{"article":{"id":18373,"heading":"9\/11 "Conspriacies" and How The Right and Left Try to Disprove Them","author":"Nafeez Mossaddeq Ahmed, c\/o concerned citizen","created":"2002-08-16 14:26:25","modified":"2002-08-16 16:59:32","last_modified":"Fri, 16 Aug 2002 23:59:32","article":"

Please go to:

http:\/\/www.globalresearch.org\/view_article.php?aid=342536303<\/a>

or if the link doesn't work, go to the globalresearch.org website and enter Ahmed in

the search engine.

In \"911 'Conspiracies\" and the Defactualization of Analysis: How Ideologues on the Left

and Right Theorise Vacuously to Support Baseless Supposition,\" Ahmed provides a

sharp and incisive argument on how the U.S. government's pre-knowledge of the 911

attacks is being disproves by establishment journalists on the left and right (including

the superfluous arguments of David Corn.) Ahmed's adept analysis also makes all

of the right connections, including the historical link to the U.S. governments pre-knowledge

of the attack on Pearl Harbor.

This document is extremely useful in light of the impending anniversary of 911 and the

forethcoming jingoism and govt.\/media propaganda that will accompany it (i.e. the anniversary

as a pretext for justifying war with Iraq). The truth is slowly starting to seep out....

<\/p>\n","contact":"","link":"","address":"","phone":"","parent_id":0,"mime_type":"text\/plain","summary":"Nafeez Mossaddeq Ahmed of the Global Research Institute (a non-profit think tank) provides what is probably the best article and research on the U.S. government's pre-knowledge of the 9\/11 attack, and how establishment journalists on both the right and left have made it their duty to disprove these facts.","numcomment":1,"fileurl":"\/uploads\/","filesize":null,"article_url":"\/news\/2002\/08\/18373.php"},"attachments":[],"comments":[{"id":18378,"heading":"EXCELLENT!","article":"everyone should read this. it's long but definitely worth it. i never liked Albert's take on the 911 issue, but i like Znet. this article does a great job of breaking down the numerous assumptions made by those who support the "intelligence failure\/incompetence" arguments in relation to the U.S. governments prior knowledge of the attacks.\r\n\r\n","author":"000","parent_id":18373,"mime_type":"text\/plain","created":"2002-08-16 16:59:32","modified":"2002-08-16 16:59:32","fileurl":""}]}