good idea to get hysterical, but <br>  <br>  this <br>  <br>  is definitely a serious threat.  I've been writing about this conflict for most <br>  <br>  of <br>  <br>  the summer in Random Lengths, so this doesn't come out of the blue for me.  <br>  <br>  Here's a <br>  <br>  bit of background. <br><br>  First off, the issue is NOT technology, it IS outsourcing.  The 1960 <br>  <br>  Modernization <br>  <br>  and Mechanization (M&amp;M) Agreement set up the basic framework which has been in <br>  <br>  place <br>  <br>  ever since.  The M&amp;M Agreement says that the union will not oppose <br>  <br>  modernization, <br>  <br>  and the employeers will not use modernization to get rid of union jobs--all new <br>  <br>  and <br>  <br>  remaining jobs will be union jobs.  This agreement has NOT been honored by some <br>  <br>  members of the PMA in recent years--most notably Stevedore Services of America <br>  <br>  (SSA), which owns a number of other companies, such as Matson.  SSA has <br>  <br>  outsourced <br>  <br>  jobs to Utah, for example. <br><br>  The head of the PMA, the employeer's association, was basically hired to break <br>  <br>  the <br>  <br>  union--either literally or figuratively--and this is his last negotiation before <br>  <br>  HIS <br>  <br>  contract is up.  SSA was instrumental in his hiring.  At the very least, he was <br>  <br>  supposed to break their spirit and make them accept managements terms, which <br>  <br>  would <br>  <br>  lead to the long-term decline of the union, at most was the hope of breaking the <br>  <br>  union completely.  The Bush Adminstration has openly speculated about breaking <br>  <br>  up <br>  <br>  the jurisdiction units, so that each port would negotiate separately.  This <br>  <br>  would <br>  <br>  effectively destroy the union's bargaining power. <br><br>  Most of August was taken up by the union rallying political support to tell the <br>  <br>  Bush <br>  <br>  Administration to keep out of negotiations.  The ultimate purpose of the lockout <br>  <br>  is <br>  <br>  to paint it as a strike, give the Bush Administration an excuse to invoke <br>  <br>  Taft-Hartley, and then go even further--once again casting labor rights as an <br>  <br>  impediment to the \"war on terror,\" just as he's doing with the Department of <br>  <br>  Homeland Security.  Active support can definitely make a difference now, <br>  <br>  demonstrating that such an attempt to cast labor rights as dangerous will not <br>  <br>  succede. <br><br>  <br>  <br> <\/p>\n","contact":"(from LA-IMC listserve)","link":"","address":"","phone":"","parent_id":0,"mime_type":"text\/plain","summary":"The ILWU may be &quot;only&quot; 10,500 strong, but it's arguably one of the strongest and\r\n most militant unions in the US.  It's never a good idea to get hysterical, but this is definitely a serious threat.","numcomment":2,"fileurl":"\/uploads\/","filesize":null,"article_url":"\/news\/2002\/09\/19437.php"},"attachments":[],"comments":[{"id":19467,"heading":"PRESIDENT METAL STAMPING CO","article":"MY HAT GOES OFF TO EVERY LONGSHOREMAN THAT IS INVOLVED IN THIS STRIKE, IT IS ABOUT TIME OUR GOVERNMENT BE TOLD THEY ARE WORKING FOR THE PEOPLE OF THE USA AND NOT THE PEOPLES REPUBLIC OF CHINA.  WE HAVE LOST WELL OVER 1.2 MILLION JOBS TO THE SLAVE DRIVERS THAT ARE RUNNING CHINA.  IT MUST STOP, OR THERE WILL BE NO MANUFACTURING IN THIS COUNTRY.   TYHANK YOU","author":"BRYAN SCHAFFER","parent_id":19437,"mime_type":"text\/plain","created":"2002-10-01 20:33:17","modified":"2002-10-01 20:33:17","fileurl":""},{"id":19561,"heading":"Simple","article":"Fire all those jerks and advertise that 10,500 jobs are available, no experience necessary, starting at 50k a year with full benefits.  Problem solved.","author":"Simple Simon","parent_id":19437,"mime_type":"text\/plain","created":"2002-10-04 19:28:35","modified":"2002-10-04 19:28:35","fileurl":""}]}